He is gone...rumour
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006 8:34am
- Location: Jurassic Park
I don't know which overseas people you have been talking too, but everyone of my American friends who live in America, love the game and would love to go to one if they could get down here during the season.
It has everything Americans love about sport, it's fast, teams score regularly, players tackle each other and it has drama.
All of these reasons probably explain why soccer has never been a success in the U.S. beyond 10 year olds and their moms.
It has everything Americans love about sport, it's fast, teams score regularly, players tackle each other and it has drama.
All of these reasons probably explain why soccer has never been a success in the U.S. beyond 10 year olds and their moms.
Except for the sanity nothing much has been lost.
- rodgerfox
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 327 times
Good point actually.3rd generation saint wrote:I don't know which overseas people you have been talking too, but everyone of my American friends who live in America, love the game and would love to go to one if they could get down here during the season.
It has everything Americans love about sport, it's fast, teams score regularly, players tackle each other and it has drama.
All of these reasons probably explain why soccer has never been a success in the U.S. beyond 10 year olds and their moms.
The game is very much Americanised. And no surprise that the AFL honchos do annual trips to the States to 'research' the NFL.
The problem with that though, is it reallly supports my point.
The Yanks are cool with a club changing it's name like I change my jocks. They're cool with a club pulling up stumps and moving somewhere else. They don't generally give a shiit - because they're (generally) passionate about the sport.
They're passionate about watching it. Which in American sport, is the main thing.
Australian's generally follow things they are parochial about. Ford or Holden, the cricket, the NRL, the AFL, and slowly the A-League due it's 'state vs state' rivalry that is slowly being built up.
The AFL have made it pretty clear that they think the American way is the go. Remove the contact as much as possible, speed it up, sanitise it, and charge people to even think about it.
Aussies however, I believe, will simply start watching something else if the passion and tribal element is removed from the footy. Which it has been.
- rodgerfox
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 327 times
Black or white.GrumpyOne wrote:
Yeah.... RL didn't win us a flag, gambled and lost on a couple of draft picks, time to sack him.
Sheesh, but for Pakistan's imeptitude we could have had Ricky Ponting.
With us or against us.
Love or hate.
Success or sack.
And people get upset when I say the average footy fan is a moron.
Surely it's Ok to criticise someone or something without wanting them killed, sacked or beaten up?
- Milton66
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3521
- Joined: Tue 19 May 2009 9:53pm
- Location: None of your goddam business
If it was about passion for the game, then VFL attendances would be much higher.
The strength of footy following was the suburban tribalism it once represented.
However, this no longer exists. Demographics have changed, as has people's needs.
I think this is why we see fluctuations in membership numbers. People like to be associated with winners.
Times have changed, and so has the game. Rightly or wrongly.
I must admit that going to a game and standing in the rain no longer appeals to me.
I also think we're stil luck to have huge attendances. And by the way, the people are voting with there feet and attendances have gone up. I'd be interested to see a comparison betwen aggregate attendances compared to population grwoth to get the real icture.
Anyways, back on track... TV rights are a massive income source, so I can understand why the game is being Americanised.. or Televisionised.
The strength of footy following was the suburban tribalism it once represented.
However, this no longer exists. Demographics have changed, as has people's needs.
I think this is why we see fluctuations in membership numbers. People like to be associated with winners.
Times have changed, and so has the game. Rightly or wrongly.
I must admit that going to a game and standing in the rain no longer appeals to me.
I also think we're stil luck to have huge attendances. And by the way, the people are voting with there feet and attendances have gone up. I'd be interested to see a comparison betwen aggregate attendances compared to population grwoth to get the real icture.
Anyways, back on track... TV rights are a massive income source, so I can understand why the game is being Americanised.. or Televisionised.
Hotel De Los Muertos: Your room is ready... Care to step inside?
The difference between Aussie sport and Americam sport is that Aussies actually go and support their teams live on a regular basis, because its affordablerodgerfox wrote:Good point actually.3rd generation saint wrote:I don't know which overseas people you have been talking too, but everyone of my American friends who live in America, love the game and would love to go to one if they could get down here during the season.
It has everything Americans love about sport, it's fast, teams score regularly, players tackle each other and it has drama.
All of these reasons probably explain why soccer has never been a success in the U.S. beyond 10 year olds and their moms.
The game is very much Americanised. And no surprise that the AFL honchos do annual trips to the States to 'research' the NFL.
The problem with that though, is it reallly supports my point.
The Yanks are cool with a club changing it's name like I change my jocks. They're cool with a club pulling up stumps and moving somewhere else. They don't generally give a shiit - because they're (generally) passionate about the sport.
They're passionate about watching it. Which in American sport, is the main thing.
Australian's generally follow things they are parochial about. Ford or Holden, the cricket, the NRL, the AFL, and slowly the A-League due it's 'state vs state' rivalry that is slowly being built up.
The AFL have made it pretty clear that they think the American way is the go. Remove the contact as much as possible, speed it up, sanitise it, and charge people to even think about it.
Aussies however, I believe, will simply start watching something else if the passion and tribal element is removed from the footy. Which it has been.
Go have a look at how much a season ticket is for the average NFL or even college football game in the states and you'll see why people choose to watch it on TV
Same goes for NBA, MLB and NHL games
THE BUBBLE HAS BURST
2011 player sponsor
- Milton66
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3521
- Joined: Tue 19 May 2009 9:53pm
- Location: None of your goddam business
My mates took to Miami to see the Basketball... $25 for a bourbon and coke.saint66au wrote:The difference between Aussie sport and Americam sport is that Aussies actually go and support their teams live on a regular basis, because its affordablerodgerfox wrote:Good point actually.3rd generation saint wrote:I don't know which overseas people you have been talking too, but everyone of my American friends who live in America, love the game and would love to go to one if they could get down here during the season.
It has everything Americans love about sport, it's fast, teams score regularly, players tackle each other and it has drama.
All of these reasons probably explain why soccer has never been a success in the U.S. beyond 10 year olds and their moms.
The game is very much Americanised. And no surprise that the AFL honchos do annual trips to the States to 'research' the NFL.
The problem with that though, is it reallly supports my point.
The Yanks are cool with a club changing it's name like I change my jocks. They're cool with a club pulling up stumps and moving somewhere else. They don't generally give a shiit - because they're (generally) passionate about the sport.
They're passionate about watching it. Which in American sport, is the main thing.
Australian's generally follow things they are parochial about. Ford or Holden, the cricket, the NRL, the AFL, and slowly the A-League due it's 'state vs state' rivalry that is slowly being built up.
The AFL have made it pretty clear that they think the American way is the go. Remove the contact as much as possible, speed it up, sanitise it, and charge people to even think about it.
Aussies however, I believe, will simply start watching something else if the passion and tribal element is removed from the footy. Which it has been.
Go have a look at how much a season ticket is for the average NFL or even college football game in the states and you'll see why people choose to watch it on TV
Same goes for NBA, MLB and NHL games
The other thing to remember is that for the main, most of our population live in major cities and it's actually easier to get to a game.
USA suffers to geographic constraints coz the place is so big... and let's not forget that it's population is so much bigger.
The only way more people would go is if they built stadiums that hold 1 million people.
Hotel De Los Muertos: Your room is ready... Care to step inside?
- SaintWodonga
- Club Player
- Posts: 1868
- Joined: Wed 04 Jul 2007 12:01am
- Location: Wodonga
- Contact:
- Milton66
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3521
- Joined: Tue 19 May 2009 9:53pm
- Location: None of your goddam business
Um, if I recall, the then VFL decided to go national. Whether this was seen as visionary or simply a neccesity to survive... I have no idea.rodgerfox wrote:They were before the AFL pillaged the VFL.Milton66 wrote:If it was about passion for the game, then VFL attendances would be much higher.
Passionate supporters of VFL clubs found themselves supporting AFL reserves teams - which clearly didn't appeal.
That decision will never be reversed. As I said, it was suburban rivalry.
Who lives in Nth Melb or Footscray these days? Or even Collingwood for that matter.
Evolution like change is inevitable.
I have fond memories as a kid going to the footy every Saturday. 6 games... check the scores on the board... A v B etc.
But life goes on.
We digress. Perhaps fodder for another thread?
Hotel De Los Muertos: Your room is ready... Care to step inside?
- Spinner
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8502
- Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
- Location: Victoria
- Has thanked: 185 times
- Been thanked: 133 times
Milton66 wrote:Um, if I recall, the then VFL decided to go national. Whether this was seen as visionary or simply a neccesity to survive... I have no idea.rodgerfox wrote:They were before the AFL pillaged the VFL.Milton66 wrote:If it was about passion for the game, then VFL attendances would be much higher.
Passionate supporters of VFL clubs found themselves supporting AFL reserves teams - which clearly didn't appeal.
That decision will never be reversed. As I said, it was suburban rivalry.
Who lives in Nth Melb or Footscray these days? Or even Collingwood for that matter.
Evolution like change is inevitable.
I have fond memories as a kid going to the footy every Saturday. 6 games... check the scores on the board... A v B etc.
But life goes on.
We digress. Perhaps fodder for another thread?
I think Fox was talking about VFL clubs being affiliated with AFL clubs and in effect housing reserve players in their sides. Rather than the then VFL's transition into the AFL.
I might be wrong.
You may be watching something else but luckily for the AFL most other people are watching the AFL both live and on TV so your last comment is pure speculation based on no facts at all.rodgerfox wrote:Good point actually.3rd generation saint wrote:I don't know which overseas people you have been talking too, but everyone of my American friends who live in America, love the game and would love to go to one if they could get down here during the season.
It has everything Americans love about sport, it's fast, teams score regularly, players tackle each other and it has drama.
All of these reasons probably explain why soccer has never been a success in the U.S. beyond 10 year olds and their moms.
The game is very much Americanised. And no surprise that the AFL honchos do annual trips to the States to 'research' the NFL.
The problem with that though, is it reallly supports my point.
The Yanks are cool with a club changing it's name like I change my jocks. They're cool with a club pulling up stumps and moving somewhere else. They don't generally give a shiit - because they're (generally) passionate about the sport.
They're passionate about watching it. Which in American sport, is the main thing.
Australian's generally follow things they are parochial about. Ford or Holden, the cricket, the NRL, the AFL, and slowly the A-League due it's 'state vs state' rivalry that is slowly being built up.
The AFL have made it pretty clear that they think the American way is the go. Remove the contact as much as possible, speed it up, sanitise it, and charge people to even think about it.
Aussies however, I believe, will simply start watching something else if the passion and tribal element is removed from the footy. Which it has been.
The one thing that amazes me is that you write you have no passion for game but you obviously continue to read a website on our footy club and continually write passionately that you have no passion for the game.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006 8:34am
- Location: Jurassic Park
MLB regular season games are actually quite affordable, as for Americans not caring about teams moving? maybe you should talk to the people of Baltimore and Cleveland who we're less than impressed when their football teams moved.
The Colts we're originally in Baltimore and sneaked out overnight to go to Indianopolis, and the original Briowns moved to Baltimore and had to change their names to the Ravens, the NFL had to promise Cleveland the next franchise.
Also the people of LA are not happy they don't have an NFL franchise and you can bet their city is earmarked for the next franchise.
They are passionate about their sport, but as you said due to much larger populations which creates much more demand, getting tickets to go to games is very precious.
I remember my father's best friend when I asked him in March 1992 if there was any chance of going to see Syracuse University play when I visited in October and was told that I would have to have booked back in 1990 for a seat in the 55,000 seat Carrier Dome.
The Colts we're originally in Baltimore and sneaked out overnight to go to Indianopolis, and the original Briowns moved to Baltimore and had to change their names to the Ravens, the NFL had to promise Cleveland the next franchise.
Also the people of LA are not happy they don't have an NFL franchise and you can bet their city is earmarked for the next franchise.
They are passionate about their sport, but as you said due to much larger populations which creates much more demand, getting tickets to go to games is very precious.
I remember my father's best friend when I asked him in March 1992 if there was any chance of going to see Syracuse University play when I visited in October and was told that I would have to have booked back in 1990 for a seat in the 55,000 seat Carrier Dome.
Except for the sanity nothing much has been lost.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3303
- Joined: Tue 23 May 2006 6:14pm
- Location: East Oakleigh
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 40 times
- rodgerfox
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 327 times
The one thing that amazes me is that you whinge about what I post like a child, yet respond all the time.plugger66 wrote:
The one thing that amazes me is that you write you have no passion for game but you obviously continue to read a website on our footy club and continually write passionately that you have no passion for the game.
- cowboy18
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5795
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:05pm
- Location: in my duffle coat
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 5 times
I share the disenchantment with the game - it's the club that engages with me.plugger66 wrote:The one thing that amazes me is that you write you have no passion for game but you obviously continue to read a website on our footy club and continually write passionately that you have no passion for the game.
I miss many of the provincial things that I used to love about the game (one on one duels, forwards that played up front, speccies, celebrations of individual brilliance, players kicking to competitions, long kicks, to name some that are not as prevalent as they used to be). If you want to see the end point of favouring care over flair look at rugby union at the highest levels (tests, super 14). It's rubbish compared the suburban first grade efforts which are genuinely entertaining.
AFL's move towards teams of athletes rather than teams of footballers frustrates me.
But the connection with the club drags me back to the game (& the forum). Even then, the passion for club diminishes as they forget to support their supporters.
Not so sure it is as clear as all this. There is a massive amount of tribal parochialism attached to sport in the US, it just does not exist as readily at the top levels of each sport, namely NFL, Ice Hockey and Basketball, with perhaps baseball being the exception. The issue with US sport is that at the top level, it has become out of reach of the average Joe citizen. This is partly why passionate tribal parochialism is rampant at college/school level. Americans tend to follow their local college/school teams in the same way as we, for example, might have followed a VFA side in (glory) days past. It a generalisation (and an unfair one) to suggest that sport in America is packaged, corporate and lacking in demographic allignment.rodgerfox wrote:Good point actually.3rd generation saint wrote:I don't know which overseas people you have been talking too, but everyone of my American friends who live in America, love the game and would love to go to one if they could get down here during the season.
It has everything Americans love about sport, it's fast, teams score regularly, players tackle each other and it has drama.
All of these reasons probably explain why soccer has never been a success in the U.S. beyond 10 year olds and their moms.
The game is very much Americanised. And no surprise that the AFL honchos do annual trips to the States to 'research' the NFL.
The problem with that though, is it reallly supports my point.
The Yanks are cool with a club changing it's name like I change my jocks. They're cool with a club pulling up stumps and moving somewhere else. They don't generally give a shiit - because they're (generally) passionate about the sport.
They're passionate about watching it. Which in American sport, is the main thing.
Australian's generally follow things they are parochial about. Ford or Holden, the cricket, the NRL, the AFL, and slowly the A-League due it's 'state vs state' rivalry that is slowly being built up.
The AFL have made it pretty clear that they think the American way is the go. Remove the contact as much as possible, speed it up, sanitise it, and charge people to even think about it.
Aussies however, I believe, will simply start watching something else if the passion and tribal element is removed from the footy. Which it has been.
The odd thing is that I don't think this applies to baseball, which is still very much the people's game, probably because there are just so many games played throughout the season.
The thing I feel we need to fight, whether we love the game of Australian Football itself or are tribally connected or a mixture of both, is moves by any governing authority to take the game away from the ordinary suburbanite and place it in the hands of the corporates. Sadly, I think we have lost this battle when it comes to the Grand Final. I was genuinely upset this year to have witnessed a half dressed (remember, it was freezing), champagne toting airhead hanging off the arm off an equally pissed corporate suit before the start of the game.... they were clearly just there for the occasion, and not the game itself. Hard to swallow when I'd lined up with my ten year old son at 8.30 for a good viewing possie in standing room... after having driven for two days to get there in the first place!
And don't anyone even start with the line about how the corporate dollar has kept the game alive. The corporate dollar comes from the pockets of you and I.
How all this ends up in a thread that I think started about the Lovett debacle.. I don't know!
Anyways, end of rant, I'm off to Parkes
- sainterinsydney
- Club Player
- Posts: 781
- Joined: Mon 30 Nov 2009 11:03am
- Been thanked: 22 times