older saint wrote: ↑Sun 04 Oct 2020 3:46pmOk! fine I except your opinion. Now getting back to facts, Long is 22yrs old and required player who's going to be playing with STK in the foreseeable futuresks023 wrote: ↑Fri 02 Oct 2020 6:13pmCouldn't help but get personal but that's fine, what ever floats your boat.skeptic wrote: ↑Fri 02 Oct 2020 6:01pmWithout weighing in on the topic, he’s presenting it as an opinion as opposed to a fact...sks023 wrote: ↑Fri 02 Oct 2020 5:35pmYour making the claim so the burden is on you to provide the proofolder saint wrote: ↑Fri 02 Oct 2020 4:00pmDon't rate his decision making under pressure, glad to be proved wrong .sks023 wrote: ↑Fri 02 Oct 2020 11:10amThrowing Longs name up....REALLY!older saint wrote: ↑Fri 02 Oct 2020 10:53am Throws some names up for some of the speculation above :
- Defenders - Webster /Long . Long tough and breaks lines but disposal and decision making ?? - would be ready made replacement for Saad.
- Carlisle - GWs would be interested as Davis cannot stay on the filed more than 3 games in a row and is getting on. Lost Shaw and without Davis lacks leadership down back
- Lonie - got to give to get. Probably bets season so far but Butler ahead of him comfortably. Have Gresham to come back also who cans wing between on ball and forward .
- Dunstan - Grunt player GWS needs rather than a midfield of Ferraris. Would help guys like Kelly from getting smashed week in week out.
Just throwing up some names which could bring in specific needs identified talent.
Got to give to get
That's insane!
82% disposal eff![]()
Given that it’s a subjective topic, hows he supposed to prove it?
Exactly!, So why is he asking to be proved wrong ?
He questioned Longs disposal yet he goes at 82%. That's not subjective it's a fact
Think someone needs to go to spec savers [ a subjective opinion }
I said decision making as well as disposal. Lets look at how they get efficient disposal stat- If the ball doesn't go to the opposition it is efficient. Carlisle last night at one stage had 100% efficiency yet 2 of his kicks landed short of their targets, so that stat however is still considered efficient.
How do I prove decision making , not sure. Like someone pointed out it is an opinion - and like a part of the anatomy we all have one , just some think theirs is better than others.
Tim Taranto Footy Classified
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 557
- Joined: Tue 08 May 2018 3:43pm
- Has thanked: 410 times
- Been thanked: 111 times
Re: Tim Taranto Footy Classified
Look out kids, they keep it all hid
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3353
- Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
- Has thanked: 169 times
- Been thanked: 516 times
Re: Tim Taranto Footy Classified
sks023 wrote: ↑Sun 04 Oct 2020 5:54pmMost likely yes, but if GWs said we want first rounder, Long for Taranto I would think not too many would say no.older saint wrote: ↑Sun 04 Oct 2020 3:46pmOk! fine I except your opinion. Now getting back to facts, Long is 22yrs old and required player who's going to be playing with STK in the foreseeable futuresks023 wrote: ↑Fri 02 Oct 2020 6:13pmCouldn't help but get personal but that's fine, what ever floats your boat.skeptic wrote: ↑Fri 02 Oct 2020 6:01pmWithout weighing in on the topic, he’s presenting it as an opinion as opposed to a fact...sks023 wrote: ↑Fri 02 Oct 2020 5:35pmYour making the claim so the burden is on you to provide the proofolder saint wrote: ↑Fri 02 Oct 2020 4:00pmDon't rate his decision making under pressure, glad to be proved wrong .sks023 wrote: ↑Fri 02 Oct 2020 11:10amThrowing Longs name up....REALLY!older saint wrote: ↑Fri 02 Oct 2020 10:53am Throws some names up for some of the speculation above :
- Defenders - Webster /Long . Long tough and breaks lines but disposal and decision making ?? - would be ready made replacement for Saad.
- Carlisle - GWs would be interested as Davis cannot stay on the filed more than 3 games in a row and is getting on. Lost Shaw and without Davis lacks leadership down back
- Lonie - got to give to get. Probably bets season so far but Butler ahead of him comfortably. Have Gresham to come back also who cans wing between on ball and forward .
- Dunstan - Grunt player GWS needs rather than a midfield of Ferraris. Would help guys like Kelly from getting smashed week in week out.
Just throwing up some names which could bring in specific needs identified talent.
Got to give to get
That's insane!
82% disposal eff![]()
Given that it’s a subjective topic, hows he supposed to prove it?
Exactly!, So why is he asking to be proved wrong ?
He questioned Longs disposal yet he goes at 82%. That's not subjective it's a fact
Think someone needs to go to spec savers [ a subjective opinion }
I said decision making as well as disposal. Lets look at how they get efficient disposal stat- If the ball doesn't go to the opposition it is efficient. Carlisle last night at one stage had 100% efficiency yet 2 of his kicks landed short of their targets, so that stat however is still considered efficient.
How do I prove decision making , not sure. Like someone pointed out it is an opinion - and like a part of the anatomy we all have one , just some think theirs is better than others.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 557
- Joined: Tue 08 May 2018 3:43pm
- Has thanked: 410 times
- Been thanked: 111 times
Re: Tim Taranto Footy Classified
older saint wrote: ↑Mon 05 Oct 2020 9:02amI must be the exceptionsks023 wrote: ↑Sun 04 Oct 2020 5:54pmMost likely yes, but if GWs said we want first rounder, Long for Taranto I would think not too many would say no.older saint wrote: ↑Sun 04 Oct 2020 3:46pmOk! fine I except your opinion. Now getting back to facts, Long is 22yrs old and required player who's going to be playing with STK in the foreseeable futuresks023 wrote: ↑Fri 02 Oct 2020 6:13pmCouldn't help but get personal but that's fine, what ever floats your boat.skeptic wrote: ↑Fri 02 Oct 2020 6:01pmWithout weighing in on the topic, he’s presenting it as an opinion as opposed to a fact...sks023 wrote: ↑Fri 02 Oct 2020 5:35pmYour making the claim so the burden is on you to provide the proofolder saint wrote: ↑Fri 02 Oct 2020 4:00pmDon't rate his decision making under pressure, glad to be proved wrong .sks023 wrote: ↑Fri 02 Oct 2020 11:10amThrowing Longs name up....REALLY!older saint wrote: ↑Fri 02 Oct 2020 10:53am Throws some names up for some of the speculation above :
- Defenders - Webster /Long . Long tough and breaks lines but disposal and decision making ?? - would be ready made replacement for Saad.
- Carlisle - GWs would be interested as Davis cannot stay on the filed more than 3 games in a row and is getting on. Lost Shaw and without Davis lacks leadership down back
- Lonie - got to give to get. Probably bets season so far but Butler ahead of him comfortably. Have Gresham to come back also who cans wing between on ball and forward .
- Dunstan - Grunt player GWS needs rather than a midfield of Ferraris. Would help guys like Kelly from getting smashed week in week out.
Just throwing up some names which could bring in specific needs identified talent.
Got to give to get
That's insane!
82% disposal eff![]()
Given that it’s a subjective topic, hows he supposed to prove it?
Exactly!, So why is he asking to be proved wrong ?
He questioned Longs disposal yet he goes at 82%. That's not subjective it's a fact
Think someone needs to go to spec savers [ a subjective opinion }
I said decision making as well as disposal. Lets look at how they get efficient disposal stat- If the ball doesn't go to the opposition it is efficient. Carlisle last night at one stage had 100% efficiency yet 2 of his kicks landed short of their targets, so that stat however is still considered efficient.
How do I prove decision making , not sure. Like someone pointed out it is an opinion - and like a part of the anatomy we all have one , just some think theirs is better than others.
Taranto is a soft pretty boy If you ask me and I would not trade one Ben Long for two Taranto's
Look out kids, they keep it all hid