On SEN

Solar · Post: # 948834Post **Solar** » Mon 28 Jun 2010 7:09pm

They have asked someone from the AFL to come on and they have refused.....

DISGUSTING!

dcstkfc · Post: # 948838Post **dcstkfc** » Mon 28 Jun 2010 7:10pm

Solar wrote:They have asked someone from the AFL to come on and they have refused.....

DISGUSTING!

It's an outrage.

saintsrus · Post: # 948843Post **saintsrus** » Mon 28 Jun 2010 7:11pm

Cats supporters agree with us

Ralphy · Post: # 948846Post **Ralphy** » Mon 28 Jun 2010 7:12pm

saintsrus wrote:Cats supporters agree with us

Awesome.

bendigo bob · Mon 28 Jun 2010 7:12pm

Patrick Keane from AFL coming up on 3AW

realdeal · Post: # 948853Post **realdeal** » Mon 28 Jun 2010 7:14pm

We have to bombard SEN MMM 3AW, Herald-Sun, Facebook, expressing our outrage at these decisions.

All footy lovers should be outraged at this. only Baker got hurt and it was a pure 'duel' between to players who then shook hands and smiled afterwards. You'd have thought that Baker has king hit someone..

Im preparing my hand written poster/ sign for next sunday's game now!

Ralphy · Post: # 948857Post **Ralphy** » Mon 28 Jun 2010 7:15pm

realdeal wrote:We have to bombard SEN MMM 3AW, Herald-Sun, Facebook, expressing our outrage at these decisions.

All footy lovers should be outraged at this. only Baker got hurt and it was a pure 'duel' between to players who then shook hands and smiled afterwards. You'd have thought that Baker has king hit someone..

Im preparing my hand written poster/ sign for next sunday's game now!

( will get the misses to create me something

Griggsy · Post: # 948860Post **Griggsy** » Mon 28 Jun 2010 7:15pm

bendigo bob wrote:Patrick Keane from AFL coming up on 3AW

he will just say it was separate incidents reviewed individually and that they went by the book. Doubt he can or will explain why its some rules for some different for others.

Bardon Saint · Mon 28 Jun 2010 7:17pm

saintsrus wrote:Cats supporters agree with us

Some do, some don't. Some pies supporters think it's fair.

Source: Bigfooty (I've gotta stop reading that forum, it makes me even more mad

degruch · Post: # 948872Post **degruch** » Mon 28 Jun 2010 7:17pm

Griggsy wrote:
bendigo bob wrote:Patrick Keane from AFL coming up on 3AW
he will just say it was separate incidents reviewed individually and that they went by the book. Doubt he can or will explain why its some rules for some different for others.

Exactly, push-button answers coming up, as you'd expect. Lets hope there's some semi-intelligent talk back (

).

ozrulestrace · Mon 28 Jun 2010 7:20pm

Patrick Keane is on SEN trying to explain all of this and he lost me when he started rambling on about the points.

The Sentencing Act is easier to understand that this crap.

he still hasn't explained which charge and points for which action.

Is the hand bumping included?

Solar · Post: # 948878Post **Solar** » Mon 28 Jun 2010 7:21pm

ozrulestrace wrote:Patrick Keane is on SEN trying to explain all of this and he lost me when he started rambling on about the points.

The Sentencing Act is easier to understand that this crap.

he still hasn't explained which charge and points for which action.

Is the hand bumping included?

Blah blah blah

WANKER

degruch · Post: # 948879Post **degruch** » Mon 28 Jun 2010 7:21pm

Solar wrote:
ozrulestrace wrote:Patrick Keane is on SEN trying to explain all of this and he lost me when he started rambling on about the points.

The Sentencing Act is easier to understand that this crap.

he still hasn't explained which charge and points for which action.

Is the hand bumping included?
Blah blah blah

WANKER

That's not very nice, what did ozrulestrace ever do to you.

bigred · Post: # 948880Post **bigred** » Mon 28 Jun 2010 7:22pm

Yeah he is rambling crap out.

Solar · Post: # 948882Post **Solar** » Mon 28 Jun 2010 7:23pm

degruch wrote:
Solar wrote:
ozrulestrace wrote:Patrick Keane is on SEN trying to explain all of this and he lost me when he started rambling on about the points.

The Sentencing Act is easier to understand that this crap.

he still hasn't explained which charge and points for which action.

Is the hand bumping included?
Blah blah blah

WANKER
That's not very nice, what did ozrulestrace ever do to you.

Thankyou, thats the first smile from me in the last 90 mins

saintsrus · Post: # 948885Post **saintsrus** » Mon 28 Jun 2010 7:24pm

Listen in for Finey at 7pm, should be good

degruch · Post: # 948886Post **degruch** » Mon 28 Jun 2010 7:25pm

Solar wrote:
degruch wrote:
Solar wrote:
ozrulestrace wrote:Patrick Keane is on SEN trying to explain all of this and he lost me when he started rambling on about the points.

The Sentencing Act is easier to understand that this crap.

he still hasn't explained which charge and points for which action.

Is the hand bumping included?
Blah blah blah

WANKER
That's not very nice, what did ozrulestrace ever do to you.
Thankyou, thats the first smile from me in the last 90 mins

My humour usually only makes people angrier.

ANYWAY, back to the rage...how's this boofhead on SEN going talking his way out of this c**k-up?

SaintWal · Post: # 948887Post **SaintWal** » Mon 28 Jun 2010 7:25pm

There is no Doubt now that we should have stood our ground and taken the Farmer case to court. Do not make the same mistake twice

Griggsy · Post: # 948891Post **Griggsy** » Mon 28 Jun 2010 7:26pm

Solar wrote:
degruch wrote:
Solar wrote:
ozrulestrace wrote:Patrick Keane is on SEN trying to explain all of this and he lost me when he started rambling on about the points.

The Sentencing Act is easier to understand that this crap.

he still hasn't explained which charge and points for which action.

Is the hand bumping included?
Blah blah blah

WANKER
That's not very nice, what did ozrulestrace ever do to you.
Thankyou, thats the first smile from me in the last 90 mins

You should read the thread on big footy that says Harry O'Brien kicked GOTY

ozrulestrace · Mon 28 Jun 2010 7:27pm

degruch wrote:
Solar wrote:
ozrulestrace wrote:Patrick Keane is on SEN trying to explain all of this and he lost me when he started rambling on about the points.

The Sentencing Act is easier to understand that this crap.

he still hasn't explained which charge and points for which action.

Is the hand bumping included?
Blah blah blah

WANKER
That's not very nice, what did ozrulestrace ever do to you.

Thankfully nothing but I did wonder if the comment was directed at me or Mr Keane

backit · Post: # 948895Post **backit** » Mon 28 Jun 2010 7:28pm

bigred wrote:Yeah he is rambling crap out.

That would be because he probably has no idea what to say due to the fact he does not understand how the MRP works as no-one does even those fools who work there. To come on radio and supply a response to this would have needed a full briefing with all parties involved to get their facts right on how they came to this decision and be confident enough to be able to defend it. They haven't had time and couldn't probably really prepare any person quick enough to do it.

Goes to show that the MRP is a joke. In the NRL you can knock a bloke out and not get half of what Bakes is facing.

SaintWal · Post: # 948899Post **SaintWal** » Mon 28 Jun 2010 7:28pm

Actually this is genious from the AFL.

The case about hitting the hand will be dismissed. He said in his own words that the player had to be receiving attention.

They have loaded up the works knowing that the Saints will contest and when the charges get taken back to about 6 weeks they feel that we will be placated. B...Sh..

ozrulestrace · Mon 28 Jun 2010 8:03pm

Thank you to the gentleman who just rang SEN and asked what Jack Reiwoldt got for doing the same thing a few weeks ago.

Answer from the SEN team-nothing.

Baker has been given two weeks on that charge.

So where's that precedent.

Has anyone else thought about the front page of yesterdays Hun and it's influence on the is decision?

Stillwaiting · Mon 28 Jun 2010 8:07pm

Solar wrote:
ozrulestrace wrote:Patrick Keane is on SEN trying to explain all of this and he lost me when he started rambling on about the points.

The Sentencing Act is easier to understand that this crap.

he still hasn't explained which charge and points for which action.

Is the hand bumping included?
Blah blah blah

WANKER

Yep, very good of beating around the bush to try an explain a bullshyte decision. All lot of talk to say absolutly nothing, and end up making it all as clear as mud

Stillwaiting · Mon 28 Jun 2010 8:08pm

Stillwaiting wrote:
Solar wrote:
ozrulestrace wrote:Patrick Keane is on SEN trying to explain all of this and he lost me when he started rambling on about the points.

The Sentencing Act is easier to understand that this crap.

he still hasn't explained which charge and points for which action.

Is the hand bumping included?
Blah blah blah

WANKER

Yep, very good of beating around the bush to try an explain a bullshyte decision. All lot of talk to say absolutly nothing, and end up making it all as clear as mud

God damm it I am so mad I no longer know what I am saying

On SEN

On SEN

Re: On SEN