Available Numbers

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

User avatar
avid
Club Player
Posts: 1638
Joined: Tue 11 Mar 2008 1:54am
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 19 times
Been thanked: 93 times

Re: Available Numbers

Post: # 847529Post avid »

Lenny = legend wrote:There are some significant guernsey numbers free at st kilda now:
3
8
35 (unlikely to be used again)
4
14 (if bally leaves)
etc

Do you think any current players will change their number or these numbers will be eventually taken by recruits and draftees? eg: Peake
I feel CJ should be no. 8.
It's numerically linked with his familiar 38. And there's a strong character link with Max's dogged loyalty (and non-silken skills). A good match.

I'd like Jack Steven to get no. 3. I can see the spirit of Burkey living on through Steven.

I was thinking of Zac for 3 or 4 too. (I wouldn't altogether mind if Steven were given 4) But I somehow think Dawson will stick with 43 for the rest of his career -- in acknowledgement of his last-chance humble beginnings at St Kilda. I think there's a sense of honour attached to self-effacing obscurity -- especially when you become a champion at what you're doing.

Peake might get 34 -- adds up to his old number 7

If Bally goes into the PSD, and we pick up a recycled player in return, give him number 14.

Eddy and Geary don't quite deserve a lower number yet. Wait and see.

Don't use 35 until the right player comes along. Maybe the same for 4.


User avatar
Spinner
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8502
Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
Location: Victoria
Has thanked: 185 times
Been thanked: 133 times

Post: # 847610Post Spinner »

plugger66 wrote:Why the hell wouldnt 35 be used again. Its a friggin number.
Thank goodness.

Give it to anyone, let them make their own history with in.


I dislike the Carlton way of retiring numbers - f*** that, half the time it doesn't even work out after waiting for the next star....


3 - Steven? (Armo to follow in clarkes footsteps of 20-3.....Cant see jones changing from 38.....Also, steven associated with 34)
4 - Geary (Really feel he has earned it, will play 22 next year and is associated with his number 42)
6 - Lynch! (Fisher looking like to be delisted)
8 - Dawson (Can really picture this number on his bak!)
9 - Lovett


35 - The payer we draft at 30something in this draft!


User avatar
borderbarry
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6676
Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
Location: Wodonga

Post: # 847618Post borderbarry »

I expect that there will be further numbers made available.
6. I think Leigh is even further away from a senior game with Lovett and Peake being picked up.
17. Begley reportedly wants to return to Ireland.
14. Who knows?
And they are just the low ones.


User avatar
ace
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10783
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 31 times
Been thanked: 830 times

Post: # 847622Post ace »

henno wrote:On a side note, interesting to see that X (through no fault of his own, injuries, death of his father, etc) never truly lived up to his potential that saw Burkey present him with his old number...in hindsight it should've been given to Ball.
To Dal Santo or Montagna they are loyal to the club.


The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.

If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
User avatar
avid
Club Player
Posts: 1638
Joined: Tue 11 Mar 2008 1:54am
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 19 times
Been thanked: 93 times

Post: # 847838Post avid »

I don't want to see anyone in number 4 until it's certain they're a club champion.
(I wanted Bally to take it over, a la Plugger. Shows how uncertain "certain" can be.)
Remember Paul Morwood running around in No 4? Just seemed like a slap in the face to Darrel Baldock to me. (No major disrespect, Paul, if you're reading this. -- any other number would have been OK.)
I'd be happy if Geary earned it, but I just don't think he's a sure enough bet yet.

I don't think Leigh Fisher's going to be delisted, so I'm not thinking about no 6 yet.


User avatar
Spinner
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8502
Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
Location: Victoria
Has thanked: 185 times
Been thanked: 133 times

Post: # 847848Post Spinner »

avid wrote:I don't want to see anyone in number 4 until it's certain they're a club champion.
(I wanted Bally to take it over, a la Plugger. Shows how uncertain "certain" can be.)
Remember Paul Morwood running around in No 4? Just seemed like a slap in the face to Darrel Baldock to me. (No major disrespect, Paul, if you're reading this. -- any other number would have been OK.)
I'd be happy if Geary earned it, but I just don't think he's a sure enough bet yet.

I don't think Leigh Fisher's going to be delisted, so I'm not thinking about no 6 yet.

By that time they will undoubtedly keep their own number - its catch 22.

Unless Leigh has another year on his contract...... I cant see him staying.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Post: # 847862Post plugger66 »

Spinner wrote:
avid wrote:I don't want to see anyone in number 4 until it's certain they're a club champion.
(I wanted Bally to take it over, a la Plugger. Shows how uncertain "certain" can be.)
Remember Paul Morwood running around in No 4? Just seemed like a slap in the face to Darrel Baldock to me. (No major disrespect, Paul, if you're reading this. -- any other number would have been OK.)
I'd be happy if Geary earned it, but I just don't think he's a sure enough bet yet.

I don't think Leigh Fisher's going to be delisted, so I'm not thinking about no 6 yet.

By that time they will undoubtedly keep their own number - its catch 22.

Unless Leigh has another year on his contract...... I cant see him staying.
Well he does so he may still stay.


User avatar
Spinner
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8502
Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
Location: Victoria
Has thanked: 185 times
Been thanked: 133 times

Post: # 847937Post Spinner »

plugger66 wrote:
Spinner wrote:
avid wrote:I don't want to see anyone in number 4 until it's certain they're a club champion.
(I wanted Bally to take it over, a la Plugger. Shows how uncertain "certain" can be.)
Remember Paul Morwood running around in No 4? Just seemed like a slap in the face to Darrel Baldock to me. (No major disrespect, Paul, if you're reading this. -- any other number would have been OK.)
I'd be happy if Geary earned it, but I just don't think he's a sure enough bet yet.

I don't think Leigh Fisher's going to be delisted, so I'm not thinking about no 6 yet.

By that time they will undoubtedly keep their own number - its catch 22.

Unless Leigh has another year on his contract...... I cant see him staying.
Well he does so he may still stay.
Interesting - Well Fiora showed last year that Ross doesn't waste time if players arn't in there plan. Guess its a wait and see.


Batnoe

Post: # 847945Post Batnoe »

SaintWodonga wrote:
jonesy wrote:
SaintWodonga wrote:Pretty sure clit jones will get a lower number..
That's why he's hard to find...
oops!

haha


Post Reply