Nick Heyne

BigMart · Post: # 1170823Post **BigMart** » Sun 30 Oct 2011 10:46am

I was purely interested in how Heyne was delisted whilst on contract

when I was told it WOULD NOT happen

bit like
Magner easily winning the B&F at Sandy
Armitage performing better as a mid

joffaboy · Post: # 1170829Post **joffaboy** » Sun 30 Oct 2011 10:52am

so it wasn't another, I'm right, look at me, I'm the greatest football pundit ,internet hero, of all time, thread then.

Sorry, just seemed like the rest.

BigMart · Post: # 1170836Post **BigMart** » Sun 30 Oct 2011 11:01am

I guess that is my goal in life

to be a great football pundit, internet hero

not sure how that is measured.....but the respect of faceless people I will never meet or know is something I do dream of...

maverick · Post: # 1170837Post **maverick** » Sun 30 Oct 2011 11:02am

BigMart wrote:I guess that is my goal in life

to be a great football pundit, internet hero

not sure how that is measured.....but the respect of faceless people I will never meet or know is something I do dream of...

So why feel the need to start the thread?

Dr Spaceman · Sun 30 Oct 2011 11:07am

BigMart wrote:I was purely interested in how Heyne was delisted whilst on contract

when I was told it WOULD NOT happen.

I think the only ones who suggested that also suggested that he would be rookied due to the contract.

Don't you have to be delisted first to be taken as a rookie?

Don't know that too many thought he would stay on the senior list for another year.

So what is the surprise here?

BigMart · Post: # 1170843Post **BigMart** » Sun 30 Oct 2011 11:12am

Why does anyone start threads....

Why did Loris start a thread on going to an opera???
was there an agenda there???

It was a football question....Which I hoped would be answered

Dr Spaceman · Sun 30 Oct 2011 11:16am

BigMart wrote:Why does anyone start threads....

Why did Loris start a thread on going to an opera???
was there an agenda there???

It was a football question....Which I hoped would be answered

Well you seem to have twice ignored my post regarding him being delisted whilst possibly still contracted.

Not saying I'm right, but I have genuinely tried to provide some insight.

BigMart · Post: # 1170848Post **BigMart** » Sun 30 Oct 2011 11:19am

Yes....Dr

I did take note....and thanks...

I too think he will be rookied...which I mentioned in the OP

fingers · Post: # 1170850Post **fingers** » Sun 30 Oct 2011 11:33am

joffaboy wrote:
fingers wrote:Why is it that when a thread starts and someone asks a serious question it's easier to carry on with nonsense than answer the question?
What was the question?

Thought this was just another look at me ego pissing contest.

Wasn't Eddy delisted with a contract? What about Allen? McQualter maybe?

Dont know, but why even start a thread about this unless you have an out of control ego or self esteem issues?

Maybe....and maybe I will ask again....what was it about Heyne that made people think he would be delisted?

BigMart · Post: # 1170856Post **BigMart** » Sun 30 Oct 2011 11:45am

I responded to that...

The fact he was dropped midway through the year to the Sandy Reserves...not a good sign in the third year at an AFL club....he was have a terrible season....without injury concerns

that was the reasoning I used when I suggested he was in trouble midyear

bobmurray · Post: # 1170871Post **bobmurray** » Sun 30 Oct 2011 1:12pm

fingers wrote:
joffaboy wrote:
fingers wrote:Why is it that when a thread starts and someone asks a serious question it's easier to carry on with nonsense than answer the question?
What was the question?

Thought this was just another look at me ego pissing contest.

Wasn't Eddy delisted with a contract? What about Allen? McQualter maybe?

Dont know, but why even start a thread about this unless you have an out of control ego or self esteem issues?
Maybe....and maybe I will ask again....what was it about Heyne that made people think he would be delisted?

I thought he would be delisted because he even struggled to be a GOP

fingers · Post: # 1170881Post **fingers** » Sun 30 Oct 2011 1:53pm

Thanks for the answers but nobody has really offered anything specific about his deficiencies. Just some rather broad statements.

Thanks anyway.

Mr Magic · Post: # 1170883Post **Mr Magic** » Sun 30 Oct 2011 2:07pm

fingers wrote:Thanks for the answers but nobody has really offered anything specific about his deficiencies. Just some rather broad statements.

Thanks anyway.

Maybe those now in charge feel that after 3 pre-seasons and 3 years at the Club (since drafted) he hassn't shown the required:-
a) skills
b) desire
c) application
d) concentration
e) defensive ability
d) any/all of the above

and maybe they feel that after 3 seasons he has had enough time?

Quite possibly they would rather try a new kid instead?

Or maybe he does have some sort of contract and they are hoping/planning to 'rookie' him?

tweedaletomanning · Sun 30 Oct 2011 3:54pm

Mr Magic wrote:
fingers wrote:Thanks for the answers but nobody has really offered anything specific about his deficiencies. Just some rather broad statements.

Thanks anyway.
Maybe those now in charge feel that after 3 pre-seasons and 3 years at the Club (since drafted) he hassn't shown the required:-
a) skills
b) desire
c) application
d) concentration
e) defensive ability
d) any/all of the above

and maybe they feel that after 3 seasons he has had enough time?

Quite possibly they would rather try a new kid instead?

Or maybe he does have some sort of contract and they are hoping/planning to 'rookie' him?

Agree, youd think that in 3 years in the AFL system hed show SOME improvement at the very least. But for whatever the reason, will not make it at AFL level.

plugger66 · Post: # 1171322Post **plugger66** » Mon 31 Oct 2011 5:09pm

Yes Bigmart it was me who said he was contracted but I didnt say he wouldnt be delisted, I said he may but he will be rookied. I have since found out I was wrong. He doesnt have any second year of a contract as it had a clause in it saying he had to play a certain amount of games. Yep i was wrong and you were right. Well done.

IluvHarvey · Mon 31 Oct 2011 6:48pm

Look at me! Look at me! Look at me!

IluvHarvey · Mon 31 Oct 2011 6:56pm

Look at me! Look at me! Look at me!

BigMart · Post: # 1171388Post **BigMart** » Mon 31 Oct 2011 7:46pm

finally

should I add that one to MY list

ps: i dont have a list

BigMart · Post: # 1171389Post **BigMart** » Mon 31 Oct 2011 7:47pm

finally

should I add that one to MY list

ps: i dont have a list

BigMart · Post: # 1171392Post **BigMart** » Mon 31 Oct 2011 7:49pm

finally

should I add that one to MY list

ps: i dont have a list

plugger66 · Post: # 1171393Post **plugger66** » Mon 31 Oct 2011 7:49pm

BigMart wrote:finally

should I add that one to MY list

ps: i dont have a list

I have no idea what finally means but I do suggest you get a list. TV shows have been done on lists.

BigMart · Post: # 1171397Post **BigMart** » Mon 31 Oct 2011 8:32pm

I think you do know what I mean

I have a long memory....and not just a selective one like someone else who posts regularly

saintbrat · Post: # 1171426Post **saintbrat** » Mon 31 Oct 2011 9:24pm

http://www.slatterymedia.com/store/view ... ooty-lists