So did you miss the point where I called you out on your disgraceful signature? Or do you think it is an appropriate way to treat woman?SydneySainter wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 8:42amMy point is that if we’re still developing with largely the same list for the past six seasons and we still have no star players, no AA’s since 2014, not pushing for finals and can’t attract that star free agent the club keeps promising. Shiel practically halved his potential salary by telling us “thanks but no thanks.” This is more than just a case of the list “still developing,” this is the club having to do a rebuild of Richo’s previous rebuild.HighettMan wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 6:34amYeah we had sharp upward trajectory in 04 for sure then we dipped and plateaued for 5 years till 2009.SydneySainter wrote: ↑Tue 23 Jul 2019 10:15pmThat side hit its stride in 2004, winning 10 games on the trot, being a kick away from a grand final and had two All-Australians that year and the year before.HighettMan wrote: ↑Tue 23 Jul 2019 10:09pmThe 2009-2010 side that never was, was a developing side since 1999. What's your point.SydneySainter wrote: ↑Tue 23 Jul 2019 9:42pmIt’s been a developing side since 2013.HighettMan wrote: ↑Tue 23 Jul 2019 8:24pm On 15th but all developing sides work thier way up.
Melbourne are below us atm but will be top 4 again next year.
That’s my point.
This current list had a sharp upward trajectory in 16 and 17. This list also had a dip and the sign's are we could rise sharply again.
Still not getting your point. You clearly believe development cycles should all be the same or should all just sharply and spectacularly rise to a flag in record breaking time and without a few hurdles along the way. There are rare exceptions but we are not one of them. Take Melbourne for example, prelim one year, wooden spoon the next. They will possibly be top 4 again next year.
BTW your signature is disgusting and repulsive.
Do you have a mother, sister, girlfriend or wife?
In the age of trying to educate the community about violence against women your signature is very out of step with how we should behave towards women.
The List is Good
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- HighettMan
- Club Player
- Posts: 499
- Joined: Sat 11 May 2019 7:00pm
- Has thanked: 21 times
- Been thanked: 94 times
Re: The List is Good
Have the courage to call out r ACE ism
- HighettMan
- Club Player
- Posts: 499
- Joined: Sat 11 May 2019 7:00pm
- Has thanked: 21 times
- Been thanked: 94 times
Re: The List is Good
You really don't pay attention do you. Richo is gone now and I couldn't care any less worrying about what's in the rear vision mirror.Ghost Like wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 8:45amHow foolish do the board look now, they sacked a coach when all the club needed was Jake with some run in his legs & a small forward who is just establishing himself in the 22 to return from a knee injury. As long as these two stay on the park we can't lose!HighettMan wrote: ↑Mon 22 Jul 2019 6:27amIt started last week. The new coach circus effect will dissipate quicky but I don't think we will hear the sound of a dead cat bouncing because we have a good list that has heen cruelled by jnjury.Ghost Like wrote: ↑Sun 21 Jul 2019 11:39pm I think we have started well by changing the coach. I think our list can improve markedly through trades and picks but my god it was refreshing to see the young blokes play with freedom.
So we are on our way to correcting & connecting the 3 pillars, coaching, recruiting & development.
What's changed in the past 2 weeks other than the coach. Jake is getting some touch and run in his legs jow that his pre season is almost completed and Jack L is back in the side. This guy alone creates real hardness and intensity and makes his teammates walk a little taller it would seem.
7 wins and we are still a mathematical chance of finals. Look through the list of players to come back too. Like I say a good list that can only get better.
How's the bring back Richo petition going?
Your other points are just petty childish comments.
Have the courage to call out r ACE ism
- Ghost Like
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6562
- Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
- Has thanked: 5788 times
- Been thanked: 1909 times
Re: The List is Good
It was unfair, you never did say whether Richo should stay on or be replaced. You prefer not to make a definitive comment, deflect with questions rather than answer them, endeavour to be sarcastic if belittling fails.
You speak of posters identifying things to suit their narrative. I am suggesting linking Carlisle and Lonie is a hail Mary to suit a narrative not wanting to acknowledge a change of coach.
You speak of posters identifying things to suit their narrative. I am suggesting linking Carlisle and Lonie is a hail Mary to suit a narrative not wanting to acknowledge a change of coach.
- SydneySainter
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2416
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2007 6:59pm
- Has thanked: 54 times
- Been thanked: 153 times
Re: The List is Good
Okay, I’ll bite.HighettMan wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 10:28amSo did you miss the point where I called you out on your disgraceful signature? Or do you think it is an appropriate way to treat woman?SydneySainter wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 8:42amMy point is that if we’re still developing with largely the same list for the past six seasons and we still have no star players, no AA’s since 2014, not pushing for finals and can’t attract that star free agent the club keeps promising. Shiel practically halved his potential salary by telling us “thanks but no thanks.” This is more than just a case of the list “still developing,” this is the club having to do a rebuild of Richo’s previous rebuild.HighettMan wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 6:34amYeah we had sharp upward trajectory in 04 for sure then we dipped and plateaued for 5 years till 2009.SydneySainter wrote: ↑Tue 23 Jul 2019 10:15pmThat side hit its stride in 2004, winning 10 games on the trot, being a kick away from a grand final and had two All-Australians that year and the year before.HighettMan wrote: ↑Tue 23 Jul 2019 10:09pmThe 2009-2010 side that never was, was a developing side since 1999. What's your point.SydneySainter wrote: ↑Tue 23 Jul 2019 9:42pmIt’s been a developing side since 2013.HighettMan wrote: ↑Tue 23 Jul 2019 8:24pm On 15th but all developing sides work thier way up.
Melbourne are below us atm but will be top 4 again next year.
That’s my point.
This current list had a sharp upward trajectory in 16 and 17. This list also had a dip and the sign's are we could rise sharply again.
Still not getting your point. You clearly believe development cycles should all be the same or should all just sharply and spectacularly rise to a flag in record breaking time and without a few hurdles along the way. There are rare exceptions but we are not one of them. Take Melbourne for example, prelim one year, wooden spoon the next. They will possibly be top 4 again next year.
BTW your signature is disgusting and repulsive.
Do you have a mother, sister, girlfriend or wife?
In the age of trying to educate the community about violence against women your signature is very out of step with how we should behave towards women.
You’re choosing to spin the context of my signature to make yourself appear as if you have the default moral high ground in this argument. I can accept why others would find it inappropriate and I’m happy to remove it if it offends, but to suggest that I endorse what you’re suggesting is unfounded smear.
Bad management is bad management
- Life Long Saint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5509
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
- Has thanked: 62 times
- Been thanked: 480 times
- Contact:
Re: The List is Good
Nowhere in that sig does it indicate violence, rape, or inappropriate behaviour.SydneySainter wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 10:55am You’re choosing to spin the context of my signature to make yourself appear as if you have the default moral high ground in this argument. I can accept why others would find it inappropriate and I’m happy to remove it if it offends, but to suggest that I endorse what you’re suggesting is unfounded smear.
Are men and women not allowed to have sex any more? Or is nobody allowed to have sex with the prom queen?
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1096
- Joined: Fri 28 Nov 2014 5:33pm
- Has thanked: 331 times
- Been thanked: 268 times
Re: The List is Good
I am glad someone called this out. I accept that a minority wont understand why its offensive and will try and twist the contextLife Long Saint wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 11:02amNowhere in that sig does it indicate violence, rape, or inappropriate behaviour.SydneySainter wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 10:55am You’re choosing to spin the context of my signature to make yourself appear as if you have the default moral high ground in this argument. I can accept why others would find it inappropriate and I’m happy to remove it if it offends, but to suggest that I endorse what you’re suggesting is unfounded smear.
Are men and women not allowed to have sex any more? Or is nobody allowed to have sex with the prom queen?
- HighettMan
- Club Player
- Posts: 499
- Joined: Sat 11 May 2019 7:00pm
- Has thanked: 21 times
- Been thanked: 94 times
Re: The List is Good
I suppose in the end it is a small internet enclave where mostly middle aged to older white self entitled men lurk. These incredibly antiquated views are bound to be openly expressed from the safety of anonymous social media accounts as a result.
Maybe get your mothers, wives, sisters and daughters to read the above, if you're not too embarrassed to let them that is.
Maybe get your mothers, wives, sisters and daughters to read the above, if you're not too embarrassed to let them that is.
Have the courage to call out r ACE ism
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23010
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8902 times
- Been thanked: 3883 times
Re: The List is Good
Thankfully, I turned off the signature part of SS years ago, so I don't get to read crappy ego driven signature drivel.
I suggest other users do the same.
I suggest other users do the same.
- Life Long Saint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5509
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
- Has thanked: 62 times
- Been thanked: 480 times
- Contact:
Re: The List is Good
I wasn't judging its appropriateness or otherwise.Crossy66 wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 2:00pmI am glad someone called this out. I accept that a minority wont understand why its offensive and will try and twist the contextLife Long Saint wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 11:02amNowhere in that sig does it indicate violence, rape, or inappropriate behaviour.SydneySainter wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 10:55am You’re choosing to spin the context of my signature to make yourself appear as if you have the default moral high ground in this argument. I can accept why others would find it inappropriate and I’m happy to remove it if it offends, but to suggest that I endorse what you’re suggesting is unfounded smear.
Are men and women not allowed to have sex any more? Or is nobody allowed to have sex with the prom queen?
But show me exactly where in the signature it indicates "violence against women". Which was the offensive part of it according to "SydneySainter".
If you're sensitive enough to be offended by a signature, then you should explain what back story you've imagined in that short sentance.
- HighettMan
- Club Player
- Posts: 499
- Joined: Sat 11 May 2019 7:00pm
- Has thanked: 21 times
- Been thanked: 94 times
Re: The List is Good
You are getting a bit lost in symantec's possibily.Life Long Saint wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 2:43pmI wasn't judging its appropriateness or otherwise.Crossy66 wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 2:00pmI am glad someone called this out. I accept that a minority wont understand why its offensive and will try and twist the contextLife Long Saint wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 11:02amNowhere in that sig does it indicate violence, rape, or inappropriate behaviour.SydneySainter wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 10:55am You’re choosing to spin the context of my signature to make yourself appear as if you have the default moral high ground in this argument. I can accept why others would find it inappropriate and I’m happy to remove it if it offends, but to suggest that I endorse what you’re suggesting is unfounded smear.
Are men and women not allowed to have sex any more? Or is nobody allowed to have sex with the prom queen?
But show me exactly where in the signature it indicates "violence against women". Which was the offensive part of it according to "SydneySainter".
If you're sensitive enough to be offended by a signature, then you should explain what back story you've imagined in that short sentance.
Why do these types of social issues have to be deflected by irrelevant issues such as "if" someone is offended. Like racism, isn't it just time we just call out bad behavior towards other people...irrespective of race, sex etc.
Again, like racism I suppose you first have to understand what it is which leads me to your point about questioning where the violence is.
Maybe ask woman how they feel about the statement in the signature to get some insight. Im guessing the responses will be along the lines of something like the prom queen being a prize for the jocks taking and controlling.
Again like rasism if you seek to understand it, ask a person that experiences rasim what thier views are.
Last edited by HighettMan on Wed 24 Jul 2019 4:31pm, edited 1 time in total.
Have the courage to call out r ACE ism
- Ghost Like
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6562
- Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
- Has thanked: 5788 times
- Been thanked: 1909 times
Re: The List is Good
You and SydneySainter were having a good discussion about the list until the point you deflected to his sig. I would have thought if your real issue was his sig you'd report him after a PM expressing why you find it offensive and asking he remove it. Instead it was the "look at me" indignation...end of discussion.HighettMan wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 2:04pm I suppose in the end it is a small internet enclave where mostly middle aged to older white self entitled men lurk. These incredibly antiquated views are bound to be openly expressed from the safety of anonymous social media accounts as a result.
Maybe get your mothers, wives, sisters and daughters to read the above, if you're not too embarrassed to let them that is.
Now we have your other faves, "white entitled men" and "safety of anonymous social media" (of which you are one, likely both). A very interesting insight. What wrong are you desperately trying to make up for? Don't answer that, I imagine it's extremely personal.
- Life Long Saint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5509
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
- Has thanked: 62 times
- Been thanked: 480 times
- Contact:
Re: The List is Good
Nope. I'm not getting lost in anything. I just don't go around looking to be offended by everything.HighettMan wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 4:29pm You are getting a bit lost in symantec's possibily.
Why do these types of social issues have to be deflected by irrelevant issues such as "if" someone is offended. Like racism, isn't it just time we just call out bad behavior towards other people...irrespective of race, sex etc.
Again, like racism I suppose you first have to understand what it is which leads me to your point about questioning where the violence is.
Maybe ask woman how they feel about the statement in the signature to get some insight. Im guessing the responses will be along the lines of something like the prom queen being a prize for the jocks taking and controlling.
Again like rasism if you seek to understand it, ask a person that experiences rasim what thier views are.
How do you know that the "winner" isn't already the boyfriend of the prom queen?
The Prom Queen might be the one that wants the "winner". You're assuming the "winner" just takes the prom queen.
My point is that you've read an awful lot of back story into a movie quote about winning and losing.
I personally don't like the signature but I'm not offended enough to call it out.
Again, the quote said nothing of violence or even suggested anything non-consensual. That's all on you!
I'll ask my wife tonight what she thinks of it and whether or not she's offended by it.
But really, the best person to ask is the writer of the movie. After all, it's their line.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1096
- Joined: Fri 28 Nov 2014 5:33pm
- Has thanked: 331 times
- Been thanked: 268 times
Re: The List is Good
Perhaps read through your response again and consider the ambiguity in the two paragraphs.Life Long Saint wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 2:43pmI wasn't judging its appropriateness or otherwise.Crossy66 wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 2:00pmI am glad someone called this out. I accept that a minority wont understand why its offensive and will try and twist the contextLife Long Saint wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 11:02amNowhere in that sig does it indicate violence, rape, or inappropriate behaviour.SydneySainter wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 10:55am You’re choosing to spin the context of my signature to make yourself appear as if you have the default moral high ground in this argument. I can accept why others would find it inappropriate and I’m happy to remove it if it offends, but to suggest that I endorse what you’re suggesting is unfounded smear.
Are men and women not allowed to have sex any more? Or is nobody allowed to have sex with the prom queen?
But show me exactly where in the signature it indicates "violence against women". Which was the offensive part of it according to "SydneySainter".
If you're sensitive enough to be offended by a signature, then you should explain what back story you've imagined in that short sentance.
This is a footy forum so I am not going to try and explain a non footy issue to a particular demographic - you are who you are, some get it and a minority wont.
- HighettMan
- Club Player
- Posts: 499
- Joined: Sat 11 May 2019 7:00pm
- Has thanked: 21 times
- Been thanked: 94 times
Re: The List is Good
Yadda yadda whatever....sounds like I boo him becuse he's a dirty player and not because he's black, or I was going to say yes to marriage equality but now I'm not because they've talked too much about it.Life Long Saint wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 4:47pmNope. I'm not getting lost in anything. I just don't go around looking to be offended by everything.HighettMan wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 4:29pm You are getting a bit lost in symantec's possibily.
Why do these types of social issues have to be deflected by irrelevant issues such as "if" someone is offended. Like racism, isn't it just time we just call out bad behavior towards other people...irrespective of race, sex etc.
Again, like racism I suppose you first have to understand what it is which leads me to your point about questioning where the violence is.
Maybe ask woman how they feel about the statement in the signature to get some insight. Im guessing the responses will be along the lines of something like the prom queen being a prize for the jocks taking and controlling.
Again like rasism if you seek to understand it, ask a person that experiences rasim what thier views are.
How do you know that the "winner" isn't already the boyfriend of the prom queen?
The Prom Queen might be the one that wants the "winner". You're assuming the "winner" just takes the prom queen.
My point is that you've read an awful lot of back story into a movie quote about winning and losing.
I personally don't like the signature but I'm not offended enough to call it out.
Again, the quote said nothing of violence or even suggested anything non-consensual. That's all on you!
I'll ask my wife tonight what she thinks of it and whether or not she's offended by it.
But really, the best person to ask is the writer of the movie. After all, it's their line.
Have the courage to call out r ACE ism
- SydneySainter
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2416
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2007 6:59pm
- Has thanked: 54 times
- Been thanked: 153 times
Re: The List is Good
I have removed the signature, as I ultimately have as much attachment to it as the movie I lifted it from.HighettMan wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 2:04pm I suppose in the end it is a small internet enclave where mostly middle aged to older white self entitled men lurk. These incredibly antiquated views are bound to be openly expressed from the safety of anonymous social media accounts as a result.
Maybe get your mothers, wives, sisters and daughters to read the above, if you're not too embarrassed to let them that is.
For what it’s worth, I agree with you in that the signature was inappropriate, but to suggest that I endorse what your suggesting is an unwarranted accusation.
I’ve seen enough of your posts to know that you struggle to argue the point of topic and when presented with a point of view which conflicts with yours, you resort to deflection tactics by attacking the character of the poster, either by potting the value of their supporter “loyalty” or spin-doctoring with the argument that this is your interpretation, so the poster must be a bad person.
You’re being as big a hypercrit as those so-called entitled middle-aged white men you’ve referred to on more than one occasion and as for the safety of anonymous social media accounts, you’re throwing your grenades from just that.
Bad management is bad management
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2060
- Joined: Fri 07 Jun 2013 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 217 times
- Been thanked: 343 times
Re: The List is Good
Thanks, SydneySainter, for removing the sig.SydneySainter wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 7:25pmI have removed the signature, as I ultimately have as much attachment to it as the movie I lifted it from.HighettMan wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 2:04pm I suppose in the end it is a small internet enclave where mostly middle aged to older white self entitled men lurk. These incredibly antiquated views are bound to be openly expressed from the safety of anonymous social media accounts as a result.
Maybe get your mothers, wives, sisters and daughters to read the above, if you're not too embarrassed to let them that is.
For what it’s worth, I agree with you in that the signature was inappropriate, but to suggest that I endorse what your suggesting is an unwarranted accusation.
I’ve seen enough of your posts to know that you struggle to argue the point of topic and when presented with a point of view which conflicts with yours, you resort to deflection tactics by attacking the character of the poster, either by potting the value of their supporter “loyalty” or spin-doctoring with the argument that this is your interpretation, so the poster must be a bad person.
You’re being as big a hypercrit as those so-called entitled middle-aged white men you’ve referred to on more than one occasion and as for the safety of anonymous social media accounts, you’re throwing your grenades from just that.
- HighettMan
- Club Player
- Posts: 499
- Joined: Sat 11 May 2019 7:00pm
- Has thanked: 21 times
- Been thanked: 94 times
Re: The List is Good
To be fair to me I struggle to argue with points of view that can be deconstructed by a 7 year old.SydneySainter wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 7:25pmI have removed the signature, as I ultimately have as much attachment to it as the movie I lifted it from.HighettMan wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 2:04pm I suppose in the end it is a small internet enclave where mostly middle aged to older white self entitled men lurk. These incredibly antiquated views are bound to be openly expressed from the safety of anonymous social media accounts as a result.
Maybe get your mothers, wives, sisters and daughters to read the above, if you're not too embarrassed to let them that is.
For what it’s worth, I agree with you in that the signature was inappropriate, but to suggest that I endorse what your suggesting is an unwarranted accusation.
I’ve seen enough of your posts to know that you struggle to argue the point of topic and when presented with a point of view which conflicts with yours, you resort to deflection tactics by attacking the character of the poster, either by potting the value of their supporter “loyalty” or spin-doctoring with the argument that this is your interpretation, so the poster must be a bad person.
You’re being as big a hypercrit as those so-called entitled middle-aged white men you’ve referred to on more than one occasion and as for the safety of anonymous social media accounts, you’re throwing your grenades from just that.
Mate but seriously good on you for taking it onboard. For what it's worth from an anonymous poster, respect you taking the feedback.
Now where where we with the mindless footy stuff...oh that's right I was potting you for not agreeing with me.
This list can play finals next year if we have luck with injuries...and if Ratts or Lyon doesn't change too much. Who ever is coach just needs to be good at press conferences and be one of the boys.
Have the courage to call out r ACE ism
- HighettMan
- Club Player
- Posts: 499
- Joined: Sat 11 May 2019 7:00pm
- Has thanked: 21 times
- Been thanked: 94 times
Re: The List is Good
Offence? You really don't pay attention do you. Have you got a foam beer can you can throw at the TV by chance?Ghost Like wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 4:31pmYou and SydneySainter were having a good discussion about the list until the point you deflected to his sig. I would have thought if your real issue was his sig you'd report him after a PM expressing why you find it offensive and asking he remove it. Instead it was the "look at me" indignation...end of discussion.HighettMan wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 2:04pm I suppose in the end it is a small internet enclave where mostly middle aged to older white self entitled men lurk. These incredibly antiquated views are bound to be openly expressed from the safety of anonymous social media accounts as a result.
Maybe get your mothers, wives, sisters and daughters to read the above, if you're not too embarrassed to let them that is.
Now we have your other faves, "white entitled men" and "safety of anonymous social media" (of which you are one, likely both). A very interesting insight. What wrong are you desperately trying to make up for? Don't answer that, I imagine it's extremely personal.
I normally don't report, I'm an advocate for forums finding their own way of moderation openly and collectively. Some background re the sig, I've previously called out that sig, just like I call out rasism. I do it openly. Just like I call out relentles agendas against individuals at the club which get mistaken for blind faith which couldn't be further from the truth. Example. Richo who? ...
Have the courage to call out r ACE ism
- Ghost Like
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6562
- Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
- Has thanked: 5788 times
- Been thanked: 1909 times
Re: The List is Good
Yes you do, I've noticed that, we all have. As it should always be. What I did notice though when you opened the threads on Racism and the Goodes Doco is that you never opened with your opinion. You waited until you could target someone else's thoughts. Interesting.
Relentless agendas...seems to be a theme.
"Foam beer throw", there's a new one. Reaching deep into your bag of stereotypes now.
Relentless agendas...seems to be a theme.
"Foam beer throw", there's a new one. Reaching deep into your bag of stereotypes now.
- HighettMan
- Club Player
- Posts: 499
- Joined: Sat 11 May 2019 7:00pm
- Has thanked: 21 times
- Been thanked: 94 times
Re: The List is Good
You say "we all have" like you are on some sort of committee or are you invoking Nixon's silent majority recruitment process. Funny.Ghost Like wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 8:46pm Yes you do, I've noticed that, we all have. As it should always be. What I did notice though when you opened the threads on Racism and the Goodes Doco is that you never opened with your opinion. You waited until you could target someone else's thoughts. Interesting.
Relentless agendas...seems to be a theme.
"Foam beer throw", there's a new one. Reaching deep into your bag of stereotypes now.
You REALLY don't pay attention do you.
I reckon my sig is a fairly big opinion.
Have the courage to call out r ACE ism
- Life Long Saint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5509
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
- Has thanked: 62 times
- Been thanked: 480 times
- Contact:
Re: The List is Good
Judgemental much?HighettMan wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 6:20pm Yadda yadda whatever....sounds like I boo him becuse he's a dirty player and not because he's black, or I was going to say yes to marriage equality but now I'm not because they've talked too much about it.
For the record.
I did not boo Adam Goodes. I agree with his stance...question his execution at times.
Totally voted yes and have questioned friendships with those that voted no.
But go ahead and pigeon-hole me! You ignroant, judgemental keyboard warrior!
- Ghost Like
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6562
- Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
- Has thanked: 5788 times
- Been thanked: 1909 times
Re: The List is Good
You keep telling me that but that's as far as you get.HighettMan wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 9:06pmYou say "we all have" like you are on some sort of committee or are you invoking Nixon's silent majority recruitment process. Funny.Ghost Like wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 8:46pm Yes you do, I've noticed that, we all have. As it should always be. What I did notice though when you opened the threads on Racism and the Goodes Doco is that you never opened with your opinion. You waited until you could target someone else's thoughts. Interesting.
Relentless agendas...seems to be a theme.
"Foam beer throw", there's a new one. Reaching deep into your bag of stereotypes now.
You REALLY don't pay attention do you.
I reckon my sig is a fairly big opinion.
The self righteous are the self serving.
Again with the deflection, nothing of substance. Ricky Nixon, Christine Nixon...oh President Nixon. Still a touch upset the silent majority saw through Shorten?
- HighettMan
- Club Player
- Posts: 499
- Joined: Sat 11 May 2019 7:00pm
- Has thanked: 21 times
- Been thanked: 94 times
Re: The List is Good
I take most of that back then. My apologies. Clearly I misjudged you based on the discussion about appropriate behaviour towards women.Life Long Saint wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 9:16pmJudgemental much?HighettMan wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 6:20pm Yadda yadda whatever....sounds like I boo him becuse he's a dirty player and not because he's black, or I was going to say yes to marriage equality but now I'm not because they've talked too much about it.
For the record.
I did not boo Adam Goodes. I agree with his stance...question his execution at times.
Totally voted yes and have questioned friendships with those that voted no.
But go ahead and pigeon-hole me! You ignroant, judgemental keyboard warrior!
Have the courage to call out r ACE ism
- HighettMan
- Club Player
- Posts: 499
- Joined: Sat 11 May 2019 7:00pm
- Has thanked: 21 times
- Been thanked: 94 times
Re: The List is Good
If it helpz do ya just wanna just keep the convo on footy stuff.Ghost Like wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 9:25pmYou keep telling me that but that's as far as you get.HighettMan wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 9:06pmYou say "we all have" like you are on some sort of committee or are you invoking Nixon's silent majority recruitment process. Funny.Ghost Like wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 8:46pm Yes you do, I've noticed that, we all have. As it should always be. What I did notice though when you opened the threads on Racism and the Goodes Doco is that you never opened with your opinion. You waited until you could target someone else's thoughts. Interesting.
Relentless agendas...seems to be a theme.
"Foam beer throw", there's a new one. Reaching deep into your bag of stereotypes now.
You REALLY don't pay attention do you.
I reckon my sig is a fairly big opinion.
The self righteous are the self serving.
Again with the deflection, nothing of substance. Ricky Nixon, Christine Nixon...oh President Nixon. Still a touch upset the silent majority saw through Shorten?
SAINTS ROCK!
Have the courage to call out r ACE ism
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23010
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8902 times
- Been thanked: 3883 times
Re: The List is Good
I never booed Goodes either, but I voted no and don'y have a problem with people who voted yes. In fact, I have never asked anyone whether they voted yes or no as it is none of my business.HighettMan wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 10:00pmI take most of that back then. My apologies. Clearly I misjudged you based on the discussion about appropriate behaviour towards women.Life Long Saint wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 9:16pmJudgemental much?HighettMan wrote: ↑Wed 24 Jul 2019 6:20pm Yadda yadda whatever....sounds like I boo him becuse he's a dirty player and not because he's black, or I was going to say yes to marriage equality but now I'm not because they've talked too much about it.
For the record.
I did not boo Adam Goodes. I agree with his stance...question his execution at times.
Totally voted yes and have questioned friendships with those that voted no.
But go ahead and pigeon-hole me! You ignroant, judgemental keyboard warrior!
Wouldn't have a clue which way the missus voted either. Marriage question or election. Don't care either.