Traded X for nothing?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- SaintWodonga
- Club Player
- Posts: 1868
- Joined: Wed 04 Jul 2007 12:01am
- Location: Wodonga
- Contact:
Traded X for nothing?
RL said that we were unlikely to use pick 62 in the draft (read below) but we got pick 60 from Lions for X. Are we likely to use that pick? Or did we give away X for nothing?
"“We couldn’t get a deal done. In the end it was 25 and 62 on the table. We were unlikely to use 62 and, in our view, 25 was not going to get Luke Ball done," Lyon
http://www.afl.com.au/Offseason/TradeBl ... fault.aspx
"“We couldn’t get a deal done. In the end it was 25 and 62 on the table. We were unlikely to use 62 and, in our view, 25 was not going to get Luke Ball done," Lyon
http://www.afl.com.au/Offseason/TradeBl ... fault.aspx
Last edited by SaintWodonga on Fri 09 Oct 2009 3:07pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Armoooo
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7281
- Joined: Sun 26 Nov 2006 2:28pm
- Location: The Great South East
- Contact:
Well he certainly wasn't a part of our plans, at least we are giving him a chance to further his career elsewhere....
ROBERT HARVEY A.K.A The Great Man, Banger, Harves, Ol' Man River...
384 games, 4 B&F's, 3 EJ Whitten Medals, St.Kilda Captain, 2 Time Brownlow Medalist, 8 Time All Australian, 2nd Highest Brownlow votes poller.... The greatest of ALL TIME!!
384 games, 4 B&F's, 3 EJ Whitten Medals, St.Kilda Captain, 2 Time Brownlow Medalist, 8 Time All Australian, 2nd Highest Brownlow votes poller.... The greatest of ALL TIME!!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1166
- Joined: Mon 17 Sep 2007 1:52pm
- Location: Outer Wing Moorabbin
- cowboy18
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5795
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:05pm
- Location: in my duffle coat
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 5 times
Ithink they had a good reason.
Same reason Geelong traded Gardiner and King and the reason the Schneider/Dempster trade was weighted in our favour.
The club respected the player's wishes and the club's balancing act with salary cap and took a minor hit wrt "market value". But did the right thing by a player who was not a strong chance to feature in plans for next year.
very disappointing to see him leave but they did the right thing.
Same reason Geelong traded Gardiner and King and the reason the Schneider/Dempster trade was weighted in our favour.
The club respected the player's wishes and the club's balancing act with salary cap and took a minor hit wrt "market value". But did the right thing by a player who was not a strong chance to feature in plans for next year.
very disappointing to see him leave but they did the right thing.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6043
- Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 5:31pm
- Location: Currumbin, Quoinslairnd
Agree. Had X in mind for the third forward role, but others who know much more obviously didn't.
Does it not also free up a bit of moolah for renegotiating with Ball?
Surely there would have had to be a contingency in place given Pies horrible trade week reputation?
Does it not also free up a bit of moolah for renegotiating with Ball?
Surely there would have had to be a contingency in place given Pies horrible trade week reputation?
"The inches we need are everywhere around us. They're in every break in the game. Every minute, every second. On this team we fight for that inch. On this team we tear ourselves and everyone around us to pieces for that inch. We claw with our fingernails for that inch. Because we know when we add up all those inches that's gonna make the f***in' difference between winning and losing! Between living and dying!'
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6090
- Joined: Fri 11 Mar 2005 9:18pm
Re: Traded X for nothing?
Fair call. I suspect that the Lovett deal, and X's fitness put a big question mark on his future. I also suspect that this move may be the turning point of both Clarkes's careers. Let's hope so for them and us.SaintWodonga wrote:RL said that we were unlikely to use pick 62 in the draft (read below) but we got pick 60 from Lions for X. Are we likely to use that pick? Or did we give away X for nothing?
"“We couldn’t get a deal done. In the end it was 25 and 62 on the table. We were unlikely to use 62 and, in our view, 25 was not going to get Luke Ball done," Lyon
http://www.afl.com.au/Offseason/TradeBl ... fault.aspx
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Sun 31 May 2009 11:32am
- Location: St Kilda
- TassieJones
- Club Player
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 9:17pm
- Location: The NCR
we wouldn't use pick 62 because we got pick 60 for X.
That said we still got ripped off though.
That said we still got ripped off though.
Last edited by TassieJones on Fri 09 Oct 2009 3:25pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Joffa Burns
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7081
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
- Has thanked: 1871 times
- Been thanked: 1570 times
Andrew Raines traded to Brisbane for pick 44.
X traded to Brisbane for pick 60.
I may be biased but X even returning from a reco is 5 times the player dud Raines is.
I'd say salary cap and doing the right thing by the player were the major reasons behind this trade.
X traded to Brisbane for pick 60.
I may be biased but X even returning from a reco is 5 times the player dud Raines is.
I'd say salary cap and doing the right thing by the player were the major reasons behind this trade.
Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 16885
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3580 times
- Been thanked: 2844 times
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2246
- Joined: Thu 18 Mar 2004 5:14pm
- Location: Level 1 Aisle 37 Row G Telstra Dome
We are under serious salary cap pressures and we had to make room for the incoming salaries plus the retention of some of our key players prior to the upcoming GC17 and WS18 inclusions. Whilst i liked X i don't see it as a big loss since he was regularly injured anyway.
Bleeding Red, Black and White for 38 years!
Life Motto - Fortius Quo Fidelius
Raph "Cult Hero" Clarke Fan Club.
Life Motto - Fortius Quo Fidelius
Raph "Cult Hero" Clarke Fan Club.
Maybe you are right but at the same time X is a 26 year old who has played a total of 26 games in the last 3 years including finals. I really like X and think he can still become a good player but no matter how much potential he has and he is a class bloke, he just doesn't get on the field often enough.Joffa Burns wrote:Andrew Raines traded to Brisbane for pick 44.
X traded to Brisbane for pick 60.
I may be biased but X even returning from a reco is 5 times the player dud Raines is.
I'd say salary cap and doing the right thing by the player were the major reasons behind this trade.
You can't help injuries, but pick 60 is about the going rate for a guy who is looking for a change, has a long history of injuries and is coming back from a knee reco.
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11235
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 119 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6090
- Joined: Fri 11 Mar 2005 9:18pm
Re: Traded X for nothing?
Think I heard you on SEN.SaintWodonga wrote:RL said that we were unlikely to use pick 62 in the draft (read below) but we got pick 60 from Lions for X. Are we likely to use that pick? Or did we give away X for nothing?
"“We couldn’t get a deal done. In the end it was 25 and 62 on the table. We were unlikely to use 62 and, in our view, 25 was not going to get Luke Ball done," Lyon
http://www.afl.com.au/Offseason/TradeBl ... fault.aspx
- desertsaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10404
- Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
- Location: out there
- Has thanked: 186 times
- Been thanked: 701 times
- bigred
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11463
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 7:39am
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 609 times
I reckon it will be more of the same @ Brisbane.skeptic wrote:we put a lot of work into X and then he just walked out and left us high and dry... we not only got nothing for him and he will spend the rest of his career trying to beat us
he's a quality bloke but quite frankly i have no gratitude for him
He just cant get his body right....and I don't think he ever will.
"Now the ball is loose, it gives St. Kilda a rough chance. Black. Good handpass. Voss. Schwarze now, the defender, can run and from a long way".....
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
We were screwed eh?Schillaci wrote:IF X wanted a change of environment and the brainstrust thought with his injuries that would suit both parties ....Fine.
Otherwise trading for pick 60 has me baffled. We were screwed.
I'd like to hear the club's reasoning on this one.
So what makes you think that ANY other club was willing to part with a higher draft pick than 60?
Not that likely!
Remember, unless a player is a gun with strong, consistent recent form (read: Lovett, Fevola), it's bloody hard to get a decent pick in return.
X sadly has neither, and strength of character and being a top person doesn't equate to a higher draft pick for most.
Rip it up at the Gabba X!!!
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2185
- Joined: Sun 28 Mar 2004 1:59pm
- Location: by the seaside..
- Has thanked: 35 times
- Been thanked: 185 times
the way i read it -
Brisbane came sniffing for X,
Saints asked X what he wanted to do and would not stand in his way if he wanted out,
X would have thought to himself that it was going to be hard to break into the senior team and we just added Peake and Lovett into the mix of players he would compete for a spot with,
X decided to take his chances elsewhere in the hope he might get a regular game,
Saints made it easy for him to move figuring that fate seemed determined to give X a hard time whilst he remained at the Saints [/list]
Brisbane came sniffing for X,
Saints asked X what he wanted to do and would not stand in his way if he wanted out,
X would have thought to himself that it was going to be hard to break into the senior team and we just added Peake and Lovett into the mix of players he would compete for a spot with,
X decided to take his chances elsewhere in the hope he might get a regular game,
Saints made it easy for him to move figuring that fate seemed determined to give X a hard time whilst he remained at the Saints [/list]
“If you want the rainbow you gotta put up with rain” Dolly Parton