This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators , Saintsational Moderators
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626 Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh
Post: # 864895Post
plugger66 » Tue 08 Dec 2009 7:00pm
So it wasnt because GT apparently dated Bally's Mum and it wasnt because Gt got his way over the preident who has no right at all anyway to get involved in picking players. Well I am shocked.
The Craw
Club Player
Posts: 1874 Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 10:38pm
Location: In a laundrette, San Francisco USA
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 54 times
Post: # 864966Post
The Craw » Wed 09 Dec 2009 1:15pm
He left for the money, no if's or buts about it.
Players are filthy with him, moved heaven and earth to get him to stay.
You may find that his number will not be worn by any player next year and that speaks volumes imho.
Not Craw, CRAW!
saintly
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5412 Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 10:29am
Has thanked: 33 times
Been thanked: 47 times
Post: # 864970Post
saintly » Wed 09 Dec 2009 3:01pm
The Craw wrote: He left for the money, no if's or buts about it.
Players are filthy with him, moved heaven and earth to get him to stay.
You may find that his number will not be worn by any player next year and that speaks volumes imho .
where has that been stated, except on here?
Spinner
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8502 Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
Location: Victoria
Has thanked: 185 times
Been thanked: 133 times
Post: # 864971Post
Spinner » Wed 09 Dec 2009 3:01pm
The Craw wrote: He left for the money, no if's or buts about it.
Players are filthy with him, moved heaven and earth to get him to stay.
You may find that his number will not be worn by any player next year and that speaks volumes imho.
How do you know?
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626 Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh
Post: # 864982Post
plugger66 » Wed 09 Dec 2009 4:41pm
The Craw wrote: He left for the money, no if's or buts about it.
Players are filthy with him, moved heaven and earth to get him to stay.
You may find that his number will not be worn by any player next year and that speaks volumes imho.
Well done you are about 90% wrong.
Eastern
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14357 Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
Location: 3132
Been thanked: 1 time
Post: # 864991Post
Eastern » Wed 09 Dec 2009 5:11pm
plugger66 wrote: The Craw wrote: He left for the money, no if's or buts about it.
Players are filthy with him, moved heaven and earth to get him to stay.
You may find that his number will not be worn by any player next year and that speaks volumes imho.
Well done you are about 90% wrong.
Care to elaborate on the other 10% ???? !!
NEW scarf signature (hopefully with correct spelling) will be here as soon as it arrives !!
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626 Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh
Post: # 864994Post
plugger66 » Wed 09 Dec 2009 5:21pm
Eastern wrote: plugger66 wrote: The Craw wrote: He left for the money, no if's or buts about it.
Players are filthy with him, moved heaven and earth to get him to stay.
You may find that his number will not be worn by any player next year and that speaks volumes imho.
Well done you are about 90% wrong.
Care to elaborate on the other 10% ???? !!
Well I think money had about 10% to do with him leaving.
Dr Spaceman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14102 Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
Has thanked: 104 times
Been thanked: 62 times
Post: # 865001Post
Dr Spaceman » Wed 09 Dec 2009 5:26pm
The fact the topic is now into a 3rd page suggests people aren’t in fact over talking about Luke Ball. However, IMO, they should be. There was a lot to talk about it in Trade Week, and then in the lead up to the Draft and then the Draft itself. And fair enough; we all wanted to know what it was all about. But 2 things we know for certain - he is gone and he ain’t coming back!
The “Luke’s a Scumâ€
barks4eva
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10748 Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:39pm
Has thanked: 190 times
Been thanked: 92 times
Post: # 865009Post
barks4eva » Wed 09 Dec 2009 6:12pm
[quote="Dr Spaceman"]The fact the topic is now into a 3rd page suggests people aren’t in fact over talking about Luke Ball. However, IMO, they should be. There was a lot to talk about it in Trade Week, and then in the lead up to the Draft and then the Draft itself. And fair enough; we all wanted to know what it was all about. But 2 things we know for certain - he is gone and he ain’t coming back!
The “Luke’s a Scumâ€
DO THE MATHS AND THE SQUARES ARE ALL ROOTED.