I remember not so long ago when Jimmy was arguably our best player. Circa the AR era.
His tackle on Collyer was top notch. Put it in the coaching manual. Timing, technique, speed, strength.
Signalled we had effectively won after absorbing great pressure.
Jimmy Webster
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4753
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
- Has thanked: 1374 times
- Been thanked: 1379 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 658
- Joined: Tue 13 Oct 2020 9:25pm
- Has thanked: 497 times
- Been thanked: 110 times
Re: Jimmy Webster
Could we play Leinert at CHB has size and skillshanegrambeau wrote: ↑Tue 01 Mar 2022 10:29pmThat’s savage! But I love it!nostalgicsaint wrote: ↑Sun 27 Feb 2022 4:21pmHB: Hill, Battle, SinclairYorkeys wrote: ↑Sun 27 Feb 2022 9:19am ? = Starting line up, defense: current thinking, all fit, maybe:
HBL: Highmore, Battle, Sinclair,
FBL: Wilkie, Howard, Paton
So possibly Jimmy W starting on the bench; Hill on a wing, SInclair and Paton's side of ground....
? ? I think its a selectors dilemma, or is that conundrum.
(Be interesting who is and isn't put in cotton wool v Essendon: we seem to be keeping our cards close to chest, Mar. 18 starting 22 wise.)
FB: Wilkie, Howard, Webster
Paton bench.
Highmore misses
I totally disagree, but brutal is the way.
And I don’t mind Shane savage! Who can forget that sneaky deft lil’ wee hand pass from a set free for a pumping goal in ‘that’ final.
Highmore best
Then Paton Hill
Then Webby
IMO
And Battle not good enough for CHB imo.,