Hawks pick. What do we do with it?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: Fri 04 Nov 2011 3:00pm
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Re: Hawks pick. What do we do with it?
PICK 2 - CAMERON RAYNER
PICK 7/HICKEY - LACHIE WHITFIELD
DUNSTAN TO CROWS FOR PICK 17
PICK 17- HUNTER CLARKE
2018 - buy a KPP (should get lever ffs)
2019 - buy J.KELLY
PICK 7/HICKEY - LACHIE WHITFIELD
DUNSTAN TO CROWS FOR PICK 17
PICK 17- HUNTER CLARKE
2018 - buy a KPP (should get lever ffs)
2019 - buy J.KELLY
Re: Hawks pick. What do we do with it?
If you check out the future stars they came to the idea that if we get Kelly it will be hard to keep the 2 firsts. If we get Dusty on the other hand you can keep the 2 firsts.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: Fri 04 Nov 2011 3:00pm
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Re: Hawks pick. What do we do with it?
Why would dusty leave? Money yes but from tichmond mcg 70k fans on the verge of a possible flag to us???Wombat15 wrote:If you check out the future stars they came to the idea that if we get Kelly it will be hard to keep the 2 firsts. If we get Dusty on the other hand you can keep the 2 firsts.
Nah. And besides theres no way hed come to us leaving tigers with no picks. He'll stay. From the old school thinking will be loyal.
I rate rayner and whitfield over just spending money on jkelly.
We could get pittard, may, whitfield all for $2m or spend $1.3m on the jkelly ... AND add rayner cause we'll have pick 2/3
Wouldnt that be the better move?
Re: Hawks pick. What do we do with it?
I completely get both sides of the argument. The way im seeing it is much like future stars.SMS wrote:Why would dusty leave? Money yes but from tichmond mcg 70k fans on the verge of a possible flag to us???Wombat15 wrote:If you check out the future stars they came to the idea that if we get Kelly it will be hard to keep the 2 firsts. If we get Dusty on the other hand you can keep the 2 firsts.
Nah. And besides theres no way hed come to us leaving tigers with no picks. He'll stay. From the old school thinking will be loyal.
I rate rayner and whitfield over just spending money on jkelly.
We could get pittard, may, whitfield all for $2m or spend $1.3m on the jkelly ... AND add rayner cause we'll have pick 2/3
Wouldnt that be the better move?
Scenario A: We get kelly on the reported offer but it will probably cost us 2 firsts but wed probably get a couple of 2nds in return maybe.
Scenario B: Martin on roughly the same money and pricing richmond out of room to match meaning we would get dusty and potentially Rayner, LDU or Fogarty and maybe a Jack Higgins type with our next pick. I should mention im starting to like Higgins purely because you could have him and gresh terrorising forward lines for the next 10 years. Both have the ability to play in mid as well.
I guess because i dont trust our recruiting staff to get the top end talent right im on the scenario A bandwagon. But based on the fact the club loves that 2009 draft i could see them going the dusty option. It would mean we have Stevens, Carlisle and Martin from that draft. then you just have to hope they grab best available talent that arent KPP.
- bigred
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11463
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 7:39am
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 609 times
Re: Hawks pick. What do we do with it?
I reckon we should start cheating the salary cap and get them all.
"Now the ball is loose, it gives St. Kilda a rough chance. Black. Good handpass. Voss. Schwarze now, the defender, can run and from a long way".....
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10734
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 30 times
- Been thanked: 819 times
Re: Hawks pick. What do we do with it?
Whitfield has made it pretty clear he is staying in Sydney.
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3950
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2015 3:12pm
- Has thanked: 372 times
- Been thanked: 214 times
Re: Hawks pick. What do we do with it?
Kelly and/or Lever will do nicely, otherwise retain and use on the two best talents available!!!!!
'Cause StoneCold Said So'!!!!!
We will be great again once Billy is back playing!!!!!
The 'Last Post', it's the gift that keeps giving![📯](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f4ef.svg)
![📯](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f4ef.svg)
![📯](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f4ef.svg)
![📯](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f4ef.svg)
![📯](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f4ef.svg)
We will be great again once Billy is back playing!!!!!
The 'Last Post', it's the gift that keeps giving
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 547
- Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 5:20pm
- Location: donvale
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 67 times
- Contact:
Re: Hawks pick. What do we do with it?
We payed overs for Carlisle, because he suited our needs, so we will probably have to pay overs for Kelly if he chooses us (i.e. two-first round picks with a first or second-round pick in return from GWS).
If he doesn't choose us we should use both of them in the draft and look to trade other picks for steak knives from other clubs.
If he doesn't choose us we should use both of them in the draft and look to trade other picks for steak knives from other clubs.
its time to make a name for yourself like you've never made before!
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2295
- Joined: Sun 27 Jan 2008 9:05am
- Has thanked: 769 times
- Been thanked: 207 times
Re: Hawks pick. What do we do with it?
Pick 1-3 has to be taken to the draft IMO
Our first round pick can be shopped around
I'm happy to give up big money for a needs based gun ( free agency)
Im happy to give up two first round picks for a needs based gun but not pick 1-3 along with 6-12 along with heaps of money for a needs based gun
Our first round pick can be shopped around
I'm happy to give up big money for a needs based gun ( free agency)
Im happy to give up two first round picks for a needs based gun but not pick 1-3 along with 6-12 along with heaps of money for a needs based gun
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11322
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
- Location: South of Heaven
- Has thanked: 1312 times
- Been thanked: 447 times
Re: Hawks pick. What do we do with it?
Make a decision by the end of the season. That's the best thing to do with it right now.
Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/LkJcQq3.jpg?2)
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/LkJcQq3.jpg?2)
- Johnny Member
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4157
- Joined: Thu 05 Oct 2006 12:27pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Hawks pick. What do we do with it?
I don't necessarily agree that we paid overs.darylcowie wrote:We payed overs for Carlisle, because he suited our needs, so we will probably have to pay overs for Kelly if he chooses us (i.e. two-first round picks with a first or second-round pick in return from GWS).
If he doesn't choose us we should use both of them in the draft and look to trade other picks for steak knives from other clubs.
We Gave:
Pick No.5 and pick No.24
We Got:
Carlisle and pick No.14
The picks turned out to be Parish, Gresham, Alex Morgan.
So in effect, We Gave:
Darcy Parish & Alex Morgan
We Got:
Jake Carlisle & Jade Gresham
I don't reckon that's overs. I reckon we did really well from it.
- Johnny Member
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4157
- Joined: Thu 05 Oct 2006 12:27pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Hawks pick. What do we do with it?
Regarding the OP though, we should keep both picks and use the Draft.
Worst case is that we trade one of the picks for a decent player from somewhere - but I'd be dirty if we gave up two top 10 picks for anyone. I mean, Callum Mills and Clayton Oliver went 3 and 4 in the Draft. To get two young dudes like that would be amazing.
Worst case is that we trade one of the picks for a decent player from somewhere - but I'd be dirty if we gave up two top 10 picks for anyone. I mean, Callum Mills and Clayton Oliver went 3 and 4 in the Draft. To get two young dudes like that would be amazing.
- Devilhead
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8376
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
- Has thanked: 137 times
- Been thanked: 1169 times
Re: Hawks pick. What do we do with it?
Yes we did well from however you are wrongJohnny Member wrote:I don't necessarily agree that we paid overs.darylcowie wrote:We payed overs for Carlisle, because he suited our needs, so we will probably have to pay overs for Kelly if he chooses us (i.e. two-first round picks with a first or second-round pick in return from GWS).
If he doesn't choose us we should use both of them in the draft and look to trade other picks for steak knives from other clubs.
We Gave:
Pick No.5 and pick No.24
We Got:
Carlisle and pick No.14
The picks turned out to be Parish, Gresham, Alex Morgan.
So in effect, We Gave:
Darcy Parish & Alex Morgan
We Got:
Jake Carlisle & Jade Gresham
I don't reckon that's overs. I reckon we did really well from it.
Our pick 5 got knocked back to pick 6 as Sydney matched Melbourne's bid for Mills at pick 3
So it wasn't Parish but Aaron Francis who Essendon picked up using our pick that we swapped in the Carlisle trade
So I guess that means we have done even better ...... at this stage!
The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6582
- Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 1276 times
- Been thanked: 464 times
Re: Hawks pick. What do we do with it?
According to some dude on on the couch GWS have been fined 1000 points in the draft and said something about not being able to compete in the first round. What does that mean for our first round picks?
As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23020
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8912 times
- Been thanked: 3884 times
Re: Hawks pick. What do we do with it?
Wombat15 wrote:personally im not a fan of our drafting strategy weve had 1 pick pay off in the past 4 Richardson Drafts (Gresh). yet to get consistency from Paddy or JB. The picks at the time were defensible but retrospectively they havent paid dividends as of yet. So im hesitant to say lets go to the draft with 2 top 10 picks. Unless one of them falls in the top 3 i cant see the value. LDU, Rayner and Fogarty are probably the big 3 at the moment. The other concern is if Kelly does in fact nominate us we will have to give up picks to get him. i could see a scenario where its Kelly and pick 16-18 for our 2 firsts. Because at the back end of that draft we could get a Hunter Clark type.saynta wrote:dragit wrote:I will vomit if we downgrade a top 3 pick into 2 later picks.
Yep. I have never understood how that is a win. Ask the dees.They could have picked Kelly.
im dreaming in this scenario but if the football gods allowed us to go. Keep hawks pick and trade Saints 2017&18 First rounders for Kelly that would be ideal.
Gws don't have a pick in the first round.
- borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga
Re: Hawks pick. What do we do with it?
I dont see any point in trading our first round pick away. It will hopefully be around 11.
Whereas our Hawthorn pick could be 2 to 6. If 2 or 3 I would trade in=t out for a top ten pick and a lower first round pick. Which would give us three picks in the first round.
Whereas our Hawthorn pick could be 2 to 6. If 2 or 3 I would trade in=t out for a top ten pick and a lower first round pick. Which would give us three picks in the first round.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 878
- Joined: Sun 27 Mar 2016 8:05pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 94 times
Re: Hawks pick. What do we do with it?
Aside from GWS & GCS, has a team with two top 10 picks ever come out of the draft with a win?
Just off the top of my head
Scully & Trengrove
Brayshaw & Petracca (stiff on Brayshaw)
Freeman & Scharenberg
John Butcher & Andrew Moore
Roughead & Franklin are probably the only ones I can think of.
Just off the top of my head
Scully & Trengrove
Brayshaw & Petracca (stiff on Brayshaw)
Freeman & Scharenberg
John Butcher & Andrew Moore
Roughead & Franklin are probably the only ones I can think of.