Middle sized defenders

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Middle sized defenders

Post: # 1216457Post Con Gorozidis »

SaintPav wrote:Con, how is someone disagreeing with you playing the man?
Its not. Im happy for disagreement. I meant playing the man when no reason is giving or the actual subject mattter or issue is not addressed but the response ispurely directed at the person. Thats playing the man.
Happy for people to say Con youre a dumb loser bed wetter because of these issues. dot dot dot.
but often people avoid the subject altogether and just say the first bits without back-up or reference to the subject.

as an example. BM disagreed with me and then gave a good reason based on the subject matter. I then thought about and agreed he was right.

or the other really funny one on this forum is when say something - the people attack you based on argument you never made in the first palce. i know i have been guilty of this one. usually due to skimming/not reading it right in the first place.


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18987
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1591 times
Been thanked: 1998 times

Re: Middle sized defenders

Post: # 1216521Post SaintPav »

Con Gorozidis wrote:
SaintPav wrote:Con, how is someone disagreeing with you playing the man?
Its not. Im happy for disagreement. I meant playing the man when no reason is giving or the actual subject mattter or issue is not addressed but the response ispurely directed at the person. Thats playing the man.
Happy for people to say Con youre a dumb loser bed wetter because of these issues. dot dot dot.
but often people avoid the subject altogether and just say the first bits without back-up or reference to the subject.

as an example. BM disagreed with me and then gave a good reason based on the subject matter. I then thought about and agreed he was right.

or the other really funny one on this forum is when say something - the people attack you based on argument you never made in the first palce. i know i have been guilty of this one. usually due to skimming/not reading it right in the first place.
cheers..you certainly are a passionate saints man.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
Post Reply