Standard of footy commentators..
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga
Standard of footy commentators..
Standard of footy commentators.. And what can be done to improve them.
I still think Tim Lane is one of the best of a bad lot, providing Carlscum are'nt in the match.
The young woman who called a match or two last season seemed to me to be as good as most of them, at least she seemed to know who the players were, but obviou sly she will not be given much of a chance except on maybe weekends where they are trying to promote the AFL /Female relationship.
I cant think of a male commentator who hqas been blooded for years, except the odd recently retired AFL Star, most of whom dont really comentate or call the game, but just give opinions and comments throughout the game.
I still think Tim Lane is one of the best of a bad lot, providing Carlscum are'nt in the match.
The young woman who called a match or two last season seemed to me to be as good as most of them, at least she seemed to know who the players were, but obviou sly she will not be given much of a chance except on maybe weekends where they are trying to promote the AFL /Female relationship.
I cant think of a male commentator who hqas been blooded for years, except the odd recently retired AFL Star, most of whom dont really comentate or call the game, but just give opinions and comments throughout the game.
- St Loxton
- Club Player
- Posts: 1232
- Joined: Mon 02 Feb 2009 9:50pm
- Location: Jindivick
- Has thanked: 225 times
- Been thanked: 58 times
I know what you are saying, it does s*** me the crap they go on with. Not sure how to improve them at exept to watch the game with both neutral eyes open. If it wasnt for the slight delay in the broadcast id listen to the radio, seems most of them are generaly more accurate and descriptive, giving you more than what you see on the tv.
Hunter Clark 2024 StKilda Saints Premiership captain.
- Life Long Saint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5508
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
- Has thanked: 61 times
- Been thanked: 480 times
- Contact:
As a general rule in any sport, I normally find that players that have just finished playing make the best commentators.
They seem to understand modern tactics and give you insights that other commentators and punters like us miss.
As an example I thought that Tom Harley on Friday night was excellent. After a few years they just fall into media street and serve up the same crap as other commentators. An other example that I can think of is Dermot Brereton. When he started as a commentator, I thought he was brilliant. Now he is just another media hack.
They seem to understand modern tactics and give you insights that other commentators and punters like us miss.
As an example I thought that Tom Harley on Friday night was excellent. After a few years they just fall into media street and serve up the same crap as other commentators. An other example that I can think of is Dermot Brereton. When he started as a commentator, I thought he was brilliant. Now he is just another media hack.
when you judge someone,
You don't define them,
You define yourself.
You don't define them,
You define yourself.
- doppler effect
- Club Player
- Posts: 196
- Joined: Sun 01 Feb 2009 10:16am
- Location: Canberra
Agreed. I really liked his insights during commentry. He wasn't a great caller of the game but he could point out things that most other commentators would be blind to. He should really have been a coach.jack wrote: An other example that I can think of is Dermot Brereton. When he started as a commentator, I thought he was brilliant.
At least we're still blessed by his presence on Getaway...
- St Fidelius
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10492
- Joined: Sun 01 Aug 2004 10:30am
What annoys me is that they get paid for it and don't keep up to date with the rules and argue with each other about them.
FFS read an up to date rule book and keep the viewers informed, instead of the crap of finding the information several moments later.
Gee, one would think if you are employed to call the football, one of the requirements is to understand all of the rules![Idea :idea:](./images/smilies/icon_idea.gif)
FFS read an up to date rule book and keep the viewers informed, instead of the crap of finding the information several moments later.
Gee, one would think if you are employed to call the football, one of the requirements is to understand all of the rules
![Idea :idea:](./images/smilies/icon_idea.gif)
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
Agreed, he was outstanding.Life Long Saint wrote:Clinton Grybas has left a huge hole...
He was terrific!
Feature article: KFC's "Double Down" burger!
TV Ratings: Hey Hey It's Saturday ratings overview
Do you know what C# is? .NET? Then you need to know this: XSD
TV Ratings: Hey Hey It's Saturday ratings overview
Do you know what C# is? .NET? Then you need to know this: XSD
I have also found Tom Harley to be a welcome addition so far and it makes a change to think that the expert commentator actually knows more than you do - something David Schwarz never quite convinced me of.jack wrote:As a general rule in any sport, I normally find that players that have just finished playing make the best commentators.
They seem to understand modern tactics and give you insights that other commentators and punters like us miss.
As an example I thought that Tom Harley on Friday night was excellent. Af
I also like Leigh Matthews but can't quite understand why he has to stand up to deliver his insights from time to time (please drop that Channel 7)!!
Regarding Kelli Underwood, I read recently where she will be calling more games this year - not just a token appearance now and then.
i think the expert commentators are by-and-large ok, but the play-by-play is pretty dire. most of the time is setting up jokes and they're not great at actually describing the play. watching the replay from last friday, so often the camera was off the ball and they forgot to tell you what was actually happening.jack wrote:As a general rule in any sport, I normally find that players that have just finished playing make the best commentators.
the obvious occasion which stands out was in the first quarter when medhurst had a shot at goal from about twenty metres on a slight angle. they cut to a replay of the lead up, and then quickly came back - st kilda had the ball and were rebounding from defence! no idea what happened there, and the commentators just said "now st kilda coming out of defence" so obviously they didn't know either. amateur.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23208
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 735 times
- Been thanked: 1776 times
Tim Lanes up there with the worst.
Bruce is tired and getting more effeminate by the minute......good luck to him...
Tom Harley is a yes-man commentator.....doesnt really give you his opinion and straddles the fence on anything controversial....
Swarze was terribly bad.
Walls/Blight - outdated.
Quartermaine - so biased to Hawthorn it is not funny and just adds ZERO excitement...
So whose good?
Lets see......
I like Commetti - he can deliver a line and still keep pace with the game.
I dont mind Matthews but agree - drop the stand up bit for special plays etc.....just looks like a bunch of p!ss pots standing round a urinal...
I dont understand why networks dont steal more radio talent.....they are far more educated on the game and actually give you an insight....
For mine ABC radio with Alves etc are miles ahead - actually call the game and discuss footy and leave the cr@p.....BTW Brayshaws a flog.
Bruce is tired and getting more effeminate by the minute......good luck to him...
Tom Harley is a yes-man commentator.....doesnt really give you his opinion and straddles the fence on anything controversial....
Swarze was terribly bad.
Walls/Blight - outdated.
Quartermaine - so biased to Hawthorn it is not funny and just adds ZERO excitement...
So whose good?
Lets see......
I like Commetti - he can deliver a line and still keep pace with the game.
I dont mind Matthews but agree - drop the stand up bit for special plays etc.....just looks like a bunch of p!ss pots standing round a urinal...
I dont understand why networks dont steal more radio talent.....they are far more educated on the game and actually give you an insight....
For mine ABC radio with Alves etc are miles ahead - actually call the game and discuss footy and leave the cr@p.....BTW Brayshaws a flog.
“Yeah….nah””
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6090
- Joined: Fri 11 Mar 2005 9:18pm
Sadly, sadly missed. Knew him through work and still makes me very sad. Was working at a sister station when the news came through. Made Fox Footy work with White Line Fever and many other contributions.Life Long Saint wrote:Clinton Grybas has left a huge hole...
He was terrific!
My biggest beef is the way that conversations seem to continue when a player may be having a set shot. Also sometimes they keep talking while a snap shot goes through. What happened to the drama of commentary, the excitement of a great mark or a goal. The footy seems to be interrupting the commentary. That has started to creep in to cricket as well when they talk over a delivery, especially when the opposition are batting, and they fail to acknowledge a great shot.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6090
- Joined: Fri 11 Mar 2005 9:18pm
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4622
- Joined: Tue 22 Jan 2008 5:41pm
- Has thanked: 400 times
- Been thanked: 476 times
My beef is....... he's (ie he's kicking action) when it should be...... hisMilan Faletic wrote:I also get miffed at mispronunciation of particular words such as:
laxadaisical when it is lackadaisical
comrardarie when it is camaraderie
deboo when it is debut (pronounced day-bue)
![Mad :x](./images/smilies/icon_mad.gif)
That ex- Melbourne boofhead Davis Schwartze used to annoy me with the use of he's. Also Leigh Matthews says it a fair amount.......although I do like Leigh's comments.
Last edited by loris on Mon 22 Feb 2010 9:01pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4655
- Joined: Sun 18 Jun 2006 2:04pm
- Location: Melb
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 23 times
Now I have Foxtel,and I watched the game at Subi last night....and was thinking the exact same thing! Inspired by the utter deplorableness of Glenn Jackovich and Matt Cambell.....honestly,how do they get a gig?
Cambell called players by there wrong name for half of the match,he's just second rate,manufactured,terrible.
Then there's Jackovich.....overated as a footballer, therefore networks seem to think his opinion matters. Just speaks biased nonsense,and when he does talk about the non WA side it was terrible.
At one stage he was tearing shreds off the Walpari wizard for not giving enough effort in the game...no more than 5 minutes later he said "well you certainly can't critisise his commitment,things just aren't happening for him"...?? I nearly fell off my chair in bewilderment
Cambell called players by there wrong name for half of the match,he's just second rate,manufactured,terrible.
Then there's Jackovich.....overated as a footballer, therefore networks seem to think his opinion matters. Just speaks biased nonsense,and when he does talk about the non WA side it was terrible.
At one stage he was tearing shreds off the Walpari wizard for not giving enough effort in the game...no more than 5 minutes later he said "well you certainly can't critisise his commitment,things just aren't happening for him"...?? I nearly fell off my chair in bewilderment
Bring back the Lockett era
Agree Spinner, I find WA games hard to watch on Foxtel for that very reason.
I mentioned on another thread, that I like Harley in the special comments role. Ten were foolish to let him go, he comes across as both articulate and likeable. Richo is also going to be very interesting, think his laidback and friendly approach as boundary rider is going to get more out of players than they anticpated giving him.
I like Nathan Thompson on SEN, I think he may be pursuing the calling of games?
I mentioned on another thread, that I like Harley in the special comments role. Ten were foolish to let him go, he comes across as both articulate and likeable. Richo is also going to be very interesting, think his laidback and friendly approach as boundary rider is going to get more out of players than they anticpated giving him.
I like Nathan Thompson on SEN, I think he may be pursuing the calling of games?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6090
- Joined: Fri 11 Mar 2005 9:18pm
Was going to mention that game but thought I might have been the only person who watched it! Jakovich is the token WA rep but I am sure there are better people than him. Campbell can be good but gets sucked in to the conversation side of the commentary. Healy is ok by me because he is a Saints man. To be fair, the game was rubbish and I reckon they hit the booze at half time to get them through the game!jonesy wrote:Now I have Foxtel,and I watched the game at Subi last night....and was thinking the exact same thing! Inspired by the utter deplorableness of Glenn Jackovich and Matt Cambell.....honestly,how do they get a gig?
Cambell called players by there wrong name for half of the match,he's just second rate,manufactured,terrible.
Then there's Jackovich.....overated as a footballer, therefore networks seem to think his opinion matters. Just speaks biased nonsense,and when he does talk about the non WA side it was terrible.
At one stage he was tearing shreds off the Walpari wizard for not giving enough effort in the game...no more than 5 minutes later he said "well you certainly can't critisise his commitment,things just aren't happening for him"...?? I nearly fell off my chair in bewilderment
- Spinner
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8502
- Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
- Location: Victoria
- Has thanked: 185 times
- Been thanked: 133 times
jonesy wrote:Now I have Foxtel,and I watched the game at Subi last night....and was thinking the exact same thing! Inspired by the utter deplorableness of Glenn Jackovich and Matt Cambell.....honestly,how do they get a gig?
Cambell called players by there wrong name for half of the match,he's just second rate,manufactured,terrible.
Then there's Jackovich.....overated as a footballer, therefore networks seem to think his opinion matters. Just speaks biased nonsense,and when he does talk about the non WA side it was terrible.
At one stage he was tearing shreds off the Walpari wizard for not giving enough effort in the game...no more than 5 minutes later he said "well you certainly can't critisise his commitment,things just aren't happening for him"...?? I nearly fell off my chair in bewilderment
Yep, Ive come to the realisation that Jackovich might just not be all there......
Healy plays with his head.....Seriously.
Fremantle gets a free for a holding in the contest that CLEARLY wasnt there....
Jackovic: Well done by the Freo player, worked hard for his kick.
Healy: Was the free there thou Jaco?
Jacovich: 100% there.
SILENCE
...
...
...
NEXT BALL UP AFTER GOAL
Healy: Jaco, Wayne just texted in saying if that was a free he would have kicked 10 on you each time.
Jacovich: The games different now Gerard.
SHUT UP JACKOVIC you idiot!
Commentators aside, I just wish to God everyone would scrap the post match onfield player interviews. Bailing up a buggered player for a comment 30 secs after the game finishes is boring vision and nearly as boring sound
"Happy with the boys effort", "Glad to come away with the 4 points", "{opposition team} had a real crack, credit to them"..every freaking game its the same cliches, it brings down the emotion in a close finish 1000%. Stick your camera over the fence and ask a few of the fans how they feel, it would be better TV and the (mostly) delay would let you edit out anything offensive.
"Happy with the boys effort", "Glad to come away with the 4 points", "{opposition team} had a real crack, credit to them"..every freaking game its the same cliches, it brings down the emotion in a close finish 1000%. Stick your camera over the fence and ask a few of the fans how they feel, it would be better TV and the (mostly) delay would let you edit out anything offensive.
![Image](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v131/littlemiter/66sig.jpg)
THE BUBBLE HAS BURST
2011 player sponsor
- Eastern
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14357
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
- Location: 3132
- Been thanked: 1 time
You forgot Tony Shaw's eckspeciallyMilan Faletic wrote:I also get miffed at mispronunciation of particular words such as:
laxadaisical when it is lackadaisical
comrardarie when it is camaraderie
deboo when it is debut (pronounced day-bue)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
NEW scarf signature (hopefully with correct spelling) will be here as soon as it arrives !!
![Image](http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o23/saintbrat/9c94369c.jpg)
![Image](http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o23/saintbrat/9c94369c.jpg)
- TazzieSaintGirl83
- Club Player
- Posts: 727
- Joined: Wed 07 Oct 2009 1:16pm
- Location: Beautiful Isle of Tasmania :)
Couldnt agree more, a few times I have sat back annoyed as a commentator dribbles on while something that needs no words is taking place on screen.Milan Faletic wrote:
My biggest beef is the way that conversations seem to continue when a player may be having a set shot. Also sometimes they keep talking while a snap shot goes through. What happened to the drama of commentary, the excitement of a great mark or a goal. The footy seems to be interrupting the commentary. That has started to creep in to cricket as well when they talk over a delivery, especially when the opposition are batting, and they fail to acknowledge a great shot.
For my 2cents Commetti often cracks me up with his dry one liners. A fair bit of the time though I am so into the game I havent heard what they said
100% Sainter Girl Through and Through
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
- Location: North
- Has thanked: 1011 times
- Been thanked: 1055 times
About the only one I can tolerate on TV is Cometti. Agree that Jakovic is awful. His WA parochialism is too much. Scott Watters is just as bad - no actually he's worse.
Lane - not a bad commentator so long as Carlscum aren't playing.
Drew Morphett is ok - competent at least.
Apart from Lane, the ABC is the best option for me. Alves, Walls, Jarrod Molloy, Aussie Jones as special comments guys with Morphett, Lane and Whately. They just call the game and talk about footy without trying to make celebrities out of themselves with half-arsed wisecracks.
Lane - not a bad commentator so long as Carlscum aren't playing.
Drew Morphett is ok - competent at least.
Apart from Lane, the ABC is the best option for me. Alves, Walls, Jarrod Molloy, Aussie Jones as special comments guys with Morphett, Lane and Whately. They just call the game and talk about footy without trying to make celebrities out of themselves with half-arsed wisecracks.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6090
- Joined: Fri 11 Mar 2005 9:18pm
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2523
- Joined: Mon 27 Jun 2005 1:27pm
- Location: Abiding
- Has thanked: 171 times
- Been thanked: 375 times
- IluvHarvey
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2621
- Joined: Fri 06 Jun 2008 4:51pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 34 times
- Been thanked: 257 times