Armo
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Armo
Didn't get to watch the game (fortunately it seems).
I noticed Armo and Blake topped the DreamTeam points for our team.
Does this reflect how he really went on the day? Was he any good? Worth keeping next week?
Feel free to comment on Blake as well.
I noticed Armo and Blake topped the DreamTeam points for our team.
Does this reflect how he really went on the day? Was he any good? Worth keeping next week?
Feel free to comment on Blake as well.
Armo was our 7th highest DT scorer and our 11th highest Super Coach scorer.
The supercoach scores are in fact the Champion data ranking points, and they take into acount a whole heap of things such has efficiency, effectives, turnovers, hardball gets, ect. So it is a more realist judge of how a player performed.
Arm was good, but he has played better in the past. Certainly not one of our best for mine.
The supercoach scores are in fact the Champion data ranking points, and they take into acount a whole heap of things such has efficiency, effectives, turnovers, hardball gets, ect. So it is a more realist judge of how a player performed.
Arm was good, but he has played better in the past. Certainly not one of our best for mine.
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11235
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 119 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11235
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 119 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11235
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 119 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
Mini keeps getting selected. I didn't see anything today to suggest he did anything different. Ross loves Mini. Ross does not like Armo.Moccha wrote:You obviously didn't watch the gameBernard Shakey wrote:Why?saintkid wrote:Well if he goes then McQualter has to go too.Bernard Shakey wrote:He won't play next week.
Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
With that theory in mind how will Zac miss out?Bernard Shakey wrote:Mini keeps getting selected. I didn't see anything today to suggest he did anything different. Ross loves Mini. Ross does not like Armo.Moccha wrote:You obviously didn't watch the gameBernard Shakey wrote:Why?saintkid wrote:Well if he goes then McQualter has to go too.Bernard Shakey wrote:He won't play next week.
- DWOODROW
- Club Player
- Posts: 1123
- Joined: Tue 10 Feb 2009 4:36pm
- Location: TOWNSVILLE
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 38 times
He was s*** along with Roo, kosi, Mcqualter,dawson,gwilt,miles,fisher,gilbert, geary,mcevoy, take your pick.
How do I come up with this you ask.
Well out of our so called best in the team, who stood out yesterday. While Hayes, Dal and Montagna got the possesions on the board they didn't seem to impact on the game. I must be blind but I couldn't even remeber seeing Dal that much let Jones who came away with 20 disposals.
While I think there will be some changes I don't think Armo will make way. He has been out for alot of weeks and is getting better.
It was a crap game and a few have to lift. Not the end of the world though. Geelong next week will be interesting.
The question is will we have a strong team.
How do I come up with this you ask.
Well out of our so called best in the team, who stood out yesterday. While Hayes, Dal and Montagna got the possesions on the board they didn't seem to impact on the game. I must be blind but I couldn't even remeber seeing Dal that much let Jones who came away with 20 disposals.
While I think there will be some changes I don't think Armo will make way. He has been out for alot of weeks and is getting better.
It was a crap game and a few have to lift. Not the end of the world though. Geelong next week will be interesting.
The question is will we have a strong team.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1105
- Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 12:29am
- Location: everywhere
- Has thanked: 47 times
- Been thanked: 74 times
Thought he wass passable and did a lot of heavy inside work - certainly not our worst and would be stiff to miss out next week. But he does often seem to be on the first out list ?????? I assume the the cat (S.D) will probably use up another of his 9 lives and stay in.
We had a lot of ordinary players.
We had a lot of ordinary players.
Very very difficult to rate most of the 22 on this performance. Only four earned their pay in my opinion: Goddard,Hayes, Blake and Montagna. The main concern is whether the whole group has enough focus left to become positive in a week before we take on the Cats after such a poor display. RL has admitted they were trying to avoid injury. I have always believed that is when you run into them.
The only impression I gained was that it was a training run to sharpen up our handball.![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
The only impression I gained was that it was a training run to sharpen up our handball.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
A Saint Forever!
They will have to be judged though, because there are players banging on the door who will be definite ins. Milne, Schneider. And some with a strong chance. Eddy, Baker.Duggie wrote:Very very difficult to rate most of the 22 on this performance. Only four earned their pay in my opinion: Goddard,Hayes, Blake and Montagna. The main concern is whether the whole group has enough focus left to become positive in a week before we take on the Cats after such a poor display. RL has admitted they were trying to avoid injury. I have always believed that is when you run into them.![]()
The only impression I gained was that it was a training run to sharpen up our handball.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23208
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 735 times
- Been thanked: 1776 times
His inside tackling intensity could be very needed against Cats.
That said.....if he goes missinbg for long periods he's a liability.
That said.....he can jag a goal.....could he be a sneaky fwd optuion?
That said his ability to run/put immediate fwd pressure on opposition fwds isnt as good as say an Eddy who runs like a mad man at you.
That said, Im confused.
That said.....if he goes missinbg for long periods he's a liability.
That said.....he can jag a goal.....could he be a sneaky fwd optuion?
That said his ability to run/put immediate fwd pressure on opposition fwds isnt as good as say an Eddy who runs like a mad man at you.
That said, Im confused.
“Yeah….nah””
Eddy vs ArmoTeflon wrote:His inside tackling intensity could be very needed against Cats.
That said.....if he goes missinbg for long periods he's a liability.
That said.....he can jag a goal.....could he be a sneaky fwd optuion?
That said his ability to run/put immediate fwd pressure on opposition fwds isnt as good as say an Eddy who runs like a mad man at you.
That said, Im confused.
On paper, Armo would win hands down. But really it has been question facing the match committee for two years now.
It would seem that when they are both fit, Eddy is the preferred option.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Tue 27 May 2008 6:35pm
On paper means little. Eddy's performances in his previous 2 games before injury were his best for the club. Eddys ferocity at the ball and the opposition are 2nd to none.
That said Armo's done extremely well since returning to the team. His contested ball and takling have been great. Difficult to leave him outve the team.
That said Armo's done extremely well since returning to the team. His contested ball and takling have been great. Difficult to leave him outve the team.
Is there a place for both of them?MadSaintFan wrote:On paper means little. Eddy's performances in his previous 2 games before injury were his best for the club. Eddys ferocity at the ball and the opposition are 2nd to none.
That said Armo's done extremely well since returning to the team. His contested ball and takling have been great. Difficult to leave him outve the team.
At whose expense?
Geary? No, been very solid.
Mcqualter? Definitely. I think Eddy could perform this role better than Mcqualter is doing it at the moment.
Dempster? Yes, however if he is being replaced, it will be by Baker.
- Moccha
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4528
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 3:33pm
- Location: Two Pronged Attack
- Contact:
Definately have to drop McQualter and Dempster. Both were hopeless yesterday. Dempster is an absolute fruit cake. He hasn't got the ability to solve a noughts and crosses puzzle. McQualter just get the footy enough. All he does is chase butt and he's not even good enough for that
Another opportunity awaits!