Negatives from tonight...

SainterK · Post: # 947167Post **SainterK** » Sat 26 Jun 2010 1:32am

We couldn't find the car

Not used to the MCG carpark

saint1974 · Post: # 947176Post **saint1974** » Sat 26 Jun 2010 1:35am

Geelong supporters sooking,for god sake you have won 2 flags bugger off and let us enjoy the win!

bendigo bob · Sat 26 Jun 2010 3:34am

saint1974 wrote:Geelong supporters sooking,for god sake you have won 2 flags bugger off and let us enjoy the win!

should have heard the 4 behind me - "bloody umpires" "Chappy was out" "half their best team was out" "Selwood not getting frees he deserves""Taylor hurt" etc etc. Fair dinkum they were pathetic even started bagging their team. Hate to think what they would be like if they weren't supporting the "best" team to have ever played the game!

Milan Faletic · Sat 26 Jun 2010 3:38am

My biggest negative is that I couldn't get there.

I watched the first half at the work function and the second half at home.

My neighbours heard me screaming.

They are used to it.

saint3d · Post: # 947299Post **saint3d** » Sat 26 Jun 2010 4:46am

saint1974 wrote:Geelong supporters sooking,for god sake you have won 2 flags bugger off and let us enjoy the win!

I would call that a positive.

dcstkfc · Post: # 947300Post **dcstkfc** » Sat 26 Jun 2010 4:52am

Not their conditions but admittedly Kosi and Stanley were rarely sighted.

But conversely this is a positive as without winning tall forward we beat geelong by 4 goals

Moods · Post: # 947315Post **Moods** » Sat 26 Jun 2010 7:00am

I was actually quite pleased with both Stanley's and Kosi's games. they competed - which is all you can ask from your big blokes in the wet.

My negative was that I too couldn't make the game in the end.

saintspremiers · Sat 26 Jun 2010 9:09am

Big negative was that at least 10K Saints fans stayed at home because of the weather and missed the fun!

rodgerfox · Post: # 947355Post **rodgerfox** » Sat 26 Jun 2010 9:38am

There was one glaring negative.

Still makes me ill thinking about it.

plugger66 · Post: # 947357Post **plugger66** » Sat 26 Jun 2010 9:39am

rodgerfox wrote:There was one glaring negative.

Still makes me ill thinking about it.

GT isnt coach?

rodgerfox · Post: # 947361Post **rodgerfox** » Sat 26 Jun 2010 9:42am

plugger66 wrote:
rodgerfox wrote:There was one glaring negative.

Still makes me ill thinking about it.
GT isnt coach?

No, I'd say that's a very big positive. GT couldn't have coached AFL post-2007 in my opinion.

The negative is that we are a better team than Geelong. And we have been since R1 2009.

35...LEGEND · Sat 26 Jun 2010 9:43am

rodgerfox wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
rodgerfox wrote:There was one glaring negative.

Still makes me ill thinking about it.
GT isnt coach?
No, I'd say that's a very big positive. GT couldn't have coached AFL post-2007 in my opinion.

The negative is that we are a better team than Geelong. And we have been since R1 2009.

Negatives from last night ??

bigred · Post: # 947366Post **bigred** » Sat 26 Jun 2010 9:45am

rodgerfox wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
rodgerfox wrote:There was one glaring negative.

Still makes me ill thinking about it.
GT isnt coach?
No, I'd say that's a very big positive. GT couldn't have coached AFL post-2007 in my opinion.

The negative is that we are a better team than Geelong. And we have been since R1 2009.

Agreed. Unfortunately they just won the game that mattered.

joffaboy · Post: # 947367Post **joffaboy** » Sat 26 Jun 2010 9:45am

rodgerfox wrote: The negative is that we are a better team than Geelong. And we have been since R1 2009.

Results (1 grand Final win v ) Grand Final win) suggests otherwise.

Biggest negative - Sitting between Eastern and Saint66au - they need one and a half seats each

plugger66 · Post: # 947368Post **plugger66** » Sat 26 Jun 2010 9:45am

35...LEGEND wrote:
rodgerfox wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
rodgerfox wrote:There was one glaring negative.

Still makes me ill thinking about it.
GT isnt coach?
No, I'd say that's a very big positive. GT couldn't have coached AFL post-2007 in my opinion.

The negative is that we are a better team than Geelong. And we have been since R1 2009.

Negatives from last night ??

He is just trying to say that we were badly coached in the GF. He loves it.

rodgerfox · Post: # 947371Post **rodgerfox** » Sat 26 Jun 2010 9:46am

35...LEGEND wrote:
rodgerfox wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
rodgerfox wrote:There was one glaring negative.

Still makes me ill thinking about it.
GT isnt coach?
No, I'd say that's a very big positive. GT couldn't have coached AFL post-2007 in my opinion.

The negative is that we are a better team than Geelong. And we have been since R1 2009.

Negatives from last night ??

We did the same thing to Geelong last night that we did in the GF last year.....except for one minor little thing.

Still makes me sick. Last night actually made me feel worse about the whole thing.

plugger66 · Post: # 947374Post **plugger66** » Sat 26 Jun 2010 9:47am

rodgerfox wrote:
35...LEGEND wrote:
rodgerfox wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
rodgerfox wrote:There was one glaring negative.

Still makes me ill thinking about it.
GT isnt coach?
No, I'd say that's a very big positive. GT couldn't have coached AFL post-2007 in my opinion.

The negative is that we are a better team than Geelong. And we have been since R1 2009.

Negatives from last night ??
We did the same thing to Geelong last night that we did in the GF last year.....except for one minor little thing.

Still makes me sick. Last night actually made me feel worse about the whole thing.

You are right. Would have been better if we lost.

Finna · Post: # 947377Post **Finna** » Sat 26 Jun 2010 9:50am

rodgerfox wrote:
35...LEGEND wrote:
rodgerfox wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
rodgerfox wrote:There was one glaring negative.

Still makes me ill thinking about it.
GT isnt coach?
No, I'd say that's a very big positive. GT couldn't have coached AFL post-2007 in my opinion.

The negative is that we are a better team than Geelong. And we have been since R1 2009.

Negatives from last night ??
We did the same thing to Geelong last night that we did in the GF last year.....except for one minor little thing.

Still makes me sick. Last night actually made me feel worse about the whole thing.

You should be feeling good on the 26th September this Year about 6pm. And I reckon it will feel even better this year than it would've last year Rodge.

rodgerfox · Post: # 947383Post **rodgerfox** » Sat 26 Jun 2010 9:52am

plugger66 wrote:
You are right. Would have been better if we lost.

Why would it have better if we lost?

I'm not sure I follow you.

bigred · Post: # 947384Post **bigred** » Sat 26 Jun 2010 9:53am

RF is right...

We converted last night.

f*** Geelong.

chook23 · Post: # 947387Post **chook23** » Sat 26 Jun 2010 9:54am

Rain

Kept away 15000 - 20000

bottom line

$300,000 +

plugger66 · Post: # 947388Post **plugger66** » Sat 26 Jun 2010 9:55am

rodgerfox wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
You are right. Would have been better if we lost.
Why would it have better if we lost?

I'm not sure I follow you.

Well you said it made you feel worse winning so logically that would mean you would feel better if we lost. Dont question me, you said it.

rodgerfox · Post: # 947398Post **rodgerfox** » Sat 26 Jun 2010 10:02am

plugger66 wrote:
rodgerfox wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
You are right. Would have been better if we lost.
Why would it have better if we lost?

I'm not sure I follow you.
Well you said it made you feel worse winning so logically that would mean you would feel better if we lost. Dont question me, you said it.

Logically it would be better for the St Kilda Football Club to lose just so I didn't feel more disappointed about last year's GF??

You have a very, very strange sense of logic.

plugger66 · Post: # 947401Post **plugger66** » Sat 26 Jun 2010 10:04am

rodgerfox wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
rodgerfox wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
You are right. Would have been better if we lost.
Why would it have better if we lost?

I'm not sure I follow you.
Well you said it made you feel worse winning so logically that would mean you would feel better if we lost. Dont question me, you said it.
Logically it would be better for the St Kilda Football Club to lose just so I didn't feel more disappointed about last year's GF??

You have a very, very strange sense of logic.

Why are you questioning my logic when you said it. Strange.

saintnick12 · Sat 26 Jun 2010 10:16am

rodgerfox wrote:
35...LEGEND wrote:
rodgerfox wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
rodgerfox wrote:There was one glaring negative.

Still makes me ill thinking about it.
GT isnt coach?
No, I'd say that's a very big positive. GT couldn't have coached AFL post-2007 in my opinion.

The negative is that we are a better team than Geelong. And we have been since R1 2009.

Negatives from last night ??
We did the same thing to Geelong last night that we did in the GF last year.....except for one minor little thing.

Still makes me sick. Last night actually made me feel worse about the whole thing.

Agree it was very similar to last years GF, only this time we took our chances when we had them. We also did better at stopping them from scoring.
I think the cats had their air of invicibility back and many in the football world had them penciled in for another premiership and many had written us off completely 6 weeks ago after we lost a few games. But after the last 5 games and the last two in particular, people have been slowly been jumping back on the bandwagon. We are right in it again this year which only the true believers really thought after Nick went down and we lost a few.

We have sent a big message to the rest of the competition that we are the real deal again this year. I heard one of the commentators last night saying as much as the win doesn't make up for losing the GF last year, it does show that the players don't hold any mental scars from that loss due to the way they came out and played tonight. So a big positive from the night is they way they were able to come out in a similar game and get a different result. Great for our confidence and belief going forward.