Hayes
Marshall
Sinclair
Wood
Gresham
Votes v Pies
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
Sainter_Dad
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6284
- Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
- Has thanked: 260 times
- Been thanked: 1097 times
Re: Votes v Pies
100 Hayes
78 Sinclair
58 Marshall
19.5 Gresham
18.5 Steele
14 Hill
13 Crouch
13 Wilkie
7 King
3 Membrey
2 Wood
1 McKenzie
Therefore:
5 Hayes
4 Sinclair
3 Marshall
2 Gresham
1 Steele
78 Sinclair
58 Marshall
19.5 Gresham
18.5 Steele
14 Hill
13 Crouch
13 Wilkie
7 King
3 Membrey
2 Wood
1 McKenzie
Therefore:
5 Hayes
4 Sinclair
3 Marshall
2 Gresham
1 Steele
“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
-
Yorkeys
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4891
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
- Has thanked: 1410 times
- Been thanked: 1426 times
Re: Votes v Pies
Interesting.
Is it arguable that Sinclair letting his guy dominate from the get go and later completely misjudging a few crucial incoming balls actually set up the Pies win, notwithstanding a sterling comeback later?
Too much later of course.
By contrast I saw Wilkie as playing far better, selfless, committed role over the whole game against strong odds and he is hardly rated.
What's not arguable, I feel, is that Membrey was far better than Sincs, but there you go, we all see things differently.
Is it arguable that Sinclair letting his guy dominate from the get go and later completely misjudging a few crucial incoming balls actually set up the Pies win, notwithstanding a sterling comeback later?
Too much later of course.
By contrast I saw Wilkie as playing far better, selfless, committed role over the whole game against strong odds and he is hardly rated.
What's not arguable, I feel, is that Membrey was far better than Sincs, but there you go, we all see things differently.
-
Scollop
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11540
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3516 times
- Been thanked: 2464 times
Re: Votes v Pies
Sinclair wasn’t perfect but you rate him too harshly. We had a fair amount of footy in the first half and we kept it in our attacking zone for lengthy periods which meant that obviously if you were a backman that you weren’t getting much chance to tally possession stats. The fact that we butchered the ball or that we didn’t hold our marks inside 50 in the first half wasn’t Sincs fault
The two highest for inside 50’s in our team were Gresham and Wood. Both not renowned for their ball use. We need to make sure that Hill, Sinclair, and perhaps Webster and Wilkie get more of a chance to pass to our forwards. Hill has to play higher up the ground. Steele and Crouch were below standard. Our mids were beaten at centre clearance.
Wilkie was good, but wasn’t perfect by the way. He completely misjudged the footy on more than one occasion, but you have to slow down the play and watch the replay a couple of times to pick up who the culprits are. All you Anglos look alike so I can understand that you mistook him for some one else
The two highest for inside 50’s in our team were Gresham and Wood. Both not renowned for their ball use. We need to make sure that Hill, Sinclair, and perhaps Webster and Wilkie get more of a chance to pass to our forwards. Hill has to play higher up the ground. Steele and Crouch were below standard. Our mids were beaten at centre clearance.
Wilkie was good, but wasn’t perfect by the way. He completely misjudged the footy on more than one occasion, but you have to slow down the play and watch the replay a couple of times to pick up who the culprits are. All you Anglos look alike so I can understand that you mistook him for some one else
-
B.M
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12052
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2601 times
Re: Votes v Pies
Thought Steele had a ‘meh’ game
Must have high expectations of him, which is probably a compliment
In fact, he hasn’t been great during the preseason
Must have high expectations of him, which is probably a compliment
In fact, he hasn’t been great during the preseason