Changes For Next Week
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Re: Changes For Next Week
Oldboy?Austinnn wrote:
I would reanimate the ghost of Barks4eva and go bezerk here, then kidnap Chris Pelchen and lock him alone in the list managers office with a phone and play him the recorded thoughts of Dermott Brereton until we won a premiership.
- dragit
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13047
- Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
- Has thanked: 605 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: Changes For Next Week
Haha - Welcome back mate!Con Gorozidis wrote:8856brother wrote:Welcome back Con. How did you spend your holiday?Con Gorozidis wrote:Yep fair enough. No hurry. Nice 5 year contracttony74 wrote:I've said all along that Blake is a huge talent. Got more than a bit of Pendelbury about him. But he's just a kid and will be monstered by big bodied opposition midfielders. I mean he doesn't even shave yet! He'll get his chance Con.
And he is a very young kid. Still only 19.5.
I put my head down, stayed out of trouble and worked on the things I was asked to by the leadership group and the coaches. Worked on my mental application and got the skinfolds down. I didn't want to become the next Colin Sylvia.
I won't mention the Sch-word...
Roo, Sinclair & Lonie will be the obvious outs you'd think...
Geary & Montagna would come in if fit,
Membrey, Ray & Acres would be close to the fringe too...
- borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga
Re: Changes For Next Week
Out..
Reiwoldt, Lonie (concussion)
Shenton, Templeton, Sinclair (return to rookie list)
In... Geary, Ray, Montagna if fit, otherwise Minchinton. Acres, Lee.
Reiwoldt, Lonie (concussion)
Shenton, Templeton, Sinclair (return to rookie list)
In... Geary, Ray, Montagna if fit, otherwise Minchinton. Acres, Lee.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12421
- Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 296 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: Changes For Next Week
Old Mate wrote:Oldboy?Austinnn wrote:
I would reanimate the ghost of Barks4eva and go bezerk here, then kidnap Chris Pelchen and lock him alone in the list managers office with a phone and play him the recorded thoughts of Dermott Brereton until we won a premiership.
As in the Korean film? Classic disturbing cinema. Makes Tarantino look mild.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: Changes For Next Week
A couple of things - Lonie will play - most players do after mild concussion the following week.
Schneider won't be dropped as both Roo and Joey are extremely likely outs and we need experience.
Schneider won't be dropped as both Roo and Joey are extremely likely outs and we need experience.
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Re: Changes For Next Week
Lonie could be rested regardless IMO. He's a little fella who has played seniors since round 1 and has copped a sore knee against the Pies and now a concussion against the Crows.saintspremiers wrote:A couple of things - Lonie will play - most players do after mild concussion the following week.
If Paddy & HG were rested from Sandy yesterday then no reason why the Saints may not decide to give Jack a week off, regardless of whether or not he is passed as fit to play.
Re: Changes For Next Week
If Joey is fit, he's an obvious in. We must find room for Acres and probably Ray IMO.
In: Joey Acres Membrey/Lee
Out: Sinclair Lonie Riewoldt
I think Dunstan has to be on notice that if he doesn't lift his output he will be replaced.
In: Joey Acres Membrey/Lee
Out: Sinclair Lonie Riewoldt
I think Dunstan has to be on notice that if he doesn't lift his output he will be replaced.
- dragit
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13047
- Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
- Has thanked: 605 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: Changes For Next Week
Yes I think we can afford to be extremely cautious at the moment, there is no need for him to play a week after concussion even if he passes the relevant tests… it would be a good chance to get games into a few others waiting on the sidelines... I don't think there are any doubts - Lonie & Sinclair can play - they will be back.Dr Spaceman wrote:Lonie could be rested regardless IMO. He's a little fella who has played seniors since round 1 and has copped a sore knee against the Pies and now a concussion against the Crows.saintspremiers wrote:A couple of things - Lonie will play - most players do after mild concussion the following week.
If Paddy & HG were rested from Sandy yesterday then no reason why the Saints may not decide to give Jack a week off, regardless of whether or not he is passed as fit to play.
Re: Changes For Next Week
Exactly. Didn't know SP was on match committee. Well done SP. Anyway I reckon rooy, Lonie and Sinclair are out and in comes Acres, membery and Minchington.Dr Spaceman wrote:Lonie could be rested regardless IMO. He's a little fella who has played seniors since round 1 and has copped a sore knee against the Pies and now a concussion against the Crows.saintspremiers wrote:A couple of things - Lonie will play - most players do after mild concussion the following week.
If Paddy & HG were rested from Sandy yesterday then no reason why the Saints may not decide to give Jack a week off, regardless of whether or not he is passed as fit to play.
Re: Changes For Next Week
If Joey doesn't come up, then Ray is probably in before Minchington.plugger66 wrote:Exactly. Didn't know SP was on match committee. Well done SP. Anyway I reckon rooy, Lonie and Sinclair are out and in comes Acres, membery and Minchington.Dr Spaceman wrote:Lonie could be rested regardless IMO. He's a little fella who has played seniors since round 1 and has copped a sore knee against the Pies and now a concussion against the Crows.saintspremiers wrote:A couple of things - Lonie will play - most players do after mild concussion the following week.
If Paddy & HG were rested from Sandy yesterday then no reason why the Saints may not decide to give Jack a week off, regardless of whether or not he is passed as fit to play.
Will probably be Membrey for Roo, but Lee gave himself a sniff with a dominant performance.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1081
- Joined: Sat 27 Apr 2013 7:44pm
- Been thanked: 52 times
Re: Changes For Next Week
out: Roo, Lonie, Dunstan, Sinclair
In: Membrey, Minchi, Curren, Acres
SUb: Schneider
Think Curren has earnt a crack at the inside mid role with consistent numbers in the 2's...Deserves his crack on form over dunstan IMO.
In: Membrey, Minchi, Curren, Acres
SUb: Schneider
Think Curren has earnt a crack at the inside mid role with consistent numbers in the 2's...Deserves his crack on form over dunstan IMO.
Re: Changes For Next Week
FQF wrote:If Joey doesn't come up, then Ray is probably in before Minchington.plugger66 wrote:Exactly. Didn't know SP was on match committee. Well done SP. Anyway I reckon rooy, Lonie and Sinclair are out and in comes Acres, membery and Minchington.Dr Spaceman wrote:Lonie could be rested regardless IMO. He's a little fella who has played seniors since round 1 and has copped a sore knee against the Pies and now a concussion against the Crows.saintspremiers wrote:A couple of things - Lonie will play - most players do after mild concussion the following week.
If Paddy & HG were rested from Sandy yesterday then no reason why the Saints may not decide to give Jack a week off, regardless of whether or not he is passed as fit to play.
Will probably be Membrey for Roo, but Lee gave himself a sniff with a dominant performance.
Didn't he play as a backman?
Re: Changes For Next Week
Played forward for second half and kicked two goals, set up another. (I wasn't there, but that's the report)plugger66 wrote:FQF wrote:If Joey doesn't come up, then Ray is probably in before Minchington.plugger66 wrote:Exactly. Didn't know SP was on match committee. Well done SP. Anyway I reckon rooy, Lonie and Sinclair are out and in comes Acres, membery and Minchington.Dr Spaceman wrote:Lonie could be rested regardless IMO. He's a little fella who has played seniors since round 1 and has copped a sore knee against the Pies and now a concussion against the Crows.saintspremiers wrote:A couple of things - Lonie will play - most players do after mild concussion the following week.
If Paddy & HG were rested from Sandy yesterday then no reason why the Saints may not decide to give Jack a week off, regardless of whether or not he is passed as fit to play.
Will probably be Membrey for Roo, but Lee gave himself a sniff with a dominant performance.
Didn't he play as a backman?
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30089
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
Re: Changes For Next Week
OUT: Roo, Lonie, Sinclair
Other could also be dropped, but I suspect that the club will not want to make too many changes, and wil be happy to give players like Templetona second crack.
With Roo not playing I would give Lee a crack as he has been in good form, is an excellent field kick and canplay the Roo linking role as well as up forward, or down back.
IN: Lee, Acres, Minch
Which will leave us with a reasonably well ballance team.
Saad has had a pretty dynamic 2 weeks and so it would not surprise if he erans recall woth Lonie and Sinclair both out.
Other could also be dropped, but I suspect that the club will not want to make too many changes, and wil be happy to give players like Templetona second crack.
With Roo not playing I would give Lee a crack as he has been in good form, is an excellent field kick and canplay the Roo linking role as well as up forward, or down back.
IN: Lee, Acres, Minch
Which will leave us with a reasonably well ballance team.
Saad has had a pretty dynamic 2 weeks and so it would not surprise if he erans recall woth Lonie and Sinclair both out.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
Re: Changes For Next Week
I would only want Saad to be considered if he plays dominant footy (tackles, goals, no fading) for a month. He's similar to TDL who can excel at VFL but can't make the jump.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Changes For Next Week
I just hope they dont bring in the Minch for a single game against the Hawks where we get thrashed and they say oh yeah not good enough. That would be grossly unfair on a kid in the final year of his contract. He needs a fair go. His last 10-12 games in the VFL have been very good to excellent. He has earnt a fair go.
Re: Changes For Next Week
Con Gorozidis wrote:I just hope they dont bring in the Minch for a single game against the Hawks where we get thrashed and they say oh yeah not good enough. That would be grossly unfair on a kid in the final year of his contract. He needs a fair go. His last 10-12 games in the VFL have been very good to excellent. He has earnt a fair go.
That's fine but now we are saying similar of Curren but when he played his 2 ordinary games in the ones this year just about everyone wanted him dropped. Lets face it if Minch comes in and doesn't have an impact in 2 games just about everyone on here will want him dropped again. I think I will be one of them.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: Changes For Next Week
Remember we are playing 2nd on the ladder. I don't want Acres in as he doesn't seem hard enough for AFL level yet and could get smashed by the Eagles.
Would like to see Lee in but would that mean say Fisher playing further forward due to Roos absence?
Also don't want Membrey in - not up to it.
Would like to see Lee in but would that mean say Fisher playing further forward due to Roos absence?
Also don't want Membrey in - not up to it.
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12421
- Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 296 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: Changes For Next Week
saintspremiers wrote:Remember we are playing 2nd on the ladder. I don't want Acres in as he doesn't seem hard enough for AFL level yet and could get smashed by the Eagles.
Would like to see Lee in but would that mean say Fisher playing further forward due to Roos absence?
Also don't want Membrey in - not up to it.
That's actually not a bad idea having Lee and Fisher swapping between forward and back. If Lee looks lost he goes forward and Fisher goes back. Fisher would at least pull down a heap of marks up and could set up play from CHF. At worst Lee can play a sacrificial forward role to free up Bruce and hickey.
Re: Changes For Next Week
This thread completely destroys my anticipation for Thursdays 'Guess this weeks ins and outs' thread.
Whats the point now?!!![Crying or Very sad :cry:](./images/smilies/icon_cry.gif)
Whats the point now?!!
![Crying or Very sad :cry:](./images/smilies/icon_cry.gif)
- desertsaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10404
- Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
- Location: out there
- Has thanked: 186 times
- Been thanked: 701 times
Re: Changes For Next Week
guy spends twenty years in captivity without getting so much as raped or beaten, walks out, eats some seafood, gets in a brawl, bags some hot young chick and cries about it?gringo wrote:Old Mate wrote:Oldboy?Austinnn wrote:
I would reanimate the ghost of Barks4eva and go bezerk here, then kidnap Chris Pelchen and lock him alone in the list managers office with a phone and play him the recorded thoughts of Dermott Brereton until we won a premiership.
As in the Korean film? Classic disturbing cinema. Makes Tarantino look mild.
"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
- dragit
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13047
- Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
- Has thanked: 605 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: Changes For Next Week
I think this one is meant to be a longer form discussion on the game and who we think should be dropped, whereas the Thursday one is what we think the changes will actually be.Sobraz wrote:This thread completely destroys my anticipation for Thursdays 'Guess this weeks ins and outs' thread.
Whats the point now?!!
It's an incredibly dynamic and exciting place is SS.