plugger66 wrote:Solar wrote:plugger66 wrote:Solar wrote:I'm with eastern, not happy ad think the whole system is buggered but moving on.
If anything this thread has shown that p66 is a clown
You cant help yourself can you. It is obvious who the clown is and it isnt me. You start by sooking about kosi getting weeks and the say he should have got 2-3. You have issues that you need to deal with.
Try this site.
www.ihavenocluesatallaboutfootysubjects.com
or
www.icontinuetoembarresmyself.com
another great answer but the clown! oooo I can post made up websites too if you want to continue to stupidity.... no-one is laughing...
yes I bitch about the kosi incident when the AFL chop and change every week. I have no issues, I just believe that the system needs to say whats allowed and stick to it. You flip flop evry week depending on what the AF feed you. Then you throw in a stupid example of lloyd and think your mr expert. Then when question about this you revert back to childish retorts....
BTW at least quote me in context when having a go at me. Otherwise it highlights the light weight bulls*** you make us all put up with.
You said the kennedy incident was closer to Kosi's and I said that the Lloyd incident was closer. I stick to that especially after seeing the Kennedy incident. How is that even remotely like Kosi incident. Just explain to me where there is any similarity at all? I am no expert but compared to you I am Gerard Healy, Danny Frawley, Gary Lyon and anyone else with an idea on footy all rolled into one.
I will humour you
reason 1
swans player did not have the ball, sylvia did not have the ball, hawks player did. Therefore llyod could tackle, the other two could not.
reason 2
kennedy was sheparding for is team mate who had the ball.
kosi was sheparding his team mate who was about to pick up the ball
llyod was not protecting a team mate
If you can't see that the only 3 differences between the kennedy and kosi incident was that kosi hit the guy a split second before BJ picked up the ball while kennedy's team mate had the ball. The other differences were the fact that the kosi hit was in a pack and the swans player slipped on the service, thus producing the head hit.
Oh yeah and the fact that the swans player was back on with 10 mins, kicking a goal and sylvia got a broken jaw and wont play for the next month.....
Strangly all those experts were agreeing that the kennedy decision was wrong. My beef as a saints supporter is that kosi went when kennedy's hit caused more damaged and was not cited.
In the context of earlier decisions the kosi one is a disgrace, suprising no but still a disgrace. Kosi should have got 2-3 but kennedy should have got 4 weeks. Hell gia should have got 4 weeks.....
But don't let facts get in the way of some highly amusing internet jokes by the one and only p66
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)