Why the noose on Goose?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4241
- Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
- Location: earth
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1390 times
Why the noose on Goose?
I have been bemused by many on the forum who have concluded that Matt Maguire is finished as a footballer or we should have traded him for crappy draft picks.
I think our current defensive style suits him, with less emphasis on one on one contests, instead setting up zones where players can cut across the path of the incoming ball. In the past, he has been one of our few key defenders who knew when to leave his man and attack. His kicking is also long and penetrating and a nightmare for opposition defenders.
I think the football department has managed his return to football extremely well. it's not just the broken leg, but the foot problems have presented the most dangerous long term risk to his football career. We have seen how Egan from Geelong and recently Trent Croad who have paid the price of returning too early from their foot injuries (or continuing to play with them).
Dave Misson, as we have seen, knows what he's doing, and now Maguire has a chance to have his first proper pre-season in four years. If he can become as aerobically fit as our other defenders, I really see a place for him in this team.
I haven't written him off at any stage, and I won't be the least bit surprised if he's one of our boom recruits for 2010. Like I said, the current defensive style suits him beautifully and his kicking can punch through the opposition zone.
.
I think our current defensive style suits him, with less emphasis on one on one contests, instead setting up zones where players can cut across the path of the incoming ball. In the past, he has been one of our few key defenders who knew when to leave his man and attack. His kicking is also long and penetrating and a nightmare for opposition defenders.
I think the football department has managed his return to football extremely well. it's not just the broken leg, but the foot problems have presented the most dangerous long term risk to his football career. We have seen how Egan from Geelong and recently Trent Croad who have paid the price of returning too early from their foot injuries (or continuing to play with them).
Dave Misson, as we have seen, knows what he's doing, and now Maguire has a chance to have his first proper pre-season in four years. If he can become as aerobically fit as our other defenders, I really see a place for him in this team.
I haven't written him off at any stage, and I won't be the least bit surprised if he's one of our boom recruits for 2010. Like I said, the current defensive style suits him beautifully and his kicking can punch through the opposition zone.
.
Re: Why the noose on Goose?
Been saying exactly that for a while. I also think this year has been a huge step in Goose's recovery and great to see there has been no rush in bringing him back.cwrcyn wrote:I think the football department has managed his return to football extremely well.
He was supposedly in line for a recall for the Hawks game when he did the hammy, but I don't think he was ever in Ross's grand plan for the finals this year.
2010 for Goose, looking forward to it immensely.
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11235
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 119 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18579
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1904 times
- Been thanked: 841 times
Re: Why the noose on Goose?
i'd love to see him make it back, but it might not happen.
his problem is that he's limited in the number of positions he can play and all the key position spots were pretty adequetely filled last season in a team that kept on winning.
i would have given him a run as a like-for-like replacement for kosi when kosi was suspended, but goose had been playing mostly back for sandringham.
at his best he's aerially a very strong key position player. ross and sos seem to think mostly in terms of match-ups defensively, so the lack of too many jonathan brown types among our opponents might count against him.
i'd like to see him play forward for sandringham more often. this would give him a better opportunity to press his claims.
his problem is that he's limited in the number of positions he can play and all the key position spots were pretty adequetely filled last season in a team that kept on winning.
i would have given him a run as a like-for-like replacement for kosi when kosi was suspended, but goose had been playing mostly back for sandringham.
at his best he's aerially a very strong key position player. ross and sos seem to think mostly in terms of match-ups defensively, so the lack of too many jonathan brown types among our opponents might count against him.
i'd like to see him play forward for sandringham more often. this would give him a better opportunity to press his claims.
- saintnick12
- Club Player
- Posts: 1877
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 2:08pm
- ausfatcat
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6524
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:36pm
- Has thanked: 19 times
- Been thanked: 95 times
Re: Why the noose on Goose?
Ankles BTWcwrcyn wrote: We have seen how Egan from Geelong and recently Trent Croad who have paid the price of returning too early from their foot injuries (or continuing to play with them).
As for Goose he has to show a lot next season if he has a hope of staying around and it wouldn't surprise me (but I don't think it will happen) if he is cut loose this year anyway.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5062
- Joined: Sun 27 Feb 2005 2:30am
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 125 times
The instigator of this post has nailed one damn fine piece of analysis. He's dead right when commenting on Goose's propensity to run off, to attack, to unsettle the opposition. He is spot on.
I just hope that trademark, entirely in keeping with how we play, is the reason his career is still alive with us. I like to think it is.
Brave bastards who will go to the next contest with commitment, is our trademark. Goose did it before Ross made it so.
And, if nothing else, if Zac was to go down, who of size could step up?
I just hope that trademark, entirely in keeping with how we play, is the reason his career is still alive with us. I like to think it is.
Brave bastards who will go to the next contest with commitment, is our trademark. Goose did it before Ross made it so.
And, if nothing else, if Zac was to go down, who of size could step up?
'I have no new illusions, and I have no old illusions' - Vladimir Putin, Geneva, June 2021
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 16885
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3580 times
- Been thanked: 2843 times
I'm very doubtful too
IMO he just doesn't suit the modern game.
He's not a clean enough spoiler for the backline, nor is he quck, versatile, and his disposal is ok at best.
Forumites may not remember, but he was REALLY struggling even b4 he hurt jis leg/foot whatver the injury was.
The query is his agility now.
The only potential I see for him is up forward as a medium sized forward but I don't know if I can see him do it.
If we could have gotten a decent pick for him I would have taken it. IMO high risk of ending up on the stockpile at the end of the season
IMO he just doesn't suit the modern game.
He's not a clean enough spoiler for the backline, nor is he quck, versatile, and his disposal is ok at best.
Forumites may not remember, but he was REALLY struggling even b4 he hurt jis leg/foot whatver the injury was.
The query is his agility now.
The only potential I see for him is up forward as a medium sized forward but I don't know if I can see him do it.
If we could have gotten a decent pick for him I would have taken it. IMO high risk of ending up on the stockpile at the end of the season
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6090
- Joined: Fri 11 Mar 2005 9:18pm
Re: Why the noose on Goose?
I think he may be our tall forward that we have been looking for.Iceman234 wrote:Been saying exactly that for a while. I also think this year has been a huge step in Goose's recovery and great to see there has been no rush in bringing him back.cwrcyn wrote:I think the football department has managed his return to football extremely well.
He was supposedly in line for a recall for the Hawks game when he did the hammy, but I don't think he was ever in Ross's grand plan for the finals this year.
2010 for Goose, looking forward to it immensely.
Matt, you have my full support for what it's worth. Go Goose!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6090
- Joined: Fri 11 Mar 2005 9:18pm
Skeptic, I generally agree with you but on this I respectfully don't agree with you on this one. I think the fitness staff have had a plan for Goose based on the demise of Egan and Brown. I think he needs to re-bulk up and play on the forward line. However, if he could get back to playing on the back line that would be great.skeptic wrote:I'm very doubtful too
IMO he just doesn't suit the modern game.
He's not a clean enough spoiler for the backline, nor is he quck, versatile, and his disposal is ok at best.
Forumites may not remember, but he was REALLY struggling even b4 he hurt jis leg/foot whatver the injury was.
The query is his agility now.
The only potential I see for him is up forward as a medium sized forward but I don't know if I can see him do it.
If we could have gotten a decent pick for him I would have taken it. IMO high risk of ending up on the stockpile at the end of the season
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 16885
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3580 times
- Been thanked: 2843 times
- Saints43
- Club Player
- Posts: 1826
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:01pm
- Location: L2 A38
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
I don't want this to sound like I'm having a go at Zac or Blakey (who I have been a big defender of over the years) but if Goose can't look at our backline (which works because of system rather than stars) and believe that he cannot take one of those spots then he should give it away.
I reckon he would be confident of forcing his way in if his body holds up.
I reckon he would be confident of forcing his way in if his body holds up.
- SaintWodonga
- Club Player
- Posts: 1868
- Joined: Wed 04 Jul 2007 12:01am
- Location: Wodonga
- Contact:
Have to agree plugger, whilst still hoping *fingers crossed* that I am wrong. Watched quite a few Sandringham games this year. There are some question marks.......plugger66 wrote:I am afraid after seeing Goose this year that he will be lucky to play a few games at best next year. Due to injury doesnt really have much going for him now. Is a depth player at best.
Fortius Quo Fidelius
- Milton66
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3521
- Joined: Tue 19 May 2009 9:53pm
- Location: None of your goddam business
In my expert opinion, based on the fact that I have not got a clue as to what's going on inside the club... and not having any direct communication with Ross Lyon, I can honestly state as fact that Goose will either be with us next year... or maybe he won't.
Hotel De Los Muertos: Your room is ready... Care to step inside?
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10734
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 30 times
- Been thanked: 819 times
The Goose will fly again.
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 190
- Joined: Sun 22 Jun 2008 10:53pm
- Eastern
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14357
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
- Location: 3132
- Been thanked: 1 time
We all need to be mindful that Goose is coming from a long way back. There were reports that he came close to having part of his leg amputated. That is a bloody serious injury. Former Saint Dean Greig lost part of a leg because of compartment syndrome after breaking his leg playing suburban footy.
If Goose gets back to playing at the top level, it will be testement to the Guy's strength of character (and the skills of our medical & physio people). I say;
GOOD LUCK GOOSE !!
If Goose gets back to playing at the top level, it will be testement to the Guy's strength of character (and the skills of our medical & physio people). I say;
GOOD LUCK GOOSE !!
NEW scarf signature (hopefully with correct spelling) will be here as soon as it arrives !!
![Image](http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o23/saintbrat/9c94369c.jpg)
![Image](http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o23/saintbrat/9c94369c.jpg)
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2295
- Joined: Sun 27 Jan 2008 9:05am
- Has thanked: 769 times
- Been thanked: 207 times