MRP- Brown 2 weeks
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- saintbrat
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 44575
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
- Location: saints zone
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 188 times
MRP- Brown 2 weeks
coming through now
Milne- pushing motion no action
just an aside :Waite free again
Milne- pushing motion no action
just an aside :Waite free again
StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
![Image](http://www.saintsmembership.com.au/theme/afl-stkilda/img/how-i-want-to-be.png)
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
![Image](http://www.saintsmembership.com.au/theme/afl-stkilda/img/how-i-want-to-be.png)
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
Re: MRP- Brown 2 weeks
Why would Waite go for that and what do you mean free again.saintbrat wrote:coming through now
Milne- pushing motion no action
just an aside :Waite free again
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1165
- Joined: Tue 11 Apr 2006 9:45pm
- Location: Tassies Wild West
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12775
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 784 times
- Been thanked: 425 times
From the AFL website:-
Maybe he needed to put Dal's nose through the back of his head, because breaking it was only assesed as 'medium impact'?![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
I wonder what Brown needed to do to be charged with 'high impact'?Charges Laid:
Campbell Brown, Hawthorn, has been charged with a level three striking offence against Nick Dal Santo, St Kilda, during the first quarter of the round 17 match between Hawthorn and St Kilda, played at Etihad Stadium on Friday July 23, 2010.
In summary, his previous poor record means that his two-game sanction must remain at two games, even with an early plea.
The incident was assessed as reckless conduct (two points), medium impact (two points) and high contact (two points). This is a total of six activation points, resulting in a classification of a level three offence, drawing 225 demerit points and a two-match sanction. He has an existing bad record of two matches suspended within the last three years, which increases the penalty by 20 per cent to 270 demerit points. An early plea reduces the sanction by 25 per cent to 202.50 points and a two-game sanction.
Maybe he needed to put Dal's nose through the back of his head, because breaking it was only assesed as 'medium impact'?
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6090
- Joined: Fri 11 Mar 2005 9:18pm
Totally agree, MM. Dal looked like he was hit by a truck on Saturday night at the Hall of Fame.Mr Magic wrote:From the AFL website:-
I wonder what Brown needed to do to be charged with 'high impact'?Charges Laid:
Campbell Brown, Hawthorn, has been charged with a level three striking offence against Nick Dal Santo, St Kilda, during the first quarter of the round 17 match between Hawthorn and St Kilda, played at Etihad Stadium on Friday July 23, 2010.
In summary, his previous poor record means that his two-game sanction must remain at two games, even with an early plea.
The incident was assessed as reckless conduct (two points), medium impact (two points) and high contact (two points). This is a total of six activation points, resulting in a classification of a level three offence, drawing 225 demerit points and a two-match sanction. He has an existing bad record of two matches suspended within the last three years, which increases the penalty by 20 per cent to 270 demerit points. An early plea reduces the sanction by 25 per cent to 202.50 points and a two-game sanction.
Maybe he needed to put Dal's nose through the back of his head, because breaking it was only assesed as 'medium impact'?
I reckon the AFL should be cited by the Surface Review Panel. Absolute disgrace on Friday night.
- AlpineStars
- Club Player
- Posts: 492
- Joined: Wed 05 Apr 2006 7:44pm
- Location: Aspendale
- Contact:
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Sun 21 Jun 2009 11:12am
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006 8:34am
- Location: Jurassic Park
- kosifantutti23
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2388
- Joined: Fri 26 Sep 2008 12:55am
- Location: Horgen
Another case of the MRP deciding how many weeks he should get and manipulating the categories until it sounds about right.saintsareprettygoodhey wrote:about right. would've been pretty stiff for him to go for 4 weeks on something that is more reckless than intentional.. though i do hate him.
but medium contact just makes you wonder if brown would've had to kill dal to get high impact :s
Furtius Quo Rdelious
Re: MRP- Brown 2 weeks
plugger66 wrote:Why would Waite go for that and what do you mean free again.saintbrat wrote:coming through now
Milne- pushing motion no action
just an aside :Waite free again
Go back on holidays or where ever you went..
Always the Smart ar#e !!!!!!
PS Brown got 2...ha ha ha
Jack Newnes happy to be a Saint !!!! PS and to hit a target !!!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18599
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1924 times
- Been thanked: 852 times
Re: MRP- Brown 2 weeks
So let me get this right.
Two players with form.
One gets 12 weeks for doing no actual damage.
Another gets two weeks for deliberately and intentionally splattering a ball player's nose right across his face.
Hmmm
Two players with form.
One gets 12 weeks for doing no actual damage.
Another gets two weeks for deliberately and intentionally splattering a ball player's nose right across his face.
Hmmm
He tried to hit him, saying he lined up a nose that wasn't in his field of vision is a bit much. Stupid, deserved two weeks, but didn't deserve more than that. And what's with everyone hating Browny? He's a good character I reckon, and I've got no problem with someone with a bit of mongrel in them. Although I may be a tad biased here.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18599
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1924 times
- Been thanked: 852 times
- degruch
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8948
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
- Location: Croydonia
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
Of course, but not everything that looks like an accident IS an accident, just like a natural arc doesn't look like someone improving their goal-kicking angle by 4 meters...just depends on how you look at it.bigcarl wrote:Make it look like an accidentdegruch wrote:Hmmm...I thought it was impossible to prove Brown deliberately struck NDS?![]()
Doubter should have know better, since when do you need to prove anything with the MRP, they cast judgements according to what papers say, don't they?
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11237
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 121 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6043
- Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 5:31pm
- Location: Currumbin, Quoinslairnd
That's what I thought until I just saw the replay on the tele.Bernard Shakey wrote:Where's plugger66?
Please defend your call of the savage whack being accidental.
I was way, way wrong.
Difference between that and Stevie J on Baker? Zilch.
Should have been 4 wk minimum.
"The inches we need are everywhere around us. They're in every break in the game. Every minute, every second. On this team we fight for that inch. On this team we tear ourselves and everyone around us to pieces for that inch. We claw with our fingernails for that inch. Because we know when we add up all those inches that's gonna make the f***in' difference between winning and losing! Between living and dying!'
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11237
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 121 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
Still haven't heard from the umpires friend.Thinline wrote:That's what I thought until I just saw the replay on the tele.Bernard Shakey wrote:Where's plugger66?
Please defend your call of the savage whack being accidental.
I was way, way wrong.
Difference between that and Stevie J on Baker? Zilch.
Should have been 4 wk minimum.
Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23218
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 735 times
- Been thanked: 1778 times
Just sick of the media hypocrisy and looking after their favorite teams.
Watched Quartermain (whose a monster nerd/flog) whingeing cause poor old Campbell Brown got 2 weeks and the MRP inconsistency.........where was the outcry you pathetic felcher when Baker gets done for supposedly targeting an injured player while others got away with it?
Even Luke Darcy indicated there was no way Browns action was an accident.......pr!ck was lucky for mine absolute fitlhy pr!ck.......yet Baker gets targeted.
If you cant hide/temper your club allegiances get the F@RCK out of the media and stick to your coke fuelled parties you weird little squib.
Watched Quartermain (whose a monster nerd/flog) whingeing cause poor old Campbell Brown got 2 weeks and the MRP inconsistency.........where was the outcry you pathetic felcher when Baker gets done for supposedly targeting an injured player while others got away with it?
Even Luke Darcy indicated there was no way Browns action was an accident.......pr!ck was lucky for mine absolute fitlhy pr!ck.......yet Baker gets targeted.
If you cant hide/temper your club allegiances get the F@RCK out of the media and stick to your coke fuelled parties you weird little squib.
“Yeah….nah””
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11237
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 121 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
Nothing wrong with soft drink, but you'd think someone of his age would have some grog available.Mr Magic wrote:Why not tell us what you really think of Quarterbrain? :)Teflon wrote:
If you cant hide/temper your club allegiances get the F@RCK out of the media and stick to your coke fuelled parties you weird little squib.
Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
- Dis Believer
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5089
- Joined: Sun 28 Mar 2004 1:42pm
- Location: The terraces at Moorabbin, in the pouring rain.......
- Has thanked: 258 times
- Been thanked: 272 times
And you won't - he's as weak as piss............Bernard Shakey wrote:Still haven't heard from the umpires friend.
Conspicuous by his absence when the indefensible S Baker farce was rolled out as well.
Credit him with being smart enough to know when the BS is so deep even he can't wield the AFL issue shovel to any effect.
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11237
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 121 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
Went searching for the incident on the game analyser on the afl website. 2 weeks is very soft. Thought it was accidental in the game but seeing it again shows that was no falling motion and was completly intentional out of frustration. The only accidental part about it was he wouldn't have known where he was hitting Dal but thats no excuse. Should have been high impact no doubt.