Team vs Doggies

sax · Post: # 914364Post **sax** » Wed 28 Apr 2010 9:28pm

Quixote wrote:OK seeing as it's turned into predictions:

ONE of Gram/Ray won't come up, so, IN: GRAY (Gram or Ray), Steven, Stanley

OUT: Peake, King, Mini

Note: the above WILL NOT happen. But I reckon it should.

When the other half of GRAY is fit, Eddy, Clarke or Steven goes.

Eddy won't be dropped this week he had a cracker against Port.

Eddy had a cracker? You're kidding aren't you?
He had 6 kicks, 9 HB, 5 tackles. If he had a cracker, Peake had a blinder! 11 Kicks, 7 HB, 6 tackles!
But Mini had a deadset howler, 3 kicks, 10 HB, 2 tackles.

I know it doesn't all come down to stats, but IMHO, TWO players, at least, should go before Peake!

sainterinsydney · Wed 28 Apr 2010 10:40pm

Dunno why everyone is getting stuck into Peake. The guy never messes up a disposal. Did you notice the guy had 91 DT points in the Port game? Goddard had 67 DT points.

sax · Post: # 914392Post **sax** » Wed 28 Apr 2010 10:55pm

sainterinsydney wrote:Dunno why everyone is getting stuck into Peake. The guy never messes up a disposal. Did you notice the guy had 91 DT points in the Port game? Goddard had 67 DT points.

When did they start picking sides on DT points?

Dr Spaceman · Wed 28 Apr 2010 11:06pm

sax wrote:
sainterinsydney wrote:Dunno why everyone is getting stuck into Peake. The guy never messes up a disposal. Did you notice the guy had 91 DT points in the Port game? Goddard had 67 DT points.
When did they start picking sides on DT points?

How come Peake's got the DTs?

Now if it were Lovett.....

Dr Spaceman · Thu 29 Apr 2010 3:01pm

Dr Spaceman wrote:
sax wrote:
sainterinsydney wrote:Dunno why everyone is getting stuck into Peake. The guy never messes up a disposal. Did you notice the guy had 91 DT points in the Port game? Goddard had 67 DT points.
When did they start picking sides on DT points?
How come Peake's got the DTs?

Now if it were Lovett.....

Well I'm just going to have to say it myself!

Devilhead · Post: # 914584Post **Devilhead** » Thu 29 Apr 2010 5:11pm

sainterinsydney wrote:Dunno why everyone is getting stuck into Peake.

Several times last Saturday we moved the ball quickly out of the backline to Peake who marked a pass and instead giving off a handball to a player running past or playing on and moving the ball he slowed things down and hatched it - by the time he disposed of the ball Port had already flooded back and we lost important momentum - very frustrating!!

Ins - Gram, Ray, McEvoy
Outs - Eddy, Peake, King

bigcarl · Post: # 914589Post **bigcarl** » Thu 29 Apr 2010 5:19pm

In: Steven, Gram, Ray
Out: King, Eddy, Peake

zac to ff. bj to chf. kosi to second ruck. blake on hall.

spert · Post: # 914598Post **spert** » Thu 29 Apr 2010 5:26pm

I reckon Kosi should go onto Hall, and it also means there's a strong marking tall deep in the backline for the Dogs to try and counter which would congest their forward line nicely. No harm in giving Zac a crack at CHF and BJ at FF. Drop King for McEvoy as Macca is a bit more mobile around the ground and can take a grab and slot a goal.

plugger66 · Post: # 914600Post **plugger66** » Thu 29 Apr 2010 5:33pm

spert wrote:I reckon Kosi should go onto Hall, and it also means there's a strong marking tall deep in the backline for the Dogs to try and counter which would congest their forward line nicely. No harm in giving Zac a crack at CHF and BJ at FF. Drop King for McEvoy as Macca is a bit more mobile around the ground and can take a grab and slot a goal.

Do we want to win the game or completely wreck Kosi. Hall would have a field day on him. He is far to fast for Kosi. If Kosi was to ever play back and IMO he cant it could only be on a guy like Hawkins and what would be the point of that.