OFFICIAL Trade thread (saints involved) !!

undecided · Post: # 841112Post **undecided** » Mon 05 Oct 2009 4:06pm

There is no way lynch is goin anywhere, he wouldn't agree to it.

Eastern · Post: # 841126Post **Eastern** » Mon 05 Oct 2009 4:35pm

undecided wrote:There is no way lynch is goin anywhere, he wouldn't agree to it.

Geezus. Where did that one come from. Anyway, I thought that 1st & 2nd year players were off limits; or has that changed too? !!

ausfatcat · Post: # 841130Post **ausfatcat** » Mon 05 Oct 2009 4:43pm

Never were off limits Eastern, they can be traded away or delisted after their first season. But very very rare to do so.

And technically if a player is within contract such as Lynch they have no say in the trade.

Milton66 · Post: # 841132Post **Milton66** » Mon 05 Oct 2009 4:58pm

Unless the club has quickly realised that Lynch is a spud (which he isn't), it would be an absolute disgrace to trade him.

Very similar to what Carlton did when they went after Judd.

Mind you, given the recent trade, it's the Eagles who might be laughing sooner than Carlton.

ausfatcat · Post: # 841133Post **ausfatcat** » Mon 05 Oct 2009 5:00pm

It's only posters here talking about trading Lynch no mention anywhere else but here. So stop worrying guys.

milney044 · Post: # 841137Post **milney044** » Mon 05 Oct 2009 5:18pm

Latest trade rumours i've heard:

Collingwood have offered Luke Ball $500,000.

Lovett to St.Kilda for pick 16.

I'm interested to see how accurate my source is, they seem to think this is legit.

jimbob · Post: # 841140Post **jimbob** » Mon 05 Oct 2009 5:23pm

BUT WHAT DO WE GET FOR BALL?

S.A Saint · Post: # 841142Post **S.A Saint** » Mon 05 Oct 2009 5:27pm

milney044 wrote:Latest trade rumours i've heard:

Collingwood have offered Luke Ball $500,000.

Lovett to St.Kilda for pick 16.

I'm interested to see how accurate my source is, they seem to think this is legit.

would not give up pick 16 for lovett...we would get bent over hard in that deal....i would give them our second pick that's about it...a guy who is 27 and has of field issues no thanks for a 1st rounder...

milney044 · Post: # 841143Post **milney044** » Mon 05 Oct 2009 5:27pm

Yeah that's the bit i forgot to ask cause i was too busy comprahending Saints without Lukey Ball!! I'm not sure but it would want to be good. Is he in contract?

HarveysDeciple · Mon 05 Oct 2009 5:32pm

I wonder if someone will emerge out of left field in the race for Burgoyne, Lovett, Fev and Ball etc.

With fev no one is going to show their hand this early as it gives the blues a great bargaining position.

Still think Sydney for him TBH.

Burgoyne will go to Essendon, gut feel.

bigred · Post: # 841151Post **bigred** » Mon 05 Oct 2009 5:34pm

yeah I'm thinking that Burgoyne will lob at the bombers.

Lovett to Freo in a three way

Freo are looking to trade reasonably heavily apparently. Their muppet coach thinks he can trade his way to a good list.

S.A Saint · Post: # 841152Post **S.A Saint** » Mon 05 Oct 2009 5:34pm

HarveysDeciple wrote:I wonder if someone will emerge out of left field in the race for Burgoyne, Lovett, Fev and Ball etc.

With fev no one is going to show their hand this early as it gives the blues a great bargaining position.

Still think Sydney for him TBH.

Burgoyne will go to Essendon, gut feel.

for some reason i think he will come to us...not sure what we are going to give up thou (from left field ball and 1st rounder for burgoyne and their 3rd)..as you say i gut feeling....

Thinline · Post: # 841154Post **Thinline** » Mon 05 Oct 2009 5:36pm

bigred wrote:yeah I'm thinking that Burgoyne will lob at the bombers.

Lovett to Freo in a three way

Freo are looking to trade reasonably heavily apparently. Their muppet coach thinks he can trade his way to a good list.

Geez...that avatar and now talk of three ways...

Is it warm in here all of a sudden???

Goose is king · Mon 05 Oct 2009 5:37pm

Well this isn't a very official thread after all is it.

jimbob · Post: # 841158Post **jimbob** » Mon 05 Oct 2009 5:41pm

IF WE GOT LOVETT THAT WOULD FREE UP BJ TO PLAY FORWARD AND WE ALSO GET SOME PACE, I WOULD BE VERY HAPPY TO TRADE PICK 16 FOR HIM

Milton66 · Post: # 841159Post **Milton66** » Mon 05 Oct 2009 5:41pm

HarveysDeciple wrote:I wonder if someone will emerge out of left field in the race for Burgoyne, Lovett, Fev and Ball etc.

With fev no one is going to show their hand this early as it gives the blues a great bargaining position.

Still think Sydney for him TBH.

Burgoyne will go to Essendon, gut feel.

Agree. But if Lovett is to come to us, what's in for th Bummers? Ball to the filth? Not Fraser... pleeeeassee. Collingwood are cr@p to trade with.

Fev to Sydney.

Going by previous years, we'll only trade if it's good value.. nothoing outrageous.

Give Port pick 15/16 (?) and Ball for Burgoyne. Port would do it as payback to Burgoyne for leaving.

#1GILL · Post: # 841161Post **#1GILL** » Mon 05 Oct 2009 5:43pm

I think we will trade our 3rd rounder for Peake, and that will be all she wrote as far as we are concerned

Milton66 · Post: # 841162Post **Milton66** » Mon 05 Oct 2009 5:44pm

#1GILL wrote:I think we will trade our 3rd rounder for Peake, and that will be all she wrote as far as we are concerned

That might just be it, I reckon.

So who would you prefer... LOvett or Peake?

yeah yeah... neither

#1GILL · Post: # 841163Post **#1GILL** » Mon 05 Oct 2009 5:46pm

Milton66 wrote:
#1GILL wrote:I think we will trade our 3rd rounder for Peake, and that will be all she wrote as far as we are concerned
That might just be it, I reckon.

So who would you prefer... LOvett or Peake?

yeah yeah... neither

Obviously Lovett is the better player, but i think our 3rd rounder is practicly useless, so Peake would come alot cheaper. I would prefer the Peake option i think

HarveysDeciple · Mon 05 Oct 2009 5:50pm

#1GILL wrote:I think we will trade our 3rd rounder for Peake, and that will be all she wrote as far as we are concerned

Yeah I think so to.

saintbrat · Post: # 841171Post **saintbrat** » Mon 05 Oct 2009 5:58pm

HarveysDeciple wrote:
#1GILL wrote:I think we will trade our 3rd rounder for Peake, and that will be all she wrote as far as we are concerned
Yeah I think so to.

good

Milton66 · Post: # 841175Post **Milton66** » Mon 05 Oct 2009 6:00pm

#1GILL wrote:
Milton66 wrote:
#1GILL wrote:I think we will trade our 3rd rounder for Peake, and that will be all she wrote as far as we are concerned
That might just be it, I reckon.

So who would you prefer... LOvett or Peake?

yeah yeah... neither
Obviously Lovett is the better player, but i think our 3rd rounder is practicly useless, so Peake would come alot cheaper. I would prefer the Peake option i think

so you wouldn't do a 2nd rounder and a player for Lovett?

saintly · Post: # 841179Post **saintly** » Mon 05 Oct 2009 6:04pm

milney044 wrote:Yeah that's the bit i forgot to ask cause i was too busy comprahending Saints without Lukey Ball!! I'm not sure but it would want to be good. Is he in contract?

he has been offered a new 3 year contract (reduced pay) but he has not signed it.

ThomasR · Post: # 841180Post **ThomasR** » Mon 05 Oct 2009 6:04pm

"Is that how you bash your f***ing missus?" - N Riewoldt

We do not need and we will not get Lovett

xander · Post: # 841181Post **xander** » Mon 05 Oct 2009 6:07pm

I hope we don't get Peake. He is one of those players that the fans want delisted during the year saying they'll be lucky to get anything. Then when another club is interested in trade week suddenly he's worth a 3rd round pick