emma quayle says saints will be going downhill in 2 years,.
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 16892
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3583 times
- Been thanked: 2852 times
- bobmurray
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7781
- Joined: Mon 03 Oct 2005 11:08pm
- Location: In the stand at RSEA Park.
- Has thanked: 497 times
- Been thanked: 226 times
It's all a bit of a raffle anyway when it comes to drafting..
We recently delisted a former No.27 draft pick,not one the recruiter would ever hang his hat on....
Some seem to be making the assumption that all the TAC kids that get drafted make the grade.....that is not so...whatever number draft pick they are....
It's all about the player mix but Ross seems to have a fixation with recycling players from other clubs.....
We recently delisted a former No.27 draft pick,not one the recruiter would ever hang his hat on....
Some seem to be making the assumption that all the TAC kids that get drafted make the grade.....that is not so...whatever number draft pick they are....
It's all about the player mix but Ross seems to have a fixation with recycling players from other clubs.....
Six debutants for the Saints so far in Season 2024. ![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
I'm not sure it's a fixation. Making the Grand Final meant we weren't gonna get an early pick anyway. Trading 16 for Lovett will be liked by some and hated by others but the GF certainly exposed the Saints lack of pace & accuracy in the forward line, whether that be hitting targets or scoring goals. Could we have solved that with a kid at pick 16? Perhaps, but it probably would have taken a few years for that kid to make it to the seniors even if he was good enough. So I don't have any problem with giving up our earliest pick for Lovett.bobmurray wrote:It's all a bit of a raffle anyway when it comes to drafting..
We recently delisted a former No.27 draft pick,not one the recruiter would ever hang his hat on....
Some seem to be making the assumption that all the TAC kids that get drafted make the grade.....that is not so...whatever number draft pick they are....
It's all about the player mix but Ross seems to have a fixation with recycling players from other clubs.....
As I stated in my previous post I also don't have a problem with recycled players with our later picks where there was a perceived lack of talented kids available in a weak & compromised draft.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5410
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 10:29am
- Has thanked: 33 times
- Been thanked: 47 times
my thought is thatTeflon wrote:I understand her opinion and I guess against perhaps the amount of young talent other clubs have stockpiled (Geelong again this year) it could be argued we may struggle when Hayes/Roo/Kosi et al go.
Lyon has backed the here and now which I also understand....but geez......last time we were here and now we didnt get another shot for 13 yrs....
Mind you its interesting that Smith is only 23, Pattison 23 (have copped a heap of cr@p off mates for this selection...) so while they arent kids.....they arent 28.
I guess is we get 1 flag at least in the next couple of years you could argue its paid off? .....however, 2 would be in the realms of this group IMHO.
geelong has been on top for three years still likely to be their for te next 2-3 and yet they still go with youth.
the saints tried the route of topping up after 1997 and still took us 13 years to make a grand final. if the saints do not win the grand final within the next 2 years the topping up (even if they are low 20 year olds) may come back to haunt the saints in the years of GC and GWS drafts.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6090
- Joined: Fri 11 Mar 2005 9:18pm
- saintnick12
- Club Player
- Posts: 1877
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 2:08pm
Geelong had to go with youth as they couldn't afford anyone else. They were interested in Lovett last year and apparently some others this year. But they are under such tight salary cap pressure due to the ongoing success that they cannot afford to do anything other than go for kids. If we have room for a few older players in our cap that might make the difference to winning a flag then go for it I say. We still drafted young with our first and last pick and also most of our picks last year. We have also increased our number of rookies over the past few years and have had great success with this - Jones, Geary, Dawson, McQualter and Eddy were all rookies.
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30089
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
Ok..based on Saints who are currently 26 or less we have a team of:
Smith Dawson Miles
Dempster Gilbert Peake
DalSanto Goddard Montagna
Gram Lynch McQualter
Schneider Cahill Jones
McEvoy Armitage Steven
Stanley Geary Ray Clarke
Quite likely to still be playing in 2012 = Roo, Lovett, Kosi, Sam Fisher
Wildcard = Walsh
Rookies = Given our recent success it is likely that one or two new rookies will have forced their way in the 2012 team
Lenny and Roo are our only two true current elites. Losing them would make a hole in any team.
however BJ may well soon be one.
Smith Dawson Miles
Dempster Gilbert Peake
DalSanto Goddard Montagna
Gram Lynch McQualter
Schneider Cahill Jones
McEvoy Armitage Steven
Stanley Geary Ray Clarke
Quite likely to still be playing in 2012 = Roo, Lovett, Kosi, Sam Fisher
Wildcard = Walsh
Rookies = Given our recent success it is likely that one or two new rookies will have forced their way in the 2012 team
Lenny and Roo are our only two true current elites. Losing them would make a hole in any team.
however BJ may well soon be one.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
And what does it matter how many draft picks she has right. She has an opinion which cannot be right or wrong. Amazingly before she han a negative opinion about the saints this time( I dont think it is negative) most people rated her just about the best journalist around.Top4King wrote:how many draft picks in the first round did she get right this year plugger66?
it seems they have removed her predictions article from The Age.com
saintbrat? can you find her predictions article. i would love to know how many first round selections she got right.
most ppl. i think she's crap. monday's expert always has been.plugger66 wrote:And what does it matter how many draft picks she has right. She has an opinion which cannot be right or wrong. Amazingly before she han a negative opinion about the saints this time( I dont think it is negative) most people rated her just about the best journalist around.Top4King wrote:how many draft picks in the first round did she get right this year plugger66?
it seems they have removed her predictions article from The Age.com
saintbrat? can you find her predictions article. i would love to know how many first round selections she got right.
Well I am speaking from a pedophile point of view apparently. She is also no Monday expert as you call her as she puts her picks out there before the draft not after.Top4King wrote:most ppl. i think she's crap. monday's expert always has been.plugger66 wrote:And what does it matter how many draft picks she has right. She has an opinion which cannot be right or wrong. Amazingly before she han a negative opinion about the saints this time( I dont think it is negative) most people rated her just about the best journalist around.Top4King wrote:how many draft picks in the first round did she get right this year plugger66?
it seems they have removed her predictions article from The Age.com
saintbrat? can you find her predictions article. i would love to know how many first round selections she got right.
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30089
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
Emma I normally rate quite highly...but in this case people should not get too excited. It was a "filler" article with a few paragraphs on each club and mainly lightweight lines. Not normal Emm material at all.
Compared to the detailed in-depth articles that she normally writes this was paper to line the bird-cage.
Compared to the detailed in-depth articles that she normally writes this was paper to line the bird-cage.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
i think it's important that we publish the article in full:
Mods edit: Deleted for posting entire article...heres the URL
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/t ... -jyed.html
Mods edit: Deleted for posting entire article...heres the URL
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/t ... -jyed.html
and saintbrat will find them........... if anyone can find it saintbrat will.plugger66 wrote:Well I am speaking from a pedophile point of view apparently. She is also no Monday expert as you call her as she puts her picks out there before the draft not after.Top4King wrote:most ppl. i think she's crap. monday's expert always has been.plugger66 wrote:And what does it matter how many draft picks she has right. She has an opinion which cannot be right or wrong. Amazingly before she han a negative opinion about the saints this time( I dont think it is negative) most people rated her just about the best journalist around.Top4King wrote:how many draft picks in the first round did she get right this year plugger66?
it seems they have removed her predictions article from The Age.com
saintbrat? can you find her predictions article. i would love to know how many first round selections she got right.
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30089
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30089
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
i've read it. i thought this was an extra-ordinary situation. hey did you read the homepage 'True Believer'?. Yeah that's mine.saintsRrising wrote:I think you might want to read the first Stickie then.....see at top of page.Top4King wrote:i think it's important that we publish the article in full:
: