Disappointed in the club

SainterK · Post: # 848647Post **SainterK** » Tue 13 Oct 2009 10:47pm

Untenable, if I hear that one more time...it's right up there with due dillegence as the footy catch phrase of the month!

Milton66 · Post: # 848648Post **Milton66** » Tue 13 Oct 2009 10:51pm

SainterK wrote:Untenable, if I hear that one more time...it's right up there with due dillegence as the footy catch phrase of the month!

But surely if you follow the process and apply enough forward pressure, then due dilligence is no longer required... unles the position is untenable.

Bernard Shakey · Tue 13 Oct 2009 10:51pm

SainterK wrote:Untenable, if I hear that one more time...it's right up there with due dillegence as the footy catch phrase of the month! :shock:

Disgruntled is my favourite.

Does anybody know anyone who is gruntled?

Milton66 · Post: # 848650Post **Milton66** » Tue 13 Oct 2009 10:52pm

Bernard Shakey wrote:
SainterK wrote:Untenable, if I hear that one more time...it's right up there with due dillegence as the footy catch phrase of the month!
Disgruntled is my favourite.

Does anybody know anyone who is gruntled?

Does anybody know where Morang is?

saint66au · Post: # 848652Post **saint66au** » Tue 13 Oct 2009 10:53pm

Milton66 wrote:
Bernard Shakey wrote:
SainterK wrote:Untenable, if I hear that one more time...it's right up there with due dillegence as the footy catch phrase of the month!
Disgruntled is my favourite.

Does anybody know anyone who is gruntled?
Does anybody know where Morang is?

Or Neerim?

Iceman234 · Post: # 848654Post **Iceman234** » Tue 13 Oct 2009 10:54pm

Milton66 wrote:
Bernard Shakey wrote:
SainterK wrote:Untenable, if I hear that one more time...it's right up there with due dillegence as the footy catch phrase of the month!
Disgruntled is my favourite.

Does anybody know anyone who is gruntled?
Does anybody know where Morang is?

Just north of South Morang...

SainterK · Post: # 848661Post **SainterK** » Tue 13 Oct 2009 11:06pm

Bernard Shakey wrote:
SainterK wrote:Untenable, if I hear that one more time...it's right up there with due dillegence as the footy catch phrase of the month!
Disgruntled is my favourite.

Does anybody know anyone who is gruntled?

Fair point...

bob__71 · Post: # 848662Post **bob__71** » Tue 13 Oct 2009 11:09pm

Bernard Shakey wrote:
SainterK wrote:Untenable, if I hear that one more time...it's right up there with due dillegence as the footy catch phrase of the month!
Disgruntled is my favourite.

Does anybody know anyone who is gruntled?

Those people who are prone to being disgruntled I would expect.

desertsaint · Tue 13 Oct 2009 11:12pm

well i'm not gruntled over the luke ball situation!

Milton66 · Post: # 848668Post **Milton66** » Tue 13 Oct 2009 11:33pm

desertsaint wrote:well i'm not gruntled over the luke ball situation!

how about disenfranchised?

desertsaint · Wed 14 Oct 2009 2:16pm

Milton66 wrote:
desertsaint wrote:well i'm not gruntled over the luke ball situation!
how about disenfranchised?

luke should be enfranchised!

Joffa 5 · Post: # 848798Post **Joffa 5** » Wed 14 Oct 2009 2:21pm

Milton66 wrote: But surely if you follow the process and apply enough forward pressure, then due dilligence is no longer required... unles the position is untenable.

Don't forget to check all the boxes

ausfatcat · Post: # 848832Post **ausfatcat** » Wed 14 Oct 2009 3:47pm

Maybe this is the reason why Collinwood wouldn't deal properly

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/f ... 5786658000

saintbrat · Post: # 848882Post **saintbrat** » Wed 14 Oct 2009 6:38pm

Nixon revealed this morning that in the Ball deal with an attempt to get Everitt the Bulldogs pulled out atleast an hur before trading conculded because it just wasn't going to get done. ( he is Andreas' manager)

Mr Magic · Post: # 848883Post **Mr Magic** » Wed 14 Oct 2009 6:42pm

saintbrat wrote:Nixon revealed this morning that in the Ball deal with an attempt to get Everitt the Bulldogs pulled out atleast an hur before trading conculded because it just wasn't going to get done. ( he is Andreas' manager)

And Connors 'mouthpiece' Greg Denham stated on SEN this morning that Collingwood was to blame for the failure of the deal to get done.
Claimed they never want to give up0 any players which is why they rarely get deals across teh line.

saintbrat · Post: # 848885Post **saintbrat** » Wed 14 Oct 2009 6:45pm

Mr Magic wrote:
saintbrat wrote:Nixon revealed this morning that in the Ball deal with an attempt to get Everitt the Bulldogs pulled out atleast an hur before trading conculded because it just wasn't going to get done. ( he is Andreas' manager)
And Connors 'mouthpiece' Greg Denham stated on SEN this morning that Collingwood was to blame for the failure of the deal to get done.
Claimed they never want to give up0 any players which is why they rarely get deals across teh line.

and that would be what the Saints were saying THIS time last week- surprise surprise ........

Mr Magic · Post: # 848886Post **Mr Magic** » Wed 14 Oct 2009 6:47pm

saintbrat wrote:
Mr Magic wrote:
saintbrat wrote:Nixon revealed this morning that in the Ball deal with an attempt to get Everitt the Bulldogs pulled out atleast an hur before trading conculded because it just wasn't going to get done. ( he is Andreas' manager)
And Connors 'mouthpiece' Greg Denham stated on SEN this morning that Collingwood was to blame for the failure of the deal to get done.
Claimed they never want to give up0 any players which is why they rarely get deals across teh line.
and that would be what the Saints were saying THIS time last week- surprise surprise ........

But because we were saying it makes it untrue in some people's eyes.

SainterK · Post: # 849027Post **SainterK** » Thu 15 Oct 2009 12:05am

Well, thanks to the doggies for at least trying I guess...

Milan Faletic · Thu 15 Oct 2009 12:39am

Gawd, this thread has turned in to a Luke Ball thread as well.

Ghost Like · Post: # 849071Post **Ghost Like** » Thu 15 Oct 2009 8:39am

Iceman234 wrote:
Milton66 wrote:
Bernard Shakey wrote:
SainterK wrote:Untenable, if I hear that one more time...it's right up there with due dillegence as the footy catch phrase of the month!
Disgruntled is my favourite.

Does anybody know anyone who is gruntled?
Does anybody know where Morang is?
Just north of South Morang...

Ghost Like · Post: # 849075Post **Ghost Like** » Thu 15 Oct 2009 8:46am

saintbrat wrote:
Mr Magic wrote:
saintbrat wrote:Nixon revealed this morning that in the Ball deal with an attempt to get Everitt the Bulldogs pulled out atleast an hur before trading conculded because it just wasn't going to get done. ( he is Andreas' manager)
And Connors 'mouthpiece' Greg Denham stated on SEN this morning that Collingwood was to blame for the failure of the deal to get done.
Claimed they never want to give up0 any players which is why they rarely get deals across teh line.
and that would be what the Saints were saying THIS time last week- surprise surprise ........

Listening to SEN this morning with them talking up the fact Richmond now want Luke Ball, it seems to me the club rated his worth and value pretty much spot on...he's obviously a valuable commodity to a few clubs, it's a pity two of those wanted to wait for him to slip through. Smart by them, probably realised Collingwood would play hard and St Kilda would not fold. If anything Collingwood badly 'underrated' a player they desperately need for the purposes of trying to screw St Kilda.

Not disappointed in the club at all, respect their decision not to accept crap because a gun, being the 2pm deadline, was held to their heads.

saintly · Post: # 849081Post **saintly** » Thu 15 Oct 2009 9:05am

Ghost Like wrote:
saintbrat wrote:
Mr Magic wrote:
saintbrat wrote:Nixon revealed this morning that in the Ball deal with an attempt to get Everitt the Bulldogs pulled out atleast an hur before trading conculded because it just wasn't going to get done. ( he is Andreas' manager)
And Connors 'mouthpiece' Greg Denham stated on SEN this morning that Collingwood was to blame for the failure of the deal to get done.
Claimed they never want to give up0 any players which is why they rarely get deals across teh line.
and that would be what the Saints were saying THIS time last week- surprise surprise ........

Listening to SEN this morning with them talking up the fact Richmond now want Luke Ball, it seems to me the club rated his worth and value pretty much spot on...he's obviously a valuable commodity to a few clubs, it's a pity two of those wanted to wait for him to slip through. Smart by them, probably realised Collingwood would play hard and St Kilda would not fold. If anything Collingwood badly 'underrated' a player they desperately need for the purposes of trying to screw St Kilda.

Not disappointed in the club at all, respect their decision not to accept crap because a gun, being the 2pm deadline, was held to their heads.[/quote]

agree with you!

respect the club alot.