GT's view on the AFL MRP
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- evertonfc
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7261
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 9:11pm
- Location: 'Quietly Confident' County
- Has thanked: 115 times
- Been thanked: 267 times
- Contact:
GT's view on the AFL MRP
From the Ninemsn website...
Confusion reigns supreme
30/06/2010 5:02:00 PM, Grant Thomas
The AFL can defend their position until the cows come home. Adrian Anderson denies any involvement whatsoever in any case stating "The AFL has never SOUGHT to influence the match review panel's view on the guilt or innocence or level of sanction for any player".
What a pathetic attempt to divorce and exonerate oneself from the heat.
Read the whole article:
http://wwos.ninemsn.com.au/Blog.aspx?blogid=4088
Confusion reigns supreme
30/06/2010 5:02:00 PM, Grant Thomas
The AFL can defend their position until the cows come home. Adrian Anderson denies any involvement whatsoever in any case stating "The AFL has never SOUGHT to influence the match review panel's view on the guilt or innocence or level of sanction for any player".
What a pathetic attempt to divorce and exonerate oneself from the heat.
Read the whole article:
http://wwos.ninemsn.com.au/Blog.aspx?blogid=4088
Clueless and mediocre petty tyrant.
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 30 times
- Been thanked: 822 times
Re: GT's view on the AFL MRP
No need to "seek to influence" when you issue a direct instruction.evertonfc wrote:From the Ninemsn website...
Confusion reigns supreme
30/06/2010 5:02:00 PM, Grant Thomas
The AFL can defend their position until the cows come home. Adrian Anderson denies any involvement whatsoever in any case stating "The AFL has never SOUGHT to influence the match review panel's view on the guilt or innocence or level of sanction for any player".
What a pathetic attempt to divorce and exonerate oneself from the heat.
Read the whole article:
http://wwos.ninemsn.com.au/Blog.aspx?blogid=4088
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23227
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 738 times
- Been thanked: 1787 times
Re: GT's view on the AFL MRP
yep....Grant can be a flog of the highest and has his own axe to grind with Dimwit...but hes right.ace wrote:No need to "seek to influence" when you issue a direct instruction.evertonfc wrote:From the Ninemsn website...
Confusion reigns supreme
30/06/2010 5:02:00 PM, Grant Thomas
The AFL can defend their position until the cows come home. Adrian Anderson denies any involvement whatsoever in any case stating "The AFL has never SOUGHT to influence the match review panel's view on the guilt or innocence or level of sanction for any player".
What a pathetic attempt to divorce and exonerate oneself from the heat.
Read the whole article:
http://wwos.ninemsn.com.au/Blog.aspx?blogid=4088
“Yeah….nah””
- meher baba
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7211
- Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
- Location: Tasmania
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 513 times
It's all true, but what do you do?
This is AFL 21st century style. Baker is too good at stopping star opponents from playing attractive football, so we embark on a 5 year campaign to rub him out of the game.
Meanwhile, there are no penalties applied to equally (or arguably more) violent acts by "marquee" players like Judd and J Riewoldt.
We are (insanely IMO) by expanding into rugby areas so we set up new tinpot teams which will have few spectators.
We then buy them rugby players who will be inept at AFL but who we think will attract fans because of name recognition and novelty value. And we pay these guys more than many of our game's elite players.
And we see a guy like Lenny Hayes go on telly and toe the party line say he's happy to be paid less than Israel Folau: even though he knows that Folau almost certainly will struggle to reach NSWFL standards, let alone AFL
In the minds of those who run the AFL today, it's ok to sacrifice the integrity of your product on the altar of marketing.
But watch out. That's the way Kevin Rudd and his coterie of pimply young West Wing wannabes saw things as well......
This is AFL 21st century style. Baker is too good at stopping star opponents from playing attractive football, so we embark on a 5 year campaign to rub him out of the game.
Meanwhile, there are no penalties applied to equally (or arguably more) violent acts by "marquee" players like Judd and J Riewoldt.
We are (insanely IMO) by expanding into rugby areas so we set up new tinpot teams which will have few spectators.
We then buy them rugby players who will be inept at AFL but who we think will attract fans because of name recognition and novelty value. And we pay these guys more than many of our game's elite players.
And we see a guy like Lenny Hayes go on telly and toe the party line say he's happy to be paid less than Israel Folau: even though he knows that Folau almost certainly will struggle to reach NSWFL standards, let alone AFL
In the minds of those who run the AFL today, it's ok to sacrifice the integrity of your product on the altar of marketing.
But watch out. That's the way Kevin Rudd and his coterie of pimply young West Wing wannabes saw things as well......
"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
- Jonathan Swift
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12421
- Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 296 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
I don't get why they see Baker as a big problem, he is no different to guys like Crouch and Carr, yet he seems to have had a stigma from his place as one of the first high profile taggers. Even guys like Aker slip a shifty fist in occasionally and guys like Mooney have it as a way of intimidating the defender but is let go. The AFL knows St kilda will not have media voice of high profile clubs. And they have no interest in protecting the brand like they do in Sydney and Brisbane. When Barry hall left for Sydney he was no different from when he was with us yet all of a sudden he had "controlled aggression". He still let his frustration get the better of him at times, but wasn't penalized relentlessly.
- rodgerfox
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 327 times
I must admit, I don't get it either.gringo wrote:I don't get why they see Baker as a big problem, he is no different to guys like Crouch and Carr, yet he seems to have had a stigma from his place as one of the first high profile taggers. Even guys like Aker slip a shifty fist in occasionally and guys like Mooney have it as a way of intimidating the defender but is let go. The AFL knows St kilda will not have media voice of high profile clubs. And they have no interest in protecting the brand like they do in Sydney and Brisbane. When Barry hall left for Sydney he was no different from when he was with us yet all of a sudden he had "controlled aggression". He still let his frustration get the better of him at times, but wasn't penalized relentlessly.
And as I've said before, as for his 'track record', the AFL handed him that.
Up until the Farmer debacle, he'd only missed 7 matches through suspension over nearly 10 years.
And, in cluded in those 7 weeks were the farcical 'attempted jumper punch' and the 'kick' on Alessio's leg.
Both a complete joke. So as for his 'history' that resulted in the 9 week flogging, the 'history' itself is probably more farcial than the latest suspension.
- Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12779
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 792 times
- Been thanked: 426 times
The reason given to Rendell was quite simple.
They didn't want vision of their most marketable players resorting to retaliatory strikes/elbows (insert the name Judd). Therefore they were going to get rid of what they considered the source.
It also came, I believe, not long after the game vs Carlton where Baker hit Murphy a few times and was charged twice?
They didn't want vision of their most marketable players resorting to retaliatory strikes/elbows (insert the name Judd). Therefore they were going to get rid of what they considered the source.
It also came, I believe, not long after the game vs Carlton where Baker hit Murphy a few times and was charged twice?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6043
- Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 5:31pm
- Location: Currumbin, Quoinslairnd
Concur unequivocally.rodgerfox wrote:I must admit, I don't get it either.gringo wrote:I don't get why they see Baker as a big problem, he is no different to guys like Crouch and Carr, yet he seems to have had a stigma from his place as one of the first high profile taggers. Even guys like Aker slip a shifty fist in occasionally and guys like Mooney have it as a way of intimidating the defender but is let go. The AFL knows St kilda will not have media voice of high profile clubs. And they have no interest in protecting the brand like they do in Sydney and Brisbane. When Barry hall left for Sydney he was no different from when he was with us yet all of a sudden he had "controlled aggression". He still let his frustration get the better of him at times, but wasn't penalized relentlessly.
And as I've said before, as for his 'track record', the AFL handed him that.
Up until the Farmer debacle, he'd only missed 7 matches through suspension over nearly 10 years.
And, in cluded in those 7 weeks were the farcical 'attempted jumper punch' and the 'kick' on Alessio's leg.
Both a complete joke. So as for his 'history' that resulted in the 9 week flogging, the 'history' itself is probably more farcial than the latest suspension.
Carr, Hall, Picken, Jack, Mooney, Ling, Mitchell, Brennan, Brown, Kosi, O'Bree, O'Brien...If you put your mind to it there's about a million players who flirt with the edge of the rules by being overtly physical.
Baker is but one...
And as you point out, really, Baker's REAL record is hardly mind-bogglingly violent...
Very odd.
But what can do...
"The inches we need are everywhere around us. They're in every break in the game. Every minute, every second. On this team we fight for that inch. On this team we tear ourselves and everyone around us to pieces for that inch. We claw with our fingernails for that inch. Because we know when we add up all those inches that's gonna make the f***in' difference between winning and losing! Between living and dying!'