Blake Free to Play

saint75 · Post: # 955780Post **saint75** » Mon 12 Jul 2010 6:00pm

Seems Blake is fine to play. Results coming through now. Not sure that he was even looked at.

Cloke - 2 weeks with an early plea

SainterK · Post: # 955781Post **SainterK** » Mon 12 Jul 2010 6:01pm

Awesome, I always argued it wasn't intentional....Cloke's is fair I reckon

saint75 · Post: # 955783Post **saint75** » Mon 12 Jul 2010 6:04pm

14 players find from Brisbane and St Kilda fined for the 'melee'.

My apologies. Blake was looked at. He can accept a reprimand.

SainterK · Post: # 955784Post **SainterK** » Mon 12 Jul 2010 6:05pm

Blake and Gilbert can accept reprimands

chook23 · Post: # 955787Post **chook23** » Mon 12 Jul 2010 6:12pm

Suprised Gilbert even cited.......

but now another carrying the burden of points.......

93.0 pts with a plea

super dooper · Mon 12 Jul 2010 6:18pm

chook23 wrote:Suprised Gilbert even cited.......

but now another carrying the burden of points.......

93.0 pts with a plea

Bit of a concern leading into finals if something was to happen....

Is there anywhere where we can check out of curiosity all the other saints players with points over their head??

Milan Faletic · Mon 12 Jul 2010 6:23pm

saint75 wrote:14 players find from Brisbane and St Kilda fined for the 'melee'.

As Roo said post match, a lot of them played for free tonight!

backit · Post: # 955794Post **backit** » Mon 12 Jul 2010 6:24pm

it was on here a couple of weeks ago, it was a Herald Sun article, only focussing on Saints players, written by Bruce Matthews (I think)

degruch · Post: # 955795Post **degruch** » Mon 12 Jul 2010 6:24pm

Milan Faletic wrote:
saint75 wrote:14 players find from Brisbane and St Kilda fined for the 'melee'.

As Roo said post match, a lot of them played for free tonight!

Was he one of them? Mind you, it'd be a whopper of a fine.

Griggsy · Post: # 955797Post **Griggsy** » Mon 12 Jul 2010 6:27pm

according the AFl website "His teammate Jason Black can also accept a reprimand for tripping Lions player Jack Redden."

IluvHarvey · Post: # 955799Post **IluvHarvey** » Mon 12 Jul 2010 6:29pm

Griggsy wrote:according the AFl website "His teammate Jason Black can also accept a reprimand for tripping Lions player Jack Redden."

.

Awesome so Blake got away with it then?? Rub that Black out he is useless!

degruch · Post: # 955800Post **degruch** » Mon 12 Jul 2010 6:29pm

Griggsy wrote:according the AFl website "His teammate Jason Black can also accept a reprimand for tripping Lions player Jack Redden."

I hope the club appeals, this Jason Black guy is causing all this trouble for us, and he's not even in the team!

The_Merchant · Mon 12 Jul 2010 6:30pm

Dale Thomas not even looked at. Not saying he should have gone, but at least it should have been looked at. If he had the StKilda No.10 on his back they definitely would have at least investigated it.

degruch · Post: # 955804Post **degruch** » Mon 12 Jul 2010 6:31pm

The_Merchant wrote:Dale Thomas not even looked at. Not saying he should have gone, but at least it should have been looked at. If he had the StKilda No.10 on his back they definitely would have at least investigated it.

Maybe they just couldn't believe Daisy Thomas could throw a jumper punch?

Yes, under the Baker Rule, low impact, intentional high contact, 3 weeks.

saintbrat · Post: # 955811Post **saintbrat** » Mon 12 Jul 2010 6:41pm

http://www.saints.com.au/season2010/new ... fault.aspx
EDITED

The AFL Match Review Panel has laid a number of charges following a melee at three quarter time in the match between Brisbane and St Kilda at the Gabba on Saturday night.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>;

Sam Gilbert, St Kilda, has been charged with a Level One engaging in rough conduct offence against Simon Black, Brisbane Lions ''''''In summary, he can accept a reprimand and 93.75 points towards his future record.

Jason Blake, St Kilda, has been charged with a Level One tripping offence against Jack Redden, .

In summary, he can accept a reprimand and 45 points towards his future record with an early plea, due to an existing five-year good record.

Adam Pattison, St Kilda, has been charged with a first offence for engaging in a melee

In summary, he can accept a $1200 sanction with an early plea.

Nick Riewoldt, St Kilda, has been charged with a first offence for engaging in a melee

In summary, he can accept a $1200 sanction with an early plea.

Lenny Hayes, St Kilda, has been charged with a first offence for engaging in a melee

In summary, he can accept a $1200 sanction with an early plea.

Jason Gram, St Kilda, has been charged with a first offence for engaging in a melee

In summary, he can accept a $1200 sanction with an early plea.

Nick Dal Santo, St Kilda, has been charged with a first offence for engaging in a melee
In summary, he can accept a $1200 sanction with an early plea.

Sam Fisher, St Kilda, has been charged with a first offence for engaging in a melee .

In summary, he can accept a $1200 sanction with an early plea.

Andrew McQualter, St Kilda, has been charged with a first offence for engaging in a melee

In summary, he can accept a $1200 sanction with an early plea.

Brendan Fevola, Brisbane Lions, has been charged with a first offence for engaging in a melee .

In summary, he can accept a $1200 sanction with an early plea.

Jack Redden, Brisbane Lions, has been charged with a first offence for engaging in a melee

In summary, he can accept a $1200 sanction with an early plea.

Pearce Hanley, Brisbane Lions, has been charged with a first offence for engaging in a melee

In summary, he can accept a $1200 sanction with an early plea.

Ashley McGrath, Brisbane Lions, has been charged with a first offence for engaging in a melee
In summary, he can accept a $1200 sanction with an early plea.

Todd Banfield, Brisbane Lions, has been charged with a first offence for engaging in a melee
In summary, he can accept a $1200 sanction with an early plea.

Joel Patfull, Brisbane Lions, has been charged with a first offence for engaging in a melee

In summary, he can accept a $1200 sanction with an early plea.

Amon Buchanan, Brisbane Lions, has been charged with a first offence for engaging in a melee

In summary, he can accept a $1200 sanction with an early plea.

Banger724 · Post: # 955812Post **Banger724** » Mon 12 Jul 2010 6:42pm

should fight the gilbert one imo.

plugger66 · Post: # 955814Post **plugger66** » Mon 12 Jul 2010 6:43pm

Banger724 wrote:should fight the gilbert one imo.

Only if they are mad.

chook23 · Post: # 955818Post **chook23** » Mon 12 Jul 2010 6:45pm

plugger66 wrote:
Banger724 wrote:should fight the gilbert one imo.
Only if they are mad.

why?

degruch · Post: # 955819Post **degruch** » Mon 12 Jul 2010 6:47pm

chook23 wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Banger724 wrote:should fight the gilbert one imo.
Only if they are mad.
why?

I only fight when I'm mad...otherwise, I don't see the point.

plugger66 · Post: # 955821Post **plugger66** » Mon 12 Jul 2010 6:48pm

chook23 wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Banger724 wrote:should fight the gilbert one imo.
Only if they are mad.
why?

Are you serious?

Eastern · Post: # 955822Post **Eastern** » Mon 12 Jul 2010 6:50pm

plugger66 wrote:
Banger724 wrote:should fight the gilbert one imo.
Only if they are mad.

And can prove to the tribunal that the MRP are all mad. Accept it and move on !!

saintspremiers · Mon 12 Jul 2010 6:53pm

Eastern wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Banger724 wrote:should fight the gilbert one imo.
Only if they are mad.
And can prove to the tribunal that the MRP are all mad. Accept it and move on !!

Exactly.

The MRP are corrupt, so a waste of time fighting a lost cause.

ozrulestrace · Mon 12 Jul 2010 6:53pm

Forget appealing against the Gilbert decision.

Can't we appeal against that measly sanction against McGrath?

Agreed he plays for the opposition, but let's challenge it on the ground he had Sam Gilbert by the throat and Gilbert couldn't get him to release the half nelson or what ever McGrath had on him.

Not enough punishment for something that fell with the melee.

Melle-confused fight or struggle or crowd, not grabbing your opponent by the throat.

degruch · Post: # 955826Post **degruch** » Mon 12 Jul 2010 6:55pm

Eastern wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Banger724 wrote:should fight the gilbert one imo.
Only if they are mad.
And can prove to the tribunal that the MRP are all mad. Accept it and move on !!

Given that it only took them one week to (conveniently) forget their crackdown on off-the-ball sniping, best go nowhere near the corrupt pack of pricks.

chook23 · Post: # 955828Post **chook23** » Mon 12 Jul 2010 6:56pm

plugger66 wrote:
chook23 wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Banger724 wrote:should fight the gilbert one imo.
Only if they are mad.
why?
Are you serious?

interesting seeing your comment in the MRP result thread