Dont follow at all.chook23 wrote:interesting seeing your comment in the MRP result threadplugger66 wrote:Are you serious?chook23 wrote:why?plugger66 wrote:Only if they are mad.Banger724 wrote:should fight the gilbert one imo.
Blake Free to Play
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
chook23
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7301
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:31am
- Has thanked: 12 times
- Been thanked: 143 times
you mentioned we could win one and lose oneplugger66 wrote:Dont follow at all.chook23 wrote:interesting seeing your comment in the MRP result threadplugger66 wrote:Are you serious?chook23 wrote:why?plugger66 wrote:Only if they are mad.Banger724 wrote:should fight the gilbert one imo.
implied the possible loss would be blake and win (gilbert) if challenged
Cant follow what you wrote?
saint4life
-
Stillwaiting
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4432
- Joined: Sun 25 May 2008 5:39pm
Maybe the just assumed that the powder puff Thomas could not possibly throw anything high impactdegruch wrote:Maybe they just couldn't believe Daisy Thomas could throw a jumper punch?The_Merchant wrote:Dale Thomas not even looked at. Not saying he should have gone, but at least it should have been looked at. If he had the StKilda No.10 on his back they definitely would have at least investigated it.
Yes, under the Baker Rule, low impact, intentional high contact, 3 weeks.
I love this club
I was saying under the old system Blake would have got a week and Gilbert may have got off completely. This system means accepting guilt when maybe innocent but also allows for reprimands.chook23 wrote:you mentioned we could win one and lose oneplugger66 wrote:Dont follow at all.chook23 wrote:interesting seeing your comment in the MRP result threadplugger66 wrote:Are you serious?chook23 wrote:why?plugger66 wrote:Only if they are mad.Banger724 wrote:should fight the gilbert one imo.
implied the possible loss would be blake and win (gilbert) if challenged
Cant follow what you wrote?