Caro predicts our downfall

Thinline · Post: # 952300Post **Thinline** » Sun 04 Jul 2010 7:10pm

joffaboy wrote:What did she say so wrong?

She needs to fill space and put together a straw man argument to justify it thats all.

Really dont read it if you dont like it.

How can one actually do that? Wouldn't you need some kind of parallel existence in play?? Interesting metaphysical proposition...

saintsrus · Post: # 952403Post **saintsrus** » Sun 04 Jul 2010 9:16pm

Ha, Finey has just teed off on Caro, dis-tastefull, typical Caro etc

Teflon · Post: # 952411Post **Teflon** » Sun 04 Jul 2010 9:22pm

what a load of tripe, such a confused piece.

Lets not compare clubs cause saints have improved......but wait.....they COULD fall over as their problems are worse than Eagles.....

Really poor journalism - if she wrote such a piece bout Hawthorn shed be calledinto question. For us she'll win an award.

fingers · Post: # 952457Post **fingers** » Sun 04 Jul 2010 9:50pm

Finey's crack at Caro was beautiful

felixleo · Post: # 952477Post **felixleo** » Sun 04 Jul 2010 10:03pm

To quote Travis Cloke there was a lot of smoke and shadows behind the windows in that article. Hardly surprising from a journalist who does their best to undermine players and clubs and very rarely has anything good to say about fooball.

dcstkfc · Post: # 952482Post **dcstkfc** » Sun 04 Jul 2010 10:05pm

fingers wrote:Finey's crack at Caro was beautiful

Yeah totally agree. He's so right about her not having any actual idea about footy so she just tees up with off-field rubbish.

SaintWal · Post: # 952516Post **SaintWal** » Sun 04 Jul 2010 10:28pm

Finey was great,

As for me, Read the headline, read the first few lines, then put the paper in the recycle bin where it belongs.

What a pathetic gutter scraping piece of trash that woman is.

SainterK · Post: # 952637Post **SainterK** » Mon 05 Jul 2010 2:09am

Vague

saintsRrising · Mon 05 Jul 2010 3:16am

That would have to be about the worst article ever froma supposedly footy journalist.

Nothing but inferences.....BUT she is clearly tring to paint that St Kilda has a sex culture just like WC had a drug culture...which our Club is painting over!!!!!!!!!!!!

What rubbish.....as is the slur that because we do we were happy to recruit Lovett.

She is too gutless to stae what she actually means...but is happy to paint our club in a bad light. All based on what she suspects , rather than knows. And she clearly knows naught about what has happened.

What a trollop!!!!!!!!!!

Sainternist · Mon 05 Jul 2010 12:22pm

I'm yet to ever read an article by Wilson that is actually about onfield events.

The comparison to the Eagles of 4 years ago proves she is struggling as a writer.

I don't understand why the editorial hasn't given her a column called "Caro's Sewing Circle" or "Hit The Showers! with Caro".

It simply boggles the mind how they even consider publishing these kind of articles. So negative and irrelevant.

Dis Believer · Mon 05 Jul 2010 1:25pm

To the best of my admittedly poor memory, Caro has never written of anyhting other than off-field events or back room politics. Ever.

gringo · Post: # 952744Post **gringo** » Mon 05 Jul 2010 1:35pm

She tipped us to miss the 8 last year and the Tigers to go top 2. She delights in all the negative associations in football. Another s*** piece in a slow news week. Another journo saying nothing positive about a club that is to busy fending off attacks to defend it's self. Well done Caro, hard hitting stuff.

Who cares, just another hack sniping while we're down, at least when we start to snub her at press conferences she can whine about Lyons lack of respect for the media. Another of her favorite gripes.

SainterK · Post: # 952752Post **SainterK** » Mon 05 Jul 2010 1:54pm

OK, I'm trying to join the dots here, is she trying to say that the court case later this year is going to expose some more unsavoury things about some of our players?

StSteven · Post: # 952754Post **StSteven** » Mon 05 Jul 2010 1:56pm

SainterK wrote:OK, I'm trying to join the dots here, is she trying to say that the court case later this year is going to expose some more unsavoury things about some of our players?

That is how I read it.

bozza1980 · Post: # 952781Post **bozza1980** » Mon 05 Jul 2010 2:51pm

StSteven wrote:
SainterK wrote:OK, I'm trying to join the dots here, is she trying to say that the court case later this year is going to expose some more unsavoury things about some of our players?
That is how I read it.

I did too, but I'm not sure how??

It was odd all round, on Footy Classified the other day she said she thinks we'll go all the way now this.

If left as a piece comparing clubs fighting for a flag whilst dealing with numerous outside issues it would have been plausible.

Some of the tangents and suppositions were a little off though.

SainterK · Post: # 952791Post **SainterK** » Mon 05 Jul 2010 3:01pm

She is a channel 9 employee as well as a writer for The Age.

Probably a little peeved that all of channel 7, channel 10, and foxsports have had heaps of access to St Kilda football club in recent weeks.

Oh, by the way, Hi Caro.

Thinline · Post: # 952795Post **Thinline** » Mon 05 Jul 2010 3:05pm

StSteven wrote:
SainterK wrote:OK, I'm trying to join the dots here, is she trying to say that the court case later this year is going to expose some more unsavoury things about some of our players?
That is how I read it.

How on earth would she know?

And what court case?

Quit jumping at shadows...

saintly · Post: # 952797Post **saintly** » Mon 05 Jul 2010 3:11pm

StSteven wrote:
SainterK wrote:OK, I'm trying to join the dots here, is she trying to say that the court case later this year is going to expose some more unsavoury things about some of our players?
That is how I read it.

thats how i read it as well.

InkerSaint · Post: # 952802Post **InkerSaint** » Mon 05 Jul 2010 3:14pm

It's a pity Nathan Buckley isn't still writing for RealFooty. He could turn out some great analysis pieces - as opposed to this trash.

On the subject, I hate what The Age have done with their page format. Their archives are no longer publicly accessible, articles seem fewer and farther between, and what is published ranges from largely superfluous all the way to total rubbish. I hardly bother with them now.

Thinline · Post: # 952803Post **Thinline** » Mon 05 Jul 2010 3:18pm

saintly wrote:
StSteven wrote:
SainterK wrote:OK, I'm trying to join the dots here, is she trying to say that the court case later this year is going to expose some more unsavoury things about some of our players?
That is how I read it.
thats how i read it as well.

What else could there be to know?

Is someone going to reveal some smoking gun video or some such? Is there a recording of A saying X to B?

There is nothing else. Caro was filling space with drivel.

Paranoia. A particularly Saint-like virtue. I've suffered from it myself for a long time...

Hurricane · Post: # 952901Post **Hurricane** » Mon 05 Jul 2010 7:11pm

Over the years Caro has wasted more paper than Stephanie Meyer.

Why bother to read the poorly written shite she somehow gets paid for

BANG BANG

Eastern · Post: # 953313Post **Eastern** » Tue 06 Jul 2010 9:08pm

Gerard Healey took Caro to task about the article on 3AW tonight. Kept asking her why she was comparing the 2010 saints with the 2005 West Coast. The back-pedalling Caro was trying to say that she WASN'T comparing and that she "Loves the Saints". Healey kept pushing her and got an admission that she had taken a call from the club and that they were NOT HAPPY with the article !!

ace · Post: # 953338Post **ace** » Tue 06 Jul 2010 10:38pm

Caro is already a down fallen woman.

stinger · Post: # 953349Post **stinger** » Tue 06 Jul 2010 11:15pm

Thinline wrote:
saintsrus wrote:Another stirling story from Caro

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/s ... -zv0q.html
What was that story actually about?

...nothing actually......gutter journalism by a no talent dried up old hag.........

Caro predicts our downfall

Re: Caro predicts our downfall