Eleven reasons why we won't win another game in 2008

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

User avatar
perfectionist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9024
Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
Has thanked: 60 times
Been thanked: 347 times

Post: # 621277Post perfectionist »

BAM! (shhhh) wrote:
How many flags actually playing fullback? (hint: the guy who played fullback in 2000 is a 2 flag winning fullback, but isn't Fletcher). Last 5 years regularly beaten by leading forwards.

Fletcher almost always played at full back - you drongo - and was named All Australian last year - you know 2007 - and it wasn't for his play on the wing.
Last edited by perfectionist on Tue 12 Aug 2008 7:33pm, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
Mr Magic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12754
Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
Has thanked: 764 times
Been thanked: 423 times

Post: # 621278Post Mr Magic »

perfectionist wrote:
Mr Magic wrote:...Perfectionist, I think you are being particularly harsh on Max and not giving him the kudos he deserves.
If you want to win a flag you must start at full back - and you need a star, not a plodder. Simple as that, as history has shown.
Like D. Wakelin at Port Adelaide?

I just cannot understand your apparent animosity towards Max.

You seem to view whatever faults he has using extreme magnification, whilst at teh same time belittling his undoubted talent at doing what all full-backs are supposed to do first and foremost - stop their opponent scoring.


Sobraz
SS Life Member
Posts: 3399
Joined: Thu 29 Mar 2007 1:06pm
Has thanked: 2 times

Post: # 621279Post Sobraz »

(Quote)
perfectionist wrote:"BAM! (shhhh) wrote:
How many flags actually playing fullback? (hint: the guy who played fullback in 2000 is a 2 flag winning fullback, but isn't Fletcher). Last 5 years regularly beaten by leading forwards.

Fletcher almost always played at full back - you drongo - and was named All Australian last year - you know 2007 - and it wasn't for his play on the wing
(Quote)




Hardly ever played on the gun forwards tho... always hidden (and cleverly so by Sheedy to utilise his offensive/ step up skills) on the lesser forwards...

Max is a great stopper/spoiler... For mine, the less time with the ball in his hands, the better... but when it comes to stopping a dangerous forward, there are none better...
Last edited by Sobraz on Tue 12 Aug 2008 7:37pm, edited 2 times in total.


User avatar
perfectionist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9024
Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
Has thanked: 60 times
Been thanked: 347 times

Post: # 621281Post perfectionist »

Wakelin was better than Max, but not star. Our worst decision to get rid of them. And Port stole our premiership anyway. If they had any decency, they'd give us the cup!


User avatar
perfectionist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9024
Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
Has thanked: 60 times
Been thanked: 347 times

Post: # 621283Post perfectionist »

Sobraz wrote:(Quote)
perfectionist wrote:"BAM! (shhhh) wrote:
How many flags actually playing fullback? (hint: the guy who played fullback in 2000 is a 2 flag winning fullback, but isn't Fletcher). Last 5 years regularly beaten by leading forwards.

Fletcher almost always played at full back - you drongo - and was named All Australian last year - you know 2007 - and it wasn't for his play on the wing
Hardly ever played on the gun forwards tho... always hidden (and cleverly so by Sheedy to utilise his offensive/ step up skills) on the lesser forwards... (Quote)




Max is a great stopper/spoiler... For mine, the less time with the ball in his hands, the better... but when it comes to stopping a dangerous forward, there are none better...
OK, you are blind supporter of the club. Fine. But leave it at that. That dumb old Sheedy playing that hack Fletcher all those years, he even gave that plodder Hird a game. Geez.


Sobraz
SS Life Member
Posts: 3399
Joined: Thu 29 Mar 2007 1:06pm
Has thanked: 2 times

Post: # 621288Post Sobraz »

perfectionist wrote:
Sobraz wrote:(Quote)
perfectionist wrote:"BAM! (shhhh) wrote:
How many flags actually playing fullback? (hint: the guy who played fullback in 2000 is a 2 flag winning fullback, but isn't Fletcher). Last 5 years regularly beaten by leading forwards.

Fletcher almost always played at full back - you drongo - and was named All Australian last year - you know 2007 - and it wasn't for his play on the wing
Hardly ever played on the gun forwards tho... always hidden (and cleverly so by Sheedy to utilise his offensive/ step up skills) on the lesser forwards... (Quote)




Max is a great stopper/spoiler... For mine, the less time with the ball in his hands, the better... but when it comes to stopping a dangerous forward, there are none better...
OK, you are blind supporter of the club. Fine. But leave it at that. That dumb old Sheedy playing that hack Fletcher all those years, he even gave that plodder Hird a game. Geez.

Did max beat pointless both fevola and Buddy 2 weeks running??... surely you concede that...


User avatar
perfectionist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9024
Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
Has thanked: 60 times
Been thanked: 347 times

Post: # 621294Post perfectionist »

Sobraz wrote:
perfectionist wrote:
Sobraz wrote:(Quote)
perfectionist wrote:"BAM! (shhhh) wrote:
How many flags actually playing fullback? (hint: the guy who played fullback in 2000 is a 2 flag winning fullback, but isn't Fletcher). Last 5 years regularly beaten by leading forwards.

Fletcher almost always played at full back - you drongo - and was named All Australian last year - you know 2007 - and it wasn't for his play on the wing
Hardly ever played on the gun forwards tho... always hidden (and cleverly so by Sheedy to utilise his offensive/ step up skills) on the lesser forwards... (Quote)




Max is a great stopper/spoiler... For mine, the less time with the ball in his hands, the better... but when it comes to stopping a dangerous forward, there are none better...
OK, you are blind supporter of the club. Fine. But leave it at that. That dumb old Sheedy playing that hack Fletcher all those years, he even gave that plodder Hird a game. Geez.

Did max beat pointless both fevola and Buddy 2 weeks running??... surely you concede that...
Yes, and don't call me Shirley!

The work of the mid fielders who put pressure on Judd, Murphy,etc and Mitchell, etc. had something to do with it. Do you concede?


User avatar
Animal Enclosure
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2364
Joined: Mon 04 Apr 2005 2:37pm
Location: Saints Footy Central

Post: # 621295Post Animal Enclosure »

perfectionist wrote:Wakelin was better than Max, but not star. Our worst decision to get rid of them. And Port stole our premiership anyway. If they had any decency, they'd give us the cup!
Ah Darryl's trade gave us Aaron Hamill & Shane's delisting was due to our doctors at the time advising that he would never play again due to a golden staff infection in his achilles.

Hamill was a fantastic trade, unfortunately a great St Kilda career shortened by injury (which is still hurting us now).

Shane was always a bit part player at St Kilda before Malthouse turned him into a solid player & nothing more.

Once again Perfectionist, your posts don't reflect your tag name. Max is a gun, is twice the fullback Darryl Wakelin was & you're just embarrassing yourself arguing otherwise. You're welcome to your opinion though (even if it reflects poorly on you).


User avatar
bobmurray
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7781
Joined: Mon 03 Oct 2005 11:08pm
Location: In the stand at RSEA Park.
Has thanked: 497 times
Been thanked: 226 times

Post: # 621299Post bobmurray »

saint66au wrote:perfectionist..whilst you are of course entitled to your opinion, your constant criticism of #8 does you no favours IMHO

He obviously was still hampered with injury last night but you seem to take every opportuinity to have a crack, yet remain silent when he plays well.

Very disrespectful to the best fullback weve had in a very long time, since Bob Murray Id dare to say
Are you saying that Max is better than Spud....big call....


Six debutants for the Saints so far in Season 2024. :D
User avatar
perfectionist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9024
Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
Has thanked: 60 times
Been thanked: 347 times

Post: # 621302Post perfectionist »

Animal Enclosure wrote:
perfectionist wrote:Wakelin was better than Max, but not star. Our worst decision to get rid of them. And Port stole our premiership anyway. If they had any decency, they'd give us the cup!
Ah Darryl's trade gave us Aaron Hamill & Shane's delisting was due to our doctors at the time advising that he would never play again due to a golden staff infection in his achilles.

Hamill was a fantastic trade, unfortunately a great St Kilda career shortened by injury (which is still hurting us now).

Shane was always a bit part player at St Kilda before Malthouse turned him into a solid player & nothing more.

Once again Perfectionist, your posts don't reflect your tag name. Max is a gun, is twice the fullback Darryl Wakelin was & you're just embarrassing yourself arguing otherwise. You're welcome to your opinion though (even if it reflects poorly on you).
Very good points, which are all wrong. We got Hamill because he was out of contract, wanted more money and would have been able to go to a club that finished lower on the ladder than Carlton ie us - stone motherless last! Our coach (oh, brother) did not rate either Wakelin. When you consider the amount of work Stan Alves put into these boys, you remember Stan, the man who got us to our fifth GF ever, and who was white anted by one MAX, said idiot coach said 'goodbye' to the Wakelins. (We got zip for Shane!)

Two good things came out of the trade. We got Hamill and Carlton got Cranage, but I suppose you thought he was a "gun" too!

Grow up! Wake up and smell the roses!


User avatar
Mr Magic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12754
Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
Has thanked: 764 times
Been thanked: 423 times

Post: # 621306Post Mr Magic »

perfectionist wrote: Our coach (oh, brother) did not rate either Wakelin. When you consider the amount of work Stan Alves put into these boys, you remember Stan, the man who got us to our fifth GF ever, and who was white anted by one MAX, said idiot coach said 'goodbye' to the Wakelins. (We got zip for Shane!)
Maybe we are finally seeing the real source of Perfectionist's lack of approval for Max?

Do you know for a fact what you have alleged Max to have done?

I only ask because for a number of years it was 'hinted at'. 'inferred' and 'rumoured' that it was Harvey, Burke and Loewe.
No proof was ever given, to my knowledge, on those accusations either?


User avatar
perfectionist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9024
Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
Has thanked: 60 times
Been thanked: 347 times

Post: # 621313Post perfectionist »

[quote="Mr Magic"]
Do you know for a fact what you have alleged Max to have done?
quote]

Yes. But if he played like Fletcher or Scarlett or Michael or Glass.... I would probably overlook it.

Look at what Robert Harvey said about his coaches last Monday night. Isn't that the position that all players should adopt? Max didn't. He sooked and Alves went - as did our prospects of a flag at the time. Our time with a coach who knew the value of skills, knew that all players didn't have them at the start and set programs to improve them (admittedly really tough programs) also finished. Alas, a practice of the past and we can see the results.


saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Post: # 621375Post saintspremiers »

perfectionist wrote:
ralphysaints35 wrote:number 8.... seriously... you are disturbed
Max - Kicking: 2 out of ten
- Contested marking: 0 out of ten (never taken one)
- Uncontested marking: 3 out of ten (punches anywhere most times)
- Thinking: 1 out of ten (there's a man who's covered, I'll kick to him)
- Hard running: 5 out of ten (cf Scarlett)
- Fisting ball from pass to opponent: 8 out of ten
- Foolish courage: 10 out of ten

Unfortunately, whilst foolish courage might attract hero worshippers it is not high on the list of football skills.
Hey maestro, have you considered that perhaps Max was only half fit?

We do afterall play players well below full fitness nowadays.

Max IMO will be heaps better vs Freo assuming a higher fitness base.


User avatar
WayneJudson42
SS Life Member
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon 07 Jul 2008 9:53pm
Location: I'm a victim of circumstance

Post: # 621382Post WayneJudson42 »

perfectionist wrote:
Sobraz wrote:
perfectionist wrote:
Sobraz wrote:(Quote)
perfectionist wrote:"BAM! (shhhh) wrote:
How many flags actually playing fullback? (hint: the guy who played fullback in 2000 is a 2 flag winning fullback, but isn't Fletcher). Last 5 years regularly beaten by leading forwards.

Fletcher almost always played at full back - you drongo - and was named All Australian last year - you know 2007 - and it wasn't for his play on the wing
Hardly ever played on the gun forwards tho... always hidden (and cleverly so by Sheedy to utilise his offensive/ step up skills) on the lesser forwards... (Quote)




Max is a great stopper/spoiler... For mine, the less time with the ball in his hands, the better... but when it comes to stopping a dangerous forward, there are none better...
OK, you are blind supporter of the club. Fine. But leave it at that. That dumb old Sheedy playing that hack Fletcher all those years, he even gave that plodder Hird a game. Geez.

Did max beat pointless both fevola and Buddy 2 weeks running??... surely you concede that...
Yes, and don't call me Shirley!

The work of the mid fielders who put pressure on Judd, Murphy,etc and Mitchell, etc. had something to do with it. Do you concede?
When Judd was killing us in the 4th, our defence including Max looked very average IMO.


The lid is off after Round 2! Enjoy the journey, coz you just don't know where we'll end up. Live for today and seize the moment.
User avatar
WayneJudson42
SS Life Member
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon 07 Jul 2008 9:53pm
Location: I'm a victim of circumstance

Post: # 621386Post WayneJudson42 »

perfectionist wrote:
Mr Magic wrote:...Perfectionist, I think you are being particularly harsh on Max and not giving him the kudos he deserves.
I do say what he can do, but I'm honest about he weaknesses. Just why some players should be immune from criticism whilst others get bagged remorselessly is quite amusing. If you want to win a flag you must start at full back - and you need a star, not a plodder. Simple as that, as history has shown.
Once upon a time, there was a thing called a "spine"...

FB, CHB, C, CHF, FF.

Currently, we have no (pure) FB or CHB... and now we have no FF.

In short, we have no spine. We alternate between Gwilt, Fish and Gilbert.

The game has evolved, and like Gherig @ FF, the traditional full back's role has changed also. That's why Scarlett is now the quintessential FB.

Even Michael is now impotent because of teams playing without traditional FF's.

It's a catch 22.


The lid is off after Round 2! Enjoy the journey, coz you just don't know where we'll end up. Live for today and seize the moment.
User avatar
perfectionist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9024
Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
Has thanked: 60 times
Been thanked: 347 times

Post: # 621484Post perfectionist »

WayneJudson42 wrote:
perfectionist wrote:
Mr Magic wrote:...Perfectionist, I think you are being particularly harsh on Max and not giving him the kudos he deserves.
I do say what he can do, but I'm honest about he weaknesses. Just why some players should be immune from criticism whilst others get bagged remorselessly is quite amusing. If you want to win a flag you must start at full back - and you need a star, not a plodder. Simple as that, as history has shown.
Once upon a time, there was a thing called a "spine"...

FB, CHB, C, CHF, FF.

Currently, we have no (pure) FB or CHB... and now we have no FF.

In short, we have no spine. We alternate between Gwilt, Fish and Gilbert.

The game has evolved, and like Gherig @ FF, the traditional full back's role has changed also. That's why Scarlett is now the quintessential FB.

Even Michael is now impotent because of teams playing without traditional FF's.

It's a catch 22.
True. To be fair, our spine was looked pretty good with Matt Maguire at CHB and Luke Penny at FB. Throw in the two Fishers, Aussie and Max in a role that actually suits his abilities, and it was as good as any in 2004 and 2005. It is not the fault of the current players that our current line up does not have the same strength, but it is also no good pretending that we have "guns" everywhere but strangely just can't win.


User avatar
BAM! (shhhh)
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2134
Joined: Thu 24 May 2007 5:23pm
Location: The little voice inside your head

Post: # 621496Post BAM! (shhhh) »

perfectionist wrote:BAM! (shhhh) wrote:
How many flags actually playing fullback? (hint: the guy who played fullback in 2000 is a 2 flag winning fullback, but isn't Fletcher). Last 5 years regularly beaten by leading forwards.

Fletcher almost always played at full back - you drongo - and was named All Australian last year - you know 2007 - and it wasn't for his play on the wing.
psst. Damien Hardwick... Essendon couldn't hold onto him because of salary cap reasons. But if you want to judge positions on where people are named in the AA team, you go right ahead. Dusting Fletcher was such a great fullback in '07 that when they played Hawthorn he wasn't first picked to take the most dangerous tall forward... yup, definately there for defensive skills first(great that you've got two of your choices for great fullbacks of the last 5 years on the 1 team last year).

Drongo? What is this saintsational back paddock edition? If you're out bush and can't get to games, just say so and I'll stop expecting you to know what you're talking about.


"Everything comes to he who hustles while he waits"
- Henry Ford
Post Reply