Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
maybe he meant itplugger66 wrote:I had a few. probably more than a few and was suggesting what moves they could have made during tha last quarter. He was fine about it and was having a bit of a laugh and suggesting I apply for a coaching position next year. So it isnt just me who is sarcastic.bigcarl wrote:come clean with it now. what did you say?plugger66 wrote:Hope he didnt mention what stupid comments I said to him on Saturday night.
He would have meant it if he said can you please piss off.bigcarl wrote:maybe he meant itplugger66 wrote:I had a few. probably more than a few and was suggesting what moves they could have made during tha last quarter. He was fine about it and was having a bit of a laugh and suggesting I apply for a coaching position next year. So it isnt just me who is sarcastic.bigcarl wrote:come clean with it now. what did you say?plugger66 wrote:Hope he didnt mention what stupid comments I said to him on Saturday night.
bad linkmatrixcutter wrote:http://www.esnips.com/doc/e073a720-fc0f ... er-GF-2009
see if that works
windows media player wont play it but quicktime will
god friggin damn itsaintbrat wrote:bad linkmatrixcutter wrote:http://www.esnips.com/doc/e073a720-fc0f ... er-GF-2009
see if that works
windows media player wont play it but quicktime will
3AW usually have Sports Tonight episode up the next day - will wait and see- several stations appear to have sent their podcast / technicians of on holiday- not updating at all. MMM are still back at week one of the finals and SEN are slack as well.
So is that certain poster who boycotted SEN going to not listen to 3AW as well. Maybe they should stop going to the footy as well, or never vote.saintbrat wrote:if your still listening this guy mario HATES lyon and expreses that regulalry on SEN,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.
why do the RAPH Haters always get online >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>FN FN FN FN FN FN FN FN sdhlgjkaehbdmn
Great write up.saintbrat wrote:
Max match up? see article,=R:- no naive article , he'd only played 7 games too much of a risk- Zac had been unwell - on a drip and two hour solids till he got through warm up. Max at his fittest yes BUT limited prep, Dempster other option in that position.
Geary over Armo... meh I dont know if that would of been the right thing, if anything you'd choose max to play to replace zac. Oh wells, if this, if that, doesnt matter nowsaintsRrising wrote:Great write up.saintbrat wrote:
However more on this is that Geary WOULD have played if Zac had not come up.
Indeed Ross explained in reference to Max that Ross had misgivings that the selected team was too tall....and then indicated that if Zac had not have played that they would have gone with Geary.
you wouldn't choose max to replace zac if you thought the team was already too tall - doesn't help on that front.lefty wrote:Geary over Armo... meh I dont know if that would of been the right thing, if anything you'd choose max to play to replace zac.saintsRrising wrote:However more on this is that Geary WOULD have played if Zac had not come up.
Indeed Ross explained in reference to Max that Ross had misgivings that the selected team was too tall....and then indicated that if Zac had not have played that they would have gone with Geary.
Exactly.bergholt wrote:you wouldn't choose max to replace zac if you thought the team was already too tall - doesn't help on that front.lefty wrote:Geary over Armo... meh I dont know if that would of been the right thing, if anything you'd choose max to play to replace zac.saintsRrising wrote:However more on this is that Geary WOULD have played if Zac had not come up.
Indeed Ross explained in reference to Max that Ross had misgivings that the selected team was too tall....and then indicated that if Zac had not have played that they would have gone with Geary.
geary ahead of armo? the point of difference between them is that geary gives more run, so i guess that's an indicator as to why we haven't seen much armo this year. needs to get more run and carry into his legs, i think.
any particular part of game you looked at = R Geelong lifted and took opportunity -we did alot right and they persisted- ( he's on the eastern freeway) what immediate thoughts =R:didn't read the papers, cats celebrating and it twisted knife had the morning at Etihad- hadn't slept much( bed at 5 am)and only 3 drinks , wasn't easier, brutal end to season but proud of way they played and show they put on who played well- R: Gram, hayes, baker, dal under heavy tag- corky in 2nd, Ball, schneider, Roo. Kosi, hayes never gave up- we had opportunity, but they took their opportunities. did not rotate the backs as usual Max match up? see article,=R:- no naive article , he'd only played 7 games too much of a risk- Zac had been unwell - on a drip and two hour solids till he got through warm up. Max at his fittest yes BUT limited prep, Dempster other option in that position. medium forward deficiency- Nathan Brown? ==R: agree on void and would like to play Goddard, drafted for it with Cahill LYnch and Heyne- but still coming on- only kicked 15 goals less than Cats for year, lot of opportunities. hadn't thought of Brown Fev named saints-= R: aware of his saying saints- reviewing list and know of his saintly history , on the table but all new info but not something they have considered, Ball- R: met with players and sent them away with programs, Luke had a difficult period and measurable things to work on Started him in centre square for G/F ( show of confidence and support)- contract offered- , unless anything different he is required and has said he wishes to stay . Delivered as asked with his work . Matty Maguire= R: discussions held a long way out from end of season , picked for Hawks game but injured in last session and then difficult to get him in, no ones asking about his position ( trade) -HE IS required. Difficult to know can he really get going again- well respected and member of the group and will chat with him, contract will be different= he is happy to Stay use the result for /as positive when they come back = R: Bottom line is the team had improved, individuals improved, systems improved - improved by along way, 
''We worked really closely [during the season] and the things we wanted him to work on were measurable and he got back and we started him in the centre square bounce for the grand final,'' Lyon said. ''Luke's a fantastic kid and I was really proud of his efforts on the weekend and he delivered what we asked him to.
''We've invested a lot in Luke, Luke's invested a lot in the club and as far as I know
- Matthew Drain has put a [new] contract offer to Luke and he's a required player.''
Matt Maguire, who did not play a senior game this season, is also a required player, according to Lyon.
He is a required player unless offered something of value for him. The fact that there is no contract in front of him and the fact that Ross said in the interview that he 'doesn't know how he will perform' or 'no one has been beating down our door' speaks volumes.saintbrat wrote:http://www.theage.com.au/news/rfnews/ly ... 58278.html''We worked really closely [during the season] and the things we wanted him to work on were measurable and he got back and we started him in the centre square bounce for the grand final,'' Lyon said. ''Luke's a fantastic kid and I was really proud of his efforts on the weekend and he delivered what we asked him to.
''We've invested a lot in Luke, Luke's invested a lot in the club and as far as I know
- Matthew Drain has put a [new] contract offer to Luke and he's a required player.''
Matt Maguire, who did not play a senior game this season, is also a required player, according to Lyon.
might be time to take a punt on a kid like lynch and hope that he's a quick study because the lack of a goal-kicker in that position is a weakness imo.saintsRrising wrote:Yes he would "like to" BUT he also said that he needs him in the midfield more.AnythingsPossibleSaints wrote:Very glad to see that he said he'd like to play BJ up forward. Time to do it, if we don't get Fev.
