nathan carroll anyone

saintly · Post: # 851003Post **saintly** » Tue 20 Oct 2009 1:01pm

it appears that hawthorn wants him

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showthread.php?t=646039

"Was in Camberwell earlier this morning, and saw Nathan Carroll being put through the motions by some of the Hawthorn conditioning staff.

Anybody else heard anything about this? "

mick13 · Post: # 851005Post **mick13** » Tue 20 Oct 2009 1:03pm

What a brilliant decision it was to take Zac instead...

I'm actually amazed I'm saying that with no sarcasm at all!

<3 Zac.

SainterK · Post: # 851006Post **SainterK** » Tue 20 Oct 2009 1:04pm

Now doesn't that ring a bell...didn't we make good with someone Hawthorn overlooked

plugger66 · Post: # 851012Post **plugger66** » Tue 20 Oct 2009 1:17pm

Would be interested if we can get him late in the draft. Maybe use our pick 32 on him.

ausfatcat · Post: # 851014Post **ausfatcat** » Tue 20 Oct 2009 1:18pm

plugger66 wrote:Would be interested if we can get him late in the draft. Maybe use our pick 32 on him.

Oh god plugger you do realise there would be people that will believe you don't you?

mightysainters · Tue 20 Oct 2009 2:00pm

we could have easily got him with our pick 16 no chance now big mistake for getting that bloke lovett

Batnoe · Post: # 851023Post **Batnoe** » Tue 20 Oct 2009 2:00pm

ausfatcat wrote:
plugger66 wrote:Would be interested if we can get him late in the draft. Maybe use our pick 32 on him.
Oh god plugger you do realise there would be people that will believe you don't you?

Are you serious? I wish we had our pick 16 still, would be silly not to use it, we are serioulsy lacking down back

joffaboy · Post: # 851032Post **joffaboy** » Tue 20 Oct 2009 2:23pm

plugger66 wrote:Would be interested if we can get him late in the draft. Maybe use our pick 32 on him.

Is that pick for the superhero discard from Melbourne called Buckley?

Milan Faletic · Tue 20 Oct 2009 2:26pm

Carroll not Carrol

ace · Post: # 851078Post **ace** » Tue 20 Oct 2009 4:52pm

What would we do with an early Christmas Carroll.

skeptic · Post: # 851086Post **skeptic** » Tue 20 Oct 2009 5:09pm

not getting him clearly cost us a premiership

sunsaint · Post: # 851094Post **sunsaint** » Tue 20 Oct 2009 5:41pm

skeptic wrote:not getting him clearly cost us a premiership

if you mean his one job all year was to go Mad dog and take Rooke out
then yeah probably did

Eastern · Post: # 851144Post **Eastern** » Tue 20 Oct 2009 8:31pm

Is the word NO emphatic enough

!!

The Saintsational Man · Tue 20 Oct 2009 9:55pm

I want Naffan!!!

Milan Faletic · Wed 21 Oct 2009 12:38pm

Maybe he can rush through behinds for them and win a flag again. Oh, that's right, you can't do that anymore

SENsei · Post: # 851330Post **SENsei** » Wed 21 Oct 2009 12:46pm

The only thing Nathan Carroll is good for is the Movember fundraising.

HarveysDeciple · Wed 21 Oct 2009 1:24pm

Hawks also trying to talk Brendan Lade out of retirement to fill their ruck hole.

They tried to persuade Max to go around again too.

SENsei · Post: # 851354Post **SENsei** » Wed 21 Oct 2009 1:41pm

HarveysDeciple wrote:Hawks also trying to talk Brendan Lade out of retirement to fill their ruck hole.

They tried to persuade Max to go around again too.

Maybe Gary Dempsey might be available also.

Desperation.

Milan Faletic · Wed 21 Oct 2009 1:59pm

SENsaintsational wrote:
HarveysDeciple wrote:Hawks also trying to talk Brendan Lade out of retirement to fill their ruck hole.

They tried to persuade Max to go around again too.
Maybe Gary Dempsey might be available also.

Desperation.

....or Don Scott

Hurricane · Post: # 851384Post **Hurricane** » Wed 21 Oct 2009 2:27pm

Milan Faletic wrote:
SENsaintsational wrote:
HarveysDeciple wrote:Hawks also trying to talk Brendan Lade out of retirement to fill their ruck hole.

They tried to persuade Max to go around again too.
Maybe Gary Dempsey might be available also.

Desperation.
....or Don Scott

Mabey Dipper and John Paltten might be a show.....Dermie is still in good shape isnt he?

Why not get a renunion going at Tank......I mean Hawk land

BANG BANG

EB · Post: # 851443Post EB » Wed 21 Oct 2009 6:14pm

SENsaintsational wrote:
HarveysDeciple wrote:Hawks also trying to talk Brendan Lade out of retirement to fill their ruck hole.

They tried to persuade Max to go around again too.
Maybe Gary Dempsey might be available also.

Desperation.

Not too different from Gardiner and King imo

joffaboy · Post: # 851461Post **joffaboy** » Wed 21 Oct 2009 7:08pm

EB wrote:
SENsaintsational wrote:
HarveysDeciple wrote:Hawks also trying to talk Brendan Lade out of retirement to fill their ruck hole.

They tried to persuade Max to go around again too.
Maybe Gary Dempsey might be available also.

Desperation.
Not too different from Gardiner and King imo

A huge difference.

How old is Lade?

How old is Gardiner? How old is King?

Had Gardiner and King retired?

More like Doc Clarke than those two.

Seems as though Clarkson still cant get Port out of his mind.

EB · Post: # 851464Post EB » Wed 21 Oct 2009 7:21pm

Lade could provide similar service to Hawks as Everitt did Swans, Salmon and Barnes did Essendon.
Ruckman have a much longer life span than most so it wouldn't be the worst idea ever.

As for Carroll. He really only got delisted cos he's a nuffa and the Demons don't want anyone who can grow facial hair on their list