Tim Taranto Footy Classified

[sks023]

Throws some names up for some of the speculation above :

- Defenders - Webster /Long . Long tough and breaks lines but disposal and decision making ?? - would be ready made replacement for Saad.
- Carlisle - GWs would be interested as Davis cannot stay on the filed more than 3 games in a row and is getting on. Lost Shaw and without Davis lacks leadership down back
- Lonie - got to give to get. Probably bets season so far but Butler ahead of him comfortably. Have Gresham to come back also who cans wing between on ball and forward .
- Dunstan - Grunt player GWS needs rather than a midfield of Ferraris. Would help guys like Kelly from getting smashed week in week out.

Just throwing up some names which could bring in specific needs identified talent.

Got to give to get

Throwing Longs name up....REALLY!
That's insane!
82% disposal eff

Don't rate his decision making under pressure, glad to be proved wrong .

Your making the claim so the burden is on you to provide the proof

Without weighing in on the topic, he’s presenting it as an opinion as opposed to a fact...
Given that it’s a subjective topic, hows he supposed to prove it?


Exactly!, So why is he asking to be proved wrong ?
He questioned Longs disposal yet he goes at 82%. That's not subjective it's a fact
Think someone needs to go to spec savers [ a subjective opinion }

Couldn't help but get personal but that's fine, what ever floats your boat.
I said decision making as well as disposal. Lets look at how they get efficient disposal stat- If the ball doesn't go to the opposition it is efficient. Carlisle last night at one stage had 100% efficiency yet 2 of his kicks landed short of their targets, so that stat however is still considered efficient.

How do I prove decision making , not sure. Like someone pointed out it is an opinion - and like a part of the anatomy we all have one , just some think theirs is better than others.

Ok! fine I except your opinion. Now getting back to facts, Long is 22yrs old and required player who's going to be playing with STK in the foreseeable future

[older saint]

Throws some names up for some of the speculation above :

- Defenders - Webster /Long . Long tough and breaks lines but disposal and decision making ?? - would be ready made replacement for Saad.
- Carlisle - GWs would be interested as Davis cannot stay on the filed more than 3 games in a row and is getting on. Lost Shaw and without Davis lacks leadership down back
- Lonie - got to give to get. Probably bets season so far but Butler ahead of him comfortably. Have Gresham to come back also who cans wing between on ball and forward .
- Dunstan - Grunt player GWS needs rather than a midfield of Ferraris. Would help guys like Kelly from getting smashed week in week out.

Just throwing up some names which could bring in specific needs identified talent.

Got to give to get

Throwing Longs name up....REALLY!
That's insane!
82% disposal eff

Don't rate his decision making under pressure, glad to be proved wrong .

Your making the claim so the burden is on you to provide the proof

Without weighing in on the topic, he’s presenting it as an opinion as opposed to a fact...
Given that it’s a subjective topic, hows he supposed to prove it?


Exactly!, So why is he asking to be proved wrong ?
He questioned Longs disposal yet he goes at 82%. That's not subjective it's a fact
Think someone needs to go to spec savers [ a subjective opinion }

Couldn't help but get personal but that's fine, what ever floats your boat.
I said decision making as well as disposal. Lets look at how they get efficient disposal stat- If the ball doesn't go to the opposition it is efficient. Carlisle last night at one stage had 100% efficiency yet 2 of his kicks landed short of their targets, so that stat however is still considered efficient.

How do I prove decision making , not sure. Like someone pointed out it is an opinion - and like a part of the anatomy we all have one , just some think theirs is better than others.

Ok! fine I except your opinion. Now getting back to facts, Long is 22yrs old and required player who's going to be playing with STK in the foreseeable future

Most likely yes, but if GWs said we want first rounder, Long for Taranto I would think not too many would say no.

[sks023]

Throws some names up for some of the speculation above :

- Defenders - Webster /Long . Long tough and breaks lines but disposal and decision making ?? - would be ready made replacement for Saad.
- Carlisle - GWs would be interested as Davis cannot stay on the filed more than 3 games in a row and is getting on. Lost Shaw and without Davis lacks leadership down back
- Lonie - got to give to get. Probably bets season so far but Butler ahead of him comfortably. Have Gresham to come back also who cans wing between on ball and forward .
- Dunstan - Grunt player GWS needs rather than a midfield of Ferraris. Would help guys like Kelly from getting smashed week in week out.

Just throwing up some names which could bring in specific needs identified talent.

Got to give to get

Throwing Longs name up....REALLY!
That's insane!
82% disposal eff

Don't rate his decision making under pressure, glad to be proved wrong .

Your making the claim so the burden is on you to provide the proof

Without weighing in on the topic, he’s presenting it as an opinion as opposed to a fact...
Given that it’s a subjective topic, hows he supposed to prove it?


Exactly!, So why is he asking to be proved wrong ?
He questioned Longs disposal yet he goes at 82%. That's not subjective it's a fact
Think someone needs to go to spec savers [ a subjective opinion }

Couldn't help but get personal but that's fine, what ever floats your boat.
I said decision making as well as disposal. Lets look at how they get efficient disposal stat- If the ball doesn't go to the opposition it is efficient. Carlisle last night at one stage had 100% efficiency yet 2 of his kicks landed short of their targets, so that stat however is still considered efficient.

How do I prove decision making , not sure. Like someone pointed out it is an opinion - and like a part of the anatomy we all have one , just some think theirs is better than others.

Ok! fine I except your opinion. Now getting back to facts, Long is 22yrs old and required player who's going to be playing with STK in the foreseeable future

Most likely yes, but if GWs said we want first rounder, Long for Taranto I would think not too many would say no.

I must be the exception
Taranto is a soft pretty boy If you ask me and I would not trade one Ben Long for two Taranto's