Umpire treatment of our key forwards

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
kosifantutti
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8581
Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
Location: Back in town
Has thanked: 526 times
Been thanked: 1527 times

Re: Umpire treatment of our key forwards

Post: # 1574906Post kosifantutti »

Mr Magic wrote:
kosifantutti wrote:Bannister also says that "he was going for the ball and you've taken his head off" which again refers to his right arm, not the arm he spoiled with.

If he thought that second contact was accidental, it would still be a free. If you are spoiling with one arm and your other arm makes contact with the head it should be a free.*

* Does not apply to Riewoldt or Bruce
I agree 100%
which makes the non=decision to Sinclair even more puzzling.

It was interesting watching Fox Footy's Close Encounters this morning _Saints vs Geelong 2011 to see the 'old interpretation' of 'ducking the head' being rewarded with a 'too high contact' free kick.
I just watched the Sam Day incident. Totally accidental just like the Sinclair one. No free kick paid and not one of the commentators even mentioned the possibility of a free kick.


Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
Post Reply