![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/s ... -zv0q.html
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
What was that story actually about?saintsrus wrote:Another stirling story from Caro![]()
![]()
![]()
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/s ... -zv0q.html
Thats what got me - she almost willing the old saints to come back and for the club to self implode like the old days.However then she tries to compare them, even though she reckons the Saints have changed their culture and are much or resilient.
Good assessment. Stats there incompariable - then attempts to compare. What a joke, and I like caro.joffaboy wrote:What did she say so wrong?
She needs to fill space and put together a straw man argument to justify it thats all.
Really dont read it if you dont like it.
Personally I thought it was a pretty confused piece. First she talks about WCE and their troubles and their fall in fortunes from 2006 to now, then she says who the Saints troubles of this year are incomparable.
However then she tries to compare them, even though she reckons the Saints have changed their culture and are much or resilient.
She brings up Lovett, then Milne, then the 16 y.o. pregnant girl (and then mysteriously tries to drum up more dirt by inferring Ricky Nixon was to involved in managing the issue?????) and inferrs that this is somehow the same, but not the same, but could be similiar, if...but...maybe.
Really a nothing piece of trying to put two and two together, giving it a back rub, comparing it to an algabretic equation (with WCE as the varible), coming up with the meaning of life (Doug Adams told us that it was 42) and then pondering the future by observing the entrails of a ritually slaughtered Oxen.![]()
Why get upset about a puff piece?
Im with JB on this one.Spinner wrote:Good assessment. Stats there incompariable - then attempts to compare. What a joke, and I like caro.joffaboy wrote:What did she say so wrong?
She needs to fill space and put together a straw man argument to justify it thats all.
Really dont read it if you dont like it.
Personally I thought it was a pretty confused piece. First she talks about WCE and their troubles and their fall in fortunes from 2006 to now, then she says who the Saints troubles of this year are incomparable.
However then she tries to compare them, even though she reckons the Saints have changed their culture and are much or resilient.
She brings up Lovett, then Milne, then the 16 y.o. pregnant girl (and then mysteriously tries to drum up more dirt by inferring Ricky Nixon was to involved in managing the issue?????) and inferrs that this is somehow the same, but not the same, but could be similiar, if...but...maybe.
Really a nothing piece of trying to put two and two together, giving it a back rub, comparing it to an algabretic equation (with WCE as the varible), coming up with the meaning of life (Doug Adams told us that it was 42) and then pondering the future by observing the entrails of a ritually slaughtered Oxen.![]()
Why get upset about a puff piece?