Team Saints v Demons

backit · Post: # 951315Post **backit** » Thu 01 Jul 2010 6:15pm

The team has Bakes out and ins are Dawson, gram, heyne, Pattison trying a link

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/ ... fault.aspx

backit · Post: # 951316Post **backit** » Thu 01 Jul 2010 6:18pm

St. Kilda
B: Brett Peake, Jason Blake, Sam Gilbert
HB: Jarryn Geary, Sam Fisher, James Gwilt
C: Brendon Goddard, Nick Dal Santo, Farren Ray
HF: Clinton Jones, Justin Koschitzke, Adam Schneider
F: Andrew McQualter, Ben McEvoy, Stephen Milne
Foll: Michael Gardiner, Lenny Hayes, Leigh Montagna
I/C (from): Zac Dawson, Sean Dempster, Jason Gram, Nick Heyne, Adam Pattison, Rhys Stanley, Jack Steven

In: Gram, Dawson, Pattison, Heyne
Out: Steven Baker (suspension)

Thursday July 1, 2010 5:15

Melbourne
B: Clint Bartram, James Frawley, Kyle Cheney
HB: Colin Garland, Jared Rivers, Jack Grimes
C: Brad Green, Jack Trengove, Cameron Bruce
HF: Jamie Bennell, Matthew Bate, Lynden Dunn
F: Neville Jetta, Jack Watts, Aaron Davey
Foll: Mark Jamar, Brent Moloney, Nathan Jones
I/C (from): Joel Macdonald, Tom Scully, Jordie McKenzie, Jake Spencer, Brad Miller, Matthew Warnock, Addam Maric

In: Cheney, Maric, Spencer, Bennell
Out: Cale Morton

Thursday July 1, 2010 5:17

SainterK · Post: # 951318Post **SainterK** » Thu 01 Jul 2010 6:20pm

Gram a maybe perhaps....would be nice to see him out there, feels like ages.

S.A Saint · Post: # 951320Post **S.A Saint** » Thu 01 Jul 2010 6:26pm

hopefully its in gram out baker....

stanley to keep playing

backline works better without dawson as gwilt and blake can take key forwards with the help of fisher and gilbert if needed so until it goes pear shaped keep it the same

steven to hold his spot after that performance

dempster and geary will be our small defenders for the time being or until eddy gets back so we can asses who is more suitable

saintsRrising · Thu 01 Jul 2010 6:26pm

Dees do not have a tall fwd line and Watts is lightly framed still.

So we do not need Zac (though Lyon may wish to play him into form).

Gram is the guy I would go for.....

borderbarry · Thu 01 Jul 2010 6:26pm

In Gram
Out Baker

I hope.

Moods · Post: # 951323Post **Moods** » Thu 01 Jul 2010 6:29pm

Why do they go through the charade of naming Pattison every week?

jays · Post: # 951324Post **jays** » Thu 01 Jul 2010 6:37pm

so hope gram comes in and not dawson

S.A Saint · Post: # 951328Post **S.A Saint** » Thu 01 Jul 2010 6:46pm

Moods wrote:Why do they go through the charade of naming Pattison every week?

maybe so that he misses on playing for the reserves so that others can build up form, just my guess.

Solar · Post: # 951331Post **Solar** » Thu 01 Jul 2010 6:51pm

Moods wrote:Why do they go through the charade of naming Pattison every week?

he is ahead of kin obviously as the back up ruck. Go figure

in gram

out baker

said that 3 days ago

borderbarry · Thu 01 Jul 2010 6:53pm

King was named as our best last match for Sandy. How come Patterson named before him?

Sam23 · Post: # 951333Post **Sam23** » Thu 01 Jul 2010 6:54pm

Stanley is out I suspect.

Wrote for Luck · Thu 01 Jul 2010 6:56pm

S.A Saint wrote:
Moods wrote:Why do they go through the charade of naming Pattison every week?
maybe so that he misses on playing for the reserves so that others can build up form, just my guess.

I presume because you need an emergency ruck, like a goalkeeper. Unsure why Kingy's not on there though.

S.A Saint · Post: # 951337Post **S.A Saint** » Thu 01 Jul 2010 6:59pm

millarsaint wrote:
S.A Saint wrote:
Moods wrote:Why do they go through the charade of naming Pattison every week?
maybe so that he misses on playing for the reserves so that others can build up form, just my guess.
I presume because you need an emergency ruck, like a goalkeeper. Unsure why Kingy's not on there though.

dont think it has to be a ruck...they need someone to have as back up on the day the game is played incase of a last minute injury..so having all 3 stay back would mean they wont play for sandy cause our game is on sunday..basically keep one back up so the other 2 get a game for sandy so they dont miss out altogether..

Thinline · Post: # 951338Post **Thinline** » Thu 01 Jul 2010 6:59pm

Reckon Kingy's done. There to coach and mentor from now I suspect. Use if needed.

3rd generation saint · Thu 01 Jul 2010 7:34pm

If Gram's fit, he's the one change. Only reason Stanley will be dropped is if he is injured or when Roo comes back.

Stillwaiting · Thu 01 Jul 2010 9:42pm

3rd generation saint wrote:If Gram's fit, he's the one change. Only reason Stanley will be dropped is if he is injured or when Roo comes back.

That about sums it up. Steven will be in for the near future, Stanley until Roo is back and hopefully beyond

Bernard Shakey · Thu 01 Jul 2010 9:54pm

Solar wrote:
Moods wrote:Why do they go through the charade of naming Pattison every week?
he is ahead of kin obviously as the back up ruck. Go figure

in gram

out baker

said that 3 days ago ;)

King wil not play again unless Gardiner or McEvoy suffer injuries.

Milan Faletic · Fri 02 Jul 2010 6:11am

Bernard Shakey wrote:
Solar wrote:
Moods wrote:Why do they go through the charade of naming Pattison every week?
he is ahead of kin obviously as the back up ruck. Go figure

in gram

out baker

said that 3 days ago
King wil not play again unless Gardiner or McEvoy suffer injuries.

What a revelation!

degruch · Post: # 951550Post **degruch** » Fri 02 Jul 2010 10:59am

saintsRrising wrote:Dees do not have a tall fwd line and Watts is lightly framed still.

So we do not need Zac (though Lyon may wish to play him into form).

Gram is the guy I would go for.....

They don't mind moving Jamar forward and exploiting the definsive side of the opposition ruckman (generally zero). It's a tactic to watch, but of course, they've got to get it to him first. Agree that Watt's could probably be handled by any one of Blake, Gilbert (usually gets a small against Melbourne), Fisher, et al.

bergholt · Post: # 951555Post **bergholt** » Fri 02 Jul 2010 11:02am

Stillwaiting wrote:That about sums it up. Steven will be in for the near future, Stanley until Roo is back and hopefully beyond

beyond? i'm not sure what we'd do with stanley if riewoldt and kosi were both in the side. unless you want riewoldt/stanley with kosi dropped...

jonesy · Post: # 951557Post **jonesy** » Fri 02 Jul 2010 11:04am

How's Gram been on the track anyone been down or know?

Vital to our september chances that we have a fit Gram up and running

SainterK · Post: # 951584Post **SainterK** » Fri 02 Jul 2010 12:07pm

Milan Faletic wrote:
Bernard Shakey wrote:
Solar wrote:
Moods wrote:Why do they go through the charade of naming Pattison every week?
he is ahead of kin obviously as the back up ruck. Go figure

in gram

out baker

said that 3 days ago
King wil not play again unless Gardiner or McEvoy suffer injuries.
What a revelation!

Borderbarry did ask why King wasn't named as emergency when best for Sandy...

matrix · Post: # 951589Post **matrix** » Fri 02 Jul 2010 12:13pm

3rd generation saint wrote:If Gram's fit, he's the one change. Only reason Stanley will be dropped is if he is injured or when Roo comes back.

bingo

dont need dawson back into that backline
not against melbs