Father / Son
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 616
- Joined: Sun 05 Sep 2004 2:28am
- Location: Ballarat
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 50 times
Father / Son
Geelong have build an awesome team based around some very good father son picks. I am interested to know if there are any promising boy coming up through the system that would qualify for a father / son pick for St. Kilda.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4432
- Joined: Sun 25 May 2008 5:39pm
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 444
- Joined: Fri 29 Apr 2005 12:26pm
- Location: Local Saint Territory
- Contact:
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4432
- Joined: Sun 25 May 2008 5:39pm
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4432
- Joined: Sun 25 May 2008 5:39pm
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 965
- Joined: Tue 03 Feb 2009 4:25pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 9 times
Yeah, they changed the rule two years ago i think.
Now, once a club selects a father/son player prior to the draft, other clubs can bid for him. The club that the father played for has first rights, they just have to give up a pick from the same round.
We did it with Ayce Cordy from the Bulldogs.
They wanted him father/son. We said we'd be prepared to give our first rounder for him. Therefore the Doggies had to give up thier first round pick to secure him.
The new system is much better. IMO, it was brought in because of Geelong's sucess.
Hopefully Harves has started coaching him already.![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
Now, once a club selects a father/son player prior to the draft, other clubs can bid for him. The club that the father played for has first rights, they just have to give up a pick from the same round.
We did it with Ayce Cordy from the Bulldogs.
They wanted him father/son. We said we'd be prepared to give our first rounder for him. Therefore the Doggies had to give up thier first round pick to secure him.
The new system is much better. IMO, it was brought in because of Geelong's sucess.
Hopefully Harves has started coaching him already.
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
Last edited by shmic_s on Thu 03 Jun 2010 2:17pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1928
- Joined: Sun 22 May 2005 11:42pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 90 times
I agree that the rule is better but I don't understand why they don't ditch it all together. It still allows a team to win a premiership and select an obivous 1# draft pick by using pick #16. It's one for the romantics only.shmic_s wrote:Yeah, they changed the rule two years ago i think.
Now, once a club selects a father/son player prior to the draft, other clubs can bid for him. The club that the father played for has first rights, they just have to give up a similar round pick.
We did it with Ayce Cordy from the Bulldogs i think. They wanted him father/son. We said we'd be prepared to give our first rounder for him. Therefore the Doddies had to give up thier first round pick to secure him.
The new system is much better. IMO, it was brought in because of Geelong's sucess.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 965
- Joined: Tue 03 Feb 2009 4:25pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 9 times
A bit little romance is alright.suss wrote:I agree that the rule is better but I don't understand why they don't ditch it all together. It still allows a team to win a premiership and select an obivous 1# draft pick by using pick #16. It's one for the romantics only.shmic_s wrote:Yeah, they changed the rule two years ago i think.
Now, once a club selects a father/son player prior to the draft, other clubs can bid for him. The club that the father played for has first rights, they just have to give up a similar round pick.
We did it with Ayce Cordy from the Bulldogs i think. They wanted him father/son. We said we'd be prepared to give our first rounder for him. Therefore the Doddies had to give up thier first round pick to secure him.
The new system is much better. IMO, it was brought in because of Geelong's sucess.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
It is implemented much better now.
EDIT: Didn't notice my spelling was so bad. Rushing so the boss didn't see the computer screen!
- degruch
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8948
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
- Location: Croydonia
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
It's a pretty randon rule though. For example, who thought living in Geelong would be so enticing that players would stay there and breed!?!suss wrote:I agree that the rule is better but I don't understand why they don't ditch it all together. It still allows a team to win a premiership and select an obivous 1# draft pick by using pick #16. It's one for the romantics only.shmic_s wrote:Yeah, they changed the rule two years ago i think.
Now, once a club selects a father/son player prior to the draft, other clubs can bid for him. The club that the father played for has first rights, they just have to give up a similar round pick.
We did it with Ayce Cordy from the Bulldogs i think. They wanted him father/son. We said we'd be prepared to give our first rounder for him. Therefore the Doddies had to give up thier first round pick to secure him.
The new system is much better. IMO, it was brought in because of Geelong's sucess.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4432
- Joined: Sun 25 May 2008 5:39pm
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1360
- Joined: Sun 03 Oct 2004 8:45pm
- Has thanked: 93 times
- Been thanked: 93 times
- lurker#134
- Club Player
- Posts: 362
- Joined: Fri 04 Sep 2009 11:34am
Heh... imagine that. Peckett handballs to Peckett who kicks it to Peckett who kicks to Peckett who bombs it into to the 50......PEEEECKETTTTT! WHAT A MARK!
This weeks team: Out Peckett, Peckett in Peckett, Peckett and Peckett.
One vote Peckett
Two votes Peckett
Three votes Peckett
Someone get on this.
This weeks team: Out Peckett, Peckett in Peckett, Peckett and Peckett.
One vote Peckett
Two votes Peckett
Three votes Peckett
Someone get on this.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4882
- Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
- Has thanked: 327 times
- Been thanked: 465 times
I deliberately edited your rolling eyes emoticon b/c I actually agree with what you wrote minus the facetious tone. Imagine if Harves son turns out to be champ in 7 yrs time but he had to play for another club? What if the late great TRevor Barker had a son before he died? Imagine if that boy was to play for any other team other than the saints? If Burkie had boys? The list goes on and on. THis is what creates passion and loyalty amongst supporters. I love telling my kids that Gary Ablett's dad was just as famous as his son and they played for the same club.suss wrote:At the end of this decade the father/son rule will have played a major part in two teams making 8 grand finals and most likely winning 6 premierships. Whoever came up with that idea deserves a pat on the back.
I reckon it's fantastic for the game and the individual club that champions get to play for their dad's club. Who would ever deny Steve Silvagni playing at the blues, Gary Ablett playing for the cats, or matty Richardson playing for the tiges. Just b/c it hasn't panned out for our club is no need to be bitter about it.
- borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga
Or the Clokes and Shaws screwing up Collingwood's recruiting.Moods wrote: I reckon it's fantastic for the game and the individual club that champions get to play for their dad's club. Who would ever deny Steve Silvagni playing at the blues, Gary Ablett playing for the cats, or matty Richardson playing for the tiges. Just b/c it hasn't panned out for our club is no need to be bitter about it.
- saintbrat
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 44575
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
- Location: saints zone
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 188 times
Peckett- 5
Thompson - 2
Loewe 1
Harvey -1
Hudgton -2
Milne- 1
current guys are late starters
current 100 game players
dalsanto
Clarke X
Ball
Montagna
Goddard
Blake
Koschitzke
Riewoldt
Gram
Fisher S
Hayes
Baker
recent retirees
Gerhig
Brown T-children how many and ?
Everitt
Wakelin D
peckitt -5
Thompson- 2
Sziller ?
Daniels- Jayson ?
Harvey- 1
Burke- girls
Loewe - 1
Rice ?
Shanahan?
Grant- ?
Lockett - 4 girls
Winmar 0-- 1- basketball
Pekin T ?
Frawley D- 3 girls
Coghlin F -?
Elphingston?
cunningham G
Burns ?
after that they are possibly already too old.
http://stats.rleague.com/afl/stats/alltime/stkilda.html
sorted by age.
Thompson - 2
Loewe 1
Harvey -1
Hudgton -2
Milne- 1
current guys are late starters
current 100 game players
dalsanto
Clarke X
Ball
Montagna
Goddard
Blake
Koschitzke
Riewoldt
Gram
Fisher S
Hayes
Baker
recent retirees
Gerhig
Brown T-children how many and ?
Everitt
Wakelin D
peckitt -5
Thompson- 2
Sziller ?
Daniels- Jayson ?
Harvey- 1
Burke- girls
Loewe - 1
Rice ?
Shanahan?
Grant- ?
Lockett - 4 girls
Winmar 0-- 1- basketball
Pekin T ?
Frawley D- 3 girls
Coghlin F -?
Elphingston?
cunningham G
Burns ?
after that they are possibly already too old.
http://stats.rleague.com/afl/stats/alltime/stkilda.html
sorted by age.
StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
![Image](http://www.saintsmembership.com.au/theme/afl-stkilda/img/how-i-want-to-be.png)
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
![Image](http://www.saintsmembership.com.au/theme/afl-stkilda/img/how-i-want-to-be.png)
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1928
- Joined: Sun 22 May 2005 11:42pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 90 times
You don't need to edit my post to make your point. I was criticising the person who came up with the system, not the person who came up with the current rule.Moods wrote:I deliberately edited your rolling eyes emoticon b/c I actually agree with what you wrote minus the facetious tone. Imagine if Harves son turns out to be champ in 7 yrs time but he had to play for another club? What if the late great TRevor Barker had a son before he died? Imagine if that boy was to play for any other team other than the saints? If Burkie had boys? The list goes on and on. THis is what creates passion and loyalty amongst supporters. I love telling my kids that Gary Ablett's dad was just as famous as his son and they played for the same club.suss wrote:At the end of this decade the father/son rule will have played a major part in two teams making 8 grand finals and most likely winning 6 premierships. Whoever came up with that idea deserves a pat on the back.
I reckon it's fantastic for the game and the individual club that champions get to play for their dad's club. Who would ever deny Steve Silvagni playing at the blues, Gary Ablett playing for the cats, or matty Richardson playing for the tiges. Just b/c it hasn't panned out for our club is no need to be bitter about it.
And by the way, I'm not bitter about it, I'm thinking as much about the other clubs who would've benefitted from Ablett, Scarlett and Brown etc.
I just think that if you have an entire system aimed at producing a level playing field (including salary cap and draft), it's counter-intuitive to have a loop hole which lets a club become a power house based on the quality of an ex-player's semen.
If Ablett, Scarlett and Brown had all gone into the draft, wouldn't there have been a better spread of premierships amongst the 16 teams over the last 9 years? Isn't that a good thing?
- Gilbert The Great
- Club Player
- Posts: 330
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2007 12:34am
- Location: Melbourne
I think that the father/son rule is an integral part of our game. It adds another dimension of loyalty, allows sons to follow in their fathers footsteps and play in the team they have supported all their lives. While it does create a bump in the process of creating an even compition, it would be a sad day when this rule is removed from the game. It is apart of what sets our game apart, adds passion amoung the supporters, creates stronger communities within the clubs, I would hate to see the sons of past players playing for other clubs.