Some of you posters had a go at me for thinking that Sheahan got it wrong with selecting Kerr @ 18 in his top 50....
Again, he is a dud, he has played well with both Judd and Cousins and was not tagged...
Before this year he has played 22 games in the past two years (half a season) and this year he played just the 4 matches...
Kerr was never going to be @18 of the top 50 and yet some here consider his choice as valid....
Some need a clue IMO, Kerr is and never should be in anyone's top 50...
CJ is far better player than him as far as his value to the side and games played.
The selection of Kerr @ 18 of the top fifty players was always going to be flawed IMO, and those that stood up to Sheaman need to reconsider IMO...
Mike Sheanhan's top 50...
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
St Fidelius
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10492
- Joined: Sun 01 Aug 2004 10:30am
Mike Sheanhan's top 50...
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
Re: Mike Sheanhan's top 50...
St Fidelius wrote:Some of you posters had a go at me for thinking that Sheahan got it wrong with selecting Kerr @ 18 in his top 50....
Again, he is a dud, he has played well with both Judd and Cousins and was not tagged...
Before this year he has played 22 games in the past two years (half a season) and this year he played just the 4 matches...
Kerr was never going to be @18 of the top 50 and yet some here consider his choice as valid....
Some need a clue IMO, Kerr is and never should be in anyone's top 50...
CJ is far better player than him as far as his value to the side and games played.
The selection of Kerr @ 18 of the top fifty players was always going to be flawed IMO, and those that stood up to Sheaman need to reconsider IMO...
So let me get this straight...because he gained a serious season ending injury he isnt good enough for even top 50?
Sorry but Kerr is vital to that eagles midfield and his injury was a massive blow for them. CJ is important in our 22 just like Kerr is to the eagles.
Bit low trying to score points on a guy who has been injured the majority of the season. Would be like saying that based on this year that Jack should be higher than Nick because of the fact that he was able to play more games due to injury. Had Kerr not picked up the injury and played a majority of games then you would be able to adequately compare.
Thats Mr. Smartarse to you
-
kosifantutti23
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2388
- Joined: Fri 26 Sep 2008 12:55am
- Location: Horgen
-
The Linton Street Flash
- Club Player
- Posts: 467
- Joined: Sun 10 Aug 2008 7:42pm
- Has thanked: 75 times
- Been thanked: 99 times
Re: Mike Sheanhan's top 50...
Suddenly - 6 months after Sheahan publishes his list - at 12.24am on Saturday morning - you get the urge to beat your chest about being right about an injured Eagles player...St Fidelius wrote:Some of you posters had a go at me for thinking that Sheahan got it wrong with selecting Kerr @ 18 in his top 50....
Again, he is a dud, he has played well with both Judd and Cousins and was not tagged...
Before this year he has played 22 games in the past two years (half a season) and this year he played just the 4 matches...
Kerr was never going to be @18 of the top 50 and yet some here consider his choice as valid....
Some need a clue IMO, Kerr is and never should be in anyone's top 50...
CJ is far better player than him as far as his value to the side and games played.
The selection of Kerr @ 18 of the top fifty players was always going to be flawed IMO, and those that stood up to Sheahan need to reconsider IMO...
What a very strange man you are - them are some very strong drugs your taking my friend!
Aren't you the guy with access to all our Police records?
Oh dear!
Look again it's the Flash!!
-
Thinline
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6043
- Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 5:31pm
- Location: Currumbin, Quoinslairnd
The OP reminds me of The Twilight Zone.
"The inches we need are everywhere around us. They're in every break in the game. Every minute, every second. On this team we fight for that inch. On this team we tear ourselves and everyone around us to pieces for that inch. We claw with our fingernails for that inch. Because we know when we add up all those inches that's gonna make the f***in' difference between winning and losing! Between living and dying!'
-
St Fidelius
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10492
- Joined: Sun 01 Aug 2004 10:30am
Re: Mike Sheanhan's top 50...
Kerr has had injury concerns for the last three years and in those three years he has played 25 games out of a possible 66 matches.The Linton Street Flash wrote:Suddenly - 6 months after Sheahan publishes his list - at 12.24am on Saturday morning - you get the urge to beat your chest about being right about an injured Eagles player...St Fidelius wrote:Some of you posters had a go at me for thinking that Sheahan got it wrong with selecting Kerr @ 18 in his top 50....
Again, he is a dud, he has played well with both Judd and Cousins and was not tagged...
Before this year he has played 22 games in the past two years (half a season) and this year he played just the 4 matches...
Kerr was never going to be @18 of the top 50 and yet some here consider his choice as valid....
Some need a clue IMO, Kerr is and never should be in anyone's top 50...
CJ is far better player than him as far as his value to the side and games played.
The selection of Kerr @ 18 of the top fifty players was always going to be flawed IMO, and those that stood up to Sheahan need to reconsider IMO...
What a very strange man you are - them are some very strong drugs your taking my friend!
Aren't you the guy with access to all our Police records?
Oh dear!
He was never going to be the 18th best player in the AFL.
Blind Freddie could see that and yet some on here thought he deserved the 18th best player in the AFL.
He has fallen away ever since both Cousins and Judd left and cant handle a tag and his injuries have been a concern over the last 3 years.
I really don't see why you have commented about police records as it has nothing to do with this matter
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
-
Thinline
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6043
- Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 5:31pm
- Location: Currumbin, Quoinslairnd
Other than a quest for a prize for absolute randomness, what is the point of this thread? I'm genuinely intrigued...
"The inches we need are everywhere around us. They're in every break in the game. Every minute, every second. On this team we fight for that inch. On this team we tear ourselves and everyone around us to pieces for that inch. We claw with our fingernails for that inch. Because we know when we add up all those inches that's gonna make the f***in' difference between winning and losing! Between living and dying!'
-
St Fidelius
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10492
- Joined: Sun 01 Aug 2004 10:30am
People get paid a decent sum of money for their comments about football related comments and some are way off the mark IMO.Thinline wrote:Other than a quest for a prize for absolute randomness, what is the point of this thread? I'm genuinely intrigued...
A few years ago Sheedy even listed Kerr in his best aboriginal side, not even realising he was born in Sri Lanka.
We all read some dribble from these so called experts who again get paid for their opinions, but again some are way off the mark IMO.
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
Its called opinion. I bet there are others that shouldnt have made the top 50 in hindsight as well. How come you didnt guess that they wouldnt be good enough either. IMO this thread is stupid but of course that is only my opinion so it could be wrong.St Fidelius wrote:People get paid a decent sum of money for their comments about football related comments and some are way off the mark IMO.Thinline wrote:Other than a quest for a prize for absolute randomness, what is the point of this thread? I'm genuinely intrigued...
A few years ago Sheedy even listed Kerr in his best aboriginal side, not even realising he was born in Sri Lanka.
We all read some dribble from these so called experts who again get paid for their opinions, but again some are way off the mark IMO.
What upsets me about these guys who comment on footy and get paid so well is that none of them have got every winner right in every round of footy. They get paid enough to do that surely.
-
saint vince
- Club Player
- Posts: 538
- Joined: Mon 01 Sep 2008 10:46pm
Strange topic to bring up I would have thought.plugger66 wrote:Its called opinion. I bet there are others that shouldnt have made the top 50 in hindsight as well. How come you didnt guess that they wouldnt be good enough either. IMO this thread is stupid but of course that is only my opinion so it could be wrong.St Fidelius wrote:People get paid a decent sum of money for their comments about football related comments and some are way off the mark IMO.Thinline wrote:Other than a quest for a prize for absolute randomness, what is the point of this thread? I'm genuinely intrigued...
A few years ago Sheedy even listed Kerr in his best aboriginal side, not even realising he was born in Sri Lanka.
We all read some dribble from these so called experts who again get paid for their opinions, but again some are way off the mark IMO.
What upsets me about these guys who comment on footy and get paid so well is that none of them have got every winner right in every round of footy. They get paid enough to do that surely.
-
St Fidelius
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10492
- Joined: Sun 01 Aug 2004 10:30am
It's not just the top 50 but the 18th best player in the league...plugger66 wrote:Its called opinion. I bet there are others that shouldnt have made the top 50 in hindsight as well. How come you didnt guess that they wouldnt be good enough either. IMO this thread is stupid but of course that is only my opinion so it could be wrong.St Fidelius wrote:People get paid a decent sum of money for their comments about football related comments and some are way off the mark IMO.Thinline wrote:Other than a quest for a prize for absolute randomness, what is the point of this thread? I'm genuinely intrigued...
A few years ago Sheedy even listed Kerr in his best aboriginal side, not even realising he was born in Sri Lanka.
We all read some dribble from these so called experts who again get paid for their opinions, but again some are way off the mark IMO.
What upsets me about these guys who comment on footy and get paid so well is that none of them have got every winner right in every round of footy. They get paid enough to do that surely.
Again, his opinion was flawed considering he played 22 games in two years and now just 4 this year.
He had Scott Pendlebury @ 32, Leigh Montagna @ 34 and Dane Swan @35.
Again blind Freddie should have known that Kerr was never going to be @ 18...
Maybe because I have never rated him
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
He also had Rooy at 2 I think. He will not even make his top 50 probably.St Fidelius wrote:It's not just the top 50 but the 18th best player in the league...plugger66 wrote:Its called opinion. I bet there are others that shouldnt have made the top 50 in hindsight as well. How come you didnt guess that they wouldnt be good enough either. IMO this thread is stupid but of course that is only my opinion so it could be wrong.St Fidelius wrote:People get paid a decent sum of money for their comments about football related comments and some are way off the mark IMO.Thinline wrote:Other than a quest for a prize for absolute randomness, what is the point of this thread? I'm genuinely intrigued...
A few years ago Sheedy even listed Kerr in his best aboriginal side, not even realising he was born in Sri Lanka.
We all read some dribble from these so called experts who again get paid for their opinions, but again some are way off the mark IMO.
What upsets me about these guys who comment on footy and get paid so well is that none of them have got every winner right in every round of footy. They get paid enough to do that surely.
Again, his opinion was flawed considering he played 22 games in two years and now just 4 this year.
He had Scott Pendlebury @ 32, Leigh Montagna @ 34 and Dane Swan @35.
Again blind Freddie should have known that Kerr was never going to be @ 18...
Maybe because I have never rated him
-
saint vince
- Club Player
- Posts: 538
- Joined: Mon 01 Sep 2008 10:46pm
He doesnt get paid to get his top 50 exactly right like Sheahan does. I suppose Kerr did play 3 games and one quarter this year so he should still be 18 in the top 50 if he played really well in those games.saint vince wrote:St.Fid can you post your top 50 from the start of the year. I would be interested to see how it went.
-
saintsfooty
- Club Player
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Sun 15 Aug 2010 1:40pm
-
Spinner
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8502
- Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
- Location: Victoria
- Has thanked: 185 times
- Been thanked: 133 times
Re: Mike Sheanhan's top 50...
This is potentially the worst post I have read on this site - but it does serve some purposes.St Fidelius wrote:Some of you posters had a go at me for thinking that Sheahan got it wrong with selecting Kerr @ 18 in his top 50....
Again, he is a dud, he has played well with both Judd and Cousins and was not tagged...
Before this year he has played 22 games in the past two years (half a season) and this year he played just the 4 matches...
Kerr was never going to be @18 of the top 50 and yet some here consider his choice as valid....
Some need a clue IMO, Kerr is and never should be in anyone's top 50...
CJ is far better player than him as far as his value to the side and games played.
The selection of Kerr @ 18 of the top fifty players was always going to be flawed IMO, and those that stood up to Sheaman need to reconsider IMO...
1 - A clear illustration of the posters lack of knowledge and appreciation of opposition players and talent.
2 - The unnessessary need to justify opinions made by posters months ago. Thoughts and opinions on a topic that was so insignificant.
3 - A clear indication of how quickly people forget and put down players when they surcumb to injury.
And kerr is a better player than CJ every day of the week. And I rate CJ.