Paul Chapman vs Liam Picken
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 553
- Joined: Mon 04 Aug 2008 7:46pm
- Been thanked: 7 times
Paul Chapman vs Liam Picken
I know this isn't a direct saints blog but it is saints related. I just watched Paul Chapman going hard at Liam Picken from the bulldogs, similar to the Baker Johnson incidents. He better get sited for something and get some weeks for going for an attack on a player off the ball or it is a joke even though we know it is a joke already! Chapman was doing nothing different to what Baker was doing to Johnson? Lets see what happens?
When Harvey played his first game in 1988, I was a 12yo wearing short pants and struggling with my readin', writin' and 'rithmetic in grade eight. Now, I'm a father of three and a retired AFL player. And he's still going. Amazing! - Michael Voss
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23218
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 735 times
- Been thanked: 1778 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1165
- Joined: Tue 11 Apr 2006 9:45pm
- Location: Tassies Wild West
- Been thanked: 1 time
think you will get your wish there too,...maybe 2 weeks though...jonesy wrote:Picken deserves a month off after his dog act on Selwood also.
Dogs are pathetic,flat track bullies,soft as butter,pathetic fragile group
.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11237
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 121 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
Re: Paul Chapman vs Liam Picken
Nothing head high, so nothing to answer for.R. Harvey 3 votes! wrote:I know this isn't a direct saints blog but it is saints related. I just watched Paul Chapman going hard at Liam Picken from the bulldogs, similar to the Baker Johnson incidents. He better get sited for something and get some weeks for going for an attack on a player off the ball or it is a joke even though we know it is a joke already! Chapman was doing nothing different to what Baker was doing to Johnson? Lets see what happens?
Bakes plays with bowling balls anyway, so doesn't need the MRP for holidays anymore.
Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7300
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:31am
- Has thanked: 12 times
- Been thanked: 143 times
Re: Paul Chapman vs Liam Picken
2 of bakes shots (charged with) not high (head area)...and did have to answer to MR charge.Bernard Shakey wrote:Nothing head high, so nothing to answer for.R. Harvey 3 votes! wrote:I know this isn't a direct saints blog but it is saints related. I just watched Paul Chapman going hard at Liam Picken from the bulldogs, similar to the Baker Johnson incidents. He better get sited for something and get some weeks for going for an attack on a player off the ball or it is a joke even though we know it is a joke already! Chapman was doing nothing different to what Baker was doing to Johnson? Lets see what happens?
Bakes plays with bowling balls anyway, so doesn't need the MRP for holidays anymore.
saint4life
In addition I heard on the radio that some carlton players were attacking cousins with his hurt leg?
FQF
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6090
- Joined: Fri 11 Mar 2005 9:18pm
Personally I don’t give stuff about other clubs indiscretions as it doesn’t affect us directly, unless we play them the following week.
All I care about is us winning well this week and doing it with purpose and then moving onto the next game.
It’s all about the St Kilda football club I don’t care about others.
Go Saints - we're moving into the last phase of our season.
All I care about is us winning well this week and doing it with purpose and then moving onto the next game.
It’s all about the St Kilda football club I don’t care about others.
Go Saints - we're moving into the last phase of our season.
- ChicagoSaint
- Club Player
- Posts: 1405
- Joined: Tue 13 Jul 2010 3:15pm
- Location: Seaford
none of bakers were eitherplugger66 wrote:Nothing in the Chapman incident. Not forceful enough contact.
FQF
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6043
- Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 5:31pm
- Location: Currumbin, Quoinslairnd
Perhaps St Kilda should compile a 'highlights' video of Chapman's behaviour off the ball. You know. Just to help out the MRP and the 'process' generally. The AFL can't expect to see everything. Surely we could be of some assistance as a good 'club citizen' and all round champion of the best interests of the game?
"The inches we need are everywhere around us. They're in every break in the game. Every minute, every second. On this team we fight for that inch. On this team we tear ourselves and everyone around us to pieces for that inch. We claw with our fingernails for that inch. Because we know when we add up all those inches that's gonna make the f***in' difference between winning and losing! Between living and dying!'
I don't subscribe to this theory, as it can certainly affect us come finals time if those players have carry-over points. Another minor indiscretion the week before a big final and it could rub them out against us.Pwoit wrote:Personally I don’t give stuff about other clubs indiscretions as it doesn’t affect us directly, unless we play them the following week.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23218
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 735 times
- Been thanked: 1778 times
cheers Mahatma.plugger66 wrote:Probably not but 2 wrongs doesnt make a right.Solar wrote:none of bakers were eitherplugger66 wrote:Nothing in the Chapman incident. Not forceful enough contact.
You keep fighting for the "common good of man" but dont mind the rest of us for pointing out what can only be described as disgraceful hypocrisy.
“Yeah….nah””
Yes it must you feel better thinking the world is against us. Well i'd worry about things the Saints can control like winning the GF.Teflon wrote:cheers Mahatma.plugger66 wrote:Probably not but 2 wrongs doesnt make a right.Solar wrote:none of bakers were eitherplugger66 wrote:Nothing in the Chapman incident. Not forceful enough contact.
You keep fighting for the "common good of man" but dont mind the rest of us for pointing out what can only be described as disgraceful hypocrisy.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5017
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:42am
- Location: Bayside
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 91 times
Well if Chapman missed last year's GF we would have won, but take your point, we won't talk about anything else other than the Saints or what you think is OK.plugger66 wrote:Yes it must you feel better thinking the world is against us. Well i'd worry about things the Saints can control like winning the GF.Teflon wrote:cheers Mahatma.plugger66 wrote:Probably not but 2 wrongs doesnt make a right.Solar wrote:none of bakers were eitherplugger66 wrote:Nothing in the Chapman incident. Not forceful enough contact.
You keep fighting for the "common good of man" but dont mind the rest of us for pointing out what can only be described as disgraceful hypocrisy.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11337
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
- Location: South of Heaven
- Has thanked: 1329 times
- Been thanked: 453 times
Not sure I ever mentioned what others can talk about. I think I only mentioned what is important to me.maverick wrote:Well if Chapman missed last year's GF we would have won, but take your point, we won't talk about anything else other than the Saints or what you think is OK.plugger66 wrote:Yes it must you feel better thinking the world is against us. Well i'd worry about things the Saints can control like winning the GF.Teflon wrote:cheers Mahatma.plugger66 wrote:Probably not but 2 wrongs doesnt make a right.Solar wrote:none of bakers were eitherplugger66 wrote:Nothing in the Chapman incident. Not forceful enough contact.
You keep fighting for the "common good of man" but dont mind the rest of us for pointing out what can only be described as disgraceful hypocrisy.
You got anymore holidays coming up ...? So many more interesting chats when you went away ...plugger66 wrote:Not sure I ever mentioned what others can talk about. I think I only mentioned what is important to me.maverick wrote:Well if Chapman missed last year's GF we would have won, but take your point, we won't talk about anything else other than the Saints or what you think is OK.plugger66 wrote:Yes it must you feel better thinking the world is against us. Well i'd worry about things the Saints can control like winning the GF.Teflon wrote:cheers Mahatma.plugger66 wrote:Probably not but 2 wrongs doesnt make a right.Solar wrote:none of bakers were eitherplugger66 wrote:Nothing in the Chapman incident. Not forceful enough contact.
You keep fighting for the "common good of man" but dont mind the rest of us for pointing out what can only be described as disgraceful hypocrisy.
Jack Newnes happy to be a Saint !!!! PS and to hit a target !!!
No.Middo wrote:You got anymore holidays coming up ...? So many more interesting chats when you went away ...plugger66 wrote:Not sure I ever mentioned what others can talk about. I think I only mentioned what is important to me.maverick wrote:Well if Chapman missed last year's GF we would have won, but take your point, we won't talk about anything else other than the Saints or what you think is OK.plugger66 wrote:Yes it must you feel better thinking the world is against us. Well i'd worry about things the Saints can control like winning the GF.Teflon wrote:cheers Mahatma.plugger66 wrote:Probably not but 2 wrongs doesnt make a right.Solar wrote:none of bakers were eitherplugger66 wrote:Nothing in the Chapman incident. Not forceful enough contact.
You keep fighting for the "common good of man" but dont mind the rest of us for pointing out what can only be described as disgraceful hypocrisy.