...one of your better efforts...matrix wrote:
i liked it so much i stole it...
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
...one of your better efforts...matrix wrote:
gringo wrote:I think that was under Oakley if I remember correctly.
To this columnist, the decision to go behind the club's back in itself does not present as a major crime in the football-journalism context. But, in the context of Swan's standing at the club and the high stakes surrounding his questionable future with the Magpies, it becomes a significant factor. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
We wrote last year that Collingwood should cut its losses and sack him, but naturally that did not happen. For a start - and although the club could have afforded the payout - it would have been forced to retain his six-figure wage in the 2013 salary cap.
[/quote]saintbrat wrote:the royal 'We' has appeared in response to Danes efforts this week.
We wrote last year that Collingwood should cut its losses and sack him, but naturally that did not happen. For a start - and although the club could have afforded the payout - it would have been forced to retain his six-figure wage in the 2013 salary cap.
whiskers3614 wrote:My argument was not with Swan..I'm sure he answered truthfully to the questions that werte posed.
I'm saying the whole thing was orchestrated so the difficult questions would not be asked.
I do not have a drug problem is a long way from NO I don't do party drugs!
gringo wrote:plugger66 wrote:gringo wrote:
Yes because it would be worth all this hassle and stuff in the media to do that. You need to stop looking behind you all the time. It will hurt your neck.
Like you who buries their head an says the AFL has it all under control. Disappointing that they can't self regulate then I wouldn't need to complain about them. Like when banks deregulate and are unanswerable, they have stuffed a lot of things up. It's about time Demetriou went and let someone else clean it his mess.
Can you tell me all the CEO of the AFL that were popular? I think Oakley was popular. He had stickers made about him. I know a good chiropractor.
Sobraz wrote:Didn't watch it.. Not disappointed.. Highly recommended..
I think we can all come to our own conclusions without getting caught up in such pathetic propaganda..
Swan loves the gear. He's never been caught. He's a gun footballer. Good on him.
You need IQ about 180 to get into MENSA.saintbrat wrote:heheh
Pies have also fined Cloke--- $1,000 for consistently parking in officials car parks- and after repeated warnings.
maybe he was taking his role in the ' leadership group' figuratively
bit like not realising he ws driving whilst disqualified 12 months ago..
saintbrat wrote:heheh
Pies have also fined Cloke--- $1,000 for consistently parking in officials car parks- and after repeated warnings.
maybe he was taking his role in the ' leadership group' figuratively
bit like not realising he ws driving whilst disqualified 12 months ago..
But then they would deduct IQ points for Father & Mother Cloke. Any intelligence those boys have didn't come from those two.whiskers3614 wrote:You need IQ about 180 to get into MENSA.saintbrat wrote:heheh
Pies have also fined Cloke--- $1,000 for consistently parking in officials car parks- and after repeated warnings.
maybe he was taking his role in the ' leadership group' figuratively
bit like not realising he ws driving whilst disqualified 12 months ago..
I reckon Clokes (4) would just about scrape it in!
ozrulestrace wrote:But then they would deduct IQ points for Father & Mother Cloke. Any intelligence those boys have didn't come from those two.whiskers3614 wrote:You need IQ about 180 to get into MENSA.saintbrat wrote:heheh
Pies have also fined Cloke--- $1,000 for consistently parking in officials car parks- and after repeated warnings.
maybe he was taking his role in the ' leadership group' figuratively
bit like not realising he ws driving whilst disqualified 12 months ago..
I reckon Clokes (4) would just about scrape it in!
BTW, here's an idea Travis, get a Myki, travel to Richmond Railway station and walk across to Gosch's paddock, then you won't have any parking problems.
I do not have a drug problem, means I do not have a problem getting drugswhiskers3614 wrote:My argument was not with Swan..I'm sure he answered truthfully to the questions that werte posed.
I'm saying the whole thing was orchestrated so the difficult questions would not be asked.
I do not have a drug problem is a long way from NO I don't do party drugs!
ozrulestrace wrote: BTW, here's an idea Travis, get a Myki, travel to Richmond Railway station and walk across to Gosch's paddock, then you won't have any parking problems.