We have 4 players who are far too good for VFL...

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Sobraz
SS Life Member
Posts: 3399
Joined: Thu 29 Mar 2007 1:06pm
Has thanked: 2 times

Re: We have 4 players who are far too good for VFL...

Post: # 1243954Post Sobraz »

groupie1 wrote:I actually reckon, to add to your point, that its not the Gold Coasts and GWSs that these kinds of players might appeal to, but the mid-range but still young clubs with little depth - Richmond comes to mind - that think they have a shot of taking their side into the eight but just need to top up with a few hardy experienced players. Polo would go great at Richmond, right now, for example, ironically. Peake would do well with the Doggies. Role players. If their attitude is right they can slot in nicely to a team for which they feel they can add something missing... as opposed to trying to fill in a void that is too big for them. So, I agree with you, we should be trying to trade them out, but to the Richmond/Bulldogs types.
Disagree with this... This is exactly what we did in the RL years, which led us to this lack of players in the 22-26 age group... 'Role players' is one of my most hated phrases in modern footy...


Hawkesbury Saint
Club Player
Posts: 353
Joined: Wed 07 Apr 2004 10:28pm
Location: Faulconbridge
Been thanked: 17 times

Re: We have 4 players who are far too good for VFL...

Post: # 1243957Post Hawkesbury Saint »

As far as Dean, Raph, Brett and Beau go, I'm pretty sure they would all want to stay Saints! They'd show their true colours. :D ... and that's why I love them ...


Saints Footy - Let all others follow.
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: We have 4 players who are far too good for VFL...

Post: # 1243959Post plugger66 »

Sobraz wrote:
groupie1 wrote:I actually reckon, to add to your point, that its not the Gold Coasts and GWSs that these kinds of players might appeal to, but the mid-range but still young clubs with little depth - Richmond comes to mind - that think they have a shot of taking their side into the eight but just need to top up with a few hardy experienced players. Polo would go great at Richmond, right now, for example, ironically. Peake would do well with the Doggies. Role players. If their attitude is right they can slot in nicely to a team for which they feel they can add something missing... as opposed to trying to fill in a void that is too big for them. So, I agree with you, we should be trying to trade them out, but to the Richmond/Bulldogs types.
Disagree with this... This is exactly what we did in the RL years, which led us to this lack of players in the 22-26 age group... 'Role players' is one of my most hated phrases in modern footy...

Every team has them. Even the top sides. Matter of fact I heard Nick Maxwell Say the other day on SEN that every side has at least maybe 2 defensive forwards. Not sure I agree with him but that was what he said and I reckon he has me covered for knowledge of AFL footy.


User avatar
Cairnsman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7377
Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 10:38pm
Location: Everywhere
Has thanked: 189 times
Been thanked: 276 times

Re: We have 4 players who are far too good for VFL...

Post: # 1243964Post Cairnsman »

plugger66 wrote:
Sobraz wrote:
groupie1 wrote:I actually reckon, to add to your point, that its not the Gold Coasts and GWSs that these kinds of players might appeal to, but the mid-range but still young clubs with little depth - Richmond comes to mind - that think they have a shot of taking their side into the eight but just need to top up with a few hardy experienced players. Polo would go great at Richmond, right now, for example, ironically. Peake would do well with the Doggies. Role players. If their attitude is right they can slot in nicely to a team for which they feel they can add something missing... as opposed to trying to fill in a void that is too big for them. So, I agree with you, we should be trying to trade them out, but to the Richmond/Bulldogs types.
Disagree with this... This is exactly what we did in the RL years, which led us to this lack of players in the 22-26 age group... 'Role players' is one of my most hated phrases in modern footy...

Every team has them. Even the top sides. Matter of fact I heard Nick Maxwell Say the other day on SEN that every side has at least maybe 2 defensive forwards. Not sure I agree with him but that was what he said and I reckon he has me covered for knowledge of AFL footy.
Doesn't every player have a role to play. But seriously isn't the term "defensive forward" really a weazle word created by coaches for coaches. Incidently which coach coined the phraise?


User avatar
Austinnn
Club Player
Posts: 1533
Joined: Wed 22 Jun 2011 6:02pm
Location: France
Has thanked: 2 times

Re: We have 4 players who are far too good for VFL...

Post: # 1243980Post Austinnn »

Maybe what he meant was forwards who provide decent defensive pressure to keep it in their team's Fwd50? I'm thinking about Aaron Hamill and Ahmed Saad, those types.

Dunno who does that for the pies though.

But yea, every team needs role players, or utilities as they used to be called.


Just My Opinion
------------------------------------------------

You'll Never Walk Alone
Sobraz
SS Life Member
Posts: 3399
Joined: Thu 29 Mar 2007 1:06pm
Has thanked: 2 times

Re: We have 4 players who are far too good for VFL...

Post: # 1244008Post Sobraz »

plugger66 wrote:
Sobraz wrote:
groupie1 wrote:I actually reckon, to add to your point, that its not the Gold Coasts and GWSs that these kinds of players might appeal to, but the mid-range but still young clubs with little depth - Richmond comes to mind - that think they have a shot of taking their side into the eight but just need to top up with a few hardy experienced players. Polo would go great at Richmond, right now, for example, ironically. Peake would do well with the Doggies. Role players. If their attitude is right they can slot in nicely to a team for which they feel they can add something missing... as opposed to trying to fill in a void that is too big for them. So, I agree with you, we should be trying to trade them out, but to the Richmond/Bulldogs types.
Disagree with this... This is exactly what we did in the RL years, which led us to this lack of players in the 22-26 age group... 'Role players' is one of my most hated phrases in modern footy...

Every team has them. Even the top sides. Matter of fact I heard Nick Maxwell Say the other day on SEN that every side has at least maybe 2 defensive forwards. Not sure I agree with him but that was what he said and I reckon he has me covered for knowledge of AFL footy.
You have defensive forwards like Jordan Lewis who can kick a bag on their day, and you have defensive forwards like Eddy who play a role for the team that involves very little actual football ability.. Essentially playing 1 man down when we have the ball...

Play a footballer in an arranged 'role', fine, but dont play a 'role player' that can't actually play at the level in a football team...


defacto
Club Player
Posts: 1514
Joined: Mon 20 Dec 2010 1:47pm

Re: We have 4 players who are far too good for VFL...

Post: # 1244049Post defacto »

i'm interested to read big marts comments


User avatar
Austinnn
Club Player
Posts: 1533
Joined: Wed 22 Jun 2011 6:02pm
Location: France
Has thanked: 2 times

Re: We have 4 players who are far too good for VFL...

Post: # 1244068Post Austinnn »

that makes one of us.


Just My Opinion
------------------------------------------------

You'll Never Walk Alone
User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: We have 4 players who are far too good for VFL...

Post: # 1244090Post dragit »

defacto wrote:i'm interested to read big marts comments
God, you must be very bored…


User avatar
groupie1
Club Player
Posts: 1274
Joined: Sun 18 Jun 2006 4:21am
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 52 times

Re: We have 4 players who are far too good for VFL...

Post: # 1244258Post groupie1 »

Sobraz wrote:
groupie1 wrote:I actually reckon, to add to your point, that its not the Gold Coasts and GWSs that these kinds of players might appeal to, but the mid-range but still young clubs with little depth - Richmond comes to mind - that think they have a shot of taking their side into the eight but just need to top up with a few hardy experienced players. Polo would go great at Richmond, right now, for example, ironically. Peake would do well with the Doggies. Role players. If their attitude is right they can slot in nicely to a team for which they feel they can add something missing... as opposed to trying to fill in a void that is too big for them. So, I agree with you, we should be trying to trade them out, but to the Richmond/Bulldogs types.
Disagree with this... This is exactly what we did in the RL years, which led us to this lack of players in the 22-26 age group... 'Role players' is one of my most hated phrases in modern footy...
So actually, you AGREE with me, we should be trying to trade these players out.


Gordon Fode couldda been Plugga
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: We have 4 players who are far too good for VFL...

Post: # 1244263Post plugger66 »

groupie1 wrote:
Sobraz wrote:
groupie1 wrote:I actually reckon, to add to your point, that its not the Gold Coasts and GWSs that these kinds of players might appeal to, but the mid-range but still young clubs with little depth - Richmond comes to mind - that think they have a shot of taking their side into the eight but just need to top up with a few hardy experienced players. Polo would go great at Richmond, right now, for example, ironically. Peake would do well with the Doggies. Role players. If their attitude is right they can slot in nicely to a team for which they feel they can add something missing... as opposed to trying to fill in a void that is too big for them. So, I agree with you, we should be trying to trade them out, but to the Richmond/Bulldogs types.
Disagree with this... This is exactly what we did in the RL years, which led us to this lack of players in the 22-26 age group... 'Role players' is one of my most hated phrases in modern footy...
So actually, you AGREE with me, we should be trying to trade these players out.

Tell me you are joking thinking clubs would trade for them. We will delist them so why would they trade for them? Like people saying if we trade BJ we need to get a couple of first rounders for him. He can go for nothing.

I doubt we would get anything for Gram or Kosi let alone those 2 mentioned.


SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Re: We have 4 players who are far too good for VFL...

Post: # 1244274Post SainterK »

plugger66 wrote:
I doubt we would get anything for Gram or Kosi let alone those 2 mentioned.
I think we would...

Massive KPF shortage.

Gram has played 11 games and probably gets to exercise his renewal clause?


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: We have 4 players who are far too good for VFL...

Post: # 1244275Post plugger66 »

SainterK wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
I doubt we would get anything for Gram or Kosi let alone those 2 mentioned.
I think we would...

Massive KPF shortage.

Gram has played 11 games and probably gets to exercise his renewal clause?

Gram isnt a KPF though. By the way wasnt saying we should get rid of either just saying they arent worth anything to any other side.


Post Reply