Swans pushing for walsh hard

SainterK · Post: # 1164524Post **SainterK** » Mon 17 Oct 2011 1:27pm

Mark, Ross also talked about money in the cupboard for a forward, that's hardly an assurance is it?

barks4eva · Post: # 1164528Post **barks4eva** » Mon 17 Oct 2011 1:32pm

Dr Spaceman wrote: But along the way he probably starts to feel a bit abandoned. Two major players in getting him to the AFL, Archie Thompson and Matthew Drain are no longer at St Kilda.

I didn't realise the Melbourne Victory striker Archie Thompson had anything to do with this.

Thanks for the info dr Spacebrain!

markp · Post: # 1164536Post **markp** » Mon 17 Oct 2011 1:38pm

SainterK wrote:Mark, Ross also talked about money in the cupboard for a forward, that's hardly an assurance is it?

I'd reckon you are offered a contract which you either accept or not, and the rest is up to you.

Same would apply at the swines, and the cuddle factor would not come into it.

Seriously, some over-rated f-tard condescendingly and with bugger all true insight suggests our club needs a 'cuddle' and people are happy with that?

SainterK · Post: # 1164538Post **SainterK** » Mon 17 Oct 2011 1:39pm

That's not very nice.

markp · Post: # 1164543Post **markp** » Mon 17 Oct 2011 1:42pm

SainterK wrote:That's not very nice.

I'm talking about Malthouse, not DS!

SainterK · Post: # 1164545Post **SainterK** » Mon 17 Oct 2011 1:44pm

markp wrote:
SainterK wrote:That's not very nice.
I'm talking about Malthouse, not DS!

hahaha.

Shocked me there for a minute.

sainterinsydney · Mon 17 Oct 2011 1:44pm

On TWR, Barrett said teams are still gunning for Tommy, but he reckons that Watters could not have been firmer in his stipulation that Tommy is going nowhere.

matrix · Post: # 1164554Post **matrix** » Mon 17 Oct 2011 1:47pm

will not be going anywhere in the next half hr thats left

sainterinsydney · Mon 17 Oct 2011 1:48pm

matrix wrote:will not be going anywhere in the next half hr thats left

We must be preety certain he won't leave if that is the case.

stkildathunda · Mon 17 Oct 2011 1:49pm

mickgleeson michael gleeson
Tommy Walsh apparently close to being done to syd for pick 35

chook23 · Post: # 1164559Post **chook23** » Mon 17 Oct 2011 1:49pm

pick 35 maybe for walsh?

St Chris · Post: # 1164560Post **St Chris** » Mon 17 Oct 2011 1:49pm

Tommy for Pick 35 is being touted on SEN

dragit · Post: # 1164565Post **dragit** » Mon 17 Oct 2011 1:50pm

Noooooooooooooooooooooooo

sainterinsydney · Mon 17 Oct 2011 1:50pm

St Chris wrote:Tommy for Pick 35 is being touted on SEN

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

bigred · Post: # 1164568Post **bigred** » Mon 17 Oct 2011 1:50pm

Jacks Back · Mon 17 Oct 2011 1:50pm

f****** hell. This is bulls***!!!

fugazi · Post: # 1164570Post **fugazi** » Mon 17 Oct 2011 1:50pm

Bugger...what a waste, for the sake of giving him a couple of games at the end of the season, to give him a feel for it and some hope of breaking thru. Can't blame him for moving on.

Munga · Post: # 1164571Post **Munga** » Mon 17 Oct 2011 1:50pm

barks4eva wrote:
Dr Spaceman wrote: But along the way he probably starts to feel a bit abandoned. Two major players in getting him to the AFL, Archie Thompson and Matthew Drain are no longer at St Kilda.

I didn't realise the Melbourne Victory striker Archie Thompson had anything to do with this.

Thanks for the info dr Spacebrain!

GUN

StGoddard18 · Mon 17 Oct 2011 1:51pm

St Chris wrote:Tommy for Pick 35 is being touted on SEN

If this really happens I blame Lyin!!!!

sainterinsydney · Mon 17 Oct 2011 1:51pm

Why would Watters say he was off the table!!!! This makes no sense!

SainterK · Post: # 1164575Post **SainterK** » Mon 17 Oct 2011 1:51pm

Sad if true.

Not sure we would want to lose Dawson AND Walsh

That being said, if he wants to go, what do you do.

chook23 · Post: # 1164578Post **chook23** » Mon 17 Oct 2011 1:51pm

sainterinsydney wrote:
St Chris wrote:Tommy for Pick 35 is being touted on SEN
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

If walsh wants out what are the options

35 maybe best

Jacks Back · Mon 17 Oct 2011 1:51pm

Can someone contact the saints and let em know ffs!!!1

markp · Post: # 1164580Post **markp** » Mon 17 Oct 2011 1:52pm

SainterK wrote:
markp wrote:
SainterK wrote:That's not very nice.
I'm talking about Malthouse, not DS!

hahaha.

Shocked me there for a minute.

I didn't realize it could be misconstrued until your response!

DS is of course a good bloke... even if prone to occasional wild flights of fantasy!

Munga · Post: # 1164582Post **Munga** » Mon 17 Oct 2011 1:52pm

sainterinsydney wrote:Why would Watters say he was off the table!!!! This makes no sense!

He still is. That's what the Swans want to do, not us.