Carlisle
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 465
- Joined: Thu 29 Sep 2011 12:24pm
- Location: Central Coast
- Has thanked: 210 times
- Been thanked: 58 times
Re: Carlisle
Perhaps Richo should do a Clarkson and go and "discuss" the MRO with Gillon (waste of time talking to the overlord in the middle). There are a number of inconsistent, implausible rulings in less than half a season that can be used as evidence that the new and improved review system is just as badly flawed as it's predecessor.
- asiu
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10313
- Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
- Has thanked: 1327 times
- Been thanked: 932 times
Re: Carlisle
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
he comes across as a bit of a grub , that Bernard
![Image](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_iUpoNBZyaBc/R0zVk-1LCZI/AAAAAAAAAg0/9eeT7D6cnaA/s320/compass-blu-265x220.gif)
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.
.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
- bigred
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11463
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 7:39am
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 609 times
Re: Carlisle
Yeah its uncanny....elizabethr wrote: ↑Tue 29 May 2018 11:07pm Jake Carlisle so reminds me of the $7,000,000 man,Bernard Tomic !
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
"Now the ball is loose, it gives St. Kilda a rough chance. Black. Good handpass. Voss. Schwarze now, the defender, can run and from a long way".....
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6582
- Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 1274 times
- Been thanked: 463 times
Re: Carlisle
It's funny when the good players like Cotchin or Ablett get a full 5 minutes to get rid of the ball when tackled but a new kid gets all of 1 second (and sometimes not even that) before he is pinged.
As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6582
- Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 1274 times
- Been thanked: 463 times
Re: Carlisle
The tribunal decision is BS. Take it higher. Sick of one rule for some and crap for others!
As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4881
- Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
- Has thanked: 327 times
- Been thanked: 465 times
Re: Carlisle
Gotta say - I'm surprised by the uproar. He clearly hit him in the head. Riewoldt was clearly concussed. He was always going to get weeks. It was careless at best, reckless at worst. I reckon we move on and set ourselves to be outraged over more clearly unjust things
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3303
- Joined: Tue 23 May 2006 6:14pm
- Location: East Oakleigh
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 40 times
- bigred
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11463
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 7:39am
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 609 times
Re: Carlisle
I think the club really needed to just stand by Jake for once.
Glad they did. I reckon he takes these things to heart a bit. Definitely went into his shell on Saturday.
Glad they did. I reckon he takes these things to heart a bit. Definitely went into his shell on Saturday.
"Now the ball is loose, it gives St. Kilda a rough chance. Black. Good handpass. Voss. Schwarze now, the defender, can run and from a long way".....
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: Mon 07 Aug 2006 9:50pm
- Location: Queensland - Beautiful one day ... you know the rest
- Has thanked: 65 times
- Been thanked: 318 times
Re: Carlisle
But here is the problem with the inconsistency/persecution theory
You can't possibly tell the amount of force between the two hits - you are only guessing
Where was the impact point? Temple hit can be worse for concussion. Fleshy soft bicep vs a clenched fist - now that's got to have a difference in impact force.
For how long were the players unconscious? Medical reports submitted at the tribunal - Is that a point of difference?
As for the saints getting constantly shafted at the tribunal - what has been our record for the last two seasons?
Seeya
*************
*************
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1310
- Joined: Sun 25 Mar 2012 9:45pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 99 times
Re: Carlisle
I would agree except for the Rance footage... it really looks like different rules for different playersMoods wrote: ↑Tue 29 May 2018 11:42pm Gotta say - I'm surprised by the uproar. He clearly hit him in the head. Riewoldt was clearly concussed. He was always going to get weeks. It was careless at best, reckless at worst. I reckon we move on and set ourselves to be outraged over more clearly unjust things
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1360
- Joined: Sun 03 Oct 2004 8:45pm
- Has thanked: 93 times
- Been thanked: 93 times
Re: Carlisle
Richo’s comments could have come from a politician. We think a concussion is bad so 1 week would have been enough. Never mind it was in play spoil gone bad. But Richo must not look noN-PC.
Welcome to the st kilda football “party”. Wait, is that name PC?
Welcome to the st kilda football “party”. Wait, is that name PC?
- perfectionist
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9022
- Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
- Has thanked: 60 times
- Been thanked: 347 times
Re: Carlisle
There is no "accidental" category. It is either "intentional" or "careless". So, "accidental" comes into the "careless" category. Jake's hit was assessed as being "careless", "High" contact ( Riewoldt was hit in the head) and "High" impact ( Riewoldt was concussed and left the field for the remainder of the game). This generates a 2 match suspension. There are no longer any "discounts" for early pleas for suspensions, but they do remain for fines i.e. the fine is reduced.BackFromUSA wrote: ↑Tue 29 May 2018 10:55pm Really should have tried to get it down graded to accidental - would that have helped?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10120
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 145 times
- Been thanked: 1299 times
Re: Carlisle
So Riewoldt won't miss any training sessions and will play Saturday. The Rance hit was later and with the same amount of force but no action take. Its a piss take.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: Carlisle
Rubbish. At worst it was a week. Most people think that it seems, so we weren’t off on a tangent.iwantmeseats wrote: ↑Tue 29 May 2018 1:38pm Contesting that is ridiculous. What you’d expect from this admin
Took his eyes off he ball and clotheslined him.
Ridiculous.
FFS
You have no idea if he was going for the ball or the man - that’s just an assumption.
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3950
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2015 3:12pm
- Has thanked: 372 times
- Been thanked: 214 times
Re: Carlisle
Yes, this, Jake would have got lucky to get it reduced to a week!!!!!Moods wrote: ↑Tue 29 May 2018 11:42pm Gotta say - I'm surprised by the uproar. He clearly hit him in the head. Riewoldt was clearly concussed. He was always going to get weeks. It was careless at best, reckless at worst. I reckon we move on and set ourselves to be outraged over more clearly unjust things
As much as we don't like it, was too the letter of the law!!!!!
Move on!!!!!
'Cause StoneCold Said So'!!!!!
We will be great again once Billy is back playing!!!!!
The 'Last Post', it's the gift that keeps giving![📯](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f4ef.svg)
![📯](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f4ef.svg)
![📯](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f4ef.svg)
![📯](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f4ef.svg)
![📯](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f4ef.svg)
We will be great again once Billy is back playing!!!!!
The 'Last Post', it's the gift that keeps giving
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8581
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 526 times
- Been thanked: 1527 times
Re: Carlisle
The only thing they could work on was the impact. The immediate impact on Breust looked similar to Riewoldt. But I don't know if Breust even came off. On first look it would be difficult to justify one as low and the other as high.
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
- Sainter_Dad
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6284
- Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
- Has thanked: 260 times
- Been thanked: 1097 times
Re: Carlisle
I agree that it was the letter of the law - but should not the smae be said of:stonecold wrote: ↑Wed 30 May 2018 10:02amYes, this, Jake would have got lucky to get it reduced to a week!!!!!Moods wrote: ↑Tue 29 May 2018 11:42pm Gotta say - I'm surprised by the uproar. He clearly hit him in the head. Riewoldt was clearly concussed. He was always going to get weeks. It was careless at best, reckless at worst. I reckon we move on and set ourselves to be outraged over more clearly unjust things
As much as we don't like it, was too the letter of the law!!!!!
Move on!!!!!
Rance;
Cox;
Fyfe;
Burton;
Mitchell;
...?
It feels like it is not that Carlisle is one of a string of players to get done for concussing someone, or doing an action that concussed someone - It is that he is highlighted as an individual among a sea of players getting off.
It is not this incident that I find offensive - it is the one rule for some teams - another for St Kilda
“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3950
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2015 3:12pm
- Has thanked: 372 times
- Been thanked: 214 times
Re: Carlisle
I don't think that is the case, (on my opinion), personally I don't think Fyfe did anything wrong (total accident, if you off your red, white and black goggles), haven't really seen enough of the others!!!!!Sainter_Dad wrote: ↑Wed 30 May 2018 10:15amI agree that it was the letter of the law - but should not the smae be said of:stonecold wrote: ↑Wed 30 May 2018 10:02amYes, this, Jake would have got lucky to get it reduced to a week!!!!!Moods wrote: ↑Tue 29 May 2018 11:42pm Gotta say - I'm surprised by the uproar. He clearly hit him in the head. Riewoldt was clearly concussed. He was always going to get weeks. It was careless at best, reckless at worst. I reckon we move on and set ourselves to be outraged over more clearly unjust things
As much as we don't like it, was too the letter of the law!!!!!
Move on!!!!!
Rance;
Cox;
Fyfe;
Burton;
Mitchell;
...?
It is not this incident that I find offensive - it is the one rule for some teams - another for St Kilda
Anyway, I blame our defensive coach (Spud), if he wasn't constantly encouraging/rewarding the old 'Ear Massage' on Bounce, Jake may have spoiled correctly!!!!!
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
Move on, get some more games/experience into the younger guys!!!!!
Appreciate your loyalty and opinion though Dad!!!!!
'Cause StoneCold Said So'!!!!!
We will be great again once Billy is back playing!!!!!
The 'Last Post', it's the gift that keeps giving![📯](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f4ef.svg)
![📯](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f4ef.svg)
![📯](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f4ef.svg)
![📯](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f4ef.svg)
![📯](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f4ef.svg)
We will be great again once Billy is back playing!!!!!
The 'Last Post', it's the gift that keeps giving
- dragit
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13047
- Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
- Has thanked: 605 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: Carlisle
But they do have the capacity to judge an act as "not unreasonable in the circumstance" > strangely this was the excuse made for Fyfe running into a pack attempting to kick the ball off the ground when a player had been on the ground for a long time.perfectionist wrote: ↑Wed 30 May 2018 8:34amThere is no "accidental" category. It is either "intentional" or "careless". So, "accidental" comes into the "careless" category. Jake's hit was assessed as being "careless", "High" contact ( Riewoldt was hit in the head) and "High" impact ( Riewoldt was concussed and left the field for the remainder of the game). This generates a 2 match suspension. There are no longer any "discounts" for early pleas for suspensions, but they do remain for fines i.e. the fine is reduced.BackFromUSA wrote: ↑Tue 29 May 2018 10:55pm Really should have tried to get it down graded to accidental - would that have helped?
E.g Carlisle was making a legitimate attempt to spoil, his open hand was very close to the ball, contact to Riewoldt's head was accidental.
- Sainter_Dad
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6284
- Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
- Has thanked: 260 times
- Been thanked: 1097 times
Re: Carlisle
StoneColdstonecold wrote: ↑Wed 30 May 2018 10:25amI don't think that is the case, (on my opinion), personally I don't think Fyfe did anything wrong (total accident, if you off your red, white and black goggles), haven't really seen enough of the others!!!!!Sainter_Dad wrote: ↑Wed 30 May 2018 10:15amI agree that it was the letter of the law - but should not the smae be said of:stonecold wrote: ↑Wed 30 May 2018 10:02amYes, this, Jake would have got lucky to get it reduced to a week!!!!!Moods wrote: ↑Tue 29 May 2018 11:42pm Gotta say - I'm surprised by the uproar. He clearly hit him in the head. Riewoldt was clearly concussed. He was always going to get weeks. It was careless at best, reckless at worst. I reckon we move on and set ourselves to be outraged over more clearly unjust things
As much as we don't like it, was too the letter of the law!!!!!
Move on!!!!!
Rance;
Cox;
Fyfe;
Burton;
Mitchell;
...?
It is not this incident that I find offensive - it is the one rule for some teams - another for St Kilda
Anyway, I blame our defensive coach (Spud), if he wasn't constantly encouraging/rewarding the old 'Ear Massage' on Bounce, Jake may have spoiled correctly!!!!!
Move on, get some more games/experience into the younger guys!!!!!
Appreciate your loyalty and opinion though Dad!!!!!
It is not about getting Jake off any more - I would be pissed if the roles were reversed and nothing happened - oh wait that has been the case.
My major bone of contention is that we have been taking it for long enough - the AFL wants to make a stance on something - lets do it to St Kilda!!!!!
I did not think that Fyfe should go for what he did to Carlisle - but the result was the same so therefore it must be the intent that Jake took into the action that got him looked at. I saw a clumsy spoil - with the intent of punching the ball - so nope - no illegal act there, whereas Mason Cox can intentionally bump and almost hit the head, or Ryan Burton can clean a guy up and that is all in the 'spirit' of the game.
The AFL can go and get stuffed as far as I am concerned. This s*** about having one MRO instead of a panel can get f@rked. One person cannot bring a discussion to the table - so you get one point of view - one bias.
I want the MRP bought back, and to be formed by people who understand due process:
In my simple thoughts the following is the process that needs to be followed:
1. Was there an action to be reviewed?
2. What was the intent?
3. Is the intent reportable?
4. What was the result of the action?
On the above:
1 - Yes (due to Jack being concussed)
2 - To spoil the ball
3 - No
Therefore no further action.
On Tom Mitchell
1 - Yes - He clearly swung an elbow
2 - To injury or hurt
3 - Yes
4 - No injury - fine.
On Mason Cox:
1 - Yes - bump to the head/neck area
2 - To bump head high
3 - Yes
4 - No injury - fine
On Nat Fyfe:
1 - Yes - Carlisle was knocked out
2 - To attempt to get the ball
3 - No
It is a simple formula but one that is driven by intent (as evidenced by the action. If clumsiness if a crime then we need to get rid of the spoil, bump, tackle.
You watch next week one of our guys will be hurt from a spoil/tunnel and it will be 'Nothing to see hear - move on' Especially seeing that we are playing in the West!!!!
“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2060
- Joined: Fri 07 Jun 2013 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 217 times
- Been thanked: 343 times
Re: Carlisle
Meanwhile, I see on the AFL site that in fact, if anyone ought to have a gripe against the umps - it's Richmond!
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2018-05-30/f ... es-em-away
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2018-05-30/f ... es-em-away
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13779
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1313 times
- Been thanked: 2050 times
Re: Carlisle
For once Stoney I agree with everything you say!stonecold wrote: ↑Wed 30 May 2018 10:25amI don't think that is the case, (on my opinion), personally I don't think Fyfe did anything wrong (total accident, if you off your red, white and black goggles), haven't really seen enough of the others!!!!!Sainter_Dad wrote: ↑Wed 30 May 2018 10:15amI agree that it was the letter of the law - but should not the smae be said of:stonecold wrote: ↑Wed 30 May 2018 10:02amYes, this, Jake would have got lucky to get it reduced to a week!!!!!Moods wrote: ↑Tue 29 May 2018 11:42pm Gotta say - I'm surprised by the uproar. He clearly hit him in the head. Riewoldt was clearly concussed. He was always going to get weeks. It was careless at best, reckless at worst. I reckon we move on and set ourselves to be outraged over more clearly unjust things
As much as we don't like it, was too the letter of the law!!!!!
Move on!!!!!
Rance;
Cox;
Fyfe;
Burton;
Mitchell;
...?
It is not this incident that I find offensive - it is the one rule for some teams - another for St Kilda
Anyway, I blame our defensive coach (Spud), if he wasn't constantly encouraging/rewarding the old 'Ear Massage' on Bounce, Jake may have spoiled correctly!!!!!
Move on, get some more games/experience into the younger guys!!!!!
Appreciate your loyalty and opinion though Dad!!!!!
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3950
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2015 3:12pm
- Has thanked: 372 times
- Been thanked: 214 times
Re: Carlisle
The_Dud wrote: ↑Wed 30 May 2018 11:28amFor once Stoney I agree with everything you say!stonecold wrote: ↑Wed 30 May 2018 10:25amI don't think that is the case, (on my opinion), personally I don't think Fyfe did anything wrong (total accident, if you off your red, white and black goggles), haven't really seen enough of the others!!!!!Sainter_Dad wrote: ↑Wed 30 May 2018 10:15amI agree that it was the letter of the law - but should not the smae be said of:stonecold wrote: ↑Wed 30 May 2018 10:02amYes, this, Jake would have got lucky to get it reduced to a week!!!!!Moods wrote: ↑Tue 29 May 2018 11:42pm Gotta say - I'm surprised by the uproar. He clearly hit him in the head. Riewoldt was clearly concussed. He was always going to get weeks. It was careless at best, reckless at worst. I reckon we move on and set ourselves to be outraged over more clearly unjust things
As much as we don't like it, was too the letter of the law!!!!!
Move on!!!!!
Rance;
Cox;
Fyfe;
Burton;
Mitchell;
...?
It is not this incident that I find offensive - it is the one rule for some teams - another for St Kilda
Anyway, I blame our defensive coach (Spud), if he wasn't constantly encouraging/rewarding the old 'Ear Massage' on Bounce, Jake may have spoiled correctly!!!!!
Move on, get some more games/experience into the younger guys!!!!!
Appreciate your loyalty and opinion though Dad!!!!!
No, I think that's twice now!!!!!
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
And don't make a habit of it!!!!!
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
Last edited by stonecold on Wed 30 May 2018 12:52pm, edited 1 time in total.
'Cause StoneCold Said So'!!!!!
We will be great again once Billy is back playing!!!!!
The 'Last Post', it's the gift that keeps giving![📯](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f4ef.svg)
![📯](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f4ef.svg)
![📯](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f4ef.svg)
![📯](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f4ef.svg)
![📯](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f4ef.svg)
We will be great again once Billy is back playing!!!!!
The 'Last Post', it's the gift that keeps giving
- asiu
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10313
- Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
- Has thanked: 1327 times
- Been thanked: 932 times
Re: Carlisle
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
![Image](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_iUpoNBZyaBc/R0zVk-1LCZI/AAAAAAAAAg0/9eeT7D6cnaA/s320/compass-blu-265x220.gif)
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.
.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.