Well that is uniformed crap then if they are getting a bad run with supporters.dcstkfc wrote:Since about Round 5.Saintsfan wrote:
Since when were Mini, Schneider and Geary whipping boys?
Teams. Ess v StK
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
I believe playing playing someone with a PNG parent gets us an exemption on that rule. We would also get an exemption is we played Walsh. Playing at least 5 New South Welshmen and/or Queenslanders also nets a exemption. It's the 'Growing the Game' clause.ace wrote:The AFL has a secret rule that every team must play at least one indigenous player if fit.jimbob wrote:clark wont ever get dropped ross lyons love child we be Armo, McEvoy in for king and stevensBanger724 wrote:Backs: James Gwilt / Zac Dawson / Sam Gilbert
Half backs: Baker / Sam Fisher / Jason Blake
Centreline: Clint Jones / Nick Dal Santo / Farren Ray
Half forwards: Andrew McQualter / Brendon Goddard / Adam Schneider
Forwards: Jason Gram / Justin Koschitzke / Stephen Milne
Followers: Michael Gardiner / Lenny Hayes / Leigh Montagna
Interchange From: David Armitage / Raphael Clarke / Robert Eddy
Jarryn Geary / Nick Heyne / Ben McEvoy / Rhys Stanley
From Herald Sun
Out: Jack Steven, Steven King
In: Armo, Eddy, Heyne, McEvoy & Stanley
Will take a stab in the dark and say Eddy, Clark & Heyne will come out of that extended bench tomorrow.
Gwilt does not qualify due to his background being New Guinea.
So I think we are covered and wont cop a penalty from the AFL so long as Armitage comes in or Gwilt plays.
[
I agree. I think one of them will play which means either Clarke or geary will be out. I would prefer Clarke at this stage. We are to tall down back as it is.[/quote]hope your right would like to see ins being armo ,stanley ,macca out raph ,king,steven. steven unlucky leading goal kicker last week for us .bizzare i reckon ross likes dropping players who kick goals for us ie steven and armo the week before.got have 2 tall forwards makes us less predictable going forward and gives milne,shcnieds and mini some crumbs imo.
I agree. I think one of them will play which means either Clarke or geary will be out. I would prefer Clarke at this stage. We are to tall down back as it is.[/quote]hope your right would like to see ins being armo ,stanley ,macca out raph ,king,steven. steven unlucky leading goal kicker last week for us .bizzare i reckon ross likes dropping players who kick goals for us ie steven and armo the week before.got have 2 tall forwards makes us less predictable going forward and gives milne,shcnieds and mini some crumbs imo.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23218
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 735 times
- Been thanked: 1778 times
I like the idea of:nobhead wrote:[
hope your right would like to see ins being armo ,stanley ,macca out raph ,king,steven. steven unlucky leading goal kicker last week for us .bizzare i reckon ross likes dropping players who kick goals for us ie steven and armo the week before.got have 2 tall forwards makes us less predictable going forward and gives milne,shcnieds and mini some crumbs imo.
INS - Armo, Mac, Stanley for Raph, King......but Id also like to keep Stevens as an in...BUT Im unsure if he has the defensive game to keep a Mqualter out.....I reckon IF he had that manic tackle aspect to his game Mqualter would go for mine....Geary was ok last week to me and has some zip we need.
“Yeah….nah””
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5017
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:42am
- Location: Bayside
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 91 times
+1Teflon wrote:I like the idea of:nobhead wrote:[
hope your right would like to see ins being armo ,stanley ,macca out raph ,king,steven. steven unlucky leading goal kicker last week for us .bizzare i reckon ross likes dropping players who kick goals for us ie steven and armo the week before.got have 2 tall forwards makes us less predictable going forward and gives milne,shcnieds and mini some crumbs imo.
INS - Armo, Mac, Stanley for Raph, King......but Id also like to keep Stevens as an in...BUT Im unsure if he has the defensive game to keep a Mqualter out.....I reckon IF he had that manic tackle aspect to his game Mqualter would go for mine....Geary was ok last week to me and has some zip we need.
- Statsman
- Club Player
- Posts: 1775
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:46pm
- Location: Aisle 37, Level 1, Telstra Dome
Steven actually has a slight edge in tackles with an average of ,4.5 tackles in his two games while Mini has an average of 4 tackles per game this season. However there's more to the defensive side of the game than just tackling. There's also the chasing, pressuring, harrassing, spoiling, smothering, etc. Either way, I don't think Steven is that far off Mini's level, which has dipped a little this season.Teflon wrote:INS - Armo, Mac, Stanley for Raph, King......but Id also like to keep Stevens as an in...BUT Im unsure if he has the defensive game to keep a Mqualter out.....I reckon IF he had that manic tackle aspect to his game Mqualter would go for mine....Geary was ok last week to me and has some zip we need.
Geary needs to tidy up his disposal. I think I read in the paper on Tuesday morning that his disposal effectiveness was only 50%. I don't think it's the first time he's posted that kind of number either.
"Ask not what your teammates can do for you. Ask what you can do for your teammates." - Earvin 'Magic' Johnson
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 16949
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3602 times
- Been thanked: 2875 times
I don't mean to bag the kid, but why exactly is Zac in the team
who's he going to play on...
I spy another week where he doesn't have an appropriate opponent down back and plays quasi everywhere but well no where.
Would much rather keep Steven instead.
Must say I find it frustrating that RL doesn't swing the axe a bit more or mix it up once in a while...
Guys like McQualter, Dawson, King, and to a lesser extent King, Geary and Clarke floundering whilst McEvoy, Stanley, Heyne etc barely get a look in.
Would also like to see Raph play in the middle for a change, see what he's got.
who's he going to play on...
I spy another week where he doesn't have an appropriate opponent down back and plays quasi everywhere but well no where.
Would much rather keep Steven instead.
Must say I find it frustrating that RL doesn't swing the axe a bit more or mix it up once in a while...
Guys like McQualter, Dawson, King, and to a lesser extent King, Geary and Clarke floundering whilst McEvoy, Stanley, Heyne etc barely get a look in.
Would also like to see Raph play in the middle for a change, see what he's got.
- Statsman
- Club Player
- Posts: 1775
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:46pm
- Location: Aisle 37, Level 1, Telstra Dome
Hard to disagree with that. Surely with Blake, Fisher, Gwilt, Gilbert and Clarke we have enough tall/tallish defenders to match up on most forward lines and therefore don't necessarily need Zac down there was well. However Ross obviously prefers to have Fisher and Gilbert play with freedom rather than having to lock down on an opponent. Having said that, it doesn't explain why Gilbert started on Waite last week.skeptic wrote:I don't mean to bag the kid, but why exactly is Zac in the team
who's he going to play on...
I spy another week where he doesn't have an appropriate opponent down back and plays quasi everywhere but well no where.
I'm not sure how Raph would go in the middle as he really needs time and space to be effective. He can be indecisive with the football and that spells trouble in close quarters. My worry is that he'd be caught with the ball far too often as he he often fails to take the first option and hangs onto the footy too long. His long, lean body is better suited to floating across half back rather than bustling around in the middle.skeptic wrote:Would also like to see Raph play in the middle for a change, see what he's got.
"Ask not what your teammates can do for you. Ask what you can do for your teammates." - Earvin 'Magic' Johnson
- saint patrick
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4338
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 5:20pm
- Location: mt.martha
Why the hell has Steven been dropped..a goal kicker and has pace.. ![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Never take a backward step even to gain momentum.....
'It's OK to have the capabilities and abilities, but you've got to get it done." Terry Daniher 05
"We have beauty in our captain and we have a true leader in our coach. Our time will come"
Thinline.Post 09 Grand final.
'It's OK to have the capabilities and abilities, but you've got to get it done." Terry Daniher 05
"We have beauty in our captain and we have a true leader in our coach. Our time will come"
Thinline.Post 09 Grand final.
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Happy for either to come in however if it's Heyne I'm not sure the guy himself will solve any problems. He's only 187 cms and would be playing his first game so probably wouldn't be much help to Kosi.Statsman wrote:Ross also implied in the media today that we would go with a more traditional forward structure and stop robbing from the backline and midfield. That suggests to me that either Stanley or Heyne comes in a a marking forward to support Kosi.saintsRrising wrote:So with Ben being an IN, that is three of:
David Armitage / Raphael Clarke / Robert Eddy
Jarryn Geary / Nick Heyne / Rhys Stanley
We need a tall at CFH who can take a grab, whether that be Dawson, Stanley, Macca whatever. If it is Heyne playing alongside the likes of Milne, Schneider, McQualter etc then I don't think Kosi, or the team for that matter, will be much better off.
That aside I would be happy for Heyne to debut - I would just be wary of thinking of him in terms of a marking forward.
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30091
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18599
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1924 times
- Been thanked: 852 times
maybe he needs less time to think about it (which he would get in the middle). no time to second guess yourself there. it's first option or "B-A-L-L".Statsman wrote:I'm not sure how Raph would go in the middle as he really needs time and space to be effective. He can be indecisive with the football and that spells trouble in close quarters. My worry is that he'd be caught with the ball far too often as he he often fails to take the first option and hangs onto the footy too long. His long, lean body is better suited to floating across half back rather than bustling around in the middle.skeptic wrote:Would also like to see Raph play in the middle for a change, see what he's got.
- ralphsmith
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2420
- Joined: Sat 25 Jul 2009 10:36pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 17 times
Most people would agree that Zac had a fantastic start to season 2009. Full of confidence and aggression. That has since dropped off and i personally would love to see him discover it again.dcstkfc wrote:The whipping boys Zac, Raph, Mini, Schneider and Geary will be given every chance.
Mcqualter was also great for a lot of last year, a player who was a certain delisting about 2 years ago switched it around. He became a tough little goal sneak who appears from nowhere Tim Cahill style and slots one through.
Schneider thrives when everyone else does hard work and he can be lethal.
Anyway, the team is selected. We have to keep trying things until Riewoldt gets back. I am now of the belief without him we are back with the pack. So let us struggle on until he returns.
Go sainters!
What is dead may never die, but rises again harder and stronger.
![Image](http://users.tpg.com.au/prothall//merlin.jpg)
![Image](http://users.tpg.com.au/prothall//merlin.jpg)
gumbleton or hurley? 197/90 or 193/92. not that no-one else could take them, but neither are that quick so both are reasonable matchups for zac.skeptic wrote:I don't mean to bag the kid, but why exactly is Zac in the team
who's he going to play on...
or hille if he goes down there - 201/109. not sure how much he's been doing that though.
- DWOODROW
- Club Player
- Posts: 1123
- Joined: Tue 10 Feb 2009 4:36pm
- Location: TOWNSVILLE
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 38 times
ralphsmith wrote:Most people would agree that Zac had a fantastic start to season 2009. Full of confidence and aggression. That has since dropped off and i personally would love to see him discover it again.dcstkfc wrote:The whipping boys Zac, Raph, Mini, Schneider and Geary will be given every chance.
Mcqualter was also great for a lot of last year, a player who was a certain delisting about 2 years ago switched it around. He became a tough little goal sneak who appears from nowhere Tim Cahill style and slots one through.
Schneider thrives when everyone else does hard work and he can be lethal.
I would have to say that all the boys are down from last year. It's still early and maybe they are waiting till the season gets a little bit further in but the Saints footy of last year is definitely half of what is was last year.
Hopefully by plugging away we can still come away with some wins and get back to way we play best near the finals.
Here's hoping
Anyway, the team is selected. We have to keep trying things until Riewoldt gets back. I am now of the belief without him we are back with the pack. So let us struggle on until he returns.
Go sainters!
I think Ryder has been pushing up forward a bit recently as well?bergholt wrote:gumbleton or hurley? 197/90 or 193/92. not that no-one else could take them, but neither are that quick so both are reasonable matchups for zac.skeptic wrote:I don't mean to bag the kid, but why exactly is Zac in the team
who's he going to play on...
or hille if he goes down there - 201/109. not sure how much he's been doing that though.
Well Ryder is too big, strong and plain better so he is going to have an easy evening.SainterK wrote:I think Ryder has been pushing up forward a bit recently as well?bergholt wrote:gumbleton or hurley? 197/90 or 193/92. not that no-one else could take them, but neither are that quick so both are reasonable matchups for zac.skeptic wrote:I don't mean to bag the kid, but why exactly is Zac in the team
who's he going to play on...
or hille if he goes down there - 201/109. not sure how much he's been doing that though.
Hurley is a gun. I don't want this match up.
This could be the making of Scott Gumbleton. His first major haul.
We will still win easily however. Again the cracks re Zac will be papered over.
The Saintsfan Cometh
i dunno, but i think ross wants a big, strong, tall full-back. he hasn't got a ready made one so he's building one from scratch. it's taking time but the kid has shown that he's about half-way there, just that he's inconsistent and lacking in confidence. get him over the line, though, and he'll be a serious asset to the side - i think that's what ross sees.Saintsfan wrote:We will still win easily however. Again the cracks re Zac will be papered over.
Not sure if Hurley will play forward, they are missing Pears down back and I think he will at least start there?Saintsfan wrote:Well Ryder is too big, strong and plain better so he is going to have an easy evening.SainterK wrote:I think Ryder has been pushing up forward a bit recently as well?bergholt wrote:gumbleton or hurley? 197/90 or 193/92. not that no-one else could take them, but neither are that quick so both are reasonable matchups for zac.skeptic wrote:I don't mean to bag the kid, but why exactly is Zac in the team
who's he going to play on...
or hille if he goes down there - 201/109. not sure how much he's been doing that though.
Hurley is a gun. I don't want this match up.
This could be the making of Scott Gumbleton. His first major haul.
We will still win easily however. Again the cracks re Zac will be papered over.
With Fletcher and Hooker I don't think they will need a third tall defender considering the work and output Hurley can give playing forward.SainterK wrote:Not sure if Hurley will play forward, they are missing Pears down back and I think he will at least start there?Saintsfan wrote:Well Ryder is too big, strong and plain better so he is going to have an easy evening.SainterK wrote:I think Ryder has been pushing up forward a bit recently as well?bergholt wrote:gumbleton or hurley? 197/90 or 193/92. not that no-one else could take them, but neither are that quick so both are reasonable matchups for zac.skeptic wrote:I don't mean to bag the kid, but why exactly is Zac in the team
who's he going to play on...
or hille if he goes down there - 201/109. not sure how much he's been doing that though.
Hurley is a gun. I don't want this match up.
This could be the making of Scott Gumbleton. His first major haul.
We will still win easily however. Again the cracks re Zac will be papered over.
Hooker to Kosi, Fletcher to play on our rotating second tall forward/never pick up an opponent tough-man Nick Maxwell style.
The Saintsfan Cometh
- Ghost Like
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6562
- Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
- Has thanked: 5788 times
- Been thanked: 1909 times
Personally I would like to see both Heyne & Stanley in, if they don't play then it's same same and no real difference or challenge to the opposition. With them in means that one of Schneider, Goddard or Heyne can be lead up forwards allowing for marking targets like Kosi, Stanley or Goddard (if not leading up) to remain inside 50.
I think Ross has hinted that he'll keep the mids and defence as our backbone and work on creating a workable forward line from those remaining.
We really have nothing to lose, if it works we win, if it doesn't then two young players get valuable exposure and experience.
I think Ross has hinted that he'll keep the mids and defence as our backbone and work on creating a workable forward line from those remaining.
We really have nothing to lose, if it works we win, if it doesn't then two young players get valuable exposure and experience.
This place is gonna explodeGhost Like wrote:Personally I would like to see both Heyne & Stanley in, if they don't play then it's same same and no real difference or challenge to the opposition. With them in means that one of Schneider, Goddard or Heyne can be lead up forwards allowing for marking targets like Kosi, Stanley or Goddard (if not leading up) to remain inside 50.
I think Ross has hinted that he'll keep the mids and defence as our backbone and work on creating a workable forward line from those remaining.
We really have nothing to lose, if it works we win, if it doesn't then two young players get valuable exposure and experience.
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2340
- Joined: Tue 10 Jul 2007 11:14am
- Location: Bentleigh East
- Has thanked: 268 times
- Been thanked: 604 times
Andrew McQualter should count himself very lucky to stay in the side. Jack Steven has done a reasonable job in the same role and probably deserves more of a go. Steven averaged more tackles and goals than McQualter while in the side.
McQualter kicked 22.9 last year, 0.9 goals a game. This year he's kicked only 2.4 for the season. That's very poor for a bloke who spends a lot of time in the forward line. Jack Steven kicked 3 goals in his two games.
McQualter kicked 22.9 last year, 0.9 goals a game. This year he's kicked only 2.4 for the season. That's very poor for a bloke who spends a lot of time in the forward line. Jack Steven kicked 3 goals in his two games.
Beno88 wrote:Andrew McQualter should count himself very lucky to stay in the side. Jack Steven has done a reasonable job in the same role and probably deserves more of a go. Steven averaged more tackles and goals than McQualter while in the side.
McQualter kicked 22.9 last year, 0.9 goals a game. This year he's kicked only 2.4 for the season. That's very poor for a bloke who spends a lot of time in the forward line. Jack Steven kicked 3 goals in his two games.
mini won us the game against the doggies...
.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.