wonderful!
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
According to Madeleine Riewoldt (twitter), she stole the pictures off someones computer.
Last edited by clarky449 on Mon 20 Dec 2010 11:14pm, edited 1 time in total.
Follow me for my expert opinions on Twitter @DanielClark93
- IluvHarvey
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2621
- Joined: Fri 06 Jun 2008 4:51pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 34 times
- Been thanked: 257 times
I never questioned your loyalty. Just feel a few on here are crucifying him without any facts. All we know is their is a naked photo of Roo and Zac. Thats it! Why was it taken? Where was it taken? Who took it? Under what circumstances was it taken? Noone knows. As it stands at the moment their is nothing wrong with what has happened. A lot of people (not accusing you here) are getting on their high horse because it has been leaked by an underage girl who ILLEGALLY OBTAINED THIS PHOTO, She has nothing to do with the photo itself.SainterK wrote:You confuse being loyal to the players, which even the club would be, with the fact it's big business these days.IluvHarvey wrote:Not me!SainterK wrote:No, you?IluvHarvey wrote:Precious much?SainterK wrote:Why is it becoming increasingly hard to have an opinion on here, just because mine differs from the masses this particular time?
The club is trying to negotiate a new sponsor, do you understand this?
Are you trying to tell me that the club would not be concerned, the existing sponsors wouldn't be making noises, that there would be no embarrasment from the powers that be that this story has broken when trying to negotiate a new 'major' one?
Don't confuse me voicing what I think the club will do in this situation, with a lack of loyalty.
"It only ends once. Anything that happens before that is just progress."
- markp
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 15549
- Joined: Mon 26 Mar 2007 4:22pm
- Has thanked: 62 times
- Been thanked: 81 times
Yup... it's all over the net, for all time.IluvHarvey wrote:You make a god point here. Who did take the photo?markp wrote:'Privacy'?Thinline wrote:Um. What BAD has any player done here?
Stupid, maybe. Unfortunate, definitely.
You'd reckon they's committed a crime the way some of the peanuts on here are carrying on.
The only BAD I can see is the behaviour of some trumped up tunnel c**t who represents everything grotesque about the age in which we live.
Privacy is no longer a right. Sad as.
Who took the pics?
'Privacy', like a Warne text message?
'Privacy' like Fev at a private function?
They must be really thick.
Of course it's not the end of the world... but it sure aint harmless or funny in the least.
Maybe it was taken with the utmost confidence maybe it wasn't.
Maybe it was taken to be a private shot, maybe it wasn't?
Do you know the truth?
'Utmost confidence', 'private shot'... very funny.
I'm sure Warnie sent those texts in the utmost confidence also.
But it could cost us (or maybe already has) a major sponsor, it's a very bad time.doppler effect wrote:Lets think of the positives.... It couldn't have happened at a better time. If this shite storm happened going into a finals campaign it could be catastrophic. Best to get it out of the way now. And who knows, it could be galvanising for the team. Bring on 2011!
- ralphsmith
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2420
- Joined: Sat 25 Jul 2009 10:36pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 17 times
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Would be worse from a sponsorship point of view if Roo WAS wearing a jumperSainterK wrote:But it could cost us (or maybe already has) a major sponsor, it's a very bad time.doppler effect wrote:Lets think of the positives.... It couldn't have happened at a better time. If this shite storm happened going into a finals campaign it could be catastrophic. Best to get it out of the way now. And who knows, it could be galvanising for the team. Bring on 2011!
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
- doppler effect
- Club Player
- Posts: 196
- Joined: Sun 01 Feb 2009 10:16am
- Location: Canberra
I said think of the positives. The way i see it we may have just picked up a huge sponsor in Ansell!SainterK wrote:But it could cost us (or maybe already has) a major sponsor, it's a very bad time.doppler effect wrote:Lets think of the positives.... It couldn't have happened at a better time. If this shite storm happened going into a finals campaign it could be catastrophic. Best to get it out of the way now. And who knows, it could be galvanising for the team. Bring on 2011!
Unfortunately for them, it's incredibly bad timing, and the club being involved in 'sex scandals' has become predictable and frequent.IluvHarvey wrote:I never questioned your loyalty. Just feel a few on here are crucifying him without any facts. All we know is their is a naked photo of Roo and Zac. Thats it! Why was it taken? Where was it taken? Who took it? Under what circumstances was it taken? Noone knows. As it stands at the moment their is nothing wrong with what has happened. A lot of people (not accusing you here) are getting on their high horse because it has been leaked by an underage girl who ILLEGALLY OBTAINED THIS PHOTO, She has nothing to do with the photo itself.SainterK wrote:You confuse being loyal to the players, which even the club would be, with the fact it's big business these days.IluvHarvey wrote:Not me!SainterK wrote:No, you?IluvHarvey wrote:Precious much?SainterK wrote:Why is it becoming increasingly hard to have an opinion on here, just because mine differs from the masses this particular time?
The club is trying to negotiate a new sponsor, do you understand this?
Are you trying to tell me that the club would not be concerned, the existing sponsors wouldn't be making noises, that there would be no embarrasment from the powers that be that this story has broken when trying to negotiate a new 'major' one?
Don't confuse me voicing what I think the club will do in this situation, with a lack of loyalty.
Didn't someone even post the rumour on here a few months back about nude photo's, and their concern that just our luck it would be St Kilda?
That's what this has become, the latest chapter, to an unsavoury book...
Put your corporate hat on IluvHarvey, and you will soon shake your head at the misfortune of this latest event.
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
- IluvHarvey
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2621
- Joined: Fri 06 Jun 2008 4:51pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 34 times
- Been thanked: 257 times
If you know the truth tell us who took the photo?markp wrote:Yup... it's all over the net, for all time.IluvHarvey wrote:You make a god point here. Who did take the photo?markp wrote:'Privacy'?Thinline wrote:Um. What BAD has any player done here?
Stupid, maybe. Unfortunate, definitely.
You'd reckon they's committed a crime the way some of the peanuts on here are carrying on.
The only BAD I can see is the behaviour of some trumped up tunnel c**t who represents everything grotesque about the age in which we live.
Privacy is no longer a right. Sad as.
Who took the pics?
'Privacy', like a Warne text message?
'Privacy' like Fev at a private function?
They must be really thick.
Of course it's not the end of the world... but it sure aint harmless or funny in the least.
Maybe it was taken with the utmost confidence maybe it wasn't.
Maybe it was taken to be a private shot, maybe it wasn't?
Do you know the truth?
'Utmost confidence', 'private shot'... very funny.
I'm sure Warnie sent those texts in the utmost confidence also.
Why was the photo taken?
"It only ends once. Anything that happens before that is just progress."
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4655
- Joined: Sun 18 Jun 2006 2:04pm
- Location: Melb
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 23 times
Yeah I think Dal was in a photo shoot for a new clubX adcowboy18 wrote:Maybe we're targeting underwear manufacturers?SainterK wrote: The club is trying to negotiate a new sponsor, do you understand this?
We seem to have a need for some.
Brilliant marketing if it plays out.
Bring back the Lockett era
- markp
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 15549
- Joined: Mon 26 Mar 2007 4:22pm
- Has thanked: 62 times
- Been thanked: 81 times
Hmmmm... in the name of true love and romance??IluvHarvey wrote:If you know the truth tell us who took the photo?markp wrote:Yup... it's all over the net, for all time.IluvHarvey wrote:You make a god point here. Who did take the photo?markp wrote:'Privacy'?Thinline wrote:Um. What BAD has any player done here?
Stupid, maybe. Unfortunate, definitely.
You'd reckon they's committed a crime the way some of the peanuts on here are carrying on.
The only BAD I can see is the behaviour of some trumped up tunnel c**t who represents everything grotesque about the age in which we live.
Privacy is no longer a right. Sad as.
Who took the pics?
'Privacy', like a Warne text message?
'Privacy' like Fev at a private function?
They must be really thick.
Of course it's not the end of the world... but it sure aint harmless or funny in the least.
Maybe it was taken with the utmost confidence maybe it wasn't.
Maybe it was taken to be a private shot, maybe it wasn't?
Do you know the truth?
'Utmost confidence', 'private shot'... very funny.
I'm sure Warnie sent those texts in the utmost confidence also.
Why was the photo taken?
- bigred
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11463
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 7:39am
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 609 times
We are horny little devils @ St.Kilda.
I expect better from these guys.....we all do.
I am sick of defending them. Over and over.
Not this time.
I don't understand why they leave themselves open to this stuff.
We have been putting up with this shyte for long enough.
![Evil or Very Mad :evil:](./images/smilies/icon_evil.gif)
I expect better from these guys.....we all do.
I am sick of defending them. Over and over.
Not this time.
I don't understand why they leave themselves open to this stuff.
We have been putting up with this shyte for long enough.
"Now the ball is loose, it gives St. Kilda a rough chance. Black. Good handpass. Voss. Schwarze now, the defender, can run and from a long way".....
- IluvHarvey
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2621
- Joined: Fri 06 Jun 2008 4:51pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 34 times
- Been thanked: 257 times
So as I thought you like everyone else on here including me have no idea! So lets just hang Roo out to dry without him getting a chance to defend his actions. God I hope you're not a judge.markp wrote:Hmmmm... in the name of true love and romance??IluvHarvey wrote:If you know the truth tell us who took the photo?markp wrote:Yup... it's all over the net, for all time.IluvHarvey wrote:You make a god point here. Who did take the photo?markp wrote:'Privacy'?Thinline wrote:Um. What BAD has any player done here?
Stupid, maybe. Unfortunate, definitely.
You'd reckon they's committed a crime the way some of the peanuts on here are carrying on.
The only BAD I can see is the behaviour of some trumped up tunnel c**t who represents everything grotesque about the age in which we live.
Privacy is no longer a right. Sad as.
Who took the pics?
'Privacy', like a Warne text message?
'Privacy' like Fev at a private function?
They must be really thick.
Of course it's not the end of the world... but it sure aint harmless or funny in the least.
Maybe it was taken with the utmost confidence maybe it wasn't.
Maybe it was taken to be a private shot, maybe it wasn't?
Do you know the truth?
'Utmost confidence', 'private shot'... very funny.
I'm sure Warnie sent those texts in the utmost confidence also.
Why was the photo taken?
"It only ends once. Anything that happens before that is just progress."
- cowboy18
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5795
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:05pm
- Location: in my duffle coat
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 5 times
they can sponsor the front of our shorts.markp wrote:Or small goods?cowboy18 wrote:Maybe we're targeting underwear manufacturers?SainterK wrote: The club is trying to negotiate a new sponsor, do you understand this?
We seem to have a need for some.
Brilliant marketing if it plays out.
And they can have the back of our shorts.jonesy wrote: Yeah I think Dal was in a photo shoot for a new clubX ad
Problem solved.
- saintnick12
- Club Player
- Posts: 1877
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 2:08pm
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
You are right bigred IMO.bigred wrote:We are horny little devils @ St.Kilda.![]()
I expect better from these guys.....we all do.
I am sick of defending them. Over and over.
Not this time.
I don't understand why they leave themselves open to this stuff.
We have been putting up with this shyte for long enough.
The club needs to protect it's brand, it's really tarnished, and all the defensive attitudes on here won't change that.
Not to us as supporters, who will love the club anyways, but the image of the St Kilda football club has taken (another) major hit today.
I am not going to feel
![Embarassed :oops:](./images/smilies/icon_redface.gif)
- markp
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 15549
- Joined: Mon 26 Mar 2007 4:22pm
- Has thanked: 62 times
- Been thanked: 81 times
Have you also seen the Dal shot?IluvHarvey wrote: So as I thought you like everyone else on here including me have no idea! So lets just hang Roo out to dry without him getting a chance to defend his actions. God I hope you're not a judge.
Please give me an acceptable and believable theory on how those photos were allowed to be taken.
Surely these guys are on enough coin to be reasonably expected to avoid even the slightest chance of something like this happening.
They think they're rock stars.
Yes, I meant rock.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4887
- Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
- Has thanked: 330 times
- Been thanked: 466 times
WEll SainterK you may be right who knows. The way I guauge these things is on my other footy forum that I subscribe to. It's a local footy forum which doesn't have nearly the numbers that saintsational has. However it certainly doesn't have the bias which we have on here as obviously most of the subscribers barrack for all different teams, and support local footy. Usually when a BIg footy story breaks, even a minor scandle, like Fev allegedly flashing himself at a mum, will garner about 70-80 posts.SainterK wrote:You are right bigred IMO.bigred wrote:We are horny little devils @ St.Kilda.![]()
I expect better from these guys.....we all do.
I am sick of defending them. Over and over.
Not this time.
I don't understand why they leave themselves open to this stuff.
We have been putting up with this shyte for long enough.
The club needs to protect it's brand, it's really tarnished, and all the defensive attitudes on here won't change that.
Not to us as supporters, who will love the club anyways, but the image of the St Kilda football club has taken (another) major hit today.
I am not going to feelto say that, doesn't make me any less of a supporter. I care about the club, that is my motive.
Tonight there has been 2 responses, and mine was one of them. I'm usually inundated with texts from mates when something like this involving the saints happens. Tonight I've had 2 txt msg's about it. I just reckon public opinion is that they have been foolish, but most of the angst is directed at the female involved. (maybe b/c most ppl know that there may well be photos of players from other clubs as well)
I'm not rapt with what has happened, but I reckon Roo will apologise tomorrow, admit his mistake, and hopefully the whole footy world will just move on.