Pattison in. Baker out.
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
but whilst that happened our smalls were getting a rest on the bench, so this will not completely destroy the run we get.St Fidelius wrote:There were moments last week when we had McEvoy Gards and Stanley on the ground as well as Kosi on an extremely wet ground.
This week under the roof will be different and one hopes we will always have one fresh tall on the bench if not two for some time
I guess I find it a strange team to play tall against, unless he plays full back against the big russian?
FQF
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Well I'd be very, very surprised if we went with the 22 named.Solar wrote:but whilst that happened our smalls were getting a rest on the bench, so this will not completely destroy the run we get.St Fidelius wrote:There were moments last week when we had McEvoy Gards and Stanley on the ground as well as Kosi on an extremely wet ground.
This week under the roof will be different and one hopes we will always have one fresh tall on the bench if not two for some time
I guess I find it a strange team to play tall against, unless he plays full back against the big russian?
And it's not like there hasn't been any last minute changes before.
That was our forward line for a few years, it was hardly an experiment.Solar wrote:I would be right behind him but hell we are the tallest we have been since we tried the gehrig, kosi, roo experiment (pretty sure blake was rucking then)
In fact the only reason it might have appeared that way was because seemingly someone was always out with injury.
![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
Feature article: KFC's "Double Down" burger!
TV Ratings: Hey Hey It's Saturday ratings overview
Do you know what C# is? .NET? Then you need to know this: XSD
TV Ratings: Hey Hey It's Saturday ratings overview
Do you know what C# is? .NET? Then you need to know this: XSD
I hope stanley starts at CHF in possible his last game for us as rooey will be back next week.
Iam a bit perplexed by the discission of adding luke miles to the emergencys in replacing Gram,is he still injured?
Putting patterson in for a small guy maybe the club knows something and a emergency will play instead like Luke Miles would is quick and played well for sandy.
Maybe Kosi will line up in the back line to be the tall defender would ge good to see he would not have to worry about leading out just making a man and even kosi can do that.
He has played there years ago and got the rising star award for CHB maybe a option.
Iam a bit perplexed by the discission of adding luke miles to the emergencys in replacing Gram,is he still injured?
Putting patterson in for a small guy maybe the club knows something and a emergency will play instead like Luke Miles would is quick and played well for sandy.
Maybe Kosi will line up in the back line to be the tall defender would ge good to see he would not have to worry about leading out just making a man and even kosi can do that.
He has played there years ago and got the rising star award for CHB maybe a option.
Last edited by saint58 on Fri 02 Jul 2010 7:15pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Dr Spaceman wrote:Maybe the coach is developing a new game plan which is diametrically opposed to Pagan's Paddock.realdeal wrote:people have only queried it because having potentially 4-5 ruckmen in a team is unusual to say the least..
Lyon's "Manhattan Skyline"
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Feature article: KFC's "Double Down" burger!
TV Ratings: Hey Hey It's Saturday ratings overview
Do you know what C# is? .NET? Then you need to know this: XSD
TV Ratings: Hey Hey It's Saturday ratings overview
Do you know what C# is? .NET? Then you need to know this: XSD
- St Fidelius
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10492
- Joined: Sun 01 Aug 2004 10:30am
Again, I am not surprised with Pattison being in the side, considering his only game with us he played better that McEvoy IMO, yet Pattison has been rubbished by a few posters from then to now and has played consistent football in the VFL...
What does surprise me is that Gram is still not right and the same with Eddy...
Does anyone know what is wrong with Eddy, who was a late withdrawal from last weeks game?
What does surprise me is that Gram is still not right and the same with Eddy...
Does anyone know what is wrong with Eddy, who was a late withdrawal from last weeks game?
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
Did Stanley not win the GF sprint?Solar wrote:and two on the bench then? What a slow bench we have then!!! Unless you want stanely to either play back or on the wing.St Fidelius wrote:I really don't follow you...Solar wrote:so we will have 4 on the ground any time.....St Fidelius wrote:For starters they are not going to be on the ground at the same time.Solar wrote:good luck to him but would say the same no matter which 5 rucks we had. If he came in for say kosi, macca, gards etc. I would be right behind him but hell we are the tallest we have been since we tried the gehrig, kosi, roo experiment (pretty sure blake was rucking then)St Fidelius wrote:I don't think one poster has ever been complimentary towards Pattison.
He is a Saints player and deserves a little encouragement
FFS Give him a chance
One would think either McEvoy/Pattison will be the second ruck with the other in the forward line rotating with Stanley
Hope our small are on tackling form because the ball will shoot out quickly if not. Also loose a runner in geary from last week (will play smalll back)
Two tall forwards and one ruck on the ground - most of the time
stanley, kosi, pattison, macca and gardiner are all in that team. Only one plays as a lead up forward (kosi can also lead up at a pinch).
Very slow team IMO
And looks like Kosi won't come up anyway.
STRENGTH THROUGH LOYALTY.
''I still get really excited, and I've got the '66 thing up on the wall in a frame … You look at it and think: one day, we want to achieve that.''- Arryn Siposs
''I still get really excited, and I've got the '66 thing up on the wall in a frame … You look at it and think: one day, we want to achieve that.''- Arryn Siposs
- desertsaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10404
- Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
- Location: out there
- Has thanked: 186 times
- Been thanked: 701 times
- Wrote for Luck
- Club Player
- Posts: 1519
- Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 8:33am
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11235
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 119 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
Pattison is a good VFL player and that's all he'll ever be. We are in trouble if we need to play him in the seniors.St Fidelius wrote:Again, I am not surprised with Pattison being in the side, considering his only game with us he played better that McEvoy IMO, yet Pattison has been rubbished by a few posters from then to now and has played consistent football in the VFL...
What does surprise me is that Gram is still not right and the same with Eddy...
Does anyone know what is wrong with Eddy, who was a late withdrawal from last weeks game?
If you cared to look on the Saints website, you'd find Eddy has a sore knee.
Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
- St Fidelius
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10492
- Joined: Sun 01 Aug 2004 10:30am
I really don't like your tone, but in any case was McEvoy just a good VFL player last year when he played??Bernard Shakey wrote:Pattison is a good VFL player and that's all he'll ever be. We are in trouble if we need to play him in the seniors.St Fidelius wrote:Again, I am not surprised with Pattison being in the side, considering his only game with us he played better that McEvoy IMO, yet Pattison has been rubbished by a few posters from then to now and has played consistent football in the VFL...
What does surprise me is that Gram is still not right and the same with Eddy...
Does anyone know what is wrong with Eddy, who was a late withdrawal from last weeks game?
If you cared to look on the Saints website, you'd find Eddy has a sore knee.
All I am saying is give this 25 year old ruck a chance, there are too many negative posters re Pattison..
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11235
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 119 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
No, McEvoy is a kid who has a big AFL future. Pattison is a dud that even Richmond dumped.St Fidelius wrote:I really don't like your tone, but in any case was McEvoy just a good VFL player last year when he played??Bernard Shakey wrote:Pattison is a good VFL player and that's all he'll ever be. We are in trouble if we need to play him in the seniors.St Fidelius wrote:Again, I am not surprised with Pattison being in the side, considering his only game with us he played better that McEvoy IMO, yet Pattison has been rubbished by a few posters from then to now and has played consistent football in the VFL...
What does surprise me is that Gram is still not right and the same with Eddy...
Does anyone know what is wrong with Eddy, who was a late withdrawal from last weeks game?
If you cared to look on the Saints website, you'd find Eddy has a sore knee.
All I am saying is give this 25 year old ruck a chance, there are too many negative posters re Pattison..
Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6043
- Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 5:31pm
- Location: Currumbin, Quoinslairnd
Surely one of the rucks will drop out late and we'll slot in an emg.
"The inches we need are everywhere around us. They're in every break in the game. Every minute, every second. On this team we fight for that inch. On this team we tear ourselves and everyone around us to pieces for that inch. We claw with our fingernails for that inch. Because we know when we add up all those inches that's gonna make the f***in' difference between winning and losing! Between living and dying!'
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4883
- Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
- Has thanked: 327 times
- Been thanked: 465 times
How can you say that? Pattison was woeful in a team that won by 100 points in his only game. That's a challenge in itself to play that poorly in a team that's winning that well. He looked slow, awkward and devoid of skill. Sorry but I didn't see anything in him that inspired confidence. Hope he's doing well in the reserves, b/c if he's just been added to replace a tall I reckon it's a mistake. We may as well go short and structure up differently. Hope like hell that I'm wrong. I certainly won't be bagging him on Sunday and will give him the only support that really matters - at the ground.St Fidelius wrote:Again, I am not surprised with Pattison being in the side, considering his only game with us he played better that McEvoy IMO, yet Pattison has been rubbished by a few posters from then to now and has played consistent football in the VFL...
What does surprise me is that Gram is still not right and the same with Eddy...
Does anyone know what is wrong with Eddy, who was a late withdrawal from last weeks game?
- St Fidelius
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10492
- Joined: Sun 01 Aug 2004 10:30am
Yeah righto and just how good was McEvoy in that match?Moods wrote:How can you say that? Pattison was woeful in a team that won by 100 points in his only game. That's a challenge in itself to play that poorly in a team that's winning that well. He looked slow, awkward and devoid of skill. Sorry but I didn't see anything in him that inspired confidence. Hope he's doing well in the reserves, b/c if he's just been added to replace a tall I reckon it's a mistake. We may as well go short and structure up differently. Hope like hell that I'm wrong. I certainly won't be bagging him on Sunday and will give him the only support that really matters - at the ground.St Fidelius wrote:Again, I am not surprised with Pattison being in the side, considering his only game with us he played better that McEvoy IMO, yet Pattison has been rubbished by a few posters from then to now and has played consistent football in the VFL...
What does surprise me is that Gram is still not right and the same with Eddy...
Does anyone know what is wrong with Eddy, who was a late withdrawal from last weeks game?
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4883
- Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
- Has thanked: 327 times
- Been thanked: 465 times
Can't recall to be honest. Not as bad as Pattison though. One thing that I do recall thinking as I left that game is that Patto was woeful. was the only -ive on an otherwise +ive day. McEvoy has had his good and poor games this year. So what? You're surely not suggesting that we should be playing Pattison ahead of McEvoy are you?St Fidelius wrote:Yeah righto and just how good was McEvoy in that match?Moods wrote:How can you say that? Pattison was woeful in a team that won by 100 points in his only game. That's a challenge in itself to play that poorly in a team that's winning that well. He looked slow, awkward and devoid of skill. Sorry but I didn't see anything in him that inspired confidence. Hope he's doing well in the reserves, b/c if he's just been added to replace a tall I reckon it's a mistake. We may as well go short and structure up differently. Hope like hell that I'm wrong. I certainly won't be bagging him on Sunday and will give him the only support that really matters - at the ground.St Fidelius wrote:Again, I am not surprised with Pattison being in the side, considering his only game with us he played better that McEvoy IMO, yet Pattison has been rubbished by a few posters from then to now and has played consistent football in the VFL...
What does surprise me is that Gram is still not right and the same with Eddy...
Does anyone know what is wrong with Eddy, who was a late withdrawal from last weeks game?
Pattison is nothing more than a back-up ruckman in case we have a crisis like the hawks did at the start of the year. PIcking 3 ruckman in the final team makes absolutely no sense to me. If there's a cloud over any of the ruckman well bring Patto in once that ruckman pulls out.
- borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6043
- Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 5:31pm
- Location: Currumbin, Quoinslairnd
That King played well?borderbarry wrote:From memory there was not much difference in their Stats, Patto's may have even been slightly better. But what is bewildering me is that the best Saints player for Sandy last week was S.King. Now what does that tell you?
"The inches we need are everywhere around us. They're in every break in the game. Every minute, every second. On this team we fight for that inch. On this team we tear ourselves and everyone around us to pieces for that inch. We claw with our fingernails for that inch. Because we know when we add up all those inches that's gonna make the f***in' difference between winning and losing! Between living and dying!'