Armo

Leo.J · Post: # 915705Post **Leo.J** » Sat 01 May 2010 1:39am

2 Goals, out of 7.

7 tackles, and 10 possessions.

Not too sure Luke Ball could have doen that...

felixleo · Post: # 915710Post **felixleo** » Sat 01 May 2010 1:41am

Love Luke and sad to see him go but Armo is the future and gees he hits his opponents hard.

Armoooo · Post: # 915713Post **Armoooo** » Sat 01 May 2010 1:42am

He will only get better and better, anyone know his TOG stats?

If he could get up to a 80+% TOG player he could take it another step further...

rexy · Post: # 915715Post **rexy** » Sat 01 May 2010 1:42am

Thought it was probably his worst game for the year, just couldnt get hads on the pill enough IMO. Not sure of his time on the ground or in the middle, looked to be forward at times, not sure thats his gig.

Leo.J · Post: # 915717Post **Leo.J** » Sat 01 May 2010 1:43am

felixleo wrote:Love Luke and sad to see him go but Armo is the future and gees he hits his opponents hard.

He sure does hit hard, he fears no one imo.

Hard as nails.

Buckets · Post: # 915718Post **Buckets** » Sat 01 May 2010 1:43am

Reckon Armo is beginning to assert himself in the game. Might not be the speediest bloke around but by jingos his in and under work and disposal is pretty good!

Leo.J · Post: # 915732Post **Leo.J** » Sat 01 May 2010 1:49am

rexy wrote:Thought it was probably his worst game for the year, just couldnt get hads on the pill enough IMO. Not sure of his time on the ground or in the middle, looked to be forward at times, not sure thats his gig.

He's kicked nearly 30% of our score and had 7 tackles.

Not sure who his direct opponent was, but imo opinion he's had a big impact on the game.

bigcarl · Post: # 915737Post **bigcarl** » Sat 01 May 2010 1:51am

he kicked nearly a third of our goals, so that's enough to hang his hat on IMO. i like that he's dangerous near the goals.

wraiyth · Post: # 915748Post **wraiyth** » Sat 01 May 2010 1:58am

Armoooo wrote:He will only get better and better, anyone know his TOG stats?

If he could get up to a 80+% TOG player he could take it another step further...

69% tonight which is around about his average.

Armoooo · Post: # 915752Post **Armoooo** » Sat 01 May 2010 2:00am

wraiyth wrote:
Armoooo wrote:He will only get better and better, anyone know his TOG stats?

If he could get up to a 80+% TOG player he could take it another step further...
69% tonight which is around about his average.

Interesting that he is getting around the same amount of time as Ball was, I guess this is a rotation based decision to keep our second in and under midfield fresh so that they can take the number one role when Lenny is off...

But I just feel that having Armo on the bench for 30% of the game and King and Gardiner 50% each is just wasting too much bench time...

saintsRrising · Sat 01 May 2010 2:00am

Importantly Armo seems to bea very good last quarter player. Was great against Freo.

He really helped ice the game for us tonight.

The OtherThommo · Sat 01 May 2010 2:02am

The Boss nominated his tank pre-season.

maverick · Post: # 915757Post **maverick** » Sat 01 May 2010 2:03am

Leo.J wrote:2 Goals, out of 7.

7 tackles, and 10 possessions.

Not too sure Luke Ball could have doen that...

Im sure, he couldn't.
Armo sprinted from the pocket where he created an option for Kosi, to the goalsquare where he kciked the goal.
Excellent

Beej · Post: # 915758Post **Beej** » Sat 01 May 2010 2:04am

Armoooo wrote:He will only get better and better, anyone know his TOG stats?

If he could get up to a 80+% TOG player he could take it another step further...

When he gets up to 92% we could say he contributes twice as much as Bally.

Armoooo · Post: # 915775Post **Armoooo** » Sat 01 May 2010 2:15am

Beej wrote:
Armoooo wrote:He will only get better and better, anyone know his TOG stats?

If he could get up to a 80+% TOG player he could take it another step further...
When he gets up to 92% we could say he contributes twice as much as Bally.

Judging by Ball's form this season I think we already could

saintsRrising · Sat 01 May 2010 2:17am

Ball does not kick match winning goals....

For that matter he dies not kick goals...

Armoooo · Post: # 915780Post **Armoooo** » Sat 01 May 2010 2:20am

saintsRrising wrote:Ball does not kick match winning goals....

For that matter he dies not kick goals...

Off topic but I just had a quick read of the articles in your sig...

Concave are the company you're involved in right? just how involved are you if you don't mind me asking because it looks like the company is coming along great!!

wraiyth · Post: # 915797Post **wraiyth** » Sat 01 May 2010 2:39am

saintsRrising wrote:Ball does not kick match winning goals....

For that matter he dies not kick goals...

Because he can't kick.

Bardon Saint · Sat 01 May 2010 9:43am

saintsRrising wrote:Importantly Armo seems to bea very good last quarter player. Was great against Freo.

He really helped ice the game for us tonight.

I really think that he is making a conscious effort toward good finishes. Maybe a few people in his ear after his fadeout last year against the Hawks whereby he had 3 sublime qtrs and then was gone for the last.

CeilidhSaint · Sat 01 May 2010 2:21pm

Do you think Bally would have made the distance with Armo's soccer goal in the last qtr or whould he have dished it off?!

3rd generation saint · Sat 01 May 2010 2:24pm

Luke Ball would have got 20 more possessions, and we would have lost because he wouldn't have kicked a goal.
However, I think those two goals may have saved Armo from being dropped in favour of Gram, who I think we are missing big time with that extra run and pace out of defence.

terry smith rules · Sat 01 May 2010 2:28pm

saintsRrising wrote:Importantly Armo seems to bea very good last quarter player. Was great against Freo.

He really helped ice the game for us tonight.

exactly

he is definitely our second half of the game man

Sam23 · Post: # 916108Post **Sam23** » Sat 01 May 2010 2:31pm

Is very good defensively but still doesn't find it enough for mine.

clarky449 · Post: # 916196Post **clarky449** » Sat 01 May 2010 4:42pm

3rd generation saint wrote:Luke Ball would have got 20 more possessions, and we would have lost because he wouldn't have kicked a goal.
However, I think those two goals may have saved Armo from being dropped in favour of Gram, who I think we are missing big time with that extra run and pace out of defence.

Luke ball wouldn't have had 20 more possessions i guarantee it, But it is good that Armo can kick a goal!

Sainterone · Sun 02 May 2010 11:15am

I was really happy with Armo's game.

We turned the ball over too much and almost gave the game away.
But we saw some brilliant performances from the midfield that, firstly, kept us in the game and, then allowed us to grab the 4 points late.

I thought it was an excellent perfomance by Armitage.
I didn't see any mistakes, he laid some great tacklesd and he kicked enough of our total score to be very important.

Armo

Armo

Re: Armo