Andrew Embley

BigMart · Post: # 930014Post **BigMart** » Mon 24 May 2010 7:28pm

Thankyou!

busso mick · Post: # 930017Post **busso mick** » Mon 24 May 2010 7:36pm

I think we would have won anyway but it was at a crucial time in the game. I reckon if you ranked Norm Smith Medallists against each other surely he would be stone motherless last.

quidnunc · Post: # 930018Post **quidnunc** » Mon 24 May 2010 7:40pm

And a mile ahead of us!

kosifantutti23 · Mon 24 May 2010 7:42pm

I thought this would be a thread about how we should have taken Embley instead of Schwarze.

BigMart · Post: # 930021Post **BigMart** » Mon 24 May 2010 7:43pm

Certain goal F***ed Up

23 points down in the wet halfway through the third with WC coming home with the wind....hmmm...with zero confidence

instead....we scored, 11 points down kicking with the wind, confidence up and they were deflated....

kosifantutti23 · Mon 24 May 2010 7:49pm

BigMart wrote:Certain goal F***ed Up

23 points down in the wet halfway through the third with WC coming home with the wind....hmmm...with zero confidence

instead....we scored, 11 points down kicking with the wind, confidence up and they were deflated....

Nice thought but we were only five points down and had kicked the last two goals so I think we had the run on. Great double effort by Dawson to turn the ball over in the middle to set up the Goddard goal.

yipper · Post: # 930024Post **yipper** » Mon 24 May 2010 7:50pm

What a silly post. Who knows how that play would have ended up.

For me - thankyou Lenny Hayes, Raph Clarke for putting his body on the line at a crucial stage, Milne for kicking big goals, Dal Santo for winning hard ball and using it superbly. And Goddard for taking control. We ran over the top of them, we were to good.

st_Trav_ofWA · Mon 24 May 2010 7:51pm

honestly embly has gone two seasons too many ... too slow and not skillful enough now days .. that blunder was just one in many many times he was shown lacking

saintsrus · Post: # 930032Post **saintsrus** » Mon 24 May 2010 7:55pm

kosifantutti23 wrote:
BigMart wrote:Certain goal F***ed Up

23 points down in the wet halfway through the third with WC coming home with the wind....hmmm...with zero confidence

instead....we scored, 11 points down kicking with the wind, confidence up and they were deflated....
Nice thought but we were only five points down

yes this!
even people at work told me today we would have been 23 points down, not true

BigMart · Post: # 930033Post **BigMart** » Mon 24 May 2010 7:56pm

He was running into open goal....I reckon if he hadn't F'd up the bounce he could have dribbled it from 20m

Blake was 10m behind him, and Blake aint Alwyn Davey

Beekay · Post: # 930035Post **Beekay** » Mon 24 May 2010 7:57pm

Think it is quite a good comparison. Have a look at how bad some of those Eagles got once Judd left.

Riewoldt the same. Some of our footballers look like they have gone down a class this year.

st_Trav_ofWA · Mon 24 May 2010 8:01pm

BigMart wrote:He was running into open goal....I reckon if he hadn't F'd up the bounce he could have dribbled it from 20m

Blake was 10m behind him, and Blake aint Alwyn Davey

i was right infront of the play Blake was about 20 m away from him and gaining fast had embly not fumbled the blake would of got to him befor he got 20m out from goal

yipper · Post: # 930046Post **yipper** » Mon 24 May 2010 8:04pm

st_Trav_ofWA wrote:
BigMart wrote:He was running into open goal....I reckon if he hadn't F'd up the bounce he could have dribbled it from 20m

Blake was 10m behind him, and Blake aint Alwyn Davey
i was right infront of the play Blake was about 20 m away from him and gaining fast had embly not fumbled the blake would of got to him befor he got 20m out from goal

Spot on. Embley of 2010 is not quick. Not at all. Blake would have got to him. Embley would have had to hurry a shot at goal from a long way out.

st_Trav_ofWA · Mon 24 May 2010 8:10pm

yipper wrote:
st_Trav_ofWA wrote:
BigMart wrote:He was running into open goal....I reckon if he hadn't F'd up the bounce he could have dribbled it from 20m

Blake was 10m behind him, and Blake aint Alwyn Davey
i was right infront of the play Blake was about 20 m away from him and gaining fast had embly not fumbled the blake would of got to him befor he got 20m out from goal
Spot on. Embley of 2010 is not quick. Not at all. Blake would have got to him. Embley would have had to hurry a shot at goal from a long way out.

thats the reason he fumbled he was trying to gain distance on blake and it wasnt working and he knew he couldnt kick it from 50 and there were no eagle anywhere infront of him .... simply put he shat himself

gotta love the pressure

BigMart · Post: # 930073Post **BigMart** » Mon 24 May 2010 8:33pm

He just stuffed up the bounce...BTW he was tackled on the 50 arc....if Blake was 20M behind him, would he have made up 20M in 30M....at worse, he wuld have kicked from 30m.

either way.....it helped...

st_Trav_ofWA · Mon 24 May 2010 8:35pm

BigMart wrote:He just stuffed up the bounce...BTW he was tackled on the 50 arc....if Blake was 20M behind him, would he have made up 20M in 30M....at worse, he wuld have kicked from 30m.

either way.....it helped...

no when embly got the ball blake was 20m away by the time embly got to the 50 and fumbled blake was more like 5 metre away

Sobraz · Post: # 930081Post **Sobraz** » Mon 24 May 2010 8:41pm

Luke Ball would've been able to run him down...

BallBanger · Post: # 930084Post **BallBanger** » Mon 24 May 2010 8:42pm

If embley had kicked a goal with that play our likely senario was a loss

saintsRrising · Mon 24 May 2010 8:44pm

BigMart wrote:Thankyou!

Why start a new thread when there already was one started a day prior?

http://www.saintsational.com/forum/view ... hp?t=61800

BigMart · Post: # 930091Post **BigMart** » Mon 24 May 2010 8:53pm

Did not see it...isn't that obvious....

first time on since Sunday....forgive me SR...please

Andrew Embley

Andrew Embley

Re: Andrew Embley