I really rate Longer, Lonie and Dunstan...

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

saintbob
SS Life Member
Posts: 3636
Joined: Wed 21 May 2008 8:51pm
Location: Tassie
Has thanked: 492 times
Been thanked: 316 times

Re: I really rate Longer, Lonie and Dunstan...

Post: # 1683069Post saintbob »

Lonie = Allan Murray

Dunstan = Mark McGough

Longer = Trent Knobel


User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17032
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3647 times
Been thanked: 2921 times

Re: I really rate Longer, Lonie and Dunstan...

Post: # 1683070Post skeptic »

saintbob wrote:Lonie = Allan Murray

Dunstan = Mark McGough

Longer = Trent Knobel
Alan Murray and Lonie are NOTHING alike. Alan Murray was more a lead up type forward. His style was more in line with a Tim Membrey (but not nearly as good) though more on the burst/one to one marking rather than height of the ball stuff.

McGough got/won a hell of a lot more ball than Dunst and his tank was a lot better too whereas Luke bullocks more and tries harder to get to the right places and get on the end of plays. Also, Luke's disposal is much better which isn't saying much.

Longer to Knobel is a better comparison.


The Linton Street Flash
Club Player
Posts: 471
Joined: Sun 10 Aug 2008 7:42pm
Has thanked: 76 times
Been thanked: 108 times

Re: I really rate Longer, Lonie and Dunstan...

Post: # 1683083Post The Linton Street Flash »

Linton Lodger wrote:
carn_sainter wrote:
Linton Lodger wrote: Lonie will be a gun small forward and will be in the realms of Milne. Milne had more strength, but Lonie is better by foot (in fact elite by foot), more couragious and better overhead. He is freakish overhead for a bloke his size.
Sorry, this is too much. Milne was a once in a generation player, one of the hardest players to stop so far this century. I have no problems with Lonie as my post above attests but this is too much.
Milne was far from great in his first 8 seasons. Lonie is ahead of Milne at the same stage of their careers.
What the hell are you talking about? Even in his first season we knew we had something great with Milney. He consistently scored 40+ goals per season throughout his incredible career, I'm sorry sir but you are talking absolute rubbish.

I'm 50, I've been watching league footy since I was 3 - I have NEVER followed a small forward in the same class as Milney, you are utterly deluded if you think Lonie is in anyway close to Steven Milne.

Lonie is not Milneys bumhole!


Look again it's the Flash!!
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 19106
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1603 times
Been thanked: 2019 times

Re: I really rate Longer, Lonie and Dunstan...

Post: # 1683085Post SaintPav »

Lonie isn't Milne but I think he's worth persevering with.

Has only played 34 games.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
freely
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2075
Joined: Fri 07 Jun 2013 1:03pm
Has thanked: 224 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: I really rate Longer, Lonie and Dunstan...

Post: # 1683097Post freely »

The Linton Street Flash wrote:
Linton Lodger wrote:
carn_sainter wrote:
Linton Lodger wrote: Lonie is not Milneys bumhole!
Succinct! :D


User avatar
White Winmar
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5014
Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:02pm

Re: I really rate Longer, Lonie and Dunstan...

Post: # 1683098Post White Winmar »

Longer to Knobel is a perfect comparison. Unfortunately.


I started with nothing and I've got most of it left!
User avatar
Linton Lodger
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2467
Joined: Mon 18 Aug 2014 2:07pm
Has thanked: 86 times
Been thanked: 256 times

Re: I really rate Longer, Lonie and Dunstan...

Post: # 1683114Post Linton Lodger »

saintbob wrote:Lonie = Allan Murray

Dunstan = Mark McGough

Longer = Trent Knobel
Geez, settle down.


Post Reply