Raphs hammy

Solar · Post: # 941845Post **Solar** » Mon 14 Jun 2010 1:33pm

Just curious but is it usual not to ice a hammy for a long period after pulling it? Because raph looked pretty good during the game and after walking across the ground after doing his hammy. Could it be partially torn (grade 1?) and they decided not to put him back on because it would fully tear? Is he a chance to only miss 1 week?

ausfatcat · Post: # 941859Post **ausfatcat** » Mon 14 Jun 2010 1:53pm

hope so he has been in good form the last couple of weeks and was good in the first quater again

saintly · Post: # 942078Post **saintly** » Mon 14 Jun 2010 9:02pm

did he not have problems with a hamstring at the end of last weeks game?

maybe it was a carryover?

Solar · Post: # 942081Post **Solar** » Mon 14 Jun 2010 9:05pm

saintly wrote:did he not have problems with a hamstring at the end of last weeks game?

maybe it was a carryover?

pretty sure it was the right leg and this was the left

Bernard Shakey · Mon 14 Jun 2010 9:23pm

The Age today said he has injured his calf.

3:16 · Post: # 942496Post **3:16** » Tue 15 Jun 2010 5:17pm

Solar wrote:Just curious but is it usual not to ice a hammy for a long period after pulling it? Because raph looked pretty good during the game and after walking across the ground after doing his hammy. Could it be partially torn (grade 1?) and they decided not to put him back on because it would fully tear? Is he a chance to only miss 1 week?

Had it on ice, for second, third and parts of last quarter as well as after the game in the rooms, spent much time on the table in the charter home!!!!!

plugger66 · Post: # 942511Post **plugger66** » Tue 15 Jun 2010 6:12pm

3:16 wrote:
Solar wrote:Just curious but is it usual not to ice a hammy for a long period after pulling it? Because raph looked pretty good during the game and after walking across the ground after doing his hammy. Could it be partially torn (grade 1?) and they decided not to put him back on because it would fully tear? Is he a chance to only miss 1 week?
Had it on ice, for second, third and parts of last quarter as well as after the game in the rooms, spent much time on the table in the charter home!!!!!

Were you on the plane?

35...LEGEND · Tue 15 Jun 2010 6:15pm

plugger66 wrote:
3:16 wrote:
Solar wrote:Just curious but is it usual not to ice a hammy for a long period after pulling it? Because raph looked pretty good during the game and after walking across the ground after doing his hammy. Could it be partially torn (grade 1?) and they decided not to put him back on because it would fully tear? Is he a chance to only miss 1 week?
Had it on ice, for second, third and parts of last quarter as well as after the game in the rooms, spent much time on the table in the charter home!!!!!
Were you on the plane?

intriguing isn't it

Dr Spaceman · Tue 15 Jun 2010 7:50pm

Seemed happy enough on the ground after the game.

What does that mean?

Who knows?

bigcarl · Post: # 942588Post **bigcarl** » Tue 15 Jun 2010 8:17pm

Dr Spaceman wrote:Seemed happy enough on the ground after the game

he looked capable of running a few laps, didn't he. maybe he's a hypochondriac.

saintspremiers · Tue 15 Jun 2010 8:33pm

35...LEGEND wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
3:16 wrote:
Solar wrote:Just curious but is it usual not to ice a hammy for a long period after pulling it? Because raph looked pretty good during the game and after walking across the ground after doing his hammy. Could it be partially torn (grade 1?) and they decided not to put him back on because it would fully tear? Is he a chance to only miss 1 week?
Had it on ice, for second, third and parts of last quarter as well as after the game in the rooms, spent much time on the table in the charter home!!!!!
Were you on the plane?
intriguing isn't it

Yep, one thing for certain is that 3:16 isn't Grant "Rodgerfox" Thomas!!!

saintbrat · Post: # 942604Post **saintbrat** » Tue 15 Jun 2010 8:47pm

thanks 3:16

Solar · Post: # 942722Post **Solar** » Wed 16 Jun 2010 4:50am

bigcarl wrote:
Dr Spaceman wrote:Seemed happy enough on the ground after the game
he looked capable of running a few laps, didn't he. maybe he's a hypochondriac.

glad I'm not the only one who thought he looked pretty good after the game? Hard to tell when the idiots on fox only tell us the reason for his absence was injury 2 quarters late

borderbarry · Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:55am

In todays Injury Report, both Herald Sun and The Age, has him as TBC. Must have been taken off as precautionary measure.

Solar · Post: # 942842Post **Solar** » Wed 16 Jun 2010 2:28pm

borderbarry wrote:In todays Injury Report, both Herald Sun and The Age, has him as TBC. Must have been taken off as precautionary measure.

miles is on that list so don't take it as gospal.

3:16 · Post: # 943311Post **3:16** » Thu 17 Jun 2010 3:43pm

saintspremiers wrote:
35...LEGEND wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
3:16 wrote:
Solar wrote:Just curious but is it usual not to ice a hammy for a long period after pulling it? Because raph looked pretty good during the game and after walking across the ground after doing his hammy. Could it be partially torn (grade 1?) and they decided not to put him back on because it would fully tear? Is he a chance to only miss 1 week?
Had it on ice, for second, third and parts of last quarter as well as after the game in the rooms, spent much time on the table in the charter home!!!!!
Were you on the plane?
intriguing isn't it
Yep, one thing for certain is that 3:16 isn't Grant "Rodgerfox" Thomas!!!

Don't tar me with that brush, ol' son!!!!!

Solar · Post: # 943428Post **Solar** » Thu 17 Jun 2010 7:47pm

3:16 wrote:
saintspremiers wrote:
35...LEGEND wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
3:16 wrote:
Solar wrote:Just curious but is it usual not to ice a hammy for a long period after pulling it? Because raph looked pretty good during the game and after walking across the ground after doing his hammy. Could it be partially torn (grade 1?) and they decided not to put him back on because it would fully tear? Is he a chance to only miss 1 week?
Had it on ice, for second, third and parts of last quarter as well as after the game in the rooms, spent much time on the table in the charter home!!!!!
Were you on the plane?
intriguing isn't it
Yep, one thing for certain is that 3:16 isn't Grant "Rodgerfox" Thomas!!!
Don't tar me with that brush, ol' son!!!!!

how bad is the calf?

saintspremiers · Thu 17 Jun 2010 9:09pm

3:16 wrote:
saintspremiers wrote:
35...LEGEND wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
3:16 wrote:
Solar wrote:Just curious but is it usual not to ice a hammy for a long period after pulling it? Because raph looked pretty good during the game and after walking across the ground after doing his hammy. Could it be partially torn (grade 1?) and they decided not to put him back on because it would fully tear? Is he a chance to only miss 1 week?
Had it on ice, for second, third and parts of last quarter as well as after the game in the rooms, spent much time on the table in the charter home!!!!!
Were you on the plane?
intriguing isn't it
Yep, one thing for certain is that 3:16 isn't Grant "Rodgerfox" Thomas!!!
Don't tar me with that brush, ol' son!!!!!

never, ever, you have my word on that!!

st_Trav_ofWA · Fri 18 Jun 2010 4:09pm

was compression bangaged ... raph was possitive but still annoyed with it .. reckon 4 weeks imo .. but im no expert

ace · Post: # 943912Post **ace** » Sat 19 Jun 2010 3:55am

Bernard Shakey wrote:The Age today said he has injured his calf.

Mooooooo

3:16 · Post: # 945015Post **3:16** » Tue 22 Jun 2010 12:23pm

st_Trav_ofWA wrote:was compression bangaged ... raph was possitive but still annoyed with it .. reckon 4 weeks imo .. but im no expert

Raph usually wears a compression bandage on his calf, you might find that it was a left hamstring that's the problem!!!!!

Solar · Post: # 945017Post **Solar** » Tue 22 Jun 2010 12:27pm

3:16 wrote:
st_Trav_ofWA wrote:was compression bangaged ... raph was possitive but still annoyed with it .. reckon 4 weeks imo .. but im no expert
Raph usually wears a compression bandage on his calf, you might find that it was a left hamstring that's the problem!!!!!

hey 3:16 how bad was it?

Raphs hammy

Raphs hammy

Re: Raphs hammy

Re: Raphs hammy

Re: Raphs hammy

Re: Raphs hammy

Re: Raphs hammy

Re: Raphs hammy

Re: Raphs hammy