Team Photo - No Lovett
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Team Photo - No Lovett
Just incase people missed it, in todays herald sun it mentions that Lovett was not present for the team photo. The article then goes on to mention that it is common practice that in the event of an absentee they usually leave a space for the player so that they can be digitally put in the photo later, however no place was left in the photo for said absentee.
Read into it what you will.
Read into it what you will.
- borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga
- kosifantutti23
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2388
- Joined: Fri 26 Sep 2008 12:55am
- Location: Horgen
Re: Team Photo - No Lovett
Not saying Lovett will be back but surely you can add someone to the end of a row.PaulieGa wrote:Just incase people missed it, in todays herald sun it mentions that Lovett was not present for the team photo. The article then goes on to mention that it is common practice that in the event of an absentee they usually leave a space for the player so that they can be digitally put in the photo later, however no place was left in the photo for said absentee.
Read into it what you will.
Furtius Quo Rdelious
- St Fidelius
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10492
- Joined: Sun 01 Aug 2004 10:30am
Exactly .....GrumpyOne wrote:No Lovett - No Surprise.
Just why this is news??
Lovett has been suspended indefinitely by the Club.
Absentees are different and of course the Club "may" place the said player digitally...
Did the actual article state that "however no place was left in the photo for said absentee"???
Just how long is the Club meant to wait before the "sign off" and printing of the team photo???
Again, he's been suspended indefinitely and cannot come to the Club...
I am not too sure what was written in the press, but to me it's obvious that he would not be in the team photo atm because they need to produce thousands of them and can't just wait for any further developments.
Again, if the herald sun mentioned that it is common practice to digitally place a player who was absent but have not done so with Lovett, then the article is a disgrace...
Was the article written by Captain Obvious
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Why is this NOT news St Fid?St Fidelius wrote:Exactly .....GrumpyOne wrote:No Lovett - No Surprise.
Just why this is news??
Lovett has been suspended indefinitely by the Club.
Absentees are different and of course the Club "may" place the said player digitally...
Did the actual article state that "however no place was left in the photo for said absentee"???
Just how long is the Club meant to wait before the "sign off" and printing of the team photo???
Again, he's been suspended indefinitely and cannot come to the Club...
I am not too sure what was written in the press, but to me it's obvious that he would not be in the team photo atm because they need to produce thousands of them and can't just wait for any further developments.
Again, if the herald sun mentioned that it is common practice to digitally place a player who was absent but have not done so with Lovett, then the article is a disgrace...
Was the article written by Captain Obvious
It directly related to Lovett, and to St Kilda.
I think that is obvious!
Remember, he hasn't been sacked, he's only suspended.
I'm starting to get pissed off with this who limbo bullshyte.
Either let him play or sack him.
Would anyone like to elaborate why we need all the police hoopla to conclude before he officially gets the chop?
Is it contract/legal reasoning?
ie, preventing us having to pay out his contract???
I might go to the AGM on Thursday and ask a few direct questions to the boss.
I want Lovett to play, unless he is likely to be sent to Jail, end of story.
Maybe you need to read the article but I suppose that isnt important.St Fidelius wrote:Exactly .....GrumpyOne wrote:No Lovett - No Surprise.
Just why this is news??
Lovett has been suspended indefinitely by the Club.
Absentees are different and of course the Club "may" place the said player digitally...
Did the actual article state that "however no place was left in the photo for said absentee"???
Just how long is the Club meant to wait before the "sign off" and printing of the team photo???
Again, he's been suspended indefinitely and cannot come to the Club...
I am not too sure what was written in the press, but to me it's obvious that he would not be in the team photo atm because they need to produce thousands of them and can't just wait for any further developments.
Again, if the herald sun mentioned that it is common practice to digitally place a player who was absent but have not done so with Lovett, then the article is a disgrace...
Was the article written by Captain Obvious
- St Fidelius
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10492
- Joined: Sun 01 Aug 2004 10:30am
If that was meant to be condescending, its nothing new coming from you...plugger66 wrote:Maybe you need to read the article but I suppose that isnt important.St Fidelius wrote:Exactly .....GrumpyOne wrote:No Lovett - No Surprise.
Just why this is news??
Lovett has been suspended indefinitely by the Club.
Absentees are different and of course the Club "may" place the said player digitally...
Did the actual article state that "however no place was left in the photo for said absentee"???
Just how long is the Club meant to wait before the "sign off" and printing of the team photo???
Again, he's been suspended indefinitely and cannot come to the Club...
I am not too sure what was written in the press, but to me it's obvious that he would not be in the team photo atm because they need to produce thousands of them and can't just wait for any further developments.
Again, if the herald sun mentioned that it is common practice to digitally place a player who was absent but have not done so with Lovett, then the article is a disgrace...
Was the article written by Captain Obvious
I did state that I have not read the article and asked the question if the quotation marks in my post was in the article...
You didn't even bother to verify it...
a total waste of space.....
sorry...
a total waste of a post from you
as is with most of your dribble
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
Thats it. Write an article and comment without even reading it. I su;ppose knowing what actually was written isnt important to you judging by some of your posts. At least you spend a lot on the club and have the guts to tell the world.St Fidelius wrote:If that was meant to be condescending, its nothing new coming from you...plugger66 wrote:Maybe you need to read the article but I suppose that isnt important.St Fidelius wrote:Exactly .....GrumpyOne wrote:No Lovett - No Surprise.
Just why this is news??
Lovett has been suspended indefinitely by the Club.
Absentees are different and of course the Club "may" place the said player digitally...
Did the actual article state that "however no place was left in the photo for said absentee"???
Just how long is the Club meant to wait before the "sign off" and printing of the team photo???
Again, he's been suspended indefinitely and cannot come to the Club...
I am not too sure what was written in the press, but to me it's obvious that he would not be in the team photo atm because they need to produce thousands of them and can't just wait for any further developments.
Again, if the herald sun mentioned that it is common practice to digitally place a player who was absent but have not done so with Lovett, then the article is a disgrace...
Was the article written by Captain Obvious
I did state that I have not read the article and asked the question if the quotation marks in my post was in the article...
You didn't even bother to verify it...
a total waste of space.....
sorry...
a total waste of a post from you
as is with most of your dribble
- Eastern
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14357
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
- Location: 3132
- Been thanked: 1 time
This whole sorry saga is going to drag on and on and on until such time as decisions are made/announced. We need to be mindful that there are people involved in this whose lives-careers-futures are on hold because of this.
I just wish that the Police would make an announcement one way or the other nice and soon so that everyone can move on. Those who need/require/want this matter settled should go in an order something like this;
The Alleged Victim and her family & friends
Andrew Lovett and his family & friends
Victoria Police
Those allegedly present on the night
St Kilda FC
AFL
St Kilda fans
AFL fans
!!
I just wish that the Police would make an announcement one way or the other nice and soon so that everyone can move on. Those who need/require/want this matter settled should go in an order something like this;
The Alleged Victim and her family & friends
Andrew Lovett and his family & friends
Victoria Police
Those allegedly present on the night
St Kilda FC
AFL
St Kilda fans
AFL fans
!!
NEW scarf signature (hopefully with correct spelling) will be here as soon as it arrives !!
- St Fidelius
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10492
- Joined: Sun 01 Aug 2004 10:30am
Have another read what I posted and I think I was asked the question if my quote in the post was in the article...plugger66 wrote:Thats it. Write an article and comment without even reading it. I su;ppose knowing what actually was written isnt important to you judging by some of your posts. At least you spend a lot on the club and have the guts to tell the world.St Fidelius wrote:If that was meant to be condescending, its nothing new coming from you...plugger66 wrote:Maybe you need to read the article but I suppose that isnt important.St Fidelius wrote:Exactly .....GrumpyOne wrote:No Lovett - No Surprise.
Just why this is news??
Lovett has been suspended indefinitely by the Club.
Absentees are different and of course the Club "may" place the said player digitally...
Did the actual article state that "however no place was left in the photo for said absentee"???
Just how long is the Club meant to wait before the "sign off" and printing of the team photo???
Again, he's been suspended indefinitely and cannot come to the Club...
I am not too sure what was written in the press, but to me it's obvious that he would not be in the team photo atm because they need to produce thousands of them and can't just wait for any further developments.
Again, if the herald sun mentioned that it is common practice to digitally place a player who was absent but have not done so with Lovett, then the article is a disgrace...
Was the article written by Captain Obvious
I did state that I have not read the article and asked the question if the quotation marks in my post was in the article...
You didn't even bother to verify it...
a total waste of space.....
sorry...
a total waste of a post from you
as is with most of your dribble
How about you grow up and learn to read what I posted instead of attacking me...
This all started months ago when I posted something that the Club wanted to be removed and you DEMANDED a source...
The mods knew the source and why bother posting to a numbnuts like you???
So So sorry you got your nose out of joint ....
GROW UP!!!
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4939
- Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
- Has thanked: 343 times
- Been thanked: 489 times
Nothing new there though Eastern. I'm sure every person interviewed by the police would like to know whether they're going to be charged asap. I'd be tipping that the police would be keeping the victim appraised of what's going on and what's likely to happen however.Eastern wrote:This whole sorry saga is going to drag on and on and on until such time as decisions are made/announced. We need to be mindful that there are people involved in this whose lives-careers-futures are on hold because of this.
I just wish that the Police would make an announcement one way or the other nice and soon so that everyone can move on. Those who need/require/want this matter settled should go in an order something like this;
!!
Depending on what Lovett said to the police in the interview it could take months for forensic tests to be returned and for Lovett to be formally charged or nil further action taken. I'd even hazrd to guess that Lovett himself has been given some indication of what to expect.
I know you're not suggesting this, but just b/c Lovett is a high profile footballer won't make the case go any quicker.
- St Fidelius
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10492
- Joined: Sun 01 Aug 2004 10:30am
So "it's a lie" BUT IT DIDNT EVEN SLIGHTLY UPSET YOU???plugger66 wrote:I demanded a source did I. That is a lie but that didnt even slightly upset me however i should have known you would have given inside info with all that money you spend on the club.
which is it???
Why don't you stop this crap and get back on topic
And seriously post something constructive
My post did state this
and your comment was...Did the actual article state that "however no place was left in the photo for said absentee"???
Why don't you bother to answer what I posted instead of your personal comments about how much money I give to the Club??Maybe you need to read the article but I suppose that isnt important.
In fact a mod that read your last comments suggested that you may have left out some emoticons , but I know better, and there is nothing you like more than baiting...
Stop the crap
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
- St Fidelius
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10492
- Joined: Sun 01 Aug 2004 10:30am
Care for a response.....St Fidelius wrote:So "it's a lie" BUT IT DIDNT EVEN SLIGHTLY UPSET YOU???plugger66 wrote:I demanded a source did I. That is a lie but that didnt even slightly upset me however i should have known you would have given inside info with all that money you spend on the club.
which is it???
Why don't you stop this crap and get back on topic
And seriously post something constructive
My post did state this
and your comment was...Did the actual article state that "however no place was left in the photo for said absentee"???
Why don't you bother to answer what I posted instead of your personal comments about how much money I give to the Club??Maybe you need to read the article but I suppose that isnt important.
In fact a mod that read your last comments suggested that you may have left out some emoticons , but I know better, and there is nothing you like more than baiting...
Stop the crap
I am really sick and tired of your CRAP and enough is enough..
You called me a liar and then state that what you think I didn't say didn't bother you...
Here's an idea ........plugger66 wrote:I demanded a source did I. That is a lie but that didnt even slightly upset me however i should have known you would have given inside info with all that money you spend on the club.
Stop the crap and just post on topic...
I hope the mods are reading this...
DON'T CALL ME A LIAR!!!!
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
So you went to a mod over a post I made. Seriously I really am worried about a person who would do that. As for the first comment. I can still say that is a lie without being upset. i am pretty sure one doesnt follow the other. Anyway back on topic. You made a statement without reading a paragraph in the paper and I know you mentioned it but were still negative towards the article even though you had no idea what was in the article.St Fidelius wrote:So "it's a lie" BUT IT DIDNT EVEN SLIGHTLY UPSET YOU???plugger66 wrote:I demanded a source did I. That is a lie but that didnt even slightly upset me however i should have known you would have given inside info with all that money you spend on the club.
which is it???
Why don't you stop this crap and get back on topic
And seriously post something constructive
My post did state this
and your comment was...Did the actual article state that "however no place was left in the photo for said absentee"???
Why don't you bother to answer what I posted instead of your personal comments about how much money I give to the Club??Maybe you need to read the article but I suppose that isnt important.
In fact a mod that read your last comments suggested that you may have left out some emoticons , but I know better, and there is nothing you like more than baiting...
Stop the crap
- St Fidelius
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10492
- Joined: Sun 01 Aug 2004 10:30am
The mod posted in a thread and the mod gave you the benefit of the doubt re your posts and lack of emoticons...plugger66 wrote:
So you went to a mod over a post I made. Seriously I really am worried about a person who would do that. As for the first comment. I can still say that is a lie without being upset. i am pretty sure one doesnt follow the other. Anyway back on topic. You made a statement without reading a paragraph in the paper and I know you mentioned it but were still negative towards the article even though you had no idea what was in the article.
I really cant be bothered atm finding the thread when you demanded to know the source but your post in this thread is enough.
Again, did you read the article???
Of course my post was negative, because the Club are not going to invite a player that has been suspended indefinitely to pose for the team photo.
I asked questions re the article and the "common practice" to digitally place a player in...
My thought was that the team poster would have to be printed soon and that the indefinite ban by the Club is enough said IMO
And like the original post suggested "Read into it what you will"
as I did....
So again, if you can bother....
Just what did the article state???
The original post was this...
Just incase people missed it, in todays herald sun it mentions that Lovett was not present for the team photo. The article then goes on to mention that it is common practice that in the event of an absentee they usually leave a space for the player so that they can be digitally put in the photo later, however no place was left in the photo for said absentee.
Read into it what you will.
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23243
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 741 times
- Been thanked: 1798 times
- St Fidelius
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10492
- Joined: Sun 01 Aug 2004 10:30am
lol that was my point..Teflon wrote:take it outside kids....trying to "read" the football in here not ure dribble.
Just what did the article state???
instead of the constant reminders of my contributions to the Club, which he has stated in other threads...
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
- Enrico_Misso
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11662
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
- Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
- Has thanked: 315 times
- Been thanked: 720 times
The point of the thread is that the club obviously feels that sleazebag Rapeitt is to play no part in our club.
Good decision.
Just a shame we wasted a first round pick on this piece of serial scum.
Good decision.
Just a shame we wasted a first round pick on this piece of serial scum.
The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules.
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!