Wojinski ?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 640
- Joined: Fri 19 Sep 2008 2:19pm
- Been thanked: 8 times
Re: Wojinski ?
too old...jonesy wrote:Cats having trouble fitting him in under the cap,so he may be offloaded.
Yay or nay?
I'm usually against older recruits, but Wojcinski surprised me at being 29yo.
I'd consider him with a lower draft pick, as I think he'd have a couple of good years in him and he could be quite damaging.
He has pace to burn.
I'd consider him with a lower draft pick, as I think he'd have a couple of good years in him and he could be quite damaging.
He has pace to burn.
Poster formerly known as SENsaintsational. More wisdom. More knowledge. Less name.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23208
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 735 times
- Been thanked: 1776 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6043
- Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 5:31pm
- Location: Currumbin, Quoinslairnd
More than handy but it would have to be a very low pick at that age.
"The inches we need are everywhere around us. They're in every break in the game. Every minute, every second. On this team we fight for that inch. On this team we tear ourselves and everyone around us to pieces for that inch. We claw with our fingernails for that inch. Because we know when we add up all those inches that's gonna make the f***in' difference between winning and losing! Between living and dying!'
- n1ck
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9871
- Joined: Sun 08 Aug 2004 2:28am
- Location: Clarinda
- Has thanked: 78 times
- Been thanked: 91 times
dont really need another half back.
plenty of those around and wojak only sounds good because hes been at geelong. no better than gram or gilbert or fisher or goddard.
lovett is a good fit because he has that pace, but he can slot in anywhere from half back to forward pocket. hes not huge, but he has good strength, can shrug a tackle, run like the wind and can snag a goal or two. doesnt mind a tackle every know and then either.
is two (or more?) years younger than wojak.
no to wojak - yes to lovett.
plenty of those around and wojak only sounds good because hes been at geelong. no better than gram or gilbert or fisher or goddard.
lovett is a good fit because he has that pace, but he can slot in anywhere from half back to forward pocket. hes not huge, but he has good strength, can shrug a tackle, run like the wind and can snag a goal or two. doesnt mind a tackle every know and then either.
is two (or more?) years younger than wojak.
no to wojak - yes to lovett.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3152
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 2:44am
- Location: Next to what's next to me.
- Has thanked: 71 times
- Been thanked: 35 times
If we didn't happen to land Lovett, I'd be interested in Wojak for sure (for a fairly low draft pick). Most of the guys that play down back for us are much bigger than him and no-where near as quick.
He could be really damaging, bursting out of our backline at warp speed, although it's hard to see him pushing any of our current back 6 out of a spot, especially after Baker's outstanding late season form.
He could be really damaging, bursting out of our backline at warp speed, although it's hard to see him pushing any of our current back 6 out of a spot, especially after Baker's outstanding late season form.
YOU GET WHAT YOU SETTLE FOR.
- Gilbert The Great
- Club Player
- Posts: 330
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2007 12:34am
- Location: Melbourne
- mightysainters
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 1986
- Joined: Tue 16 Mar 2004 2:21pm
- Has thanked: 28 times
- Been thanked: 52 times
- Statsman
- Club Player
- Posts: 1775
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:46pm
- Location: Aisle 37, Level 1, Telstra Dome
I just can't see Geelong trading Wojak to the Saints. Why would they want to give their biggest rival a much needed injection of pace? Our only chance at Wojak would be via the PSD if he's delisted.
"Ask not what your teammates can do for you. Ask what you can do for your teammates." - Earvin 'Magic' Johnson