Our home games against Collingfilth, Dorks and Bummers....

plugger66 · Post: # 856266Post **plugger66** » Sat 07 Nov 2009 7:00pm

St Fidelius wrote:
saintspremiers wrote:
Don't worry plugger, I reckon St Fid's problem is that he doesn't understand that he is paying for a reserved seat next year for 10 games, and gets entry to 11.

It's fair and plain simple IMO - we are NOT (for 2010) talking about a Jihad game being transferred to the MCG.

St Fid - if you don't like the deal, don't buy a reserved seat next season.

Now flower off the two of you

Just how did you come up with the comment that reserved seat holders will be paying for 10 reserved seats next year???????

YOU GOT ANY FACTS TO BACK THIS???

I know what's plain and simple and that's your thought process.

Just what deal are you talking about that I don't like???

The Club is still in negotiations about the HOME match at the MCG against Geelong and have stated that it will be a better outcome than last year's away game against Melbourne that was just compensation.

Has the penny dropped yet

2 answers to the same post 5 hours apart. That is very interesting. How do you know he is wrong?

St Fidelius · Sat 07 Nov 2009 7:05pm

plugger66 wrote:
St Fidelius wrote:
saintspremiers wrote:
Don't worry plugger, I reckon St Fid's problem is that he doesn't understand that he is paying for a reserved seat next year for 10 games, and gets entry to 11.

It's fair and plain simple IMO - we are NOT (for 2010) talking about a Jihad game being transferred to the MCG.

St Fid - if you don't like the deal, don't buy a reserved seat next season.

Now flower off the two of you

Just how did you come up with the comment that reserved seat holders will be paying for 10 reserved seats next year???????

YOU GOT ANY FACTS TO BACK THIS???

I know what's plain and simple and that's your thought process.

Just what deal are you talking about that I don't like???

The Club is still in negotiations about the HOME match at the MCG against Geelong and have stated that it will be a better outcome than last year's away game against Melbourne that was just compensation.

Has the penny dropped yet
2 answers to the same post 5 hours apart. That is very interesting. How do you know he is wrong?

A bit slow are you???

Re read what I have typed in this thread

plugger66 · Post: # 856268Post **plugger66** » Sat 07 Nov 2009 7:08pm

St Fidelius wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
St Fidelius wrote:
saintspremiers wrote:
Don't worry plugger, I reckon St Fid's problem is that he doesn't understand that he is paying for a reserved seat next year for 10 games, and gets entry to 11.

It's fair and plain simple IMO - we are NOT (for 2010) talking about a Jihad game being transferred to the MCG.

St Fid - if you don't like the deal, don't buy a reserved seat next season.

Now flower off the two of you

Just how did you come up with the comment that reserved seat holders will be paying for 10 reserved seats next year???????

YOU GOT ANY FACTS TO BACK THIS???

I know what's plain and simple and that's your thought process.

Just what deal are you talking about that I don't like???

The Club is still in negotiations about the HOME match at the MCG against Geelong and have stated that it will be a better outcome than last year's away game against Melbourne that was just compensation.

Has the penny dropped yet
2 answers to the same post 5 hours apart. That is very interesting. How do you know he is wrong?
A bit slow are you???

Re read what I have typed in this thread

Havent got an hour to waste.

St Fidelius · Sat 07 Nov 2009 7:12pm

Good, why bother asking if I have already mentioned it....

I don't intend in wasting my time in repeating it, if you are too lazy to read what I have stated.

TIP

Don't bother wasting my time again, if you can't be bothered to read.

1 hour...

I really didn't realise just how slow you really are

Nicky · Post: # 862822Post **Nicky** » Sat 28 Nov 2009 9:18pm

Have the Saints requested the AFL to switch these 3 games yet? Or are they just sitting on their arse and not doing anything about it?

plugger66 · Post: # 862823Post **plugger66** » Sat 28 Nov 2009 9:20pm

Nicky wrote:Have the Saints requested the AFL to switch these 3 games yet? Or are they just sitting on their arse and not doing anything about it?

Isnt our home ground Etihad and I think they are being played there. No point in moving them all to Geelong, the ground is to small.

Nicky · Post: # 862826Post **Nicky** » Sat 28 Nov 2009 9:21pm

plugger66 wrote:
Nicky wrote:Have the Saints requested the AFL to switch these 3 games yet? Or are they just sitting on their arse and not doing anything about it?
Isnt our home ground Etihad and I think they are being played there. No point in moving them all to Geelong, the ground is to small.

MCG.

plugger66 · Post: # 862827Post **plugger66** » Sat 28 Nov 2009 9:24pm

Nicky wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Nicky wrote:Have the Saints requested the AFL to switch these 3 games yet? Or are they just sitting on their arse and not doing anything about it?
Isnt our home ground Etihad and I think they are being played there. No point in moving them all to Geelong, the ground is to small.
MCG.

Nice ground. We probably need to play there a couple of times next year. But I still think geelong is to small for those other games you mentioned.

Nicky · Post: # 862830Post **Nicky** » Sat 28 Nov 2009 9:25pm

plugger66 wrote:
Nicky wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Nicky wrote:Have the Saints requested the AFL to switch these 3 games yet? Or are they just sitting on their arse and not doing anything about it?
Isnt our home ground Etihad and I think they are being played there. No point in moving them all to Geelong, the ground is to small.
MCG.
Nice ground. We probably need to play there a couple of times next year. But I still think geelong is to small for those other games you mentioned.

ignore.

Nicky · Post: # 867366Post **Nicky** » Tue 22 Dec 2009 8:23pm

If St kilda don't change their home games against Collingfilth, Dorks and Bummers from Telstra Dome to the MCG then they FARRRKED.

Nicky · Post: # 867369Post **Nicky** » Tue 22 Dec 2009 8:24pm

And then peolple wonder why we are not making huge profits.

saintspremiers · Tue 22 Dec 2009 8:26pm

Nicky wrote:And then peolple wonder why we are not making huge profits.

Young Nicky, perhaps the club would like to do as you suggested, but can't due to contractural obligations and the small fact that the AFL dictate where we play, not us!

Eastern · Post: # 867419Post **Eastern** » Tue 22 Dec 2009 10:20pm

saintspremiers wrote:
Nicky wrote:And then peolple wonder why we are not making huge profits.
Young Nicky, perhaps the club would like to do as you suggested, but can't due to contractural obligations and the small fact that the AFL dictate where we play, not us!

Add to this;

If the AFL couldn't/wouldn't shift the Rd 14 game v Geelong this year, we can safely assume that they will NEVER shift ANY games !!

Nicky · Post: # 867633Post **Nicky** » Wed 23 Dec 2009 9:05pm

Eastern wrote:
saintspremiers wrote:
Nicky wrote:And then peolple wonder why we are not making huge profits.
Young Nicky, perhaps the club would like to do as you suggested, but can't due to contractural obligations and the small fact that the AFL dictate where we play, not us!
Add to this;

If the AFL couldn't/wouldn't shift the Rd 14 game v Geelong this year, we can safely assume that they will NEVER shift ANY games !!

We should put our foot down and insist, or even better, tell the AFL from 2011 onwards we want 7 at ETIHAD and 4 at the MCG.

plugger66 · Post: # 867699Post **plugger66** » Thu 24 Dec 2009 7:52am

Nicky wrote:
Eastern wrote:
saintspremiers wrote:
Nicky wrote:And then peolple wonder why we are not making huge profits.
Young Nicky, perhaps the club would like to do as you suggested, but can't due to contractural obligations and the small fact that the AFL dictate where we play, not us!
Add to this;

If the AFL couldn't/wouldn't shift the Rd 14 game v Geelong this year, we can safely assume that they will NEVER shift ANY games !!
We should put our foot down and insist, or even better, tell the AFL from 2011 onwards we want 7 at ETIHAD and 4 at the MCG.

Totally agree even if we have a binding contract. Just break it. You know it makes sense.

HarveysDeciple · Thu 24 Dec 2009 9:26am

Nicky wrote:
Eastern wrote:
saintspremiers wrote:
Nicky wrote:And then peolple wonder why we are not making huge profits.
Young Nicky, perhaps the club would like to do as you suggested, but can't due to contractural obligations and the small fact that the AFL dictate where we play, not us!
Add to this;

If the AFL couldn't/wouldn't shift the Rd 14 game v Geelong this year, we can safely assume that they will NEVER shift ANY games !!
We should put our foot down and insist, or even better, tell the AFL from 2011 onwards we want 7 at ETIHAD and 4 at the MCG.

It's not that simple.

No way we could just go to the AFL and say that. We have a contract at Etihad.